154
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Key aspects of successful science fair projects

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Received 11 Sep 2023, Accepted 03 Jun 2024, Published online: 06 Jul 2024

References

  • Abernathy, T. V., & Vineyard, R. N. (2001). Academic competitions in science: What are the rewards for students? The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 74(5), 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650109599206
  • Abiddin, N. Z., Hassan, A., & Ahmad, A. R. (2009). Research student supervision: An approach to good supervisory practice. The Open Education Journal, 2(1), 11–16.
  • Bacovic, M., Andrijasevic, Z., & Pejovic, B. (2022). STEM education and growth in Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(3), 2348–2371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00817-7
  • Batterham, R. (2000). The chance to change: Final report. Department of Industry Science Resources.
  • Campbell, J. R., & Walberg, H. J. (2010). Olympiad studies: Competitions provide alternatives to developing talents that serve national interests. Roeper Review, 33(1), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.530202
  • Czech Academy of Sciences. (n.d.). Otevřená věda (Open Science): Stáže pro studenty (Internships for students). Retreived June 16, 2023, from https://www.otevrenaveda.cz/cs/staze-pro-studenty/
  • Czech Statistical Office. (2021). Sčítání 2021 (Census 2021). Retrieved June 16, 2023, from https://www.scitani.cz/vzdelani#skupina-54263
  • Czerniak, C. M., & Lumpe, A. T. (1996). Predictors of science fair participation using the theory of planned behavior. School Science and Mathematics, 96(7), 355–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb15853.x
  • DeClue, M. E., Johnson, K., Hendrickson, H., & Keck, P. (2000). Stimulate high school science fair participation by connecting with a nearby college. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(5), 608. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p608
  • Dionne, L., Reis, G., Trudel, L., Guillet, G., Kleine, L., & Hancianu, C. (2012). Students’ sources of motivation for participating in science fairs: An exploratory study within the Canada-wide science fair 2008. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(3), 669–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9318-8
  • Fabryová, A., & Janštová, V. (2018). Upper secondary school students’ motivation to participate in research projects. Project-based Education in Science Education XV.
  • Freedman, M. P. (1997). Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(4), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199704)34:4<343::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-R
  • Goodrum, D., Rennie, L. J., & Hackling, M. W. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools: A research report. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs Canberra.
  • Grinnell, F., Dalley, S., & Reisch, J. (2020). High school science fair: Positive and negative outcomes. PLoS One, 15(2), e0229237. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229237
  • Grinnell, F., Dalley, S., Shepherd, K., & Reisch, J. (2018). High school science fair: Student opinions regarding whether participation should be required or optional and why. PLoS One, 13(8), e0202320. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202320
  • Grohnert, T., Gromotka, L., Gast, I., Delnoij, L., & Beausaert, S. (2024). Effective master's thesis supervision–A summative framework for research and practice. Educational Research Review, 42, 100589. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X23000829
  • Haksever, A. M., & Manisali, E. (2000). Assessing supervision requirements of PhD students: The case of construction management and engineering in the UK. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/030437900308616
  • Inoue, N. (2007). Why face a challenge?: The reason behind intrinsically motivated students’ spontaneous choice of challenging tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(3), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.02.002
  • The Jamovi project. (2022). jamovi. (version 2.3) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org/
  • Janštová, V., Jáč, M., & Dvořáková, R. (2015). Faktory motivující žáky středních škol k zájmu o obor biologie a účasti v předmětových soutěžích s biologickou tematikou [Factors motivating secondary school students to study biology and to participate in biological competitions]. e-Pedagogium, 15(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.5507/epd.2015.006
  • Janštová, V., & Novotný, P. (2017). Didaktický výzkum jako součást závěrečných prací studentů učitelství biologie [Pedagogical research as a part of pre-service biology teachers’ theses]. Scientia in educatione, 8(2), 52–69.
  • Janštová, V., Tichá, N., & Novotný, P. (2022). Perception of biological disciplines by upper secondary school students. In Konstantinos Korfiatis & Marcus Grace (Eds.), Current research in biology education: Selected papers from the ERIDOB 2020 conference. Can be the future career choice influenced by high-school students’ experience with the Biology Olympiad? (pp. s. 219–s. 230). Springer.
  • Jaworski, B. A. (2013). The effects of science fairs on students’ knowledge of scientific inquiry and interest in science. 1–54.
  • Karp, A. (2003). Thirty years after: The lives of former winners of mathematical Olympiads. Roeper Review, 25(2), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554204
  • Kobayashi, K. (2007). The significance and importance of participation in the International Biology Olympiad, based on the importance of biological education of Japan. Plant and Cell Physiology, 48(2), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcm005
  • Kuťáková, E., & Janštová, V. (2015). ICERI2015.
  • Lewis, C. C., Schaps, E., & Watson, M. (1995). Beyond the pendulum: Creating challenging and caring schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(7), 547–548.
  • Lim, S. S. L., Cheah, H.-M., & Hor, T. S. A. (2014). Science Olympiads as vehicles for identifying talent in the sciences: The Singapore experience. In L. T. W. Hin & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Communicating science to the public (pp. s. 195–s. 211). Springer Netherlands. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007978-94-017-9097-0_12
  • Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2015). Understanding declining science participation in Australia: A systemic perspective. In E. K. Henriksen, J. Dillon, & J. Ryder (Eds.), Understanding student participation and choice in science and technology education (pp. s. 153–s. 168). Springer Netherlands.
  • Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports. (n.d.). Overview of universities in the Czech Republic: Public universities. Retrieved June 16, 2023, from https://www.msmt.cz/vzdelavani/vysoke-skolstvi/prehled-vysokych-skol-v-cr-3
  • National Pedagogical Institute of the Czech Republic. (n.d.a). Středoškolská odborná činnost: Chci dělat SOČ (Students professional activities: I want to make SPA). Retrieved June 1, 2019, from https://www.soc.cz/chci-delat-soc/
  • National Pedagogical Institute of the Czech Republic. (n.d.b). Středoškolská odborná činnost: Archive minulých ročníků (Students professional activities: Archive of previous years). Retrieved June 1, 2019, from https://www.soc.cz/archiv-minulych-rocniku/
  • Novák, M., Petr, J., & Ditrich, T. (2021). Secondary school students’ ability to work with the tasks designed for biology Olympiad. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 20(5), 827. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.827
  • Oliver, M., & Venville, G. (2011). An exploratory case study of Olympiad Students’ attitudes towards and passion for science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(16), 2295–2322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.550654
  • Ong, K. J., Chou, Y.-C., & Yang, D.-Y. (2019). The impact of science fair on the students’ engagement, capacity, continuity, and motivation towards science learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm.vol9.1.1.2019
  • Palmer, T.-A., Burke, P. F., & Aubusson, P. (2017). Why school students choose and reject science: A study of the factors that students consider when selecting subjects. International Journal of Science Education, 39(6), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1299949
  • PAQ research. (n.d). Mapa vzdělávání. Příběhy vzdělávacího (ne)úspěchu. [Education Map. Stories of educational (failure) success]. https://www.mapavzdelavani.cz/pribehy?ref = paqresearch.cz#faktory
  • Piccinin, S. J. (2000). Graduate student supervision: Resources for supervisors and students (Triannual newsletter). Centre for Development of Teaching and Learning (CDTL). University of Ottawa.
  • Prince, M., & Vigeant, M. (2006). Using inquiry-based activities to promote understanding of critical engineering concepts. Conferences &Exhibition of the American Society of Engineering Education. Conferences &Exhibition of the American Society of Engineering Education. http://www.engconfintl.org/8axabstracts/Session%201B/rees08_submission_5.doc
  • Prokop, P., Prokop, M., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2007). Is biology boring? Student attitudes toward biology. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656105
  • R Core Team. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
  • Roberts, L. D., & Seaman, K. (2018). Good undergraduate dissertation supervision: Perspectives of supervisors and dissertation coordinators. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1412971
  • Rocard, M. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe (European Comission, Directorate-General for Research, Science, Economy and Society, Information and Communication Unit). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf
  • Sahin, A., Gulacar, O., & Stuessy, C. (2015). High school students’ perceptions of the effects of international science Olympiad on their STEM career aspirations and twenty-first century skill development. Research in Science Education, 45(6), 785–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9439-5
  • Salonen, A., Hartikainen-Ahia, A., Hense, J., Scheersoi, A., & Keinonen, T. (2017). Secondary school students’ perceptions of working life skills in science-related careers. International Journal of Science Education, 39(10), 1339–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1330575
  • Schmidt, K. M., & Kelter, P. (2017). Science fairs: A qualitative study of their impact on student science inquiry learning and attitudes toward STEM. Science Educator, 25(2), 126–132.
  • Sellmann, D., & Bogner, F. X. (2013). Effects of a 1-day environmental education intervention on environmental attitudes and connectedness with nature. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(3), 1077–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-012-0155-0
  • Smith, K. N., Jaeger, A. J., & Thomas, D. (2019). “Science Olympiad is Why I’m here”: The influence of an early STEM Program on college and major choice. Research in Science Education, 51(Suppl 1), 1–17.
  • Steegh, A., Höffler, T., Höft, L., & Parchmann, I. (2021). First steps toward gender equity in the chemistry Olympiad: Understanding the role of implicit gender-science stereotypes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(1), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21645
  • Straková, J. (2010). The value-added of studying at multi-year gymnasia in the light of available data sources. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, 46(2), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2010.46.2.01
  • Strgar, J. (2007). Increasing the interest of students in plants. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656102
  • Taylor, J. A., Adams, C. T., Westbrook, A. L., Creasap Gee, J., Spybrook, J. K., Kowalski, S. M., Gardner, A. L., & Bloom, M. (2022). The effect of a student–teacher–scientist partnership program on high school students’ science achievement and attitudes about scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(3), 423–457. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21733
  • Uitto, A., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., & Meisalo, V. (2006). Students’ interest in biology and their out-of-school experiences. Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656029
  • Venville, G., Rennie, L., Hanbury, C., & Longnecker, N. (2013). Scientists reflect on why they chose to study science. Research in Science Education, 43(6), 2207–2233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9352-3
  • Wu-Tien, W. (1996). Growing up in Taiwan: The impact of environmental influences on the math Olympians. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(6), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)86729-8