158
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Effect of explicit and reflective activity-based instruction on senior secondary physics students’ views towards Nature of Science

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 11 Aug 2023, Accepted 19 Apr 2024, Published online: 02 May 2024

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 2(2), 2087–2107.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.
  • Acar, Ö, Büber, A., & Tola, Z. (2015). The effect of gender and socio-economic status of students on their physics conceptual knowledge, scientific reasoning, and Nature of Scienceunderstanding. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2753–2756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.962
  • Affandy, H., Aminah, N. S., & Supriyanto, A. (2019). The correlation of character education with critical thinking skills as an important attribute to success in the 21st century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1153(1), 012132.
  • Akerson, L. V., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, G. N. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317.
  • Bizimana, E., Mutangana, D., & Mwesigye, A. (2022). Performance analysis of biology education under the implementation of lower secondary school biology-competence-based curriculum: Policy implications. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 18(1), e2259. https://doi.org/10.21601/ijese/11331
  • Brown, C. D. (1998). Space craft mission design (2nd ed.). The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, inc. https://doi.org/10.25145/9781600862434.0184.0187 .
  • Bugingo, J. B., Yadav, L. L., & Mashood, K. K. (2022b). Rwandan senior secondary physics students’ views on nature of science. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(11), 426–442. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.11.24
  • Bugingo, J. B., Yadav, L. L., & Mashood, K. K. (2022c). Representation of Nature of Scienceaspects in secondary school physics curricula in East African community countries. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(8), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.8.11
  • Bugingo, J. B., Yadav, L. L., Mugisha, S. I., & Mashood, K. K. (2022a). Improving teachers’ and students’ views on Nature of Sciencethrough active instructional approaches: A review of the literature. Science & Education, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00382-8
  • Caramaschi, M., Cullinane, A., Levrini, O., & Erduran, S. (2022). Mapping the Nature of Sciencein the Italian physics curriculum: From missing links to opportunities for reform. International Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.2017061
  • Clough, M. P. (2018). Teaching and learning about the nature of science. Science & Education, 27, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-018-9964-0
  • Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). A critical review of students’ and teachers’ understandings of nature of science. Science & Education, 28, 205–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00051-3
  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano, C. V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  • Dagher, Z. R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Reconceptualising the nature of science: Why does it matter? Science & Education, 25(1), 147–164.
  • Das, P. M., Faikhamta, C., & Punsuvon, V. (2019). Bhutanese students’ views of the nature of science: A case study of a culturally rich country. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9611-9
  • Deng, F., Chen, D., Tsai, C., & Chai, C. (2011). Students’ views of the nature of science: A critical review of research. Science Education, 95(6), 961–999.
  • Dogan, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083–1112. http://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20243
  • Elby, A. (2001). Helping physics students learn how to learn. American Journal of Physics, Physics Education Research Supplement, 69(7), 54–64.
  • Erduran, S. (2022). Too philosophical, therefore useless for science education? Science & Education, 31, 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00340-4
  • Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Regaining focus in Irish junior cycle science: Potential new directions for curriculum development on nature of science. Irish Educational Studies, 33(4), 335–350.
  • Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw Hill Companies.
  • Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
  • Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
  • Herman, B. C., Poor, S. V., Oertli, R. T., & Schulte, K. (2023). Promoting young learners’ NOS views through place-based SSI instruction. Science & Education, 32, 947–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00353-z
  • Hrisa, K., & Psillos, D. (2022). Investigating the effectiveness of explicit and implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on primary students’ views about the non-linear nature of inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 44(4), 604–626.
  • Irzik, G., & Nola, R. (2011). A family resemblance approach to the Nature of Sciencefor science education. Science & Education, 20(7), 591–607.
  • Jones, A. (2004). A route to the ancient discovery of non-uniform planetary motion. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 35(4), 375–386.
  • Kampourakis, K. (2016). The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 667–682.
  • Kaya, E., & Erduran, S. (2016). From FRA to RFN, or how the family resemblance approach can be transformed for science curriculum analysis on nature of science. Science & Education, 25, 1115–1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-016-9861-3
  • Kaya, E., Erduran, S., Aksoza, B., & Akgun, S. (2019). Reconceptualised family resemblance approach to Nature of Sciencein pre-service science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1529447
  • Khishfe, R. (2021). Explicit instruction and student learning of argumentation and nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 325–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1822652
  • Khishfe, R. (2022). Improving students’ conceptions of nature of science: A review of the literature. Science & Education, 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00390-8
  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578.
  • Kiliç, K., Sungur, S., Çakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2005). Ninth-grade student’s understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 127–133.
  • Kinyota, M., & Rwimo, B. S. (2022). Developing student teacher’s conceptions of the nature of science: Assessment of a pre-service science teacher programme in Tanzania. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 25(3), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2022.2041788
  • Koksal, M. S., Cakiroglu, J., & Geban, O. (2013). The effect of explicit embedded reflective instruction on Nature of Scienceunderstandings in advanced science students. Journal of Biological Education, 47(4), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2013.799080
  • Kostøl, K. B., Bøe, M. V., & Skår, A. R. (2023). Nature of Sciencein Norway’s recent curricula reform analysis of the biology, chemistry, and physics curricula. Science & Education, 32(5), 1561–1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00399-z.
  • Kucuk, M. (2008). Improving preservice elementary teachers’ views of the Nature of Scienceusing explicit-reflective teaching in a science, technology and society course. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(2), 16–40. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2008v33n2.1
  • Leden, L., & Hansson, L. (2015). Nature of science progression in school year 1-9: An analysis of the Swedish curriculum and teachers’ suggestions. Proceedings of the IHPST Conference. Rio de Janeiro.
  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Sciencequestionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034
  • Liang, L. L., Chen, S., Chen, X., Kaya, O. N., Adams, A. D., Macklin, M., & Ebenezer, J. (2008). Assessing preservice elementary teachers’ views on the nature of scientific knowledge: A dual response instrument. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9, 1–20.
  • Lin, J., Yen, M., Liang, J., Chiu, M., & Guo, C. (2016). Examining the factors that influence students’ science learning processes and their learning outcomes: 30 years of conceptual change research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2617–2646. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.000600a
  • Matthews, M. R. (2012). Changing the focus: From Nature of Science(NOS) to features of science (FOS). In Advances in Nature of Science Research, 3–26.
  • Mays, J. D. (2013). Novare physical science: A mastery-oriented curriculum. Novare Science & Math.
  • Mbonyiryivuze, A., Yadav, L. L., & Amadalo, M. M. (2022). Physics students’ conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism in nine years basic education in Rwanda. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.83
  • McComas, W. F. (2015). The Nature of Science& the next generation of biology education. The American Biology Teacher, 77(7), 485–491.
  • McComas, W. F., & Nouri, N. (2016). The Nature of Scienceand the next generation science standards: Analysis and critique. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9474-3
  • Ministry of Education (MINEDUC). (2016). Education statistical yearbook. Republic of Rwanda.
  • Munezero, V., Yadav, L. L., & Bugingo, J. B. (2022). Representation of Nature of Sciencein physics textbooks of cycle 4 fundamental schools in Burundi. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 2487–2496. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.4.2487
  • National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
  • Netemeyer, R. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. SAGE.
  • Ogunniyi, M. (2006). Effects of a discursive course on two science teachers’ perceptions of the nature of science. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(1), 93–102.
  • Peters, E. E. (2009). Developing content knowledge in students through explicit teaching of the nature of science: Influences of goal setting and self-monitoring. Science & Education, 21, 881–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9219-1
  • Piliouras, P., Plakitsi, K., Seroglou, F., & Papantoniou, G. (2018). Teaching explicitly and reflecting on elements of nature of science: A discourse-focused professional development program with four fifth-grade teachers. Research in Science Education, 48(9), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9600-4
  • Rana, R. A., Mahmood, N., & Reid, N. (2015). Motivation and science performance: Influence on student learning in science. Science Institute (Lahore), 27(2), 1445–1452.
  • Rwanda Education Board (REB). (2017). Physics learner’s book for Rwandan secondary schools, S5. Ministry of Education in Rwanda.
  • Shi, X. (2021). Using explicit teaching of philosophy to promote understanding of the nature of science: A case study from a Chinese high school. Science & Education, 30(2), 409–440.
  • Stadermann, H. K. E., & Goedhart, M. J. (2020). Secondary school students’ views of Nature of Sciencein quantum physics. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 997–1016.
  • Taylor, S. R. (2001). Solar System evolution: A new perspective. Cambridge University Press.
  • The NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
  • Toma, R. B., Greca, I. M., & Orozco Gómez, M. L. (2019). Attitudes towards science and views of Nature of Scienceamong elementary school students in terms of gender, cultural background, and grade level variables. Research in Science & Technological Education, 37(4), 492–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1561433
  • Torres, J., Moutinho, S., & Vasconcelos, C. (2015). Nature of science, scientific and geoscience models: Examining students and teacher’s views. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 12(4), 3–21.
  • Tsybulsky, D., Dodick, J., & Camhi, J. (2017). The effect of field trips on university research labs on Israeli high school students’ NOS understanding. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1247–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9601-3
  • Uwizeyimana, D., Yadav, L. L., Musengimana, T., & Uwamahoro, J. (2018). The impact of teaching approaches on effective physics learning: An investigation conducted in five Secondary Schools in Rusizi District, Rwanda. Rwandan Journal of Education, 4(2), 4–14.
  • Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Joreskog, K. G. (1974). Intra class reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 25–33.
  • Witucki, A., Beane, W., Pleasants, B., Dai, P., & Rudge, D. W. (2023). An explicit and reflective approach to teaching Nature of Sciencein a course-based undergraduate research experience. Science & Education, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00441-8
  • Yacoubian, H. A. (2021). Students’ views of nature of science: A long-term study. Science & Education, 30, 381–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00179-7
  • Yadav, L. L., & Shrivastava, M. (2007). Teaching and learning of the Nature of Science and technology: A look from a developing country. International Journal of Learning, 14(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v14i02/45191
  • Yenice, N., & Saydam, G. (2010). The views of the 8th-grade students about the nature of scientific knowledge. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5012–5017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.812
  • Yoon, S. Y., Suh, J. K., & Park, S. (2014). Korean students’ perceptions of scientific practices and understanding of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2666–2693. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.928834
  • Zewdie, Z. M. (2014). An investigation of students’ approaches to problem solving in physics courses. International Journal of Chemical and Natural Science, 2(1), 77–89.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.