How do cohesion features inform science instruction for English learners?: A comparison study of digital and printed science texts

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1999, September 28). Heavy books light on learning: Not one middle grades science text rated satisfactory by AAAS’s Project 2061.ScienceDaily. www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/09/990929020538.htm
   Google Scholar
• Best, R. M., Rowe, M., Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D. S. (2005). Deep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200501000-00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilki, Z. (2014). A close observation of second language (L2) readers and texts: meaning. https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.697fcjv3
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4), 479–488. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1983). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teachers’ Course. Newbury House. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587964
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., Louwerse, M. L., McCarthy, P. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). A linguistic analysis of simplified and authentic texts. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00507.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Assessing second language reading texts at the intermediate level: An approximate replication of Crossley, Louwerse, McCarthy and McNamara (2007). Language Teaching, 41, 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444808005077
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. A., & Bricker, L. A. (2013). Science and Literacy in Teacher Education: What do Preservice Teachers Need to Know and Be Able to Do? Exploring the Overlap between “Literacy in Science” and the Practice of Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information. https://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_086022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Degand, L., & Sanders, T. (2002). The impact of relational markers on expository text comprehension both in L1 and L2. Reading and Writing, 15(7-8), 739–757. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1023A:1020932715838.pdf https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020932715838
   Google Scholar
• Duran, N. D., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & McNamara, D. S. (2006, January). Using Coh-Metrix temporal indices to predict psychological measures of time. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society, 28, 28. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/18p054r8
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2004). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science Reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 491–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F. (2021). In defense of the passive voice. American Psychologist, 76(1), 145. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillmore, L. W., & Snow, C. E. (2002). What teachers need to know about language. In C. T. Adger, C. E. Snow, & D. Christian (Eds.), What teachers need to know about language (pp. 8–51). Center for Applied Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Follmer, D J, & Sperling, R A. (2018). Interactions between reader and text: Contributions of cognitive processes, strategy use, and text cohesion to comprehension of expository science text. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, E. E., Lawton, K., & Diniz de Figueiredo, E. H. (2010). The Education of English Language Learners in Arizona: A Legacy of Persisting Achievement Gaps in a Restrictive Language Policy Climate. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED511328.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Geva, E. (1992). The role of conjunctions in L2 text comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 26(4), 731–747. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geva, E., & Ryan, E. B. (1985). Use of conjunctions in expository texts by skilled and less skilled readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17(4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968509547549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodrich, J. M., Thayer, L., & Leiva, S. (2021). Evaluating achievement gaps between monolingual and multilingual students. Educational Researcher, 50(7), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X21999043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139150484.023
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(2), 193–202. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758BF03195564.pdf https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195564
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall, S., Basran, J., Paterson, K. B., Kowalski, R., Filik, R., & Maltby, J. (2014). Individual differences in the effectiveness of text cohesion for science text comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S., Kowalski, R., Paterson, K. B., Basran, J., Filik, R., & Maltby, J. (2015). Local text cohesion, Reading ability and individual science aspirations: Key factors influencing comprehension in science classes. British Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S., Maltby, J., Filik, R., & Paterson, K. B. (2016). Key skills for science learning: the importance of text cohesion and Reading ability. Educational Psychology, 36(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.926313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014). Cohesion in English. Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836010
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. E., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2011). Improving middle and high school students’ comprehension of science texts. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 19–31. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/issue/view/23
   Google Scholar
• Jonz, J. (1987). Textual cohesion and second language comprehension. Language Learning, 37(3), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1987.tb00578.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler, C., & Quinn, M. E. (1987). ESL and science learning. In J. Crandall (Ed.), Esl through content-area instruction: Mathematics, science, social studies. Language in education: Theory and practice (pp. 417–417). Prentice-All, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100010184
   Google Scholar
• Khatib, M., & Safari, M. (2011). Comprehension of discourse markers and Reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 243–250. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p243
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D. (1993). Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H. Y., & Kang, M. K. (2021). A text difficulty analysis of English textbooks for senior high school and the college scholastic ability test in South Korea using Coh-Metrix. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11, 690–702. https://doi.org/10.21742/ajemr.2021.6.1.05
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O, Quinn, H, & Valdés, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to Next Generation Science Standards and with implications for Common Core State Standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13480524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Zhang, M. (2004). Why Mei still cannot read and what can be done. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.48.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightman, E. J., McCarthy, P. M., Dufty, D. F., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Cohesion and structural organization in high school texts. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, FLAIRS 2007. FLAIRS Conference (pp. 235–240).
   Google Scholar
• Maatta, D., Dobb, F., & Ostlund, K. (2006). Strategies for teaching science to English learners. In A. K. Fathman, & D. T. Crowther (Eds.), Science for English language learners: K-12 classroom strategies (pp. 37–59). National Science Teachers Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (1998). Discourses of science: Recontextualisation, genesis, intertextuality and hegemony. In J. Martin, & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 1–14). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203982327
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. P., Lightman, J. E., Dufty, F. D., & McNamara, S. D. (2019). Using Coh-Metrix to assess cohesion and difficulty in high-school textbooks. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.530.7721&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S. (2001). Reading both high and low coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z. (2014). Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511894664.006
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 247–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., & Floyd, R. G. (2011). Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers’ prior knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 229–257. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1070456.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). The impact of science knowledge, reading skill, and reading strategy knowledge on more traditional “high-stakes” measures of high school students’ science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 161–196. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831206298171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, Reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plakans, L., & Bilki, Z. (2016). Cohesion features in ESL Reading: Comparing beginning, intermediate and advanced textbooks. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(1), 79–100. https://infallibleinroad.co.uk/reading/scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/66716/1/28_1_10125_66716_plakans.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610317
   Google Scholar
• Siddharthan, A. (2006). Syntactic simplification and text cohesion. Research on Language and Computation, 4(1), 77–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11168-006-9011-1
   Google Scholar
• Vasiljevic, Z. (2013). Accessing learners’ comprehension of logical connectives in L2 texts. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(1), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.1.7-16
   Google Scholar
• Verdiansyah, M. Z., Sahiruddin, S., & Degeng, P. D. D. (2020). Text complexity in Reading texts of Indonesian senior high school English textbooks using Coh-metrix 3.0. Diglossia: Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah Kebahasaan dan Kesusastraan, 12(1), 1–10. https://journal.unipdu.ac.id/index.php/diglosia/article/viewFile/1925/1016
   Google Scholar
• Ying, S. (2007). An analysis of discourse markers used by non-native English learners. Cross-Cultural Communication Research, 19, 51–83. http://id.nii.ac.jp/1092/00000263/
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L., Hand, B., Goldman, S., Hildebrand, G., Osborne, J., Treagust, D., & Wallace, C. (2004). New directions in language and science education research. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(3), 347–352. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4151776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yule, G., & Brown, G. (1989). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511805226
   Google Scholar