Instructional quality in science teacher education: comparing evaluations by chemistry pre-service teachers and their advisors

References

• Berliner, D. C. (1989). Implications of studies of expertise in pedagogy for teacher education and evaluation. In New directions for teacher assessment: Proceedings of the 1988 ETC invitational conference. Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. J., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373709353129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camburn, E., & Barnes, C. A. (2004). Assessing the validity of a language arts instruction log through triangulation. Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1086/428802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charalambous, C. Y., & Praetorius, A. K. (2020). Creating a forum for researching teaching and its quality more synergistically. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 67(1), 100894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100894
   Google Scholar
• Charalambous, C. Y., & Praetorius, A. K. (2022). Synthesizing collaborative reflections on classroom observation frameworks and reflecting on the necessity of synthesized frameworks. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75(1), 101202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101202
   Google Scholar
• Charalambous, C. Y., Praetorius, A.-K., Sammons, P., Walkowiak, T., Jentsch, A., & Kyriakides, L. (2021). Working more collaboratively to better understand teaching and its quality: Challenges faced and possible solutions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71(1), 101092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101092
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, M. (2002). Unterrichtsqualität: Eine Frage der Perspektive? Empirische Analysen zur Übereinstimmung, Konstukt - und Merkmalsvalidität. [Teaching quality: A question of perspective? Empirical analyses of agreement, construct and characteristic validity]. Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., Smith, T. M., & Frisvold, D. E. (2010). Survey measures of classroom instruction: Comparing student and teacher reports. Educational Policy, 24(2), 267–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808330173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döbrich, P., & Storch, H. (2012). Pädagogische EntwicklungsBilanzen mit Studien-SEMinaren oder: Lehrerausbildung ohne Bilanzierung? [Pedagogical DevelopmentBalances with Study SEMinars or: Teacher Education without Balancing?]. Frankfurt, Main: GFPF; DIPF 2012, 75, [87]. Materialien zur Bildungsforschung 31/1. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:5987
   Google Scholar
• Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauth, B., Göllner, R., Lenske, G., Praetorius, A.-K., & Wagner, W. (2020). Who sees what? Conceptual considerations on the measurement of teaching quality from different perspectives. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik. Beiheft, 66(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:25870
   Google Scholar
• Good, T. L., & Lavigne, A. L. (2015). Rating Teachers Cheaper, Faster, and Better: Not So Fast. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(3), 288–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115574292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinitz, B., & Nehring, A. (2020). Quality of instruction in science education—a systematic review including goals, contents, and methods of science education. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 48(3), 319–360. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-020-00074-8
   Google Scholar
• Heinitz, B., Szogs, M., Förtsch, C., Korneck, F., Neuhaus, B. J., & Nehring, A. (2022). Unterrichtsqualität in den Naturwissenschaften. Eine vergleichende Gegenüberstellung von Ansätzen zwischen Fachspezifik und Generik. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 28(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-022-00146-5
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, A., & Lenske, G. (2013). Unterrichtsdiagnostik als Grundlage für Unterrichtsentwicklung. [Diagnosis of classroom instruction from different perspectives as a prerequisite for improving teaching and learning]. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 31(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.36950/bzl.31.2013.9653
   Google Scholar
• Holleman, G. A., Hooge, I. T. C., Kemner, C., & Hessels, R. S. (2020). The ‘Real-World Approach’ and Its Problems: A Critique of the Term Ecological Validity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(Article 721), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00721
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jacobs, J. K., & Morita, E. (2002). Japanese and American Teachers’ Evaluations of Videotaped Mathematics Lessons. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(3), 154. https://doi.org/10.2307/749723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H., & van Es, E. A. (2019). Articulating Design Principles for Productive Use of Video in Preservice Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487118778549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J. (2020). Interrelationship Between Inquiry-Based Learning and Instructional Quality in Predicting Science Literacy. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09946-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klieme, E., Rakoczy, K. (2003). Unterrichtsqualität aus Schülerperspektive: Kulturspezifische Profile, regionale Unterschiede und Zusammenhänge mit Effekten von Unterricht [Instructional quality from a student perspective: Culture-specific profiles, regional differences, and associations with effects of instruction]. In J. Baumert (Ed.), PISA 2000 – Ein differenzierter Blick auf die Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (pp. 333–359). Wiesbaden: VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-97590-4_12.
   Google Scholar
• Klieme, E., Schümer, G., & Knoll, S. (2001). Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I. ‘Aufgabenkultur’ und Unterrichtsgestaltung. [Teaching mathematics in lower secondary schools. 'Task culture' and lesson design.]. In E. Klieme, & J. Baumert (Eds.), TIMSS-Impulse für Schule und Unterricht. Forschungsbefunde, Reforminitiativen, Praxisberichte (pp. 43–57). Bundesministeriumfür Bildung und Forschung (BMBF).
   Google Scholar
• Korneck, F., Krüger, M., & Szogs, M. (2017). Professionswissen, Lehrerüberzeugungen und Unterrichtsqualität angehender Physiklehrkräfte unterschiedlicher Schulformen. [Professional knowledge, teacher beliefs, and teaching quality of prospective physics teachers from different types of schools]. In E. Sumfleth, & H. Fischler (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenzen von Lehrkräften der Chemie und Physik. Studien zum Physik- und Chemielernen, Bd. 200 (pp. 1–21). Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2006). Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction. Learning Environments Research, 9(3), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-006-9015-7
   Google Scholar
• Kunter, M., & Voss, T. (2011). Das Modell der Unterrichtsqualität in COACTIV: Eine multikriteriale Analyse [The model of instructional quality in COACTIV: A multicriteria analysis]. Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften: Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV, 85–113.
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakides, L., Christoforou, C., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2013). What matters for student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis of studies exploring factors of effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labudde, P., Viiri, J., Fischer, H. E., & Neumann, K. (2014). Summary and Discussion. In H. E. Fischer, P. Labudde, K. Neumann, & J. Viiri (Eds.), Quality of instruction in physics. Comparing Finland, Switzerland and Germany (pp. 111–127). Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
   Google Scholar
• Neuhaus, B. J. (2021). Unterrichtsqualität aus der Perspektive der Biologiedidaktik [Teaching quality from the perspective of biology education]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 49(2), 273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-021-00114-x
   Google Scholar
• Praetorius, A. K., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2018). Classroom observation frameworks for studying instructional quality: Looking back and looking forward. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 50(3), 535–553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0946-0
   Google Scholar
• Praetorius, A. K., Herrmann, C., Gerlach, E., Zülsdorf-Kersting, M., Heinitz, B., & Nehring, A. (2020b). Teaching quality in different subject matters in German-speaking countries—inbetween genericness and subject-specificity. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 48(3), 409–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-020-00082-8
   Google Scholar
• Praetorius, A. K., Klieme, E., Herbert, B., & Pinger, P. (2018). Generic dimensions of teaching quality: The German framework of Three Basic Dimensions. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 50(3), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0918-4
   Google Scholar
• Praetorius, A. K., Lenske, G., & Helmke, A. (2012). Observer ratings of instructional quality: Do they fulfill what they promise? Learning and Instruction, 22(6), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praetorius, A. K., Pauli, C., Reusser, K., Rakoczy, K., & Klieme, E. (2014). One lesson is all you need? Stability of instructional quality across lessons. Learning and Instruction, 31, 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praetorius, A.-K., Rogh, W., & Kleickmann, T. (2020a). Blind spots of the three basic dimensions model? Reconsidering the model based on an international synthesis on teaching quality. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 48(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-020-00072-w
   Google Scholar
• Puttick, S., & Wynn, J. (2020). Constructing ‘good teaching’ through written lesson observation feedback. Oxford Review of Education, 47(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2020.1846289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2007). How expertise develops in medicine: Knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Medical Education, 41(12), 1133–1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02915.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel, T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: The role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 454–499. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307310317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events: Teaching elementary school mathematics. In T. Wood, B. Nelson, & S. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 75–93). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Strong, M., Gargani, J., & Hacifazlioğlu, Ö. (2011). Do We Know a Successful Teacher When We See One? Experiments in the Identification of Effective Teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(4), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110390221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatto, M. T. (2021). Teacher education in the United States of America: An overview of the policies, pathways, issues and relevant research. In Mayer D. (Ed.), Teacher education policy and research (pp. 177–194). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3775-9_13
   Google Scholar
• Taut, S., & Rakoczy, K. (2016). Observing instructional quality in the context of school evaluation. Learning and Instruction, 46, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind, S. A., Jones, E., & Bergin, C. (2021). Principals’ severity affects teacher evaluation: Statistical adjustments mitigate effects. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 32(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2021.1892773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar