708
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Towards a model of plant awareness in education: a literature review and framework proposal

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 07 Jun 2023, Accepted 09 Apr 2024, Published online: 05 May 2024

References

  • Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 391–405.
  • Amprazis, A., Papadopoulou, P., & Malandrakis, G. (2021). Plant blindness and children’s recognition of plants as living things: A research in the primary schools context. Journal of Biological Education, 55(2), 139–154.
  • APA. (2022). Dictionary of Psychology Retrieved June 6, 2023. https://dictionary.apa.org/construct
  • Balding, M., & Williams, K. J. (2016). Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation. Conservation Biology, 30(6), 1192–1199.
  • Batke, S., Dallimore, T., & Bostock, J. (2020). Understanding plant blindness–students’ inherent interest of plants in higher education. Journal of Plant Sciences, 8(4), 98.
  • Beasley, K., Hesterman, S., & Lee-Hammond, L. (2023). Reviving botany in the curriculum: The botanical journey of two Western Australian early childhood teachers. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 39(2), 166–180.
  • Bennett, J., Lubben, F., Hogarth, S., & Campbell, B. (2005). Systematic reviews of research in science education: Rigour or rigidity? International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 387–406.
  • Bowker, R. (2007). Children’s perceptions and learning about tropical rainforests: An analysis of their drawings. Environmental Education Research, 13(1), 75–96.
  • Brenner, E. D. (2017). Smartphones for teaching plant movement. The American Biology Teacher, 79(9), 740–745.
  • Burke, R., Sherwood, O. L., Clune, S., Carroll, R., McCabe, P. F., Kane, A., & Kacprzyk, J. (2022). Botanical boom: A new opportunity to promote the public appreciation of botany. Plants, People, Planet, 4(4), 326–334.
  • Burrows, G. E., Krebs, G. L., & Kirchoff, B. K. (2014). Visual learning–agricultural plants of the Riverina’–A new application for helping veterinary students recognise poisonous plants. Bioscience Education, 1–13.
  • Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11–21.
  • Cil, E. (2016). Instructional integration of disciplines for promoting children’s positive attitudes towards plants. Journal of Biological Education, 50(4), 366–383.
  • Collins, J. A., & Curby, K. M. (2013). Conceptual knowledge attenuates viewpoint dependency in visual object recognition. Visual Cognition, 21(8), 945–960.
  • Comeau, P., Hargiss, C. L., Norland, J. E., Wallace, A., & Bormann, A. (2019). Analysis of children's drawings to gain insight into plant blindness. Natural Sciences Education, 48(1), 1–10.
  • Cooke, J., Araya, Y., Bacon, K. L., Bagniewska, J. M., Batty, L. C., Bishop, T. R., … Lewis, Z. (2021). Teaching and learning in ecology: A horizon scan of emerging challenges and solutions. Oikos, 130(1), 15–28.
  • Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education—A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004
  • Department of Education. (2015). Science Curriculum for England. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study Viewed on 6/6/23
  • Dillon, J. (2014). Environmental education. In N. G. Lederman, D. L. Zeidler, & J. S. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 511–528). Routledge.
  • Fančovičová, J., & Prokop, P. (2010). Development and initial psychometric assessment of the plant attitude questionnaire. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19, 415–421.
  • Finger, A., Bergmann-Gering, A., & Groß, J. (2022). The medium matters! The effect of a mobile digital identification tool on students’ intrinsic motivation during plant identification. Journal of Biological Education, 1–23.
  • Foglia, L., & Wilson, R. A. (2013). Embodied cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(3), 319–325.
  • Fried, E. I. (2017). What are psychological constructs? On the nature and statistical modelling of emotions, intelligence, personality traits and mental disorders. Health Psychology Review, 11(2), 130–134.
  • Friedersdorff, J. C., Thomas, B. J., Hay, H. R., Freeth-Thomas, B. A., & Creevey, C. J. (2019). From treetops to tabletops: A preliminary investigation of how plants are represented in popular modern board games. Plants, People, Planet, 1(3), 290–300.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Goulder, R., & Scott, G. (2006). Phytosociology for undergraduates with minimal botanical background. Journal of Biological Education, 41(1), 26–29.
  • Gregory, R. (1970). The intelligent eye. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  • Guerra, S., Betti, S., Sartori, L., Zani, G., & Castiello, U. (2024). Plant awareness in the hand. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 94, 102246.
  • Hiatt, A. C., Hove, A. A., Ward, J. R., Ventura, L., Neufeld, H. S., Boyd, A. E., … Murrell, Z. E. (2021). Authentic research in the classroom increases appreciation for plants in undergraduate biology students. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 61(3), 969–980.
  • Jeronen, E., Palmberg, I., & Yli-Panula, E. (2017). Teaching methods in biology education and sustainability education including outdoor education for promoting sustainability—A literature review. Education Sciences, 7(1), 1.
  • Ju, E. J., & Kim, J. G. (2011). Using soil seed banks for ecological education in primary school. Journal of Biological Education, 45(2), 93–101.
  • Kanske, P., Schönfelder, S., & Wessa, M. (2013). Emotional modulation of the attentional blink and the relation to interpersonal reactivity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 641.
  • Kim, S., & Rehder, B. (2011). How prior knowledge affects selective attention during category learning: An eyetracking study. Memory & Cognition, 39, 649–665.
  • Kissi, L., & Dreesmann, D. (2018). Plant visibility through mobile learning? Implementation and evaluation of an interactive flower hunt in a botanic garden. Journal of Biological Education, 52(4), 344–363.
  • Kissi, L., & Dreesmann, D. (2022). Flowers with powers–conception and evaluation of an ‘educational seed mix’. Journal of Biological Education, 56(2), 147–162.
  • Koballa, T. R., & Glynn, S. M. (2010). Handbook of research on science education. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning (pp. 75–103). Routledge.
  • Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
  • Krapp, A. (2007). An educational–psychological conceptualisation of interest. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 7, 5–21.
  • Krosnick, S. E., Baker, J. C., & Moore, K. R. (2018). The pet plant project: Treating plant blindness by making plants personal. The American Biology Teacher, 80(5), 339–345.
  • Kubiatko, M., Fančovičová, J., & Prokop, P. (2021). Factual knowledge of students about plants is associated with attitudes and interest in botany. International Journal of Science Education, 43(9), 1426–1440.
  • Lai, C. H., Yang, J. C., Chen, F. C., Ho, C. W., & Chan, T. W. (2007). Affordances of mobile technologies for experiential learning: The interplay of technology and pedagogical practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(4), 326–337.
  • Lambert, L. S., & Newman, D. A. (2023). Construct development and validation in three practical steps: Recommendations for reviewers, editors, and authors. Organizational Research Methods, 26(4), 574–607.
  • Langdale, J. (2021). UK plant science research strategy: A green roadmap for the next 10 years—UK Research and Innovation. Retrieved March 3, from https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/BBSRC120321-PlantScienceStrategy.pdf
  • Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(3), 451.
  • Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2006). Investigating nature on the way to school: Responses to an educational programme by teachers and their pupils. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 895–918.
  • Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Sheffield, D. (2017). Beyond knowing nature: Contact, emotion, compassion, meaning, and beauty are pathways to nature connection. PLoS One, 12(5), e0177186.
  • Maio, G. R., Verplanken, B., & Haddock, G. (2018). The psychology of attitudes and attitude change. Sage.
  • Meyer, M. H., Bumgarner, N., & Pulte, A. (2019). Top 10 plants: Increasing awareness of plants. Crop Science, 59(6), 2329–2336.
  • Moscoe, L. J., & Hanes, M. M. (2019). Taste of life: Science outreach made delicious. Plants, People, Planet, 1(3), 183–187.
  • Nantawanit, N., Panijpan, B., & Ruenwongsa, P. (2012). Promoting students’ conceptual understanding of plant defense responses using the fighting plant unit. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 827–864.
  • Neuendorf, K. 2019. In advanced research methods for applied psychology (pp.211-223). Paula Brough. Routledge: London.
  • Newhouse, N. (1991). Implications of attitude and behavior research for environmental conservation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 22(1), 26–32.
  • Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2016). An outdoor mobile-based assessment activity: Measuring students’ motivation and acceptance. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 10(4), 11–17.
  • Nyberg, E., & Sanders, D. (2014). Drawing attention to the ‘green side of life’. Journal of Biological Education, 48(3), 142–153.
  • Palmberg, I., Kärkkäinen, S., Jeronen, E., Yli-Panula, E., & Persson, C. (2019). Nordic student teachers’ views on the most efficient teaching and learning methods for species and species identification. Sustainability, 11(19), 5231.
  • Pany, P., Lörnitzo, A., Auleitner, L., Heidinger, C., Lampert, P., & Kiehn, M. (2019). Using students’ interest in useful plants to encourage plant vision in the classroom. Plants, People, Planet, 1(3), 261–270.
  • Pany, P., Meier, F. D., Dünser, B., Yanagida, T., Kiehn, M., & Möller, A. (2022). Measuring students’ plant awareness: A prerequisite for effective botany education. Journal of Biological Education, 1–14.
  • Parsley, K. M. (2020). Plant awareness disparity: A case for renaming plant blindness. Plants, People, Planet, 2(6), 598–601.
  • Parsley, K. M., Daigle, B. J., & Sabel, J. L. (2022). Initial development and validation of the plant awareness disparity index. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(4), ar64.
  • Petrou, S., & Korfiatis, K. (2013). The effect of a digital learning environment on children’s conceptions about the protection of endemic plants. Journal of Biological Education, 47(3), 150–156.
  • Popay, J., Roberts, H., Sowden, A., Petticrew, M., Arai, L., Rodgers, M., Britten, N., Roen, K., & Duffy, S. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme, 1(1), b92.
  • Prokop, P., Majerčíková, D., & Vyoralová, Z. (2016). The use of realia versus powerpoint presentations on botany lessons. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 18.
  • Quijas, S., Schmid, B., & Balvanera, P. (2010). Plant diversity enhances provision of ecosystem services: A new synthesis. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11(7), 582–593.
  • Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. E. (2022). Interest development, self-related information processing, and practice. Theory Into Practice, 61(1), 23–34.
  • Roediger, I. I. I., Karpicke, H. L., & D, J. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249–255.
  • Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 198.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
  • Sanders, D., Eriksen, B., Gunnarsson, C. M., & Emanuelsson, J. (2022). Seeing the green cucumber: Reflections on variation theory and teaching plant identification. Plants, People, Planet, 4(3), 258–268.
  • Stagg, B. C. (2020). Meeting Linnaeus: Improving comprehension of biological classification and attitudes to plants using drama in primary science education. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(3), 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1605347
  • Stagg, B. C., & Dillon, J. (2022). Plant awareness is linked to plant relevance: A review of educational and ethnobiological literature (1998–2020). Plants People Planet, 4(6), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10323
  • Stagg, B. C., & Donkin, M. E. (2013). Teaching botanical identification to adults: Experiences of the UK participatory science project ‘open Air laboratories’. Journal of Biological Education, 47(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.764341
  • Stagg, B. C., & Donkin, M. E. (2016). Mnemonics are an effective tool for beginners learning plant identification. Journal of Biological Education, 50(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.1000360
  • Stagg, B. C., Donkin, M. E., & Smith, A. E. (2015). Bryophytes for beginners: The usability of a printed dichotomous key versus a multi-access computer-based key for bryophyte identification. Journal of Biological Education, 49(3), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.934900
  • Stagg, B. C., & Verde, M. F. (2019). A comparison of descriptive writing and drawing of plants for the development of adult novices’ botanical knowledge. Journal of Biological Education, 53(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1420683
  • Strgar, J. (2007). Increasing the interest of students in plants. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 19–23.
  • Stroud, S., Fennell, M., Mitchley, J., Lydon, S., Peacock, J., & Bacon, K. L. (2022). The botanical education extinction and the fall of plant awareness. Ecology and Evolution, 12(7), e9019.
  • Valencia, E. (2020). Acquiescence, instructor’s gender bias and validity of student evaluation of teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 483–495.
  • Valle, N., Antonenko, P., Endara, L., Davis, E. C., Somarriba, G., Sessa, E., … McDaniel, S. (2021). Community science, storytelling, or inquiry-based learning? Evaluating three technology-enhanced pedagogical approaches in an online botany course. The American Biology Teacher, 83(8), 513–520.
  • Wandersee, J. H., Clary, R. M., & Guzman, S. M. (2006). A writing template for probing students’ botanical sense of place. The American Biology Teacher, 68(7), 419–422.
  • Wandersee, J. H., & Schussler, E. E. (2001). Towards a theory of plant blindness. Plant Science Bulletin, 47(1), 2–9.
  • Wells, N. M., & Lekies, K. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–24.
  • Wyner, Y., & Doherty, J. H. (2022). Caring to know a name: An examination of New York city student attitudes towards knowing a tree's name. Plants, People, Planet, 4(3), 283–302.
  • Yorek, N., Şahin, M., & Aydın, H. (2009). Are animals ‘more alive’ than plants? Animistic-anthropocentric construction of life concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(4), 369–378.