Visual and verbal intersections in picture books – multimodal assessment for middle years students

References

• Adoniou, M. 2014. “Drawing Conclusions: What Purpose Do Children’s Drawings Serve?” Australian Art Education 36 (1): 84.
   Google Scholar
• Arizpe, E., and M. Styles. 2016. Children Reading Picturebooks: Interpreting Visual Texts. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). 2016. The Australian Curriculum: English v8.0. http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). 2019. Program of Research: Key Findings from Four International Comparative Studies: British Columbia Curriculum; Finnish National Core Curriculum; Singapore Curriculum and New Zealand Curriculum. Retrieved from Melbourne, Australia. https://australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources-and-publications/publications/program-of-research-2017-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Autodesk. 2016. 123D Sculpt+: Autodesk. http://www.123dapp.com/sculptplus.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, J. A. 2008. Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bearne, E. 2003. “Rethinking Literacy: Communication, Representation and Text.” Literacy 37 (3): 98–103. doi:10.1046/j.0034-0472.2003.03703002.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., C. Jewitt, S. Diamantopoulou, G. Kress, and D. Mavers. 2012. “Using a Social Semiotic Approach to Multimodality: Researching Learning in Schools, Museums and Hospitals.” National Centre for Research Methods (NCRM) Working Paper 01/12. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2258/4/NCRM_working_paper_0112.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Botelho, M. J., J. Kerekes, E. E. Jang, and S. S. Peterson. 2014. “Assessing Multiliteracies: Mismatches and Opportunities.” Language and Literacy 16 (1): 1–20. doi:10.20360/G21G6W.
   Google Scholar
• Callow, J. 2008. “Show Me: Principles for Assessing Students’ Visual Literacy.” The Reading Teacher 61 (8): 616–626. doi:10.1598/RT.61.8.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callow, J. 2013. The Shape of Text to Come: How Image and Text Work. Newtown: Primary English Teaching Association Australia (PETAA).
   Google Scholar
• Callow, J. 2017. “Nobody Spoke like I Did”: Picture Books, Critical Literacy, and Global Contexts.” The Reading Teacher 71 (2): 231–237. doi:10.1002/trtr.1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callow, J. 2018. “Classroom Assessment and Pictures Books – Strategies for Assessing How Students Interpret Multimodal Texts.” Australian Journal of Language & Literacy 18 (1): 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, F. F. 2013. “Social Semiotics and Literacy: A Case Study about the Social Meanings Constructed by Ads of a Children’s Magazine.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 36: 169–180.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, A. 1994. Tell Me: Children, Reading & Talk (Australian ed.). Newtown: Primary English Teaching Association in association with the Thimble Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, E., and L. Unsworth. 2011. “Image–Language Interaction in Online Reading Environments: Challenges for Students’ Reading Comprehension.” Australian Educational Researcher 38 (2): 181–202. doi:10.1007/s13384-011-0023-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. 2000. Running Records: For Classroom Teachers. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Common Core Standards Initiative. 2012. Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/.
   Google Scholar
• Crew, G., and S. Woolman. 1997. The Watertower. Flinders Park: Era Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crew, G., and S. Woolman. 2005. Beneath the Surface. Sydney: Hodder Headline Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, A., and L. Unsworth. 2011. “Analysis and Comprehension of Multimodal Texts.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 34 (1): 61–80.
   Google Scholar
• Godhe, A.-L. 2019. “Digital Literacies or Digital Competence: Conceptualizations in Nordic Curricula.” Media and Communication 7 (2): 25–35. doi:10.17645/mac.v7i2.1888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London, UK: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G. E. 2013. “Designing Assessments: A Multiliteracies Approach.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 56 (8): 623–626. doi:10.1002/JAAL.189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, P., and P. Costello. 2005. “Principles for Literacy Assessment.” Reading Research Quarterly 40 (2): 256–267. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.2.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., B. Cope, and A. Harvey. 2003. “Assessing Multiliteracies and the New Basics.” Assessment in Education 10 (1): 15–26. doi:10.1080/09695940301692.
   Google Scholar
• Khajavi, J. 2011. “Decoding the Real: A Multimodal Social Semiotic Analysis of Reality in Animated Documentary.” Animation Studies 6: 46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kimber, K., and C. M. Wyatt-Smith. 2009. “Valued Knowledges and Core Capacities for Digital Learners: Claiming Spaces for Quality Assessment.” In Assessing New Literacies: Perspectives from the Classroom, edited by A. Burke and R. F. Hammett, 132–156. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Koss, M. D. 2015. “Diversity in Contemporary Picturebooks: A Content Analysis.” Journal of Children’s Literature 41 (1): 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. Van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Macken-Horarik, M. 2016. “Building a Metalanguage for Interpreting Multimodal Literature: Insights from Systemic Functional Semiotics in Two Case Study Classrooms.” English in Australia 51 (2): 85–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, N., and N. Veresov. 2013. “How Drawing Can Support Writing Acquisition: Text Construction in Early Writing from a Vygotskian Perspective.” Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 38 (4): 22–29. doi:10.1177/183693911303800404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantei, J., and L. Kervin. 2015. “Examining the Interpretations Children Share from Their Reading of an Almost Wordless Picture Book during Independent Reading Time.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 38: 183–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, P., R. Martens, M. H. Doyle, J. Loomis, and S. Aghalarov. 2012. “Learning from Picturebooks: Reading and Writing Multimodally in First Grade.” The Reading Teacher 66 (4): 285–294. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., and S. B. Merriam. 2009. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K. A., and B. Exley. 2014. “Narrative and Multimodality in English Language Arts Curricula: A Tale of Two Nations.” Language Arts 92 (2): 136–143.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K. A., and L. Unsworth. 2017. “Multimodal Literacy.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, edited by G. W. Noblit. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-232. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.232.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, K. A., and L. Unsworth. 2018. “iPad Animations: Powerful Multimodal Practices for Adolescent Literacy and Emotional Language.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 61 (6): 609–620. doi:10.1002/jaal.717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New London Group. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Educational Review 66 (1): 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newby, P. 2010. Research Methods for Education. Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, M. 1994. The Language of Displayed Art. London: Leicester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, C. 2018. “Multimodal Analysis of Picturebooks.” In The Routledge Companion to Picturebooks, edited by B. Kümmerling-Meibauer, 420–428. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, C., and J. R. Martin. 2011. “Intermodal Complementarity: Modelling Affordances across Image and Verbiage in Children’s Picture Books.” In Studies in Functional Linguistics and Discourse Analysis, edited by F. Yan, 132–158. Beijing: Education Press of China.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, C., J. R. Martin, and L. Unsworth. 2012. Reading Visual Narratives: Image Analysis of Children’s Picture Books. Sheffield, South Yorkshire; Oakville, CT: Equinox Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Pantaleo, S. 2012. “Exploring Grade 7 Students’ Responses to Shaun Tan’s the Red Tree.” Children’s Literature in Education 43 (1): 51–71. doi:10.1007/s10583-011-9156-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantaleo, S. 2014. “Exploring the Artwork in Picturebooks with Middle Years Students.” Journal of Children’s Literature 40 (1): 15–26.
   Google Scholar
• Pantaleo, S. 2015. “Language, Literacy and Visual Texts.” English in Education 49 (2): 113–129. doi:10.1111/eie.12053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantaleo, S. 2016. “Primary Students’ Understanding and Appreciation of the Artwork in Picturebooks.” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 16 (2): 228–255. doi:10.1177/1468798415569816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papen, U. 2019. “Using Picture Books to Develop Critical Visual Literacy in Primary Schools: Challenges of a Dialogic Approach.” Literacy 53 (3). doi:10.1111/lit.12197.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., and J. V. Hoffman. 2004. “Reading Assessments in Kindergarten through Third Grade: Findings from the Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.” The Elementary School Journal 105 (2): 199–217. doi:10.1086/428865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranker, J. 2014. “The Role of Semiotic Resource Complexes in Emergent Multimodal Reading Processes: Insights from a Young Student’s Reading of a Comic Book.” Australian Journal of Language & Literacy 37 (3): 151–160.
   Google Scholar
• Rankine, A., and J. Callow. 2017. “‘It’s All Lighted up, Because This Is a Happy Ending’ –Children’s Critical Literacy Responses to Words and Pictures.” SCAN 36 (4): 46–54.
   Google Scholar
• Seely Flint, A., L. Kitson, K. Lowe, and K. Shaw. 2014. Literacy in Australia: Pedagogies for Engagement. Milton: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sendak, M. 1963. Where the Wild Things Are. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. 2014. Reading the Visual: An Introduction to Teaching Multimodal Literacy. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. 2015. “Paths to Interpretation: Developing Students’ Interpretive Repertoires.” Language and Literacy 17 (3): 118–133. doi:10.20360/G2459V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, K. G. 2018. “What’s Trending in Children’s Literature and Why It Matters.” Language Arts 95 (5): 287–298.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A., and M. Walsh. 2015. “Children’s Literature in the Digital World: How Does Multimodality Support Affective, Aesthetic and Critical Response to Narrative?” English Teaching: Practice & Critique 14 (1): 28–43. doi:10.1108/ETPC-12-2014-0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipe, L. R. 2008a. Storytime: Young Children’s Literary Understanding in the Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sipe, L. R. 2008b. “Young Children’s Visual Meaning Making in Response to Picturebooks.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching Literacy through the Communicative and Visual Arts, Volume II: A Project of the International Reading Association, edited by J. Flood, S. Brice Heath, and L. Diane , 381–391. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, M. M. 1982. Learning to Read. London: Bodley Head.
   Google Scholar
• Thibaut, P., and J. S. Curwood. 2018. “Multiliteracies in Practice: Integrating Multimodal Production across the Curriculum.” Theory into Practice 57 (1): 48–55. doi:10.1080/00405841.2017.1392202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L. 2006. “Image/Text Relations and Intersemiosis: Towards Multimodal Text Description for Multiliteracies Education.” Paper presented at the 33rd International Systemic Functional Congress Proceedings. São Paulo: PUC.
   Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L., and M. Macken-Horarik. 2015. “Interpretive Responses to Images in Picture Books by Primary and Secondary School Students: Exploring Curriculum Expectations of a ‘Visual Grammatics’.” English in Education 49 (1): 56–79. doi:10.1111/eie.12047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. 2005. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wessel-Powell, C., T. Kargin, and K. E. Wohlwend. 2016. “Enriching and Assessing Young Children’s Multimodal Storytelling.” The Reading Teacher 70 (2): 167–178. doi:10.1002/trtr.1491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. 2014. “Learning from the Text Talk Experiences of Years 5 and 6 Students Discussing Contemporary Picture Books.” Literacy Learning: The Middle Years 22 (2): 51–59.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfenbarger, C. D., and L. R. Sipe. 2007. “A Unique Visual and Literary Art Form: Recent Research on Picturebooks.” Language Arts 84 (3): 273–280.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt-Smith, C., and K. Kimber. 2009. “Working Multimodally: Challenges for Assessment.” English Teaching 8 (3): 70–90.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zammit, K. 2007. “Popular Culture in the Classroom: Interpreting and Creating Multimodal Texts.” In Advances in Language and Education, edited by A. McCabe, M. O’Donnell, and R. Whittaker, 60–76. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Zammit, K. 2010. “The New Learning Environments Framework: Scaffolding the Development of Multiliterate Students.” Pedagogies: An International Journal 5 (4): 325–337. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2010.509479.
   Google Scholar
• Zammit, K. 2015. “Extending Students’ Semiotic Understandings: Learning about and Creating Multimodal Texts.” In International Handbook of Semiotics, edited by P. P. Trifonas, 1291–1308. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zammit, K. 2016. “Responding to Literature: IPads, Apps and Multimodal Text Creation.” Literacy Learning: The Middle Years 24 (2): 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Zammit, K. 2019. “Pedagogy, Curriculum and Assessment: Multimodal Practices That Engage Students with and in Learning.” In Multimodality across Classrooms: Learning about and through Different Modalities, edited by H.de Silva Joyce and S. Feez, 49–64. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar