Status and trends of socioscientific issues in educational literature: insights and extensions from a co-word analysis

References

• Acar, O., Turkmen, L., & Roychoudhury, A. (2010). Student difficulties in socio-scientific argumentation and decision-making research findings: Crossing the borders of two research lines. International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1191–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902991805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assefa, S. G., & Rorissa, A. (2013). A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(12), 2513–2536. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aung, P. N., & Hallinger, P. (2023). Research on sustainability leadership in higher education: A scoping review. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(3), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2021-0367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrue, C., & Albe, V. (2013). Citizenship education and socioscientific issues: Implicit concept of citizenship in the curriculum, views of French middle school teachers. Science & Education, 22(5), 1089–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9571-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baytelman, A., Iordanou, K., & Constantinou, C. P. (2020). Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 1199–1227. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belova, N., Eilks, I., & Feierabend, T. (2015). The evaluation of role-playing in the context of teaching climate change. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(S1), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9477-x
   Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandmo, C., & Braten, I. (2018). Investigating relations between beliefs about justification for knowing, interest, and knowledge across two socio-scientific topics. Learning and Individual Differences, 62, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, H., Roorda, G., Suhre, C., & Goedhart, M. (2020). Logical reasoning in formal and everyday reasoning tasks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1673–1694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10039-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalık, M., & Wiyarsi, A. (2021). A systematic review of the research papers on chemistry-focused socioscientific issues. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(3), 360–372. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Laville, F. (1991). Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics, 22(1), 155–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02019280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavagnetto, A. R. (2010). Argument to foster scientific literacy: A review of argument interventions in k-12 science contexts. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 336–371. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310376953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L., & Xiao, S. (2021). Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 32, 100377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, N., Rundgren, S. N. C., & Hoglund, H. O. (2012). Using the SEE-SEP model to analyze upper secondary students’ use of supporting reasons in arguing socioscientific issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9328-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: A journal content analysis from 1998–2014. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, S. C., Hsu, Y. S., & Lin, S. S. (2019). Conceptualizing socioscientific decision making from a review of research in science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9890-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701787909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrecht, C., Bruckermann, T., & Harms, U. (2018). Students’ decision-making in education for sustainability-related extracurricular activities—A systematic review of empirical studies. Sustainability, 10(11), 3876. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Cartiff, B. M., & Duke, R. F. (2018). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between epistemic cognition and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(8), 1084–1111. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grooms, J., Sampson, V., & Golden, B. (2014). Comparing the effectiveness of verification and inquiry laboratories in supporting undergraduate science students in constructing arguments around socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 36(9), 1412–1433. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.891160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, H., & Kim, H. B. (2021). Framing oneself and one another as collaborative contributors in small group argumentation in a science classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(3), 517–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10071-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddaway, N. R., Woodcock, P., Macura, B., & Collins, A. (2015). Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews. Conservation Biology, 29(6), 1596–1605. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hingant, B., & Able, V. (2010). Nanosciences and nanotechnologies learning and teaching in secondary education: A review of literature. Studies in Science Education, 46(2), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2010.504543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601007549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4, 275–288.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, Y. S., Tang, K. Y., & Lin, T. C. (2023). Trends and hot topics of STEM and STEM Education: A co-word analysis of literature published in 2011–2020. Science & Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00419-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C., Yang, C., Wang, S., Wu, W., Su, J., & Liang, C. (2020). Evolution of topics in education research: A systematic review using bibliometric analysis. Educational Review, 72(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1566212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, G. J., Tang, K. Y., & Tu, Y. F. (2022). How artificial intelligence (AI) supports nursing education: Profiling the roles, applications, and trends of AI in nursing education research (1993–2020). Interactive Learning Environments, https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2086579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayan-Fadlelmula, F., Sellami, A., Abdelkader, N., & Umer, S. (2022). A systematic review of STEM education research in the GCC countries: Trends, gaps and barriers. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00319-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. (2012). Nature of science and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 67–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.559490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. (2013). Transfer of nature of science understandings into similar contexts: Promises and possibilities of an explicit reflective approach. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17), 2928–2953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.672774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. (2014). A reconstructed vision of environmental science literacy: The case of Qatar. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3067–3100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.951980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilic, D., & Saglam, N. (2014). Students’ understanding of genetics concepts: The effect of reasoning ability and learning approaches. Journal of Biological Education, 48(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.837402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilinc, A., Demiral, U., & Kartal, T. (2017). Resistance to dialogic discourse in SSI teaching: The effects of an argumentation-based workshop, teaching practicum, and induction on a preservice science teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(6), 764–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinslow, A. T., Sadler, T. D., & Nguyen, H. T. (2019). Socio-scientific reasoning and environmental literacy in a field-based ecology class. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 388–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1442418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knippels, M.-C. P. J., Severiens, S. E., & Klop, T. (2009). Education through fiction: Acquiring opinion-forming skills in the context of genomics. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2057–2083. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802345888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutluca, A. Y. (2021). An investigation of elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for socioscientific argumentation: The effect of a learning and teaching experience. Science Education, 105(4), 743–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925–953. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. C., & Grace, M. (2010). Students’ reasoning processes in making decisions about an authentic, local socio-scientific issue: Bat conservation. Journal of Biological Education, 44(4), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.9656216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, J. S. C., Wong, A. S. L., & Yung, B. H. W. (2015). Understandings of nature of science and multiple perspective evaluation of science news by non-science majors. Science & Education, 24(7–8), 887–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9736-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdroff, L. (1989). Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Research Policy, 18(4), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(89)90016-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., & Froyd, J. E. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic review of journal publications. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00207-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T. C., Tang, K. Y., Lin, S. S., Changlai, M. L., & Hsu, Y. S. (2022). A co-word analysis of selected science education literature: Identifying research trends of scaffolding in two decades (2000–2019). Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 844425. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, M. G., & Linder, C. (2013). Students’ ontological security and agency in science education—An example from reasoning about the use of gene technology. International Journal of Science Education, 35(14), 2299–2330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.618516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl, M. G., & Lundin, M. (2016). How do 15–16 year old students use scientific knowledge to justify their reasoning about human sexuality and relationships? Teaching and Teacher Education, 60, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. Y., Lin, C. S., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). College students’ scientific epistemological views and thinking patterns in socioscientific decision making. Science Education, 95(3), 497–517. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Belmonte, J., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Pozo-Sánchez, S., & Marín-Marín, J. A. (2021). Co-word analysis and academic performance from the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology in Web of Science. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 119–140. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marín-Marín, J. A., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., Dúo-Terrón, P., & López-Belmonte, J. (2021). STEAM in education: A bibliometric analysis of performance and co-words in Web of Science. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00296-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinatti, G., Girault, Y., & Hammond, C. (2010). High school students debate the use of embryonic stem cells: The influence of context on decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 32(16), 2235–2251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500691003622612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. A. (2012). Science in discussions: An analysis of the use of science content in socioscientific discussions. Science Education, 96(3), 428–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, J. E., & Totten, S. (2001). Beliefs of science teachers toward the teaching of science/technological/social issues: Are we addressing national standards? Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 21(5), 376–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046760102100507
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, R., & Richard, G. (2010). Questioning the evidence for a claim in a socio-scientific issue: An aspect of scientific literacy. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(3), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2010.506413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romine, W. L., Sadler, T. D., Dauer, J. M., & Kinslow, A. (2020). Measurement of socio-scientific reasoning (SSR) and exploration of SSR as a progression of competencies. International Journal of Science Education, 42(18), 2981–3002. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1849853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudsberg, K., Ohman, J., & Ostman, L. (2013). Analyzing students’ learning in classroom discussions about socioscientific issues. Science Education, 97(4), 594–620. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternäng, L., & Lundholm, C. (2011). Climate change and morality: Students’ perspectives on the individual and society. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1131–1148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.503765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, K. Y., Chang, C. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2023). Trends in artificial intelligence-supported e-learning: A systematic review and co-citation network analysis (1998–2019). Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2134–2152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevors, G., & Duffy, M. C. (2020). Correcting COVID-19 misconceptions requires caution. Educational Researcher, 49(7), 538–542. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20953825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952–977. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387–1410. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601068095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). High school students’ informal reasoning on a socio-scientific issue: Qualitative and quantitative analyses. International Journal of Science Education, 29(9), 1163–1187. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690601083375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziadie, M. A., & Andrews, T. C. (2018). Moving evolution education forward: A systematic analysis of literature to identify gaps in collective knowledge for teaching. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17, ar11. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar