Processes of becoming-writer: thinking with a situated, relational and nomadic analysis to literacy research

References

• Alvermann, D. 2000. Researching Libraries, Literacies and Lives: A Rhizoanalysis. In Working the Ruins, edited by E. A.St. Pierre W. Pillow, 114–129. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N. 2000. “Alternative Models of Writing Development.” In Perspectives on Writing: Research, Theory, and Practice, edited by R. Indrisiano J. Squire, 90–111. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., M. Hamilton, and R Ivanic, eds. 2000. Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bearne, E. 2003. “Rethinking Literacy: Communication, Representation and Text.” Reading 37(3): 98–103.
   Google Scholar
• Bearne, E. 2009. “Multimodality, Literacy and Texts: Developing a Discourse.” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 9(2): 156–187.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2004. “The Force of Things: Steps Towards an Ecology of Matter.” Political Theory 32(3), 347–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, K., L. Evensen, and R. Thygesen 2016. “The Wheel of Writing: A Model of the Writing Domain for the Teaching and Assessing of Writing as a Key Competency.” The Curriculum Journal online, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björkvall, A., and C. Engblom 2010. “Young Children’s Exploration of Semiotic Resources During Unofficial Computer Activities in the Classroom.” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 10(3): 271–293.
   Google Scholar
• Boler, M. 1997 “Taming the Labile Other.” In Philosophy of Education Society 1997, edited by S. Laird, 416–425. Champaign, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, D., and K. Clinton 2002. “Limits of the Local: Expanding Perspectives on Literacy as a Social Practice.” Journal of Literacy Research 34(3): 337–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campton-Lilly, C. 2014. “‘Go be a Writer’: Intra-Activity with Materials, Time and Space in Literacy Learning.” Written Communication 31(4): 371–403.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D. 2013. “Lost in Data Space: Using Nomadic Analysis to Perform Social Science.” In Deleuze and Research Methodologies, edited by Coleman, and Ringrose. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B. 2004. “Introduction: Poststructuralist Lines of Flight in Australia.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 17(1): 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1990. The Logic of Sense (M. Lester C. Stivale, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. ( Original work published 1969)
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1995. Negotiations: 1972-1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press. ( Original work published 1990)
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 2004. Difference and Repetition. London: Continuum International Publishing Group. ( Original work published 1994)
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. ( Original work published 1980)
   Google Scholar
• Dufresne, T. 2006. “Exploring the Processes in Becoming Biliterate: The Roles of Resistance to Learning and Affect.” International Journal of Learning 12(8): 347–354.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H. 1997. Writing Superheroes: Contemporary Childhood, Popular Culture, and Classroom Literacy. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H. 2008. “Staying in the (curricular) Lines: Practice Constraints and Possibilities in Childhood Writing.” Written Communication 25(1): 119–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H. 2010. “Writing Childhoods Under Construction: Re-visioning ‘Copying’ in Early Childhood.” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 10(1): 7–31.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., ed. 2005. Literacy Moves on: Popular Culture, New Technologies and Critical Literacy in the Elementary Classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Fast, C. 2007. “Sju barn lär sig läsa och skriva: Familjeliv och populärkultur i möte med förskola och skola ” [Seven Children Learn to Read and Write: Family Life and Popular Culture in Contact With Preschool and Primary School]. Dissertation, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Flewitt, R. 2011. “Bringing Ethnography to a Multimodal Investigation of Early Literacy in a Digital Age.” Qualitative Research 11(3): 293–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 1996. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses, 2nd ed. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, M., M. Wedsberg and U. Wendéus 2014. En läsande klass: träna läsförståelse [A Reading Class: Practicing Reading Comprehension]. Stockholm: Insamlingsstiftelsen En läsande klass.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2000. “Action and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32(10): 1489–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagood, M. C. 2003. “New Media and Online Literacies: No Age Left Behind.” Reading Research Quarterly 38(3): 387–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagood, M. C. 2004. “A Rhizomatic Cartography of Adolescents, Popular Culture, and Constructions of Self.” In Spatializing Literacy Research and Practice, edited by K. Leander M. Sheehy, 143–160. New York, NY: P. Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Hagood, M. C. 2009. “Mapping a Rhizome of 21st Century Language Arts: Travel Plans for Research and Practice.” Language Arts 87(1): 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsmar, N., and K. Jönsson 2010. “Lärandets Vem, Varför, Vad Och Hur I Förskolan Och Grundskolans Tidiga År [The Who, Why, and How of Learning in Early Childhood School].” In Perspektiv på barndom och barns lärande: En kunskapsöversikt om lärande i förskolan och grundskolans tidigare år [Perspectives on Childhood and Learning: A Survey of Learning in Preschool and Early Years Education], 121–173. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansson, C. 2011. “Images of Writing and the Writing Child.” Nordisk Barnehageforskning 4(2): 41–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hermansson, C. 2013. “Nomadic Writing: Exploring Processes of Writing in Early Childhood Education.” Dissertation, Karlstad University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A., and R. Haworth 2009 “Affective Literacies.” In Multiple Literacies Theory: A Deleuzian Perspective, edited by D. Masny D. R. Cole. Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Hohti, R. 2016. “Children Writing Ethnography: Children’s Perspectives and Nomadic Thinking in Researching School Classrooms,” Ethnography and Education 11(1): 74–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanîc, R. 2004. “Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write.” Language and Education 18(3): 220–245.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation, edited by G. H., Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Juzwik, M. M., S. Curcic, K. Wolbers, K. D. Moxley, L. M. Dimling, and R. K. Shankland 2006. “Writing into the 21st Century: An Overview of Research on Writing, 1999 to 2004.” Written Communication 23(4): 451–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamberelis, G., and L. de la Luna 2004. “Children’s Writing: How Textual Forms, Contextual Forces, and Textual Politics Co-Emerge.” In What Writing Does and How it Does it: An Introduction to Analyzing Texts and Textual Practices, edited by C. Bazerman P. A. Prior, 239–278. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kjällander, S., and F. Moinain 2014 “Digital Tablets and Applications in Preschool: Preschoolers’ Creative Transformation of Didactic Design.” Designs for Learning 7(1): 10–33.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 1997. Before Writing: Rethinking the Paths to Literacy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2000. Multimodality. In Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures, edited by B. Cope M. Kalantzis, 182–202. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., C. Jewitt, and C. Tsatsarelis 2000. “Knowledge, Identity, Pedagogy: Pedagogic Discourse and the Representational Environments of Education in Late Modernity.” Linguistics and Education 11(1): 7–30.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K., and G. Boldt. 2013. “Rereading “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies”. Bodies, Texts, and Emergence.” Journal of literacy research 45(1): 22–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, K., and D. Rowe 2006. “Mapping Literacy Spaces in Motion: A Rhizomatic Analysis of a Classroom Literacy Performance.” Reading Research Quarterly 41(4): 428–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenz Taguchi, H. 2010. Going Beyond the Theory/Practice Divide in Early Childhood Education: Introducing an Intra-Active Pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Liberg, C., K. Hyltenstam, M. Myrberg, C. Frykholm, M. Hjort, G. Z. Nordström, et al. 2007. Att läsa och skriva [To Read and Write]. Stockholm: The Swedish National Agency for School Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, I. 2008. God skrivutveckling: Kartläggning och övningar [Developing Writing Skills Successfully: Mapping and Exercises]. Stockholm: Natur och kultur.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. 1990. “The Externalized Retina: Selection and Mathematization in the Visual Documentation of Objects and Life Sciences.” In Representation in Scientific Practice, edited by M. Lynch S. Woolgar, 153–186. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. 2003. “One-Way Traffic? Connections between Literacy Practices at Home and in the Nursery.” British Educational Research Journal 29(3): 369–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. 2005. “Young Children’s Literacy Practices in a Virtual World: Establishing an Online Interaction Order.” Reading Research Quarterly 46(2): 101–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masny, D. 2006. “Learning and Creative Processes: A Poststructural Perspective on Language and Multiple Literacies.” International Journal of Learning 12(5): 147–155.
   Google Scholar
• Masny, D. 2009. “Literacies as Becoming: A Child’s Conceptualization of Writing Systems.” In Multiple Literacies Theory: A Deleuzian Perspective, edited by D. Masny D. R. Cole, 13–30. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Masny, D. 2013. “Rhizoanalytic Pathways in Qualitative Research Qualitative Inquiry.” Qualitative Inquiry 19(5): 339–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masny, D., and D. R. Cole 2012. Mapping Multiple Literacies: An Introduction to Deleuzian Literacy Studies. New York, NY: Continuum International Pub. Group.
   Google Scholar
• Melander, H. 2009. “Trajectories of Learning: Embodied Interaction in Change.” Dissertation, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2007. “Commentary: Transcript Variations and the Indexicality of Transcribing Practices.” Discourse Studies 9(6): 809–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New London Group. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66(1): 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, L. 2013. “Taking Children’s Questions Seriously: The Need for Creative Thoughts.” Global Studies of Childhood 3(3): 230–253.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., and J. Rowsell 2005. Literacy and Education: The New Literacies in the Classroom. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, D. W. 2003. “The Nature of Young Children’s Authoring.” In Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy, edited by N. Hall J. Larson J. Marsh, 258–270. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, D. W. 2008. “Social Contracts for Writing: Negotiating Shared Understandings About Text in the Preschool Years.” Reading Research Quarterly 43(1): 66–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C. 2015. Meningsskapande undervisningssammanhang [Meaning Making Educational Settings]. In Läslyftet: Läsa och skriva i alla ämnen [The Reading program: Read and Write in All Subjects]. Accessed 22 January 2016. http://lasochskrivportalen.skolverket.se
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, K., and B. Fecho 2000. “Society’s Child: Social Context and Writing Development.” Educational Psychologist 35(1): 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semetsky, I. 2004. “The Role of Intuition in Thinking and Learning: Deleuze and the Pragmatic Legacy.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 36(4): 433–454.
   Google Scholar
• Semetsky, I. 2008. “Deleuze, Education and Becoming.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 40(3): 453–455.
   Google Scholar
• Smagorinsky, P. 2008. “The Method Section as Conceptual Epicenter in Constructing Social Science Research Reports.” Written Communication 25(3): 389–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, B. 1984. Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. 2003. “What’s ‘new’ in New Literacy Studies? Critical Approaches to Literacy in Theory and Practice.” Literacy, Education and Development 5(2): 1–10. Accessed 20 May 2015. http://www.tc.columbia.edu/cice/articles/b5/52.html
   Google Scholar
• Tjernberg, C. 2013. “Success Factors in Teaching Reading and Writing: A Praxis-Oriented Study Based on School Practices.” Dissertation, Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotskij, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar