Hybrid language as a tool for enhancing involvement in learning a biochemistry process: a self-study

References

• Akkerman, S., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Areljung, S. (2018). Why do teachers adopt or resist a pedagogical idea for teaching science in preschool? International Journal of Early Years Education, 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1481733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination by M. M. Bakhtin (pp. 259–422). University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, T., Urhahne, D., Schanze, S., & Plotezner, R. (2010). Collaborative inquiry learning: Models, tools, and challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 349–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802582241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: Critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(3), 301–329. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1503_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, S. M. (2016). Teacher candidates as researchers. In J. Loughran & M. L. Hamilton (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education (pp. 379–403). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Burmeister, M., & Eilks, I. (2013). Using participatory action research to develop a course module on education for sustainable development in pre-service chemistry teacher education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.251
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. (2015). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Creating teachable moments. National Science Teachers’ Association.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. C., Yang, W. C., & Tuan, H. L. (2016). Argumentation in a socio-scientific context and its influence on fundamental and derived science literacies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(4), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9606-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, T., & Bullock, S. M. (2015). Reframing pedagogy while teaching about teaching online: A collaborative self-study. Professional Development in Education, 41(4), 690–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.938357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M., & Rafter, M. (2020). Using visual, embodied, and language representations to teach the 5E instructional model of inquiry science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87(8), 102951–102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102951.
   Google Scholar
• Hackling, M. (2008). An overview of primary connections: Stage 3 research outcomes 2006–2008. Australian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Hanrahan, M. U. (2006). Highlighting hybridity: A critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in science classrooms. Science Education, 90(1), 8–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. P. (2012). A short guide to action research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kambrelis, G., & Wehunt, M. (2012). Hybrid discourse practice and science learning. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(3), 505–534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9395-1
   Google Scholar
• Kaplowitz, M. D. (2000). Statistical analysis of sensitive topics in group and individual interviews. Quality and Quantity, 34(4), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004844425448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., Mctaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kind, P., & Osborne, J. (2017). Styles of scientific reasoning: A cultural rationale for science education. Science Education, 101(1), 8–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajcik, J., & Sutherland, L. (2010). Supporting students in developing literacy in science. Science, 328(5977), 456–459. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally developing as a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2018). Teachers’ professional learning communities (PLCs): Towards adapting a transformative pedagogy to teaching. In I. Eilks, S. Markic, & B. Ralle (Eds.), Building bridges across disciplines for transformative education and a sustainable future (pp. 173–181). Shaker & Aachen.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nygård Larsson, P., & Jakobsson, A. (2020). Meaning-making in science from the perspective of students’ hybrid language use. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(5), 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09994-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peercy, M. N., & Troyan, F. J. (2017). Making transparent the challenges of developing a practice-based pedagogy of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning through constructing representations in science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2751–2773. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.626462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2010). Representing science literacies: An introduction. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9153-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. (2005). Science awareness and scientific literacy. Teaching Science, 51(1), 10–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ronen, K. I. (2019). The experience of teaching: Beyond teaching skills the case of the academy-class practice model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101115
   Google Scholar
• Ronen, K. I. (2020). Empathy awareness among pre-service teachers: The case of the incorrect use of the intuitive rule “same A–same B”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09952-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachyani, D., & Ronen, K. I. (2022). Making sense of biochemistry learning process and teacher’s empathy: Computer supported collaborative learning computer using emoji symbols. In S. Ventura (Ed.) Empathy – Advanced research and applications. https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/82771
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Samaras, A. P., Gudjonsdottir, H., McMurrer, J. R., & Dalmau, M. C. (2012). Self-study of a professional organization in pursuit of a shared enterprise. Studying Teacher Education, 8(3), 303–320. doi:10.1080/17425964.2012.719127
   Google Scholar
• Schuck, S., & Russell, T. (2005). Self-study, critical friendship, and the complexities of teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425960500288291
   Google Scholar
• Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z goes to college. Jossey–Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Serder, M., & Jakobsson, A. (2016). Language games and meaning as used in student encounters with scientific literacy test items. Science Education, 100(2), 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, B. R., Hall, R., & Owens, D. (2017). Developing & using interaction geography in a museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(4), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9264-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swennen, A., Lunenberg, M., & Korthagen, F. (2008). Preach what you teach! Teacher educators and congruent teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 14(5-6), 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600802571387
   Google Scholar
• Tan, E., Calabrese Barton, A., Turner, E., & Gutiérrez, M. V. (2012). Empowering science and mathematics education in urban schools. University of Chicago Press Books.
   Google Scholar
• Tytler, R., & Hubber, P. (2016). Constructing representations to learn science. In B. Hand, M. McDermott, & V. Prain (Eds.), Using multimodal representations to support learning in the science classroom (pp. 159–181). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Voet, M., & De Wever, B. (2018). Teachers’ adoption of inquiry-based learning activities: The importance of beliefs about education, the self, and the context. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 423–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. (2020). Compare inquiry-based pedagogical instruction with direct instruction for pre-service science teacher education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(6), 1063–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westaway, L., & Graven, M. (2019). Exploring grade 3 teachers’ resistance to ‘take up’ progressive mathematics teaching roles. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0237-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westaway, L., Kaiser, G., & Graven, M. (2020). What does social realism have to offer for research on teacher identity in mathematics education? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(7), 1229–1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10021-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. (2009). Using a living theory methodology in improving practice and generating educational knowledge in living theories. Educational Journal of Living Theories, 1(1), 103–126. http://ejolts.net/node/80
   Google Scholar
• Wise, A., & Schwarz, B. (2017). Visions of CSCL: Eight provocations for the future of the field. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(4), 423–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9267-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1997). Philosophical investigations. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar