From vision to enactment: reflections on the practical impact of the Beyond 2000 report

References

• 21st Century Science Project Team. (2003). 21st Century Science – a new flexible model for GCSE science. School Science Review, 85(310), 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Adonis, A., Farr, C., Lindfield, S., Wright, G, Dingwall, R., & Nerlich, B. (2006, October 12). GCSE science equips students for the real world. Letters to the editor. The Times (London).
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., & Hogarth, S. (2006). Evaluation of Twenty First Century Science GCSE. Strand 2. Attitudes to science. Department of Educational Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. (2003). Improving educational research: Toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032009003
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy. From purposes to practices. Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., French, S., Millar, R., Osborne, J., Vinen, W. F., & Wright, P. (2000). Forum: Beyond 2000. Studies in Science Education, 35(1), 167–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260008560162
   Google Scholar
• DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. Chapter 9: Scientific literacy and the new progressivism. Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education (2013). National curriculum in England: Science programmes of study. Department for Education. [https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-science-programmes-of-study].
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J. (2007). Twenty First Century Science pilot. Evaluation co-ordinator’s final report. Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gilland, T. (Ed.) (2006). What is science education for? Academy of Ideas.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2015). The knowledge capital of nations. Education and the economics of growth. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M. & Blair, A. (2006, 11 October). Science elite rejects new GCSE as ‘fit for the pub’, The Times (London). [http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/article1944010.ece].
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, E. D. (1987). Cultural literacy. What every American needs to know. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Homer, M. & Ryder, J. (2014). Measuring the impact of GCSE Twenty First Century Science on progression to postcompulsory science courses. Nuffield Foundation. [https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Nuffield_21CS_%20Final_Report_31_07_14pdf.pdf].
   Google Scholar
• Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S. (2006, October 13). Britain has at last escaped the illusion that salvation lies in mass science. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Layton, D. (1973). Science for the people. George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2006). Twenty First Century Science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2010). Increasing participation in science beyond GCSE: The impact of Twenty First Century Science. School Science Review, 91(337), 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2013). Improving science education: Why assessment matters. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy (pp. 55–68). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., Holman, J., Hunt, A., Lazonby, J., & Milner, B. (2002). 21st Century Science GCSE pilot development. Final report to the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. University of York Science Education Group.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., Holman, J., Hunt, A., Lazonby, J., Milner, B., & Reiss, M. (2001). QCA Key Stage 4 curriculum models project. Final report to the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. University of York Science Education Group.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. King's College.
   Google Scholar
• Ogborn, J. (2002). Ownership and transformation: Teachers using curriculum innovation. Physics Education, 37(2), 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/37/2/307
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M., Hanley, P., & Osborne, J. (2006). Evaluation of Twenty First Century Science GCSE. Strand 3: The teaching of Twenty First Century Science GCSE, and teachers’ and students’ views of the course. University of Southamption School of Education/Department of Education & Professional Studies, King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. A. (1982). Developing the concept of ‘curriculum emphases’ in science education. Science Education, 66(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660209
   Google Scholar
• Rudolph, J. L. (2023). Why we teach science (and why we should). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P., Ametller, J., Hall, K., Leach, J., Lewis, J., & Ryder, J. (2006). Twenty First Century Science evaluation. Students’ understanding of science explanations and ideas about science. Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, R. (2006). Inspiration through expertise. In T. Gilland (Ed.) (2006). What is science education for? (pp. 35–40). Academy of Ideas.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson Report. (1918). Report of the committee appointed by the Prime Minister to enquire into the position of natural science in the educational system of Great Britain. HM Stationery Office. [https://education-uk.org/documents/thomson1918/thomson1918.html].
   Google Scholar
• Twenty First Century Science. (2006). GCSE Science. GCSE Additional Science. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker, J. (2003). The science curriculum: Between ideals and outcomes. In B. J. Fraser, & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, part one (pp. 421–447). Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• van den Akker, J. (2010). Curriculum design research. In T. Plomp, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 37–50). SLO – Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development. https://research.utwente.nl/files/14472302/Introduction_20to_20education_20design_20research.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2010). What counts as evidence of educational achievement? The role of constructs in the pursuit of equity in assessment. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 254–284. doi:10.3102/0091732X09351544
   Google Scholar