‘My brain hurts:’ incorporating learner interests into the classroom

References

• Barron, B. 2006. “Interest and Self-sustained Learning as Catalysts of Development: A Learning Ecology Perspective.” Human Development 49(4): 193–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. C., and E. Tan. 2009. “Funds of Knowledge and Discourses and Hybrid Space.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46(1): 50–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouillion, L. M., and L. M. Gomez. 2001. “Connecting School and Community with Science Learning: Real World Problems and School-Community Partnerships as Contextual Scaffolds.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 38(8): 878–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, C. 2016. “Navigating Competing Demands in ESL Pre-Service Teacher Training.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL), Orlando, FL, April 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cunha Jr F. R. D., C. van Kruistum, and B. van Oers. 2016. “Teachers and Facebook: Using Online Groups to Improve Students’ Communication and Engagement in Education.” Communication Teacher 30(4): 228–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., and J. Bransford. 2007. Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and Be Able to Do. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Duff, P. 2001. “Language, Literacy, Content and (Pop) Culture: Challenges for ESL Students in Mainstream Courses.” Canadian Modern Language Review 58(1): 103–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H. 1997. Writing Superheroes: Contemporary Childhood, Popular Culture, and Classroom Literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gritter, K., K. Schoon-Tanis, and M. Althoff. 2014. Can Pop Culture and Shakespeare Exist in the Same Classroom?: Using Student Interest to Bring Complex Texts to Life. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K., B. Rymes, and J. Larson. 1995. “Script, Counterscript, and Underlife in the Classroom: James Brown versus Brown v. Board of Education.” Harvard Educational Review 65(3): 445–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D., and R. Kanevsky. 1992. “Ninja Turtles and Other Superheros: A Case Study of One Literacy Learner.” Linguistics and Education 4(1): 59–105.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. L. 2009. Beats, Rhymes, and Classroom Life: Hip-Hop Pedagogy and the Politics of Identity. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ito, M., K. Gutiérrez, S. Livingstone, B. Penuel, J. Rhodes, K. Salen, J. Schor, J. Sefton-Green, and S. C. Watkins. 2013. Connected Learning: An Agenda for Research and Design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 1988. “On the Sequential Organization of Troubles-Talk in Ordinary Conversation.” Social Problems 35(4): 418–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by G. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Krapp, A., S. Hidi, and K. A. Renninger. 1992. “Interest, Learning, and Development.” In The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, edited by K. Renninger, S. Hidi, A. Krapp, and A. Renninger, 3–25. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. 2002. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35(3): 277–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. D. 1993. Signifying as a Scaffold for Literary Interpretation: The Pedagogical Implications of an African American Discourse Genre. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979. Learning Lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moll, L. C., C. Amanti, D. Neff, and N. González. 1992. “Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms.” Theory into Practice 31(2): 132–141.
   Google Scholar
• Morrell, E. 2002. “Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Popular Culture: Literacy Development among Urban Youth.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 46(1): 72–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, D., R. Springs, and D. Stith. 2001. “Engaging At-Risk High School Students: Literacy Learning in a High School Literacy Lab.” In Constructions of Literacy: Studies of Teaching and Learning in and out of Secondary Schools, edited by E. B. Moje and D. G. O'Brien, 105–123. Mahawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A. 1998. “What are the Roles of Individual Interest, Task Difficulty, and Gender in Student Comprehension ?” In Interest and Learning: Proceedings of the Secon Conference on Interest and Gender, edited by L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, and J. Baumert, 228–238. Kiel, Germany: IPN.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A. 2000. “Individual Interest and its Implications for Understanding Intrinsic Motivation.” In Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance, edited by C. Sansone and J. M. Harackiewicz, 373–404. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, K. 2006. “‘Being the Teacher’: Identity and Classroom Conversation.” Applied Linguistics 27(1): 51–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rymes, B. 2003. “Eliciting Narratives: Drawing Attention to the Margins of Classroom Talk.” Research in the Teaching of English 37(3): 380–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rymes, B. 2004. “Contrasting Zones of Comfortable Competence: Popular Culture in a Phonics Lesson.” Linguistics and Education 14(3): 321–335.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, D. S. 2014. “Web 2.0 Tools and Academic Literacy Development in a US Urban School: A Case Study of a Second-Grade English Language Learner.” Language and Education 28(1): 68–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. 1993. Framing in Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ten Have, P. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. 1996. Interaction in the Language Curriculum: Awareness, Autonomy & Authenticity. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2002. “Construction or Obstruction: Teacher Talk and Learner Involvement in the EFL Classroom.” Language Teaching Research 6(1): 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2011. “Learner Initiatives and Learning Opportunities.” Classroom Discourse 2(2): 201–218.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2013. “Managing the Competing Voices in the Language Classroom.” Discourse Processes 50(5): 316–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2014. “Turn Allocation and Context: Broadening Participation in the Second Language Classroom.” Discourse in Context: Contemporary Applied Linguistics 3: 301–320.
   Google Scholar
• Wortham, S. 2006. Learning Identity: The Joint Emergence of Social Identification and Academic Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuengler, J. 2004. “Jackie Chan drinks Mountain Dew: Constructing Cultural Models of Citizenship.” Linguistics and Education 14(3): 277–303.
   Google Scholar