Effectiveness of a contextualised and integrated approach to improving and retaining preservice teachers’ views of the nature of science

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087–2107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allchin, D. (2011). Evaluating knowledge of the nature of (whole) science. Science Education, 95(3), 518–542. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: Integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragón-Méndez, M. M., Acevedo-Díaz, J. A., & García-Carmona, A. (2019). Prospective biology teachers’ understanding of the nature of science through an analysis of the historical case of Semmelweis and childbed fever. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(3), 525–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9868-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, M. P. (2018). Teaching and learning about the nature of science. Science & Education, 27(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9964-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo, C., Ariza, M. R., & Abril, A. (2020). Indagación reflexiva e historia de la ciencia para construir una visión adecuada sobre la naturaleza de la ciencia en formación inicial de profesorado. Tecné, Episteme y Didaxis: TED, 48, 13–31. https://doi.org/10.17227/ted.num48-10934
   Google Scholar
• Cobo-Huesa, C., Abril, A. M., & Ariza, M. R. (2019). Propuesta didáctica en la formación de profesorado para trabajar naturaleza de la ciencia y pensamiento crítico. Ápice. Revista de Educación Científica, 3(1), 15–12. https://doi.org/10.17979/arec.2019.3.1.4630
   Google Scholar
• Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). A critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of nature of science. Science & Education, 28(3–5), 205–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00051-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2012). Research methods in education (6th Ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Education research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, B. C., & Clough, M. P. (2016). Teachers’ longitudinal NOS understanding after having completed a science teacher education program. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(S1), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9594-1
   Google Scholar
• Herman, B. C., Owens, D. C., Oertli, R. T., Zangori, L. A., & Newton, M. H. (2019). Exploring the complexity of students’ scientific explanations and associated nature of science views within a place-based socioscientific issue context. Science & Education, 28(3-5), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00034-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D., & Wong, S. L. (2017). Going beyond the consensus view: Broadening and enriching the scope of NOS-oriented curricula. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 17(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14926156.2016.1271919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse, J., Kent-Schneider, I., Voss, S., Zacharski, K., & Rockefeller, M. (2020). Investigating the effect of NOS question type on students’ NOS responses. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09923-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 20(10), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465431562736
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138–147. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED543992.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F. (2011). The history of science and the future of science education. In P. V. Kokkotas, K. S. Malamitsa, & A. A. Rizaki (Eds.), Adapting historical knowledge production to the classroom (pp. 37–53). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mesci, G. (2020). The influence of PCK-based NOS teaching on pre-service science teachers’ NOS views. Science & Education, 29(3), 743–769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00117-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesci, G., & Schwartz, R. S. (2017). Changing preservice science teachers’ views of nature of science: Why some conceptions may be more easily altered than others. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9503-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S. B. (2008). Estimating effects sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106291059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvey, B. K., & Bell, R. L. (2017). Making learning last: Teachers’ long-term retention of improved nature of science conceptions and instructional rationales. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 62–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1267879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. PISA OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19963777
   Google Scholar
• Ozgelen, S., Hanuscin, D. L., & Yılmaz-Tuzun, O. (2013). Preservice elementary science teacher’ connections among aspects of NOS: Toward a consistent, overarching framework. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(5), 907–927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9274-3
   Google Scholar
• Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vázquez-Alonso, A., García-Carmona, A., Manassero-Mas, M. A., & Bennàssar-Roig, A. (2013). Science teachers’ thinking about the nature of science: A new methodological approach to its assessment. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 781–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9291-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesterinen, V. M., Manassero-Mas, M. A., & Vázquez-Alonso, A. (2014). History, philosophy, and sociology of science and science-technology-society traditions in science education: Continuities and discontinuities. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1895–1925). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wahbeh, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). Revisiting the translation of nature of science understandings into instructional practice: Teachers’ nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 425–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.786852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yacoubian, H. A., & BouJaoude, S. (2010). The effect of reflective discussions following inquiry-based laboratory activities on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(10), 1229–1252. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar