Integrating peer feedback and instructor feedback to support the construction of bilingual scientific argument maps

References

• Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2011). Bilingual scientific literacy. In C. Linder, L. Östman, D. A. Roberts, P.-O. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy (pp. 106–124). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aizawa, I., & Rose, H. (2019). An analysis of Japan’s English as medium of instruction initiatives within higher education: The gap between meso-level policy and micro-level practice. Higher Education, 77(6), 1125–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0323-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A. (2013). La argumentación y sus aportes a la enseñanza bilingüe de las ciencias [Argumentation and its contributions to bilingual science teaching]. Revista Eureka Sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 10(3), 406–423. https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2013.v10.i3.07
   Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., Danies, G., Truscott de Mejía, A.-M., & Restrepo, S. (2021b). Instructor practices and espoused beliefs about bilingual courses: The case of a Colombian university. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(7), 2682–2698. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.1947184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., Gravier, G., Levy, L., Ortiz, B. T., Rodríguez, A., Wilches, L., Truscott de Mejía, A.-M., & Restrepo, S. (2022a). Using formal and informal formative assessment to support bilingual argument mapping in university bilingual science courses. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(9), 3420–3435. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2062218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., Molina, J., Danies, G., Truscott de Mejía, A.-M., & Restrepo, S. (2021e). Providing undergraduates with opportunities to explicitly reflect on how news articles promote the public (mis)understanding of science. Science & Education, 30(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00175-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., Molina, J., Danies, G., Truscott de Mejía, A.-M., & Restrepo, S. (2022b). Using formal formative assessment (FFA) to promote undergraduates’ bilingual written scientific argumentation (BWSA). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(9), 3137–3150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2021.2021386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., Molina, J., & Truscott de Mejía, A.-M. (2018). Using formative assessment to promote argumentation in a university bilingual science course. International Journal of Science Education, 40(13), 1669–1695. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1504176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., Molina, J., & Truscott de Mejía, A.-M. (2020). Enriching university students’ use of logical connectors (LCs) in bilingual written scientific argumentation (BWSA). International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(5), 1569–1589. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1800586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., Molina, J., & Truscott de Mejía, A.-M. (2021a). Fostering bilingual written scientific argumentation (BWSA) through collaborative learning (CL): evidence from a university bilingual science course. International Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1844922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., Molina, J., & Truscott de Mejía, A.-M. (2021c). Using bilingual written argumentation to promote undergraduates’ bilingual scientific literacy: Socrative® as an immersive participation tool. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(6), 868–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1522293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archila, P. A., Molina, J., & Truscott de Mejía, A.-M. (2021d). Fostering bilingual scientific writing through a systematic and purposeful code-switching pedagogical strategy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(6), 785–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1516189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asassfeh, S. M. (2014). Linguistic intelligence and logical intelligence: Which is determinant for logical connector (LC) comprehension by EFL readers? Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 32(3), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2014.997066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Çakan Akkaş, B. N., Sönmez, E., & Kabataş Memiş, E. (2018). Step by step argument map in learning environments: An example of the subject of lenses. Online Science Education Journal, 3(2), 15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, K. S., de Vries, A., & Pagán Muñoz, A. (2021). Future doctors in training: Translanguaging in an evolution course. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 18(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2020.1864635
   Google Scholar
• Charamba, E. (2021). No student left behind: Enabling cognition of scientific knowledge through multilingual e-learning pedagogies. In L. Kyei-Blankson, J. Blankson, & E. Ntuli (Eds.), Handbook of research on inequities in online education during global crises (pp. 510–528). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T., Foster, L., Sloan, L., & Bryman, A. (2021). Bryman's social research methods (6th ed). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cowie, B. (2012). Focusing on the classroom: Assessment for learning. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 679–690). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 222–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2017). Teaching for transfer in multilingual school contexts. In O. García, A. M. Y. Lin, & S. May (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 5. Bilingual and multilingual education (3rd ed, pp. 103–115). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: What are the differences and do they matter? Higher Education, 62(3), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9387-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, M., Barnett, A., & van Gelder, T. (2021). Using computer-aided argument mapping to teach reasoning. In J. A. Blair (Ed.), Studies in critical thinking (2nd ed, pp. 115–151). Windsor Studies in Argumentation.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, C.-Y., & Chen, G.-D. (2021). A scaffolding tool to assist learners in argumentative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(1-2), 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1660685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J. (2010). Critique in academic disciplines and active learning of academic content. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(3), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2010.502885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J. (2012). A dialogic account of sense-making in scientific argumentation and reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 30(3), 207–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2012.689383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman, E. A., & Ford, M. J. (2014). Authority and accountability in light of disciplinary practices in science. International Journal of Educational Research, 64, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulmer, G. W., Hwang, J., Ding, C., Hand, B., Suh, J. K., & Hansen, W. (2021). Development of a questionnaire on teachers’ knowledge of language as an epistemic tool. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(4), 459–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M., Heredia, S. C., & Morrison, D. (2019). Formative assessment in science education. In H. Andrade, G. Cizek, & R. E. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines (pp. 97–125). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. (1981). Students’ difficulties with logical connectives in science. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.4.2.05gar
   Google Scholar
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step (16th ed). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, K. M., Eslami, Z. R., & Hillman, S. (2021). From English as the medium to English as a medium: Perspectives of EMI students in Qatar. System, 99, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grob, R., Holmeier, M., & Labudde, P. (2021). Analysing formal formative assessment activities in the context of inquiry at primary and upper secondary school in Switzerland. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1663453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrell, M. (2008). No computer program required: even pencil-and-paper argument mapping improves critical-thinking skills. Teaching Philosophy, 31(4), 351–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante, P., & Licona, P. R. (2021). Translanguaging as pedagogy: Developing learner scientific discursive practices in a bilingual middle school science classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(7), 913–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1526885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jumadi, J., Perdana, R., Riwayani, & Rosana, D. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning with argument mapping and online laboratory on scientific argumentation skill. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20593
   Google Scholar
• Kabataş Memiş, E., & Karakuş, E. (2021). An evaluation of academic achievements through the use of argument and concept maps embedded in argumentation based inquiry. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(3), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09679-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaeppel, K. (2021). The influence of collaborative argument mapping on college students’ critical thinking about contentious arguments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. G., Kweon, S.-O., Lee, J.-A., & Park, S. (2021). Professional development for science and engineering professors offering English-medium instruction. Language Teaching Research, 136216882110209. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211020915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Hebel, F., Constantinou, C. P., Hošpesová, A., Grob, R., Holmeier, M., Montpied, P., Moulin, M., Petr, J., Rokos, L., Stuchlíková, I., Tiberghien, A., Tsivitanidou, O., Žlábková, I., (2018). Students’ perspectives on peer assessment. In J. Dolin, & R. Evans (Eds.), Transforming assessment (pp. 141–173). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Licona, P. R., & Kelly, G. J. (2020). Translanguaging in a middle school science classroom: Constructing scientific arguments in English and Spanish. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 485–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09946-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H.-Y. (2020). Perceptions of the Englishization of higher education in Taiwan: Implementation and implications. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 23(5), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1579778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabon, L., & Shih, W.-Y. (2019). Mapping the socio-political landscape of heat mitigation through urban greenspaces: The case of Taipei Metropolis. Environment & Urbanization, 31(2), 552–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818767318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazak, C. M., & Herbas-Donoso, C. (2015). Translanguaging practices at a bilingual university: A case study of a science classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(6), 698–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2014.939138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbirimi-Hungwe, V. (2020). Translanguaging pedagogy to understand medical concepts: Positioning the lecturer in a multilingual university classroom. In V. Mbirimi-Hungwe, T. Hungwe, & S. M. Seeletse (Eds.), Emerging perspectives on translanguaging in multilingual university classrooms (pp. 56–73). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McKinley, J., Rose, H., & Zhou, S. (2021). Transnational universities and English medium instruction in China: How admissions, language support and language use differ in Chinese universities. RELC Journal, 52(2), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882211020032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moncada-Comas, B., & Block, D. (2019). CLIL-ised EMI in practice: Issues arising. The Language Learning Journal, 49(6), 686–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1660704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2009). Reliability for content analysis. In A. B. Jordan, D. Kunkel, J. Manganello, & M. Fishbein (Eds.), Media messages and public health: A decisions approach to content analysis (pp. 67–87). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ollerhead, S., Crealy, I., & Kirk, R. (2020). “Writing like a health scientist”: A translingual approach to teaching text structure in a diverse Australian classroom. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v3n1.301
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, A. E., Clark, D. B., & Brady, C. E. (2021). Scientific modeling and translanguaging: A multilingual and multimodal approach to support science learning and engagement. Science Education, 105(4), 776–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quílez, J. (2021). Supporting Spanish 11th grade students to make scientific writing when learning chemistry in English: The case of logical connectives. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1459–1482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1918794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rached, E., & Grangeat, M. (2021). French teachers’ informal formative assessment in the context of inquiry-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1740818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramli, Z., & Jamaluddin, N. (2021). A case study of translanguaging in bilingual teaching and learning in public universities in Malaysia. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(3), 381–389.
   Google Scholar
• Roza, J., Muslim, & Hasanah, L. (2017). Argument driven inquiry supported by argument map to identify the student argumentation levels of simple harmonic motion. In 4th ICRIEMS proceedings (pp. 37–42). Yogyakarta State University.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salloum, S., Siry, C., & Espinet, M. (2020). Examining the complexities of science education in multilingual contexts: Highlighting international perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 42(14), 2285–2289. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1831644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen, T., Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2010). Visualising knowledge from chat debates in argument diagrams. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J. (2018). Using peer assessment to inspire reflection and learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Uçar, B., & Demiraslan Çevik, Y. (2021). The effect of argument mapping supported with peer feedback on pre-service teachers’ argumentation skills. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 37(1), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2020.1815107
   Google Scholar
• van Amelsvoort, M., & Schilperoord, J. (2018). How number and size of text boxes in argument diagrams affect opinions. Learning and Instruction, 57, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Egmond, S., & Hekkert, M. P. (2012). Argument map for carbon capture and storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 11, 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wieman, C. (2017). Improving how universities teach science. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., & Carless, D. (2020). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zlabkova, I., Petr, J., Stuchlikova, I., Rokos, L., & Hospesova, A. (2021). Development of teachers’ perspective on formative peer assessment. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 428–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1713418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar