Science teachers’ implementation of science and engineering practices in different instructional settings

References

• Abdelmalak, M. M. M., & Parra, J. L. (2016). Expanding learning opportunities for graduate students with HyFlex course design. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design, 6(4), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2016100102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleixandre, M. P. J., & Crujeiras, B. (2017). Epistemic practices and scientific practices in science education. In Science education (pp. 69–80). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• An, Y., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Yang, J., Conan, J., Kinard, W., & Daughrity, L. (2021). Examining K-12 teachers’ feelings, experiences, and perspectives regarding online teaching during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(5), 2589–2613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10008-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias, A. M., Davis, E. A., Marino, J.-C., Kademian, S. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (2016). Teachers’ use of educative curriculum materials to engage students in science practices. International Journal of Science Education, 38(9), 1504–1526. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1198059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias, A. M., Smith, P. S., Davis, E. A., Marino, J.-C., & Palincsar, A. S. (2017). Justifying predictions: Connecting use of educative curriculum materials to students’ engagement in science argumentation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(1), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2016.1277597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2015). The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 12(1), 29–42.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2022). Australian Curriculum: Version 9.0.
   Google Scholar
• Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, K. (1999). Chapter 4: Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 101–139. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X024001101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, B. (2014). Hybrid courses with flexible participation: The HyFlex course design. In Practical applications and experiences in K-20 blended learning environments (pp. 153–177). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, B. J. (2019). Hybrid-flexible course design. In Implementing studentdirected hybrid classes. Provo, Utah: EdTech Books.
   Google Scholar
• Besser, A., Flett, G. L., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2020). Adaptability to a sudden transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Understanding the challenges for students. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Binnewies, S., & Wang, Z. (2019). Challenges of student equity and engagement in a HyFlex Course. In Blended learning designs in STEM higher education (pp. 209–230). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative research for education. Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, B. R. (2020). Integrating science and engineering practices: outcomes from a collaborative professional development. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00210-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carspecken, F. P. (2013). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colclasure, B. C., Durham Brooks, T., Helikar, T., King, S. J., & Webb, A. (2022). The effects of a modeling and computational thinking professional development program on STEM educators’ perceptions toward teaching science and engineering practices. Education Sciences, 12(8), 570. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeMarrais, K. (2004). Qualitative interview studies: Learning through experience. Foundations for Research: Methods of Inquiry in Education and the Social Sciences, 1(1), 51–68.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2015). National curriculum in England: Science programmes of study.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737024002081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordy, X. Z., Sparkmon, W., Imeri, H., Notebaert, A., Barnard, M., Compretta, C., Dehon, E., Taylor, J., Stray, S., & Sullivan, D. (2021). Science teaching excites medical interest: A qualitative inquiry of science education during the 2020 covid-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(4), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, J. I., Daehler, K. R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (1996). A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00107-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inkinen, J., Klager, C., Juuti, K., Schneider, B., Salmela-Aro, K., Krajcik, J., & Lavonen, J. (2020). High school students’ situational engagement associated with scientific practices in designed science learning situations. Science Education, 104(4), 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, E. J., McCarthy, M. J., & Donovan, C. (2019). Elementary teachers’ enactment of the NGSS science and engineering practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 30(7), 788–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2019.1630794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketelhut, D. J., Mills, K., Hestness, E., Cabrera, L., Plane, J., & McGinnis, J. R. (2020). Teacher change following a professional development experience in integrating computational thinking into elementary science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09798-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft, J. A., Navy, S. L., Wong, S. S., & Hill, K. M. (2022). The first 5 years of teaching science: The beliefs, knowledge, practices, and opportunities to learn of secondary science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K., Hill, H. C., Gonzalez, K. E., & Pollard, C. (2019). Strengthening the research base that informs STEM instructional improvement efforts: A meta-analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 41(3), 260–293. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373719849044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkawi, A. R., & Rababah, E. Q. (2018). Jordanian twelfth-grade science teachers’ self-reported usage of science and engineering practices in the next generation science standards. International Journal of Science Education, 40(9), 961–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1460695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L. (2009). Teachers’ use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena. Science Education, 93(2), 233–268. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2009). Qualitative data analysis. In Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (pp. 169–208.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. N., Sellnow, D. D., & Strawser, M. G. (2021). Pandemic pedagogy challenges and opportunities: Instruction communication in remote, HyFlex, and BlendFlex courses. Communication Education, 70(2), 202–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1857418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J., Risser, M., & Griffiths, R. (2013). Student choice, instructor flexibility: Moving beyond the blended instructional model. Issues and Trends in Educational Technology, 57(1), 8–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0654-0
   Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, E., & Medicine. (2015). Science teachers’ learning: Enhancing opportunities, creating supportive contexts. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21836
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Teachers Association [NSTA]. (2013). Next generation science standards: Science and engineering practices. National Science Teachers Association. https://static.nsta.org/ngss/MatrixOfScienceAndEngineeringPractices.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Navy, S. L., Nixon, R. S., Luft, J. A., & Jurkiewicz, M. A. (2020). Accessed or latent resources? Exploring new secondary science teachers’ networks of resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(2), 184–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
   Google Scholar
• Peters-Burton, E. E., Tran, H. H., & Miller, B. (2023). Design-Based research as professional development: Outcomes of teacher participation in the development of the science practices innovation notebook (SPIN). Journal of Science Teacher Education, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle, R. M., Mesa, J., & Hayes, L. (2017). Professional development for middle school science teachers: Does an educative curriculum make a difference? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2016.1277599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruitt, S. L. (2014). The next generation science standards: The features and challenges. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9385-0
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, J. R., Gallagher-Lepak, S., & Killion, C. (2012). “Me and My computer”: emotional factors in online learning. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-33.2.100
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rich, K. M., Yadav, A., & Schwarz, C. V. (2019). Computational thinking, mathematics, and science: Elementary teachers’ perspectives on integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(2), 165–205.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. In The coding manual for qualitative researchers (pp. 1–440.
   Google Scholar
• Schuchardt, A. M., Tekkumru-Kisa, M., Schunn, C. D., Stein, M. K., & Reynolds, B. (2017). How much professional development is needed with educative curriculum materials? It depends upon the intended student learning outcomes. Science Education, 101(6), 1015–1033. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidman, I. (2019). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singapore Ministry of Education. (2021). Science syllabuses.
   Google Scholar
• Suter, M. C. (2002). College faculty's transition to online teaching: From classroom space to virtual place. Capella University.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, R. W. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions of the shift from the classroom to online teaching. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(2), 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Trygstad, P. J., Banilower, E. R., & Pasley, J. D. (2016). Operationalizing the science and engineering practices. Horizon Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vilhunen, E., Tang, X., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2021). Instructional activities predicting epistemic emotions in Finnish upper secondary school science lessons: Combining experience sampling and video observations. Engaging with Contemporary Challenges Through Science Education Research: Selected papers from the ESERA 2019 Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340(6130), 310–313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Krist, C., Good, J., & Caeli, E. N. (2018). Computational thinking in elementary classrooms: Measuring teacher understanding of computational ideas for teaching science. Computer Science Education, 28(4), 371–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1560550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., Forbes, C. T., & Biggers, M. (2013). Fostering student sense making in elementary science learning environments: Elementary teachers’ use of science curriculum materials to promote explanation construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(8), 989–1017. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar