Development and evaluation of an online course on nanotechnology for the professional development of chemistry teachers

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10. 1002/1098-2736(200012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandron, G., Armoni, M., Gordon, M., & Harel, D. (2016). Teaching nondeterminism through programming. Informatics in Education, 15(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2016.01
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, S., Ching, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. C. (2018). Online course design in higher education: A review of national and statewide evaluation instruments. TechTrends, 62(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0215-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barak, M., & Usher, M. (2019). The innovation profile of nanotechnology team projects of face-to-face and online learners. Computers & Education, 137, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2015). Constructive alignment: An outcomes-based approach to teaching anatomy. In L. K. Chan & W. Pawlina (Eds.), Teaching anatomy (pp. 31–38). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. B. & Collis, K. F. (1989). Towards a model of school-based curriculum development and assessment using the SOLO taxonomy, Australian Journal of Education 33(2), 151–163 https://doi.org/10.1177/168781408903300205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R. (2010). The influence of a teaching model in nanotechnology on chemistry teachers’ knowledge and their teaching attitudes. Journal of Nano Education, 2(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2010.1004
   Google Scholar
• Blonder, R. (2011). The story of nanomaterials in modern technology: An advanced course for chemistry teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 88(1), 49–52. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100614f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R. (2021). Introducing contemporary research topics into school science programs: The example of nanotechnology. In A. Hofstein, A. Arcavi, B.-S. Eylon, & A. Yarden (Eds.), Long-term research and development in science education: What have we learned? (pp. 29–43). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2016). Learning about teaching the extracurricular topic of nanotechnology as a vehicle for achieving a sustainable change in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(3), 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9579-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2019). Teaching chemistry through contemporary research versus using a historical approach. Chemistry Teacher International, 2(1), 1–16.https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2018-0011.
   Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2015). The making of nanotechnology: Exposing high-school students to behind-the-scenes of nanotechnology by inviting them to a nanotechnology conference. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2017). Finding the connections between a high-school chemistry curriculum and nanoscale science and technology. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00059F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brame, C. J. (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(4), es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, L. A., Magana, A. J., & Sederberg, D. (2015). Published research on pre-college students’ and teachers’ nanoscale science, engineering, and technology learning. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. R., Blonder, R., Rap, S., & Barokas, J. (2016). Online nanoeducation resources. In Global perspectives of nanoscience and engineering education (pp. 171–194). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31833-2_6
   Google Scholar
• Delgado, C., Stevens, S. Y., Shin, N., & Krajcik, J. (2015). A middle school instructional unit for size and scale contextualized in nanotechnology. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Waard, I. K. (2012). Merging MOOC and mLearning for increased learner interactions. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 4(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.4018/jmbl.2012100103
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman, B. S., & Fortus, D. (2019). Students’ self-efficacy for science in different school systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(8), 1037–1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dori, Y. J., Dangur, V., Avargil, S., & Peskin, U. (2014). Assessing advanced high school and undergraduate students’ thinking skills: The chemistry—from the nanoscale to microelectronics module. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1306–1317. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500007s
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman-Maggor, Y., Barhoom, S., Blonder, R., & Tuvi-Arad, I. (2021). Behind the scenes of educational data mining. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1455–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10309-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, E. T., & Hersam, M. C. (2006). Assessing the need for nanotechnology education reform in the United States. Nanotechnology Law & Business, 3(4), 467–484.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, & J. J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015005005
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorne, R., Baumgartner, E., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Mouza, C., & Ferdig, R. E. (2020). Special issue editorial: Preservice and inservice professional development during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 137–147. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216910/.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, G., Lau, C., Wright, A., Fuller, S., Bishop, M. D., Srimani, T., Kanhaiya, P., Ho, R., Amer, A., Stein, Y., Murphy, D., Arvind Chandrakasan, A., & Shulaker, M. M. (2019). Modern microprocessor built from complementary carbon nanotube transistors. Nature, 572(7771), 595–602https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1493-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., Carmi, M., & Ben-Zvi, R. (2003). The development of leadership among chemistry teachers in Israel. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026139209837
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J., & Kettlewell, K. (2015). Education to employment: Complicated transitions in a changing world. Educational Research, 57(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1030848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İpek, Z., Atik, A. D., Tan, S., & Erkoç, F. (2020). Awareness, exposure, and knowledge levels of science teachers about nanoscience and nanotechnology. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3316/ielapa.085898016126754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, J. A., Cho, D. J., Lee, J., Chen, J. M., Besenbacher, F., Bonnell, D. A., & Cho, N. J. (2016). Nanotechnology education for the global world: Training the leaders of tomorrow. ACS Nano, 10(6), 5595–5599. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b03872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., Kampylis, P., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2014). Horizon report Europe: 2014 schools edition Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, & Austin. The New Media Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Blonder, R., Gardner, G. E., Albe, V., Falvo, M., & Chevrier, J. (2013). Nanotechnology and nanoscale science: Educational challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 35(9), 1490–1512. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.771828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Blonder, R., & Kähkönen, A.-L. (2020). Challenges in nanoscience education. In K. D. Sattler (Ed.), 21st century nanoscience – a handbook: Public policy, education, and global trends (volume ten). Taylor & Francis (CRC Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Gardner, G. E., Falvo, M., & Taylor, A. (2015). Precollege nanotechnology education: a different kind of thinking. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 75. http://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kähkönen, A.-L., Laherto, A., & Lindell, A. (2011). Intrinsic and extrinsic barriers to teaching nanoscale science: Finnish teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Nano Education, 3(1-2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2011.1017
   Google Scholar
• Kerby, D. S. (2014). The simple difference formula: An approach to teaching non-parametric correlation. Comprehensive Psychology, 3, 11.IT.3.1–IT. https://doi.org/10.2466/11.IT.3.1
   Google Scholar
• Laurillard, D. (2016). The educational problem that MOOCs could solve: Professional development for teachers of disadvantaged students. Research in Learning Technology, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.29369
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S. F., Chen, J. Y., Shih, K. Y., Wang, K. H., & Chang, H. P. (2015). Science teachers’ perceptions of nanotechnology teaching and professional development: A survey study in Taiwan. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2014-0019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, R., Simon, B., Thompson, E., Whalley, J. L., & Prasad, C. (2006). Not seeing the forest for the trees: novice programmers and the SOLO taxonomy. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 38(3), 118–122. https://doi.org/10.1145/1140123.1140157
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: The state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17484.x
   Google Scholar
• Mamlok-Naaman, R., Eilks, I., Bodner, G., & Hofstein, A. (2018). Professional development of chemistry teachers: Theory and practice. Royal Society of Chemistry.
   Google Scholar
• Mandrikas, A., Michailidi, E., & Stavrou, D. (2021). In-service teachers’ needs and mentor’s practices in applying a teaching–learning sequence on nanotechnology and plastics in primary education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(5), 630–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09908-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2014). Supporting professional learning in a massive open online course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 197–213. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1855
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, S. K., & Griffin, P. (2016). Understanding learning and learning design in MOOCs: A measurement-based interpretation. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(2), 88–115. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.32.5
   Google Scholar
• Minogue, J., & Jones, G. (2009). Measuring the impact of haptic feedback using the SOLO taxonomy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801992862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosavifazel, V., Kumar, A., Cho, H. J., & Seal, S. (2014). Laboratory research motivated chemistry classroom activity to promote interests among students towards science. Journal of Nano Education, 6(1), 25–29. https://doi.org/10.1166/jne.2014.1050
   Google Scholar
• Morland, D. V., & Bivens, H. (2004). Designing instructional articles in online courses for adult learners. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 1(2), 1–7. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/innovate/vol1/iss2/2.
   Google Scholar
• Murty, B. S., Shankar, P., Raj, B., Rath, B. B., & Murday, J. (2013). Textbook of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Neethirajan, S., & Jayas, D. S. (2011). Nanotechnology for the food and bioprocessing industries. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 4(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0328-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappa, E. T., Pantazi, G., Tsaparlis, G., & Byers, B. (2021). Using static colored visual representations of chemical bonding: An analysis of students’ responses using the SOLO taxonomy. In Book of abstracts (p. 22).
   Google Scholar
• Quirola, N., Marquez, V., Tecpan, S., & Baltazar, S. E. (2018, June). Didactic proposal to include nanoscience and nanotechnology at high school curriculum linking physics, chemistry and biology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1043(1), 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1043/1/012050
   Google Scholar
• Roco, M. C. (2001). International strategy for nanotechnology research. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3(5), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013248621015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, C., Romero, J. R., & Ventura, S. (2014). A survey on pre-processing educational data. In A. Peña-Ayala (Ed.), Educational data mining (pp. 29–64). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2015). Essential concepts of nanoscale science and technology for high school students based on a Delphi study by the expert community. International Journal of Science Education, 37(11), 1699–1738. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1035687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2016). Nanotechnology applications as a context for teaching the essential concepts of NST. International Journal of Science Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1152518
   Google Scholar
• Sakhnini, S., & Blonder, R. (2018). Insertion points of the essential nanoscale science and technology (NST) concepts in the Israeli middle school science and technology curriculum. Nanotechnology Reviews, 7(5), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2018-0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon, G., Gregory, J., Lokuge Dona, K., & Ross, B. (2015). Experiential online development for educators: The example of the Carpe Diem MOOC. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 542–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sgouros, G., & Stavrou, D. (2019). Teachers’ professional development in nanoscience and nanotechnology in the context of a community of learners. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2070–2093. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1659521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2019). Effects of online course load on degree completion, transfer, and dropout among community college students of the state university of New York. Online Learning, 23(4), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soffer, T., Kahan, T., & Livne, E. (2017). E-assessment of online academic courses via students’ activities and perceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, M., & Jones, K. M. (2014). MOOCs as LIS professional development platforms: Evaluating and refining SJSU’s first not-for-credit MOOC. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 55(4), 345–361. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43686997.
   Google Scholar
• Taitelbaum, D., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Carmeli, M., & Hofstein, A. (2008). Evidence for teachers’ change while participating in a continuous professional development programme and implementing the inquiry approach in the chemistry laboratory. International Journal of Science Education, 30(5), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701854840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tømte, C. E. (2019). MOOCs in teacher education: Institutional and pedagogical change? European Journal of Teacher Education, 42(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1529752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsaparlis, G., Pantazi, G., Pappa, E. T., & Byers, B. (2021). Using potential maps as visual representations to promote better understanding of chemical bonding. Chemistry Teacher International.
   Google Scholar
• Villasenor Alva, J. A., & Estrada, E. G. (2009). A generalization of Shapiro–Wilk's test for multivariate normality. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 38(11), 1870–1883. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920802474465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetisen, A. K., Qu, H., Manbachi, A., Butt, H., Dokmeci, M. R., Hinestroza, J. P., Skorobogatiy, M., Khademhosseini, A., & Yun, S. H. (2016). Nanotechnology in textiles. ACS Nano, 10(3), 3042–3068. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b08176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonai, E., & Blonder, R. (2020). USE YOUR OWN WORDS! Developing science communication skills of NST experts in a guided discourse. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 10(1), 51–76. doi:10.1080/21548455.2020.1719287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar