Teacher interventions in small group work in secondary mathematics and science lessons

References

• Alexander, R.J. 2001. Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, R.J. 2006. Towards Dialogic Teaching: Rethinking Classroom Talk. Cambridge: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Baines, E., P. Blatchford, and A. Chowne. 2007. “Improving the Effectiveness of Collaborative Group Work in Primary Schools: Effects on Science Attainment.” British Educational Research Journal 33 (5): 663–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, E., P. Blatchford, and P. Kutnick. 2003. “Changes in Grouping Practices Over Primary and Secondary School.” International Journal of Educational Research 39 (1): 9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., S. Hogarth, F. Lubben, B. Campbell, and A. Robinson. 2010. “Talking Science: The Research Evidence on the Use of Small Group Discussions in Science Teaching.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (1): 69–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatchford, P., P. Kutnick, E. Baines, and M. Galton. 2003. “Toward a Social Pedagogy of Classroom Group Work.” International Journal of Educational Research 39 (1–2): 153–172.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, M.M. 2004. “Adapting Teacher Interventions to Student Needs During Cooperative Learning: How to Improve Student Problem Solving and Time On-Task.” American Educational Research Journal 41 (2): 365–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, E.G. 1994. “Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups.” Review of Educational Research 64 (1): 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, H. 2004. “Activity Theory, Discourse and Bernstein.” Educational Review 56 (2): 121–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, A. 2010. Being an Expert Professional Practitioner: The Relational Turn in Expertise. Vol. 3. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., and N. Mercer. 1987. Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, M.L., N.M. Webb, A.G. Chan, M. Ing, D. Freund, and D. Battey. 2009. “Teacher Questioning to Elicit Students' Mathematical Thinking in Elementary School Classrooms.” Journal of Teacher Education 60 (4): 380–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galton, M., and L. Hargreaves. 2009. “Group Work: Still a Neglected Art?” Cambridge Journal of Education 39 (1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Galton, M., L. Hargreaves, C. Comber, D. Wall, and T. Pell. 1999. Inside the Primary Classroom: 20 Years On. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R.M. 2008. “The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Junior High School Students' Behaviours, Discourse and Learning During a Science-Based Learning Activity.” School Psychology International 29 (3): 328–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies, R.M., and A. Khan. 2008. “The Effects of Teacher Discourse on Students' Discourse, Problem-Solving and Reasoning During Cooperative Learning.” International Journal of Educational Research 47 (6): 323–340.
   Google Scholar
• Henningsen, M., and M.K. Stein. 1997. “Mathematical Tasks and Student Cognition: Classroom-Based Factors that Support and Inhibit High-Level Mathematical Thinking and Reasoning.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 28: 524–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, R. 2008. “Ownership in Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective on Pupil Engagement, Collaboration and Agency in the Classroom.” Unpublished PhD diss., University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C. 2010. Peer Groups and Children's Development. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., and M. Abedin. 2013. “Classroom Dialogue: A Systematic Review Across Four Decades of Research.” Cambridge Journal of Education 43 (3): 325–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., S. Luthman, K. Ruthven, N. Mercer, R. Hofmann, S. Ilie, and P. Guardia. 2015. “Rational Number and Proportional Reasoning in Early Secondary School: Towards Principled Improvement in Mathematics.” Research in Mathematics Education 17 (1): 38–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, C., A. Tolmie, V. Duchak-Tanner, and C. Rattray. 2000. “Hypothesis Testing in Science: Group Consensus and the Acquisition of Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge.” Learning and Instruction 10 (4): 361–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyriacou, C., and J. Issitt. 2008. What Characterises Effective Teacher-Initiated Teacher-Pupil Dialogue to Promote Conceptual Understanding in Mathematics Lessons in England in Key Stages 2 and 3: A Systematic Review. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, K., and C. Howe. 2010. Educational Dialogues: Understanding and Promoting Productive Interaction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McHoul, A. 1990. “The Organization of Repair in Classroom Talk.” Language in Society 19 (3): 349–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloth, M.S., and P.D. Deering. 1999. “The Role of the Teacher in Promoting Cognitive Processing During Collaborative Learning.” In Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, edited by A. O'Donnell and A. King, 235–255. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 1995. The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., L. Dawes, and J.K. Staarman. 2009. “Dialogic Teaching in the Primary Science Classroom.” Language and Education 23 (4): 353–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., L. Dawes, R. Wegerif, and C. Sams. 2004. “Reasoning as a Scientist: Ways of Helping Children to Use Language to Learn Science.” British Educational Research Journal 30 (3): 359–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and C. Howe. 2012. “Explaining the Dialogic Processes of Teaching and Learning: The Value and Potential of Sociocultural Theory.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 1 (1): 12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., and K. Littleton. 2007. Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E.F., and P.H. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Science Classrooms. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D. 2006. “Talk, Talk, Talk: Teaching and Learning in Whole Class Discourse.” Research Papers in Education 21 (1): 19–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Simon, A. Christodoulou, C. Howell-Richardson, and K. Richardson. 2013. “Learning to Argue: A Study of Four Schools and Their Attempt to Develop the Use of Argumentation as a Common Instructional Practice and its Impact on Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (3): 315–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainio, A.P., and R. Hofmann. 2015. “Transformations in Teachers' Discourse About Their Students During a School-Led Pedagogic Intervention.” The European Journal of Social and Behavioural Sciences 13 (2): 1815–1829.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Drummond, S., and N. Mercer. 2003. “Scaffolding the Development of Effective Collaboration and Learning.” International Journal of Educational Research 39 (1): 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K. 2005. “Improving the Development and Warranting of Good Practice in Teaching.” Cambridge Journal of Education 35 (3): 407–426.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K., and R. Hofmann. 2013. “Chance by Design: Devising an Introductory Probability Module for Implementation at Scale in English Early-Secondary Education.” ZDM 45 (3): 409–423.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K., R. Hofmann, C. Howe, S. Luthman, N. Mercer, and K. Taber. 2011. “The epiSTEMe Pedagogical Approach: Essentials, Rationales and Challenges.” Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics 31 (2): 131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K., R. Hofmann, and N. Mercer. 2011. “A Dialogic Approach to Plenary Problem Synthesis.” In Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, edited by B. Ubuz, Vol. 4, 81–88. Ankara: PME.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, K., N. Mercer, K. Taber, P. Guardia, R. Hofmann, S. Ilie, S. Luthman & F. Riga (forthcoming). “A research-informed dialogic-teaching approach to early secondary-school mathematics and science: the pedagogical design and field trial of the epiSTEMe intervention.” Research Papers in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, P.H., E.F. Mortimer, and O.G. Aguiar. 2006. “The Tension Between Authoritative and Dialogic Discourse: A Fundamental Characteristic of Meaning Making Interactions in High School Science Lessons.” Science Education 90 (4): 605–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J.M., and M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R.E. 2009. “Cooperative Learning.” In International Encyclopedia of Education, edited by G. McCulloch and D. Crook, 161–178. Abington: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K., K. Ruthven, C. Howe, N. Mercer, F. Riga, R. Hofmann, and S. Luthman. 2015. “Developing a Research-Informed Teaching Module for Learning About Electrical Circuits at Lower Secondary School Level: Supporting Personal Learning About Science and the Nature of Science.” In Cases on Research-Based Teaching Methods in Science Education, edited by E. de Silva, 122–156. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N.M., M.L. Franke, T. De, A.G. Chan, D. Freund, P. Shein, and D.K. Melkonian. 2009. “ ‘Explain to Your Partner’: Teachers' Instructional Practices and Students' Dialogue in Small Groups.” Cambridge Journal of Education 39 (1): 49–70.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N.M., K.M. Nemer, and M. Ing. 2006. “Small-Group Reflections: Parallels Between Teacher Discourse and Student Behavior in Peer-Directed Groups.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (1): 63–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar