Teachers and pre-service teachers’ scientific competencies: a methodological development for a systematic review

References

• Acar, Ö. (2014). Scientific reasoning, conceptual knowledge, & achievement differences between prospective science teachers having a consistent misconception and those having a scientific conception in an argumentation-based guided inquiry course. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akengin, H., & Sirin, A. (2013). A comparative study upon determination of scientific literacy level of teacher candidates. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(19), 1882–1886. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2013.1552
   Google Scholar
• Alshamali, M. A., & Daher, W. M. (2016). Scientific reasoning and its relationship with problem solving: The case of upper primary science teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(6), 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9646-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Sultan, A., Henson, H., & Fadde, P. J. (2018). Pre-service elementary teachers’ scientific literacy and self-efficacy in teaching science. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.1.02
   Google Scholar
• Al Sultan, A., Henson, H., & Lickteig, D. (2021). Assessing preservice elementary teachers’ conceptual understanding of scientific literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 102, 103327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragón, L., Jiménez-Tenorio, N., Vicente Martorell, J. J., & Eugenio Gozalbo, M. (2021). ¿Progresan las concepciones sobre la ciencia de futuros maestros/as tras la implementación de propuestas constructivistas para la alfabetización científica? Góndola, Enseñanza y Aprendizaje de las Ciencias, 16(1), 78–98. https://doi.org/10.14483/23464712.15589
   Google Scholar
• Arifin, M. A. (2021). Competence, competency, and competencies: A misunderstanding in theory and practice for future reference. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i9/11064
   Google Scholar
• Bacanak, A., & Gökdere, M. (2009). Investigating level of the scientific literacy of primary school teacher candidates. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 10(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, L., Xiao, Y., Koenig, K., & Han, J. (2018). Validity evaluation of the lawson classroom test of scientific reasoning. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(2), 020106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.020106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D., Bagley, C., Eriksson, A., & Player-Koro, C. (2014). Changing teacher education in Sweden: Using meta-ethnographic analysis to understand and describe policy making and educational changes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 44, 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büttner, F., Winters, M., Delahunt, E., Elbers, R., Lura, C. B., Khan, K. M., Weir, A., & Ardern, C. L. (2020a). Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 1: Assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(13), 798–800. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-100806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büttner, F., Winters, M., Delahunt, E., Elbers, R., Lura, C. B., Khan, K. M., Weir, A., & Ardern, C. L. (2020b). Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 2: Spot the difference – a rigorous risk of bias assessment can alter the main findings of a systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(13), 801–808. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavas, P. H., Ozdem, Y., Cakiroglu, J., & Ertepinar, H. (2013). Turkish pre-service elementary science teachers’ scientific literacy level and attitudes toward science. Science Education International, 24(4), 383–401. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1022326.
   Google Scholar
• Çibik, A. S. (2016). The effect of project-based History and Nature of Science practices on the change of nature of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(4), 453–472. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2016.331a
   Google Scholar
• de Kock, S., Stirk, L., Ross, J., Duffy, S., Noake, C., & Misso, K. (2021). Systematic review search methods evaluated using the preferred reporting of items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses and the risk of bias in systematic reviews tool. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 37(1), e18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462320002135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duruk, Ü, Akgün, A., & Tokur, F. (2019). Prospective early childhood teachers’ understandings on the nature of science in terms of scientific knowledge and scientific method. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070306
   Google Scholar
• El Islami, R. A. Z., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2020). Comparative study of scientific literacy: Indonesian and Thai pre-service science teachers report. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 9(2), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20355
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Carro, R., Vílchez, J. E., Vílchez-González, J. M., & Ezquerra, Á. (2022). Multivariate analysis of beliefs in pseudoscience and superstitions among pre-service teachers in Spain. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00354-y
   Google Scholar
• Flores-Camacho, F., Gallegos-Cázares, L., Bonilla Pedroza, X., López, L. I., & García Lupión, B. (2007). Concepciones sobre la naturaleza de la ciencia de los profesores de biología del nivel secundario. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 12(32), 359–380. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=14003217
   Google Scholar
• García-Carmona, A., Criado, A. M., & Cruz-Guzmán, M. (2017). Primary pre-service teachers’ skills in planning a guided scientific inquiry. Research in Science Education, 47(5), 989–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9536-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göhner, M., & Krell, M. (2022). Preservice science teachers’ strategies in scientific reasoning: The case of modeling. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09945-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero, G. R., Tecpan, S., Rojas-Rojas, S. P., & Joglar, C. L. (2020). Caracterización del nivel de razonamiento científico en futuros profesores: Desafíos para la formación inicial docente. Formación Universitaria, 13(5), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-50062020000500045
   Google Scholar
• Han-Tosunoglu, C., & Lederman, N. G. (2021). Developing an instrument to assess pedagogical content knowledge for biological socioscientific issues. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, S., Upmeier zu Belzen, A., Krüger, D., & Pant, H. A. (2015). Scientific reasoning in higher education. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 223(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000199
   Google Scholar
• Haug, B. S., & Mork, S. M. (2021). Taking 21st century skills from vision to classroom: What teachers highlight as supportive professional development in the light of new demands from educational reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, 103286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.899722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, G. M., & Lederman, G. N. (2014). Informal science educators’ views about nature of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(2), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2013.788802
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon, L., Davis, E. A., & Hug, B. (2017). Design approaches to support preservice teachers in scientific modeling. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(1), 1–21. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-010-9225-9
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S., & Krell, M. (2019). Scientific reasoning competencies: A case of preservice teacher education. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 19(4), 446–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-019-00063-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, K., Schen, M., & Bao, L. (2012). Explicitly targeting pre-service teacher scientific reasoning abilities and understanding of nature of science through an introductory science course. Science Educator, 21(2), 1–9. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/explicitlytargeting-pre-service-teacher/docview/1313457467/se-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kohl, C., McIntosh, E. J., Unger, S., Haddaway, N. R., Kecke, S., Schiemann, J., & Wilhelm, R. (2018). Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: A case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools. Environmental Evidence, 7(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0115-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krell, M., Mathesius, S., van Driel, J., Vergara, C., & Krüger, D. (2020a). Assessing scientific reasoning competencies of pre-service science teachers: Translating a German multiple-choice instrument into English and Spanish. International Journal of Science Education, 42(17), 2819–2841. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1837989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krell, M., Redman, C., Mathesius, S., Krüger, D., & van Driel, J. (2020b). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ scientific reasoning competencies. Research in Science Education, 50(6), 2305–2329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9780-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. E. (1996). Construction of a paper-and-pencil test of basic scientific literacy based on selected literacy goals recommended by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Public Understanding of Science, 5(4), 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/5/4/003
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E. (1978). The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660150103
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E. (2004). The nature and development of scientific reasoning: A synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3224-2
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E. (2009). Basic inferences of scientific reasoning, argumentation, and discovery. Science Education, 94(2), 336–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, A. E., Alkhoury, S., Benford, R., Clark, B. R., & Falconer, K. A. (2000). What kinds of scientific concepts exist? Concept construction and intellectual development in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 996–1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:93.0.co;2-j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7(3), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición. Psicothema, 25(2), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., Abu-Tineh, A., Calder, N., & Mansour, N. (2021). Teachers and students’ views prior to introducing inquiry-based learning in Qatari science and mathematics classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104, 103367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, C., & Smith, G. (2012). The impact of a curriculum course on pre-service primary teachers’ science content knowledge and attitudes towards teaching science. Irish Educational Studies, 31(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2011.634061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M., & Gough, D. (2020). Systematic reviews in educational research: Methodology, perspectives and application. In O. Zawacki-Richter, M. Kerres, S. Bedenlier, M. Bond, & K. Buntins (Eds.), Systematic reviews in educational research (pp. 3–22). Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2000). Measuring student knowledge and skills: The PISA 2000 assessment of Reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264181564-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). PISA 2006 technical report. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19963777
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 science framework. PISA, OECD Publishing, 97–117. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
   Google Scholar
• Opitz, A., Heene, M., & Fischer, F. (2017). Measuring scientific reasoning – a review of test instruments. Educational Research and Evaluation, 23(3–4), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2017.1338586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahrudin, A., Irwandani, E., Oktarisa, Y., & Anwar, C. (2019). The analysis of pre-service physics teachers in scientific literacy: Focus on the competence and knowledge aspects. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.15728
   Google Scholar
• Parmin, P., & Fibriana, F. (2019). Prospective teachers’ scientific literacy through ethnoscience learning integrated with the indigenous knowledge of people in the frontier, outermost, and least developed regions. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v5i2.6257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchhart, R., & Perkins, D. N. (2005). Learning to think: The challenges of teaching thinking. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 775–802). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rout, C. C., & Aldous, C. (2016). How to write a research protocol. Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 22(4), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/22201181.2016.1216664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stammen, A., Malone, K., & Irving, K. (2018). Effects of modeling instruction professional development on biology teachers’ scientific reasoning skills. Education Sciences, 8(3), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrijos-Muelas, M., González-Víllora, S., & Bodoque-Osma, A. R. (2021). The persistence of neuromyths in the educational settings: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591923
   Google Scholar
• Turgut, D., & Yakar, Z. (2020). Does teacher education program affect on development of teacher candidates’ bioethical values, scientific literacy levels and empathy skills? International Education Studies, 13(5), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n5p80
   Google Scholar
• Valls-Bautista, C., Solé-Llussà, A., & Casanoves, M. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ acquisition of scientific knowledge and scientific skills through inquiry-based laboratory activity. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-07-2020-0161
   Google Scholar
• Verdugo-Perona, J. J., Solaz-Portolés, J. J., & Sanjosé, V. (2016a). Pre-service primary school teachers’ science content knowledge: An instrument for its assessment. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 24(2), 37–51.
   Google Scholar
• Verdugo-Perona, J. J., Solaz-Portolés, J. J., & Sanjosé, V. (2016b). Pre-service primary teachers’ scientific knowledge and attitudes towards science learning and their influence on understanding of the nature of science. Croatian Journal of Education - Hrvatski Časopis za Odgoj i Obrazovanje, 18(3), 779–815. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v18i3.1760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdugo-Perona, J. J., Solaz-Portolés, J. J., & Sanjosé, V. (2019). Assessment of pre-service teachers’ Science knowledge: The case of Valencian community in Spain. Revista de Educación, 383, 133–162. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2019-383-404
   Google Scholar
• Yuksel, I. (2019). The effects of research-inquiry based learning on the scientific reasoning skills of prospective science teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(4), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v7i4.4020
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Shamsi, I. H., Batool, I., Wan, D., & Yu, B. (2016). Ten-year change in the scientific literacy of primary science teachers in China: Reflections on training programs and personnel policies. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 3(3), 16–31. https://doi.org/10.18275/fire201603031084
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, C. (2007). The development of scientific thinking skills in elementary and middle school. Developmental Review, 27(2), 172–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zulkipli, Z. A. (2020). Identifying scientific reasoning skills of science education students. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 275. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.10311
   Google Scholar