Context-based learning in flipped middle school chemistry class

References

• Assi, A., & Cohen, A. (2018). How beneficial and satisfying might a flipped classroom Be to high-school science education? A comparative case. In Y. Eshet-Alkalai, I. Blau, A. Caspi, S. Etgar, N. Geri, Y. Kalman, & V. Silber-Varod (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th Chais Conference for the Study of Innovation and Learning Technologies: Learning in the Technological Era (pp. 12-18). Raanana: The Open University of Israel.
   Google Scholar
• Avargil, S., Herscovitz, O., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Teaching thinking skills in context-based learning: Teachers’ challenges and assessment knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9302-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babo, R., & Suhonen, J. (2018). E-assessment with multiple choice questions: A qualitative study of teachers’ opinions and experience regarding the new assessment strategy. International Journal of Learning Technology, 13(3), 220–248. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2018.095964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahar, M., & Asil, M. (2018). Attitude towards e-assessment: Influence of gender, computer usage and level of education. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 33(3), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2018.1503529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahati, B., Fors, U., Hansen, P., Nouri, J., & Mukama, E. (2019). Measuring learner satisfaction with formative e-assessment strategies. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(7), 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., Lubben, F., & Hogarth, S. (2007). Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context-based and STS approaches to science teaching. Science Education, 91(3), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA (Vol. 30, No. 9, pp. 1–18).
   Google Scholar
• Broman, K., Bernholt, S., & Christensson, C. (2020). Relevant or interesting according to upper secondary students? Affective aspects of context-based chemistry problems. Research in Science & Technological Education, 40(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1824177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. L. (2016). Impacts of flipped classroom in high school health education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(4), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239515626371
   Google Scholar
• Clark, K. R. (2015). The effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2015.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A., & Ezra, O. (2018). Development of a contextualised MALL research framework based on L2 Chinese empirical study. Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(7), 764–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1449756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezra, O., & Cohen, A. (2018). Contextualised MALL: L2 Chinese students in target and non-target country. Computers and Education, 125, 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrell, G., & Gray, L. (2013). Electronic management of assessment. UK: JISC. https://www.jisc.ac.uk/guides/electronic-assessment-management
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M., & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context-based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 817–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.493185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, K. (2016). Using e-assessment to support flipped-style teaching. MSOR Connections, 15(2), 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1701
   Google Scholar
• Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K-12 blended learning. Innosight Institute, 5(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Karpinski, A. C., D’Agostino, J. V., Williams, A. E. K., Highland, S. A., & Mellott, J. A. (2019). The relationship between online formative assessment and state test scores using multilevel modeling. In D. B. A. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Advanced methodologies and technologies in modern education delivery (pp. 767–778). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• King, D. (2012). New perspectives on context-based chemistry education: Using a dialectical sociocultural approach to view teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 51–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2012.655037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D., & Henderson, S. (2018). Context-based learning in the middle years: Achieving resonance between the real-world field and environmental science concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maciejewski, W. (2016). Flipping the calculus classroom: An evaluative study. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 35(4), 187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massing, T., Schwinning, N., Striewe, M., Hanck, C., & Goedicke, M. (2018). E-Assessment using variable-content exercises in mathematical statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 26(3), 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2018.1518121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noguera, I., Roldán, A. E. G., Baneres, D., & Rodríguez, M. E. (2019). Students’ and instructors’ perspectives regarding e-assessment: A case study in introductory digital systems. The International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(2), 473–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parchmann, I., Gräsel, C., Baer, A., Nentwig, P., Demuth, R., & Ralle, B. (2006). Chemie im kontext”: A symbiotic implementation of a context-based teaching and learning approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1041–1062. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patronis, M., Ishtaiwa-Dweikat, F. F., Al Awad, M., & Aburezeq, I. M. (2019). Attitudes and perceptions towards summative e-assessment for free-text responses: A case study of a UAE university. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 15(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.2019010102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, D. J. (2016). The flipped classroom improves student achievement and course satisfaction in a statistics course: A quasi-experimental study. Teaching of Psychology, 43(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315620063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Cabrero, R., Casado-Pérez, J., Arigita-García, A., Zubiaurre-Ibáñez, E., Gil-Pareja, D., Sánchez-Rico, A., & Prendes-Espinosa, P. (2021). E-assessment in E-learning degrees: Comparison vs. face-to-face assessment through perceived stress and academic performance in a longitudinal study. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167664
   Google Scholar
• Schriebl, D., Müller, A., & Robin, N. (2023). Modelling authenticity in science education. Science and Education, 32, 1021–1048. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11191-022-00355-X/FIGURES/15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shkedi, A. (2005). Multiple case narrative: A qualitative approach to studying multiple populations (Vol. 7). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. J., Leighton, J. P., Jang, E. E., & Chu, M. W. (2016). Advances in the science of assessment. Educational Assessment, 21(1), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1127752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(4), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1039/B6RP90011A
   Google Scholar
• Sletten, S. R. (2017). Investigating flipped learning: Student self-regulated learning, perceptions, and achievement in an introductory biology course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(3), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9683-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (1994). STS education: International perspectives on reform. Ways of Knowing Science Series. Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY 10027 (clothbound: ISBN-0-8077-3366-0; paperback: ISBN-0-8077-3365-2).
   Google Scholar
• Stodberg, U. (2012). A research review of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.557496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolk, M. J., Bulte, A. M., De Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2016). A framework for empowering teachers for teaching and designing context-based chemistry education. In R. Taconis, P. D. Brok, & A. Pilot (Eds.), Teachers creating context-based learning environments in science (pp. 191–211). SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ulum, A. S., Basori, H., Suhandi, A., & Samsudin, A. (2019). Improving the mental model of high school students related to the concept of global warming through the implementation of the context based learning (CBL) model combined with the CM2RA strategy. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education, 1521(2020), 22008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/2/022008.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vorst, H. (2021). One context fits all?-analysing students’ context choice and their reasons for choosing a context-based task in chemistry education. International Journal of Science Education, 43(8), 1250–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1908640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wannagatesiri, T., Fakcharoenphol, W., Laohammanee, K., & Ramsiri, R. (2017). Implication of context-based science in middle school students: Case of learning heat. International Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Learning, 24(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7971/CGP/v24i02/1-19
   Google Scholar
• Whitelock, D. (2006). Electronic assessment: Marking, monitoring and mediating learning. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2), 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2006.010620
   Google Scholar
• Wiyarsi, A., Pratomo, H., & Priyambodo, E. (2020). Vocational high school students’ chemical literacy on context-based learning: A case of petroleum topic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.18
   Google Scholar