The effect of differentiated science module application on the scientific reasoning and scientific process skills of gifted students in a blended learning environment

References

• Akgündüz, D. (2013). The effect of blended learning and social media supported learning on the students’ academic achievement, motivation, attitude and self-learning skill in science education [Ph.D. thesis, Marmara University Institute of Educational Sciences].
   Google Scholar
• Aktamış, H., & Ergin, Ö. (2007). Investigating the relationship between science process skills and scientific creativity. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty, 33, 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Aktamış, H., Hiğde, E., & Özden, B. (2016). Effects of the inquiry based learning method on students’ achievement, science process skills and attitudes towards science: A meta-analysis science. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(4), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10183a
   Google Scholar
• Aktamış, H., & Pekmez, E. Ş. (2011). A study of developing scientific process skills inventory towards science and technology cours. Dokuz Eylul University. Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 30, 192–205.
   Google Scholar
• Alhusaini, A. A., & Maker, C. J. (2011). The uses of open-ended problem solving in regular academic subjects to develop students’ creativity: An analytical review. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 1(1), 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ayverdi, L. (2018). Usage of technology, engineering and mathematics in science education for gifted students: STEM approach [Ph.D. thesis, Balikesir University Institute of Science].
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R., Pearce, G., Smith, C., Sutherland, M., Stack, N., Winstanley, C., & Dickenson, M. (2012). Improving the educational achievement of gifted and talented students: A systematic review. Talent Development & Excellence, 4(1), 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Balım, S. (2016). The effects of using problem based learning method in science courses on talented students’ levels of academic achievements, inquiry learning skill perceptions and attitudes towards science [Master thesis, Dokuz Eylul University Institute of Educational Sciences].
   Google Scholar
• Batdal Karaduman, G. (2017). Problem based learning. In S. Emir (Ed.), Curriculum design for the gifted in education (pp. 150–161). Pegem Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bildiren, A. (2018). Gifted children. Pegem Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bildiren, A. (2020). Giftedness or disability? Living with paradox. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 48(6), 746–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1761855
   Google Scholar
• Büyüköztürk, Ş, Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, ÖE, Karadeniz, Ş, & Demirel, F. (2019). Scientific research methods in education (26th edition). Pegem Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Çalıkoğlu, B. S. (2014). The effect of differentiated science education on the basis of depth and complexity on gifted and talented students in view of success, scientific process skills and attitude [Ph.D. Thesis, Istanbul University Faculty of Educational Sciences].
   Google Scholar
• Camcı Erdoğan, S. (2014). The necessity of differentiation in science education for gifted and talented students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 2(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEYSG.201429016
   Google Scholar
• Can, İ, & İnel Ekici, D. (2019). Evaluation of gifted and talented students’ views on problem-based science activities. Uşak University Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.29065/usakead.657108
   Google Scholar
• Cetinkaya, C. (2021). Project-based curriculum differentiation example of gifted students. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 22(2), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.718625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çitil, M. (2018). Evaluation of gifted students’ education policy in Turkey. Journal of National Education, 47(1), 143–172.
   Google Scholar
• Çubukçu, Z., & Tosuntaş, Ş. (2018). Technology in gifted education. Electronic Journal of Education Sciences, 7(13), 45–47.
   Google Scholar
• Davasligil, U. (1991). Acquisition of excellence. Journal of Education and Science, 15(82), 62–67.
   Google Scholar
• Dixson, D. D., Peters, S. J., Makel, M. C., Jolly, J. L., Matthews, M. S., Miller, E. M., & Wilson, H. E. (2020). A call to reframe gifted education as maximizing learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 102(4), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721720978057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dökme, İ. (2019). The relationship between scientific reasoning and science achievement. In İ Dökme (Ed.), The art of thinking with scientific reasoning skills (pp. 7–12). Anı Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Eryılmaz, M. (2019). The analysis of student behaviors in virtual learning environments by clustering method. Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education Faculty, 16(1), 725–743. https://doi.org/10.23891/efdyyu.2019.139
   Google Scholar
• Feldhusen, J. F. (1997). Educating teachers for work with talented youth. In N. Colangelo, & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 547–555). Allyn&Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• García-Martínez, I., Gutiérrez Cáceres, R., Luque de La Rosa, A., & León, S. P. (2021). Analysing educational interventions with gifted students. Systematic review. Children, 8(5), 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8050365
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., & Newberry, M. (2017). Characteristics of individuals who are gifted and extraordinary in the field of science. In K. S. Taber (Ed.), Science education for the gifted (pp. 21–40) (Trans. Ed., M. Gökdere). Pegem Publications. (Original work published 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (pp. 333–350). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Güney, K. K. (2018). Evaluation of the differentiated research methods curriculum that developed for gifted students [PhD thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Institute of Educational Sciences].
   Google Scholar
• Han, J. (2013). Scientific reasoning: Research, development and assessment [PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University].
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K., Marcus, R., McLaren, K., & Fey, J. (2001). Curriculum materials supporting problem-based teaching. School Science & Mathematics, 101(6), 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb17962.x
   Google Scholar
• Jakubakynov, B., Berechikidze, I., Kartashova, O., & Kochetkova, G. (2021). Gifted students creativity: The role of preliminary orientation and individual learning strategies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100883–100883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, S., & Ku, J. O. (2011). Problem based learning using real-time data in science education for the gifted. Gifted Education International, 27(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142941102700304
   Google Scholar
• Kanlı, E. (2008). The effect of problem-based learning in science and technology teaching on achievement, creative thinking and motivation levels of gifted and normal students [Master thesis, Istanbul University Institute of Social Sciences].
   Google Scholar
• Kanlı, E. (2017). Integrated teaching model. In S. Emir (Ed.), Curriculum design of the gifted in education (pp. 47–61). Pegem Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kanlı, E., & Emir, S. (2013). The effect of problem based learning on gifted and normal students’ achievement and creativity levels. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 7(2), 18–45. http://doi.org/10.12973/nefmed201
   Google Scholar
• Kılıc, A. S. (2015). The impact of the activities prepared through the ıntegration of science and mathematics on the critical thinking and science process skills of the gifted 6th grade secondary school students [Ph.D. thesis, Gazi University Institute of Educational Sciences].
   Google Scholar
• Kılıç, V. C. (2015). Türkiye’de üstün ve özel yetenekli çocuklara yönelik bir eğitim politikası oluşturulamaması sorunu üzerine bir değerlendirme. Yüzyılda Eğitim ve Toplum, 4(12), 145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Kulegel, S., & Topsakal, U. U. (2021). Investigating perceptions and skills of gifted students in STEM education. World Journal of Education, 11(3), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v11n3p39
   Google Scholar
• Kutlu Abu, N. (2018). An evaluatıon of dıfferentıated scıence actıvıtıes for ınclusıon of gıfted students [PhD thesis, Amasya University, Institute of Social Sciences].
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E. (1978). The development and validation of classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660150103
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E. (2004). The nature and development of scientific reasoning: A synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3224-2
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, E. A., Clark, B., Meldrum-Cramer, E., Falconer, A. K., Sequist, M. J., & Kwon, Y. (2000). Development of scientific reasoning in college biology: Do two levels of general hypothesis-testing skills exist? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200001)37:1<81::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marland, S. P. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. (2 Vols.). Report to congress of the United States Commissioner of Education. US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J H. (2000). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Quantitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mulrine, C. F. (2007). Creating a virtual learning environment for gifted and talented learners. Ghifted Child Today, 30(2), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2007-30
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press. [on-line]. Retrieved January 27, 2021 from http://www.csun.edu/science/ref/curriculum/reforms/nses/nses-complete.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st century challenge for science education: Assessing scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir, G. (2017). An actıon research about enrıched currıculum towards the contrıbutıon to scıentıfıc process skılls and achıevement for gıfted students [Master thesis, Hacettepe University Institute of Educational Sciences].
   Google Scholar
• Özdeniz, Y. (2021). The effect of application of science module designed according to integrated curriculum model in blended learning environment on scientific reasoning and scientific process skills of gifted student [Master thesis, Adnan Menderes University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences].
   Google Scholar
• Potts, J. A. (2019). Profoundly gifted students’ perceptions of virtual classrooms. Ghifted Child Quarterly, 63(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218801075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1999). What is this thing called giftedness, and how do we develop it? A twenty-five year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329902300102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., Shore, B. M., & Enersen, D. L. (2014). Best practices in gifted education – an evidence-based guide. (Trans. Uzeyir Ogurlu, Fatih Kaya). Nobel Publishing. (Original work published 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, M. F., & Sak, U. (2013). A reflective conversation with Ugur Sak: Gifted education in Turkey. Gifted Education International, 30(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429413510639
   Google Scholar
• Stein, J., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Why blend? In M. Vai (Ed.), Essentials for blended learning a standards-based guide (pp. 14–17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suherman, Y., Maryantı, R., & Juhanaini, J. (2021). Teaching science courses for gifted students in inclusive school. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 16(3), 2426–2438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. (2017). Why science education for the gifted? In K. S. Taber (Ed.), Science education for the gifted (pp. 3–19) (Trans. Ed. M. Gökdere). Pegem Publications. (Original work published 2007)
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S. (2020). Özel yetenekli öğrenciler için eğitim stratejileri, model ve uygulamaları. In A. Ataman, & E. R. Özmen (Eds.), Öğrenme güçlüğü ve özel yetenek (pp. 205–222). Vize.
   Google Scholar
• Taşpınar, M., & Tuncer, M. (2007). Educatıon and traınıng ın vırtual envıronments and ıts future. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 6(20), 112–132.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, D. L. (2010). Beyond the classroom walls: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on how online learning can meet the needs of gifted students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(4), 662–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1002100405
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A., & Allan, S. D. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. Ascd.
   Google Scholar
• Türkman, B. (2017). Strategies for differentiating the general education program according to the needs of gifted students. In S. Emir (Ed.), Curriculum design for the gifted in education (pp. 25–38). Pegem Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ülger, B. B. (2019). The development, implementation and effect of differentiated inquiry-based lesson modules for gifted students [Ph.D. Thesis, Uludag University Institute of Educational Sciences].
   Google Scholar
• Ülger, B. B., & Çepni, S. (2020). Evaluating the effect of differentiated inquiry-based science lesson modules on gifted students’ scientific process skills. Pegem Education and Training Journal, 10(4), 1289–1324. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.039
   Google Scholar
• Uluyol, Ç, & Karadeniz, Ş. (2009). An example on blended learning environment: Student achievement and perception. Journal of Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Education, 6(1), 60–84.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., Bass, G., Ries, R., Poland, D., & Avery, L. D. (1998). A national study of science curriculum effectiveness with high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42(4), 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629804200404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., Hubbard, G. F., & Robbins, J. I. (2021). Differentiation of instruction for gifted learners: Collated evaluative studies of teacher classroom practices. Handbook of Giftedness and Talent Development in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 945–979). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3041-4_45
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., & Wood, S. (2010). The integrated curriculum model. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2009.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalçın, B. (2020). Investıgatıon of the learnıng levels of 7th grade students ın a blended learnıng envıronment (ızmır provınce -karşıyaka dıstrıct eren şahın eronat secondary school example) [Master thesis. Celal Bayar University, Institute of Science and Technology].
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, O. (2017). Blended learning in science instruction: General chemistry laboratory application. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 19(3), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.315041
   Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, J., Kim, K. J., & Koo, K. (2020). Enrichment program for the ethnic minority of gifted and talented students in science and engineering. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 10(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1714092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H. P., & Jen, E. (2020). Integrating nanotechnology in the science curriculum for elementary high-ability students in Taiwan: Evidenced-based lessons. Roeper Review, 42(1), 38–48. doi:10.1080/02783193.2019.1690078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yüzüak, A. V., & Dökme, İ. (2015). Lawson mantıksal düşünme testinin (çoktan seçmeli versiyonu) uyarlanması, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(3), 443–456.
   Google Scholar