Meaning between, in and around words, gestures and postures – multimodal meaning-making in children's classroom discourse

References

• Alexander, R. 2000. Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparison in Primary Education. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Author, R. 2006. “Actions Speak as Loud as Words: A Multimodal Analysis of Boys’ Talk in the Classroom.” English in Education 40 (3): 66–82.
   Google Scholar
• Author, R. 2012. Messing About with Metaphor: Multimodal Aspects to Children's Creative Meaning-Making. Literacy, UKLA. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1741-4369/earlyview.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1988. “Discourse in the Novel.” In The Dialogic Imagination. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, edited by Michael Holquist, 258–422. Austen: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1999. “The Problem of Speech Genres.” In The Discourse Reader, edited by Adam Jaworski and Nikolas Coupland, 121–133. London. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, D. 1976. From Communication to Curriculum. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, J., and C. Jewitt. 2003. “Orchestrating Debate: A Multimodal Analysis of Classroom Interaction.” Reading: Literacy and Language 37 (2): 64–72.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. 2001. Working with Spoken Discourse. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, R. 2004. Language and Creativity: The Art of Common Talk. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis eds. 2000. Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. Melbourne: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coupland, N. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education. 2013. The National Curriculum in England. Department of Education. https//media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/n/national%20curriculum%20consultation%20-%20framework%20document.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flewitt, R. 2005. “Is Every Child's Voice Heard?: Researching the Different Ways 3-Year Old Children Communicate and Make Meaning at Home and in a Pre-School Environment.” Early Years 25(3): 207–222.
   Google Scholar
• Flewitt, Rosie. 2006. “Using Video to Investigate Preschool Classroom Interaction: Education Research Assumptions and Methodological Practices.” Visual Communication 5(1): 25–50.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P. 1999. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Action.” Journal of Pragmatics 32(10): 1489–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E.T. 1959. The Silent Language. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. 1975. Learning How to Mean. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M.A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, R., and G. Kress. 1988. Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyatt, D. 2005. “A Critical Literacy Frame for UK Secondary Education Contexts.” English in Education 39(1): 43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. 1964. “Towards Ethnographies of Communication: The Analysis of Communicative Events.” In Language and Social Context, edited by P. Giglioli. Middlesex: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• James, K., E. Bearne, and E. Alexander. 2004. “Doggy's Dead: Reflecting on a Teacher Research Study About Young Children's Socio-Dramatic Play.” Teacher Development 8(2): 165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A. ed. 1997. Silence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski, A. 2005. “Silence in Institutional and Intercultural Contexts.” Multilingua 24: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2006. Technology, Literacy, and Learning: A Multimodal Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. ed. 2009. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., and G. Kress. 2003. “A Multimodal Approach to Research in Education.” In Language, Literacy and Education: A Reader, edited by S. Goodman, T. Lillis, J. Maybin, and N. Mercer, 277–293. London: Trentham Books/ The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, J. 2007. “Multiliteracies for Academic Purposes: Multimodality in Textbook and Computer-Based Materials in Science at University.” In Advances in Language and Education, edited by A. McCabe, M. O’Donnell and R Whitaker, 103–121. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., T. Charalampos, C. Jewitt and J. Ogborn. 2001. Multimodal Teaching and Learning: The Rhetorics of the Science Classroom. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., C. Jewitt, J. Bourne, A. Franks, J. Hardcastle, K. Jones, and E. Reid. 2005. English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning. Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. and T. Van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kyratzis, A. 2004. “Talk and Interaction Among Children and the Co-construction of Peer Groups and Peer Culture.” Annual Review of Anthropology 33: 625–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, L. 2007. “Representing the Ways of the World: How Children Under Three Start to Use Syntax in Graphic Signs.” Journal of Early Literacy 7(2): 123–152.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, D. 2013. “What is Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies?” Critical Discourse Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2013.813770.
   Google Scholar
• Maybin, J. 1996. “Story Voices: The Use of Reported Speech in 10-12-Year- Olds’ Spontaneous Narratives.” Current Issues in Language and Society 3 (1): 36–48.
   Google Scholar
• Maybin, J. 2004. “Researching Children's Language and Literacy Practices in School.” In Learning to Read Critically in Language and Literacy, edited by A. Goodwin, and A. Stables, 86–106. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maybin, 2007. “The Potential Contribution of Linguistic Ethnography to Vygotskyan Studies of Talk and Learning in Education.” Accessed October 18, http://www.ling-ethnog.org.uk/Maybin_Contr_of_LE_to_Vygotskian_studies.rtf.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 1995. The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2000. Words and Minds: How We Use Language to Think Together. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, S. 2004. Analyzing Multimodal Interaction: A Methodological Framework. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, Kay. ed. 2004. Multimodal Discourse Analysis: Systemic Functional Perspectives. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K. 2007. “Creativity in Events and Practices: A Lens for Understanding Children's Multimodal Texts.” Literacy 41(2): 86–92.
   Google Scholar
• Rampton, B. 2007. “Neo-Hymesian Linguistic Ethnography in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Sociolinguistics. 11(5): 584–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, WM. 2009. “Realizing Vygotsky:s Programme Concerning Language and Thought: Tracking Knowing (Ideas, Conceptions, Beliefs) in Real Time.” Language and Education 23(>4): 295–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saville Troike, M. 1985. “The Place of Silence in an Integrated Theory of Communication.” In Perspectives on Silence, edited by D. Tannen and M. Saville Troike, 3–20. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. 2006. “Co-ordinating Talk, Gesture and Gaze in Re-enactments.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 39(4): 377–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. 1989. Talking Voices Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. 2007. Talking Voices Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Revised 2nd ed. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. 1998. “It was Just Like Magic: A Multimodal Analysis of Children's Writing.” Linguistics and Education 10(3): 273–305.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. 1986. Thought and Language. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 2000. “Modes of Meaning in a Science Activity.” Linguistics and Education 10(3): 307–334.
   Google Scholar
• Zammit, K. 2007. “Popular Culture in the Classroom: Interpreting and Creating Multimodal Texts.” In Advances in Language and Education, edited by A. McCabe, M. O’Donnell and R. Whitteaker, 60–76. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar