Seeking educational quality in the unfolding of classroom discourse: a focus on microtransitions

References

• Aguiar, O.G.F. , E.F. Mortimer, and P. Scott. 2010. “Learning From and Responding to Students’ Questions: The Authoritative and Dialogic Tension.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (2): 174–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, R.J. 1995. Versions of Primary Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R.J. 2001. Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R.J. 2008a. Education for All, The Quality Imperative and the Problem of Pedagogy. London: Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R.J. 2008b. Essays on Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, N.D. 2009. “Negotiating Authority in an Undergraduate Teacher Education Course: A Qualitative Investigation.” Teacher Education Quarterly 36: 99–118.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, C., and D. Myhill. 2004. “Interactive or Inactive? A Consideration of the Nature of Interaction in Whole Class Teaching.” Cambridge Journal of Education 34: 35–49.
   Google Scholar
• Candela, A. 1999. “Students’ Power in Classroom Discourse.” Linguistics and Education 10: 139–63.
   Google Scholar
• Candela, A. 2005. “Students’ Participation as Co-Authoring of School Institutional Practices.” Culture & Psychology 11: 321–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazden, C.B. 2001. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno, J.G. 2006. “Authoritative, Accountable Positioning and Connected, General Knowing: Progressive Themes in Understanding Transfer.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15: 537–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, K., B. Rymes, and J. Larson. 1995. “Script, Counterscript, and Underlife in the Classroom.” Harvard Educational Review 65: 445–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krummheuer, G. 2010. “Representation of the Notion ‘Learning-As-Participation’ in Everyday Situations of Mathematics Classes.” The International Journal on Mathematics Education 43 (1): 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A. 2008. “Changing Classroom Practice Through the English National Literacy Strategy: A Micro-Analytical Perspective.” American Educational Research Journal 45: 701–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A.M. Y. 2007. “What's the Use of ‘Triadic Dialogue’? Activity Theory, Conversation Analysis and Analysis of Pedagogical Practices.” Pedagogies 2: 77–94.
   Google Scholar
• Lipponen, L., and K. Kumpulainen. 2011. “Acting as Accountable Authors: Creating Interactional Spaces for Agency Work in Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (5): 812–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lwin, S.M. , C. Goh, and P. Doyle. 2012. “I’m Going to Split You All Up’: Examining Transitions to Group/Pair Work in Two Primary English Classrooms.” Language and Education 26 (1): 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, S. 2008. “Dialogic Teaching: Discussing Theoretical Contexts and Reviewing Evidence from Classroom Practice.” Language and Education: An International Journal 22: 222–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mameli, C., and L. Molinari. 2011. “Interactive Micro-Processes in Classroom Discourse: Turning Points and Emergent Meanings.” Research Papers in Education. doi:10.1080/02671522.2011.610900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markee, N. 2004. “Zones of Interactional Transition in ESL Classes.” The Modern Language Journal 88 (4): 583–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2008. “Talk and the Development of Reasoning and Understanding.” Human Development 51 (1): 90–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2010. “The Analysis of Classroom Talk: Methods and Methodologies.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 80: 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinari, L., C. Mameli, and A. Gnisci. 2012. “A Sequential Analysis of Classroom Discourse in Italian Primary Schools. The Many Faces of the IRF Pattern.” British Journal of Educational Psychology. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02071.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinari, L., and C. Mameli. 2013. “Process quality of classroom discourse: Pupils' participation and learning opportunities.” Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E.F.H. , and P.H. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Science Classrooms. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, M. 2006. “Lesson Observation and Quality in Primary Education as Contextual Teaching and Learning Processes.” International Journal of Educational Development 26: 246–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P.H.F.F. , E.F.F. Mortimer, and O.F. Aguiar. 2006. “The Tension Between Authoritative and Dialogic Discourse: A Fundamental Characteristic of Meaning Making Interactions in High School Science Lessons.” Science Education 90: 605–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, D., and K. Murakami. 2010. “How Prosody Marks Shifts in Footing in Classroom Discourse.” International Journal of Educational Research 49: 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Sue, G. 2012. “Speaking out of Turn? Taking the Initiative in Teacher-Fronted Classroom Interaction.” Classroom Discourse 3 (1): 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2006. Investigating Classroom Discourse. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1996. “Using the Tool-Kit of Discourse in the Activity of Learning and Teaching.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 3: 74–101.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G.M., and R.M. Arauz. 2006. “Dialogue in the Classroom.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15: 379–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar