0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Enhancing students’ reasoning skills by asking students to provide evidence-based explanations in science classrooms: findings from TIMSS 2019

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 18 Jan 2024, Accepted 22 Jul 2024, Published online: 06 Aug 2024

References

  • Adey, P., & Shayer, M. (1990). Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660270309
  • Ajani, O. A. (2022). Exploring the teacher professional development activities: Perspectives of Nigerian high school teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.3
  • Avci, Y. Z., O'Dwyer, L. M., & Lawson, J. (2020). Designing effective professional development for technology integration in schools. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12394
  • Banilower, E., Cohen, K., Pasley, J., & Weiss, I. (2010). Effective science instruction: What does research tell us? (2nd ed.). RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.
  • Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (2010). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. NBER Working Paper No. 15902. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 147–161). Kluwer Academic.
  • Biggers, M., Forbes, C. T., & Zangori, L. (2013). Elementary teachers’ curriculum design and pedagogical reasoning for supporting students’ comparison and evaluation evidence-based explanations. The Elementary School Journal, 114(1), 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1086/670738
  • Borko, H. (2004). PD and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
  • Cabello, V. M., Moreira, P. M., & Morales, P. G. (2021). Elementary students’ reasoning in drawn explanations based on a scientific theory. Education Sciences, 11(10), 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100581
  • Christian, K. B., Kelly, A. M., & Bugallo, M. F. (2021). NGSS-based teacher professional development to implement engineering practices in STEM instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00284-1
  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ PD: Toward better conceptualization and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
  • Ding, L. (2018). Progression trend of scientific reasoning from elementary school to university: A large-scale cross-grade survey among Chinese students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(8), 1479–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9844-0
  • Dolfing, R., Prins, G. T., Bulte, A. M., Pilot, A., & Vermunt, J. D. (2021). Strategies to support teachers’ professional development regarding sense-making in context-based science curricula. Science Education, 105(1), 127–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21603
  • Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. (2008). Teaching scientific inquiry: Recommendations for research and implementation. Sense Publishers.
  • Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
  • Eckert, J. M. (2008). Trends in mathematics and science study (TIMSS): International accountability and implications for science instruction. Research in Comparative and International Education, 3(2), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2008.3.2.202
  • Elliott, M. (1998). School finance and opportunities to learn: Does money well spent enhance students’ achievement? Sociology of Education, 71(3), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673203
  • Furtak, E. M., Hardy, I., Beinbrech, T., Shavleson, R. J., & Shemwell, J. T. (2010). A framework for analyzing evidence-based reasoning in science classroom discourse. Educational Assessment, 15(3-4), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2010.530553
  • Gerard, L. F., Varma, K., Corliss, S. B., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Professional development for technology-enhanced inquiry science. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 408–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311415121
  • Gerber, B. L., Cavallo, A. M. L., & Marek, E. A. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690116971
  • Gess-Newsome, J. (2015). A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 28–42). Routledge.
  • Giere, R. N. (1999). Science without laws. University of Chicago Press.
  • Gillies, R. M., & Khan, A. (2008). The effect of teacher discourse on students’ discourse problem solving and reasoning during cooperative learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(6), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2008.06.001
  • Gillies, R. M., Nichols, K., & Burgh, G. (2011). Promoting problem-solving and reasoning during cooperative inquiry science. Teaching Education, 22(4), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2011.610448
  • Gore, J., & Rosser, B. (2022). Beyond content-focused professional development: Powerful professional learning through genuine learning communities across grades and subjects. Professional Development in Education, 48(2), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1725904
  • Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V., & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361–396. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066003361
  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). PD and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
  • Gutierez, S. B. (2016). Building a classroom-based professional learning community through lesson study: Insight from elementary school science teachers. PD in Education, 42(5), 801–817.
  • Hejnova, E., Eisenmann, P., Cihlár, J., & Pribyl, J. (2018). Relations between scientific reasoning, culture of problem-solving, and pupils’ school performance. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 11(2), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2018.110203
  • Huang, F. L. (2018). Multilevel modeling myths. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000272
  • Huang, B., Jong, M. S. Y., Tu, Y. F., Hwang, G. J., Chai, C. S., & Jiang, M. Y. C. (2022). Trends and exemplary practices of STEM teacher professional development programs in K-12 contexts: A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers & Education, 189, 104577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104577
  • IEA. (2015). 20 years of TIMSS. Boston College.
  • Kelter, J., Peel, A., Bain, C., Anton, G., Dabholkar, S., Horn, M. S., & Wilensky, U. (2021). Constructionist co-design: A dual approach to curriculum and professional development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1043–1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13084
  • Keys, C. W. (1994). The development of scientific reasoning skills in conjunction with collaborative writing assignments; an interpretive study of six ninth-grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1003–1022. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310912
  • Kite, V., Park, S., McCance, K., & Seung, E. (2021). Secondary science teachers’ understandings of the epistemic nature of science practices. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(3), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1808757
  • Klahr, D., Fay, A. L., & Dunbar, K. (1993). Heuristics for scientific experimentation: A developmental study. Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 111–146. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1993.1003
  • Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design into practice. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 12(4), 495–547. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1204_2
  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge University Press.
  • Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Lawson, A. E. (2004). The nature and development of scientific reasoning: A synthetic view. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3224-2
  • Lay, Y. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2016). Availability of school resources and TIMSS grade 8 students’ science achievement; a comparative study between Malaysia and Singapore. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(9), 3065–3080.
  • Lee, I., & Perret, B. (2022, June). Preparing high school teachers to integrate AI methods into STEM classrooms. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 36, No. 11, pp. 12783–12791).
  • Lee, V. I., & Zuze, T. L. (2011). School resources and academic performance in sub-Saharan Africa. Comparative Education Review, 55(3), 369–397. https://doi.org/10.1086/660157
  • Lombrozo, T., & Vasilyeva, N. (2007). Causal explanation. In M. R. Waldmann (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning (pp. 415–432). Oxford University Press.
  • Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press.
  • Luft, J. A., & Hewson, P. W. (2014). Research on teacher PD program in science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, volume II (pp. 889–910). Routledge.
  • Marek, E. A., & Cavallo, A. M. L. (1997). The learning cycle and elementary school science. Heinemann.
  • Marshall, J. C., Smart, J. B., & Alston, D. M. (2017). Inquiry-based instruction: A possible solution to improving student learning of both science concepts and scientific practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(5), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9718-x
  • McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20201
  • Miranda, R. J., & Damico, J. B. (2015). Changes in teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices concerning inquiry-based instruction following a year-long RET-PLC program. Science Educator, 24(1), 23–35.
  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College, and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).
  • The National Renewable Energy Laboratory. (2002). Energy design guidelines for high performance schools. The US Department of Energy.
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.
  • NCES. (2019). The condition of education 2019. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2019144
  • Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105
  • Osborne, J. F., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
  • Park, S. (2020). Reconciliation between the refined consensus model of PCK and extant models for advancing PCK research in science. In A. Hume, R. Cooper, & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers’ knowledge for teaching science (pp. 119–130). Springer.
  • Pedaste, M., Maeots, M., Siiman, L. A., Jong, T. D., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
  • Pella, S. (2015). Pedagogical reasoning and action: Affordances of practice-based teacher PD. Teacher Education Quarterly, 42(3), 81–101.
  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods 2. Sage Publications.
  • Sancar, R., Atal, D., & Deryakulu, D. (2021). A new framework for teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 101, 103305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103305
  • Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345–372. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10130
  • Schneider, M. (2003). Linking school facility conditions to teacher satisfaction and success. National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED480552.pdf
  • Schunk, D. (2008). A markov chain monte carlo algorithm for multiple imputation in large surveys. ASTA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 92(1), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10182-008-0053-6
  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundation of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  • Smets, W., De Neve, D., & Struyven, K. (2022). Responding to students’ learning needs: How secondary education teachers learn to implement differentiated instruction. Educational Action Research, 30(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1848604
  • Thompson, J. J., Hagenah, S., McDonald, S., & Barchenger, C. (2019). Toward a practice-based theory for how professional learning communities engage in the improvement of tools and practices for scientific modeling. Science Education, 103(6), 1423–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21547
  • Thomson, S., Wernert, N., O’Grady, E., & Rodrigues, S. (2017). TIMSS 2015 reporting Australia’s results. Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Unger, K. L., & Tracey, M. W. (2013). Examining the factors of a technology professional development intervention. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25(3), 123–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9070-x
  • van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). PD and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<137::AID-TEA1001>3.0.CO;2-U
  • Watkins, J., Portsmore, M., & Swanson, R. D. (2020). Shifts in elementary teachers’ pedagogical reasoning: Studying teacher learning in an online graduate program in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(1), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20369
  • Wellman, H. M., & Liu, D. (2007). Causal reasoning as informed by the early development of explanations. In A. Gopnik & L. Schulz (Eds.), Causal learning: Psychology, philosophy, and computation (pp. 261–279). Oxford University Press.
  • Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., & Carlson, J. (2010). The relative effects and equity of inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students’ knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 276–301.
  • Woltman, H., Feldstain, A., Mackay, J., & Rocchi, M. (2012). An introduction to hierarchical linear modeling. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 8(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p052
  • Wu, H. K., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Exploring middle school students’ use of inscriptions in project-based science classrooms. Science Education, 90(5), 852–873. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20154
  • Xu, J. (2011). Homework completion at the secondary school level: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 104(3), 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671003636752
  • Yao, J. X., & Guo, Y. Y. (2018). Validity evidence for a learning progression of scientific explanation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21420
  • Zhang, F., Jiang, Y., Ming, H., Ren, Y., Wang, L., & Huang, S. (2020). Family socio-economic status and children’s academic achievement: The different roles of parental academic involvement and subjective social mobility. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12374
  • Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.