Which factors influence the success in pedigree analysis?

References

• Abraham, J. K., Perez, K. E., & Price, R. M. (2014). The dominance concept inventory: A tool for assessing undergraduate student alternative conceptions about dominance in Mendelian and population genetics. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(2), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-08-0160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avena, J. S., McIntosh, B. B., Whitney, O. N., Wiens, A., & Knight, J. K. (2021). Successful problem solving in genetics varies based on question content. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 20(4), ar51. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-01-0016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., & Liepmann, D. (2001). Perspectives on fluid and crystallized intelligence: Facets for verbal, numerical, and figural intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(6), 977–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00087-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. L. (2010). The practical guide to the genetic family history (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470568248
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. L., Steinhaus French, K., Resta, R. G., & Lochner Doyle, D. (2008). Standardized human pedigree nomenclature: Update and assessment of the recommendations of the national society of genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 17(5), 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-008-9169-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowerman, B. L., & O’Connell, R. T. (1990). Linear statistical models: An applied approach (2nd ed.). PWS Kent.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6%3C623::AID-TEA3%3E3.0.CO;2-O
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., & Stewart, J. H. (1989). The knowledge structure of Mendelian genetics. The American Biology Teacher, 51(3), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/4448880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008). Selecting learning tasks: Effects of adaptation and shared control on learning efficiency and task involvement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 733–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Sage. https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/
   Google Scholar
• Hackling, M. W. (1994). Application of genetics knowledge to the solution of pedigree problems. Research in Science Education, 24(1), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356339
   Google Scholar
• Hackling, M. W., & Lawrence, J. A. (1988). Expert and novice solutions of genetic pedigree problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(7), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660250703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig, F. (2022). DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level / mixed) regression models (Version 0.4.1) [R package]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=DHARMa
   Google Scholar
• Heisig, J. P., & Schaeffer, M. (2019). Why you should always include a random slope for the lower-level variable involved in a cross-level interaction. European Sociological Review, 35(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logistic regression (3rd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118548387
   Google Scholar
• Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koriat, A., Nussinson, R., & Ackerman, R. (2014). Judgments of learning depend on how learners interpret study effort. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1624–1637. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostons, D., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (2012). Training self-assessment and task-selection skills: A cognitive approach to improving self-regulated learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krell, M. (2017). Evaluating an instrument to measure mental load and mental effort considering different sources of validity evidence. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1280256. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1280256
   Google Scholar
• Krell, M., Khan, S., & van Driel, J. (2021). Analyzing cognitive demands of a scientific reasoning test using the linear logistic test model (LLTM). Education Sciences, 11(9), 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubinger, K. D., & Gottschall, C. H. (2007). Item difficulty of multiple choice tests dependant on different item response formats – an experiment in fundamental research on psychological assessment. Psychology Science, 49(4), 361–374.
   Google Scholar
• Le Hebel, F., Montpied, P., Tiberghien, A., & Fontanieu, V. (2017). Sources of difficulty in assessment: Example of PISA science items. International Journal of Science Education, 39(4), 468–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1294784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liepmann, D., Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., & Amthauer, R. (2007). Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R [Intelligence structure test] (2nd ed.). Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Liou, P.-Y., & Bulut, O. (2020). The effects of item format and cognitive domain on students’ science performance in TIMSS 2011. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9682-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D. (2018). ggeffects: Tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(26), 772. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00772
   Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Patil, I., Waggoner, P., & Makowski, D. (2021). Performance: An R package for assessment, comparison and testing of statistical models. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3139. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03139
   Google Scholar
• Mosaly, P. R., Mazur, L. M., Yu, F., Guo, H., Derek, M., Laidlaw, D. H., Moore, C., Marks, L. B., & Mostafa, J. (2018). Relating task demand, mental effort and task difficulty with physicians’ performance during interactions with electronic health records (EHRs). International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(5), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2017.1365459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2013). A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberpriller, J., de Souza Leite, M., & Pichler, M. (2022). Fixed or random? On the reliability of mixed-effects models for a small number of levels in grouping variables. Ecology and Evolution, 12(7), e9062. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 744–777. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opitz, A., Heene, M., & Fischer, F. (2022). Using differential item functioning to analyze the domain generality of a common scientific reasoning test. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(4), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Darabi, A. A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 35(4), 737–743. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089303500412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. G. W. C., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(1), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.79.1.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, M. J. D. (2009). The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives: Technical report. Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, England. http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/na/NA_papers/NA2009_06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeck, A., Opfermann, M., van Gog, T., Paas, F. G. W. C., & Leutner, D. (2015). Measuring cognitive load with subjective rating scales during problem solving: Differences between immediate and delayed ratings. Instructional Science, 43(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-014-9328-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiemann, P., Nehm, R. H., & Tornabene, R. E. (2017). Assessment of genetics understanding: Under what conditions do situational features have an impact on measures? Science & Education, 26(10), 1161–1191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9925-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea, N. A., Duncan, R. G., & Stephenson, C. (2015). A tri-part model for genetics literacy: Exploring undergraduate student reasoning about authentic genetics dilemmas. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 485–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9433-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U. (1988). Successful and unsuccessful problem solving in classical genetic pedigrees. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(6), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660250602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U., & Good, R. (1984). Problem solving and classical genetics: Successful versus unsuccessful performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(9), 895–912. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiller, J., Hartmann, S., Mathesius, S., Straube, P., Tiemann, R., Nordmeier, V., Krüger, D., & Upmeier zu Belzen, A. (2016). Assessing scientific reasoning: A comprehensive evaluation of item features that affect item difficulty. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(5), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1164830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timm, J., Otto, B., Schramm, T., Striewe, M., Schmiemann, P., & Goedicke, M. (2020). Technical aspects of automated item generation for blended learning environments in biology. I-Com, 19(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1515/icom-2020-0001
   Google Scholar
• Timm, J., Wools, K., & Schmiemann, P. (2022). Secondary students’ reasoning on pedigree problems. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(1), ar14. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-01-0009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui, C.-Y., & Treagust, D. (2010). Evaluating secondary students’ scientific reasoning in genetics using a two–tier diagnostic instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1073–1098. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902951429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gog, T., Hoogerheide, V., & van Harsel, M. (2020). The role of mental effort in fostering self-regulated learning with problem-solving tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 1055–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09544-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gog, T., Kirschner, F., Kester, L., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (2012). Timing and frequency of mental effort measurement: Evidence in favour of repeated measures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(6), 833–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gog, T., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (2008). Instructional efficiency: Revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educational Psychologist, 43(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701756248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. (2009). Ggplot2. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98141-3
   Google Scholar
• Yaremych, H. E., Preacher, K. J., & Hedeker, D. (2021). Centering categorical predictors in multilevel models: Best practices and interpretation. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication, https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000434
   Google Scholar