Enhancing ecological hierarchical problem-solving with domain-specific question agendas

References

• Aalsvoort, J. V. (2004). Activity theory as a tool to address the problem of chemistry’s lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1635–1651. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000205378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 267. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchus, F., & Yang, Q. (1994). Downward refinement and the efficiency of hierarchical problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 71(1), 43–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)90062-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. C. (2010). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2011). Theoretical perspectives, methodological approaches, and trends in the study of expertise. In Y. Li & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Expertise in mathematics instruction (pp. 17–39). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. S. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (Vol. 1, pp. 1–75). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. (2002). Student-generated questions: Encouraging inquisitive minds in learning science. Teaching and Learning, 23(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110095249
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craver, C. F., & Darden, L. (2013). In search of mechanisms: Discoveries across the life sciences. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, N., & Major, C. H. (2014). Boundary crossings: Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and problem-based learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3–4), 7–55.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, A., Westbroek, H., & Janssen, F. (2019). A practical approach to differentiated instruction: How biology teachers redesigned their genetics and ecology lessons. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1523646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erceg, N., Aviani, I., & Mešic, V. (2013). Probing students’ critical thinking processes by presenting ill-defined physics problems. Revista Mexicana de Física E, 59(1), 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43(6), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. (2010). Scientific perspectivism. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, F., Hulshof, H., & van Veen, K. (2019). Wat is echt de moeite waard om te onderwijzen? Een perspectiefgerichte benadering. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, F., & Van Berkel, B. (2015). Making philosophy of science education practical for science teachers. Science & Education, 24(3), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9735-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landa, I., Westbroek, H., Janssen, F., van Muijlwijk, J., & Meeter, M. (2020). Scientific perspectivism in secondary-school chemistry education. Science & Education, 29(5), 1361–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00145-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, V., Ge, X., & Huang, K. (2020). Understanding learners’ challenges and scaffolding their ill-structured problem solving in a technology-supported self-regulated learning environment. In M. J. Bishop, E. Boling, J. Elen, & V. Svihla (Eds.), Handbook of research in educational communications and technology (pp. 321–343). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Love, A. C. (2013). Interdisciplinary lessons for the teaching of biology from the practice of evo-devo. Science & Education, 22(2), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9351-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milbourne, J., & Wiebe, E. (2018). The role of content knowledge in ill-structured problem solving for high school physics students. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9564-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving (Vol. 104). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Nokes, T. J., Schunn, C. D., & Chi, M. (2010). Problem solving and human expertise. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 265–272). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, S. (2012). The problems with problem solving: Reflections on the rise, current status, and possible future of a cognitive research paradigm. The Journal of Problem Solving, 5(1), 101–128. https://doi.org/10.7771/1932-6246.1144
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Rafanelli, S., & Kind, P. (2018). Toward a more coherent model for science education than the crosscutting concepts of the next generation science standards: The affordances of styles of reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 962–981. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overton, T. L., & Potter, N. M. (2011). Investigating students’ success in solving and attitudes towards context-rich open-ended problems in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(3), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90036F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, S. K. (2016). The structure of ill-structured (and well-structured) problems revisited. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 691–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9343-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1974). Wicked problems. Man-Made Futures, 26(1), 272–280.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4(3–4), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thagard, P. (2012). The cognitive science of science: Explanation, discovery, and conceptual change. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Merrienboer, J. J. (2013). Perspectives on problem solving and instruction. Computers & Education, 64, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, G. H., & Hengeveld, R. (2000). The structure of the two ecological paradigms. Acta Biotheoretica, 48(1), 15–46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002670731066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar