Assessing multimodal literacies in practice: a critical review of its implementations in educational settings

References

• Aagaard, T., and A. Lund. 2013. “Mind the Gap: Divergent Objects of Assessment in Technology-Rich Learning Environments.” Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 8: 225–243.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, K. P., M.-J. DePalma, and J. M. Ringer. 2016. “Adaptive Remediation and the Facilitation of Transfer in Multiliteracy Center Contexts.” Computers and Composition 41: 32–45. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2016.04.005.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., and S. Bloom. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete ed.). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, L., and J. D’warte. 2016. “Diverse Literacies and Dialects.” In The Anti-Bias Approach in Early Childhood, edited by E. Dau, 81–98. Melbourne, Australia: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment & Reporting Authority. 2010. The Australian Curriculum: English F-10. https://australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10curriculum/english/?strand=Language&strand=Literature&strand=Literacy&capability=ignore&priority=ignore&elaborations=true
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (n.d.). Students for whom EAL/D. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources/student-diversity/students-for-whom-eald/
   Google Scholar
• Barton, G., and M. Ryan. 2014. “Multimodal Approaches to Reflective Teaching and Assessment in Higher Education.” Higher Education Research & Development 33 (3): 409–424. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.841650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, K. 2018. Examination of images in Australian standardised writing assessments: A case for recognising social and cultural disadvantage. Social Semiotics 28 (2): 257–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baynham, M., and M. Prinsloo. 2001. “New Directions in Literacy Research.” Language and Education 15 (2–3): 83–91. doi:10.1080/09500780108666802.
   Google Scholar
• Bearne, E. 2017. “Assessing Children’s Written Texts: A Framework for Equity.” Literacy 51 (2): 74–83. doi:10.1111/lit.12105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfatti, M. 2015. “Lessons from Research on Young Children as Readers of Informational Texts.” Language Arts 92 (4): 270–277.
   Google Scholar
• Blevins, B. 2018. “Teaching Digital Literacy Composing Concepts: Focusing on the Layers of Augmented Reality in an Era of Changing Technology.” Computers and Composition 50: 21–38. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2018.07.003.
   Google Scholar
• Board of Studies, NSW. 2012. NSW Syllabus for the Australian Curriculum: English K-10. Sydney, Australia: Board of Studies, NSW.
   Google Scholar
• Bourelle, T., A. Bourelle, S. Spong, and B. Hendrickson. 2017. “Online Technical Communication Classroom, e-Portfolio Assessment.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 31 (2): 222–255. doi:10.1177/1050651916682288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley-Walker, K., J. Tognolini, L. Lockyer, I. Brown, and P. Caputi. 2017. “Evaluating the Validity of the Online Multiliteracy Assessment Tool.” Australian Journal of Education 61 (3): 305–327. doi:10.1177/0004944117729056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bump, J. 2013. “Thinking Outside the Text Box: 3-D Interactive, Multimodal Literacy in a College Writing Class.” In Multimodal Literacies and Emerging Genres, edited by T. Bowen and C. Whithaus, 111–140. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, R. E, A. Frazee, K. Hanggi, and A. Madden. 2014. “A Programmatic Ecology of Assessment: Using a Common Rubric to Evaluate Multimodal Processes and Artifacts.” Computers and Composition 31 (1): 53–66. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2013.12.005.
   Google Scholar
• Callow, J. 2018. “Classroom Assessment and Picture Books–Strategies for Assessing How Students Interpret Multimodal Texts.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 41 (1): 5–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, C., A. Chia, and S. Choo. 2017. “Understanding Multiliteracies and Assessing Multimodal Texts in the English Curriculum.” The English Teacher 46 (2): 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Charlton, C. 2014. “The Weight of Curious Space: Rhetorical Events, Hackerspace, and Emergent Multimodal Assessment.” Computers and Composition 31 (1): 29–42. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2013.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J., and Y. Yi. 2016. “Teachers’ Integration of Multimodality into Classroom Practices for English Language Learners.” TESOL Journal 7 (2): 304–327. doi:10.1002/tesj.204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D., and M. Kendrick. 2016. “I Wish I Was a Lion a Puppy: A Multimodal View of Writing Process Assessment.” Pedagogies: An International Journal 11 (2): 1–22. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2016.1169187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. 2019. English Language Arts Standards. http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/
   Google Scholar
• Consalvo, A. L., and A. D. David. 2016. “Writing on the Walls: Supporting 21st Century Thinking in the Material Classroom.” Teaching and Teacher Education 60: 54–65. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, B., and M. Kalantzis. 2000. Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• D’warte, J. 2014. “Exploring Linguistic Repertoires: Multiple Language Use and Multimodal Activity in Five Classrooms.” Australian Journal of Language and Literacy 37 (1): 21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Dagenais, D., K. Toohey, A. Bennett Fox, and A. Singh. 2017. “Multilingual and Multimodal Composition at School: ScribJab in Action.” Language and Education 31 (3): 263–282. doi:10.1080/09500782.2016.1261893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Silva Joyce, H., and S. Feez. 2018. Multimodality across Classrooms: Learning about and through Different Modalities. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eidman-Aadahl, E., K. Blair, D. N. DeVoss, W. Hochman, L. Jimerson, C. Jurich, … J. Wood. 2013. “Developing Domains for Multimodal Writing Assessment: The Language of Evaluation, the Language of Instruction.” In Digital Writing Assessment and Evaluation (Chapter 7), edited by H. A. McKee and D. N. DeVoss. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. http://ccdigitalpress.org/dwae.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, E. 2014. “Back to the Future? The Pedagogical Promise of the (Multimedia) Essay.” In Multimodal Literacies and Emerging Genres, edited by T. Bowen and C. Whithaus. 37–72. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., and P. Murphy. 2015. “Assessment Systems as Cultural Scripts: A Sociocultural Theoretical Lens on Assessment Practice and Products.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 22 (2): 182–192. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2015.1021568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emert, T. 2014. “Interactive Digital Storytelling with Refugee Children.” Language Arts 91 (6): 401–415.
   Google Scholar
• Engebretsen, M. 2012. Balancing cohesion and tension in multimodal rhetoric. An interdisciplinary approach to the study of semiotic complexity. Learning, Media and Technology, 37 (2): 145–162.
   Google Scholar
• Fajardo, M. F. 2018. “Cohesion and Tension in Tertiary Students’ Digital Compositions: Implications for Teaching and Assessment of Multimodal Compositions.” In Multimodality across Classrooms: Learning about and through Different Modalities, edited by H. De Silva Joyce and S. Feez, 178–193. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, W. 2018. “Show Me Your True Colours: Scaffolding Formative Academic Literacy Assessment through an Online Learning Platform.” Assessing Writing 36: 63–76. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godhe, A. 2013. “Negotiating Assessment Criteria for Multimodal Texts.” The International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation 19 (3): 31–43. doi:10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v19i03/48329.
   Google Scholar
• Goodling, L. B. 2014. “The Multimodal Turn in Higher Education on Teaching, Assessing, Valuing Multiliteracies.” Pedagogy Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature Language Composition and Culture 14 (3): 561–568. doi:10.1215/15314200-2715859.
   Google Scholar
• Gynne, A., and S. Bagga-Gupta. 2015. “Languaging in the Twenty-First Century: Exploring Varieties and Modalities in Literacies inside and outside Learning Spaces.” Language and Education 29 (6): 509–518. doi:10.1080/09500782.2015.1053812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafner, C. A. 2014. “Remix Culture and English Language Teaching: The Expression of Learner Voice in Digital Multimodal Compositions.” TESOL Quarterly 48 (4): 655–685. doi:10.1002/tesq.138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, H.-T., Y.-C.J. Chiu, and H.-C. Yeh. 2013. “Multimodal Assessment of and for Learning: A Theory-Driven Design Rubric.” British Journal of Educational Technology 44 (3): 400–409. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, G. 2013. “Designing Assessments: A Multiliteracies Approach.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 56 (8): 623–626. doi:10.1002/JAAL.189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., and D. Low. 2017. “Critical Questioning in and beyond the Margins: Teacher Preparation Students’ Multimodal Inquiries into Literacy Assessment.” English Education 49 (3): 226–264.
   Google Scholar
• Jenson, J., S. de Castell, K. Thumlert, and R. Muehrer. 2016. “Deep Assessment: An Exploratory Study of Game-Based, Multimodal Learning in Epidemic.” Digital Culture & Education 8 (1): 20–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzis, M., B. Cope, and A. Harvey. 2003. “Assessing Multiliteracies and the New Basics.” Assessment in Education 10 (1): 15–26. doi:10.1080/09695940301692.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2009. “Assessment in the Perspective of a Social Semiotic Theory of Multimodal Teaching and Learning.” In Educational Assessment in the 21st Century Connecting Theory and Practice, edited by C. Wyatt-Smith and J. Cumming, 19–41. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, J. 2018. “To Boldly Go: Feedback as Digital, Multimodal Dialogue.” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2 (49): 1–17. doi:10.3390/mti2030049.
   Google Scholar
• Loerts, T., and R. Heydon. 2017. “Multimodal Literacy Learning Opportunities within a Grade Six Classroom Literacy Curriculum: Constraints and Enablers.” Education 3-13 45 (4): 490–503. doi:10.1080/03004279.2016.1139608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrail, E., and N. Behizadeh. 2017. “K-12 Multimodal Assessment and Interactive Audiences: An Exploratory Analysis of Existing Frameworks.” Assessing Writing 31: 24–38. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mclean, C. A., J. Rowsell, and D. Lapp. 2011. “Tupaq, Katy Perry, and ‘Schindler’s’ List in the Secondary English Classroom: Assessing English in New Times.” English in Australia 46 (3): 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, K. 2016. Literacy Theories for the Digital Age: Social, Critical, Multimodal, Spatial, Material and Sensory Lenses (New Perspectives on Language and Education). Bristol, MA: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, C., and A. Herrington. 2013. “Seeking Guidance for Assessing Digital Compositions/Composing.” In Digital Writing Assessment and Evaluation (Chapter 3), edited by H. A. McKee and D. N. DeVoss. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. http://ccdigitalpress.org/dwae
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. 1996. “A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures.” Harvard Education Review 66 (1): 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, W. 2013. “Conceptualising mLearning Literacy.” International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 5 (1): 1–20. doi:10.4018/jmbl.2013010101.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, C., and J. R. Martin. 2011. “Intermodal Complementarity: Modelling Affordances across Image and Verbiage in Children’s Picture Books.” In Studies in Functional Linguistics and Discourse Analysis, edited by H. G. Wen. 132–158. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prinsloo, M. 2019. “Introduction to Special Issue: Translingual and Transmodal Complexity and Innovation in English-Language-Dominant Southern Schooling.” Language and Education 33 (2): 103–105. doi:10.1080/09500782.2019.1559504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, C., and A. Atkins. 2013. “Rewarding Risk: Designing Aspirational Assessment Processes for Digital Writing Projects.” In Digital Writing Assessment and Evaluation (Chapter 4), edited by H. A. McKee and D. N. DeVoss. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. http://ccdigitalpress.org/dwae
   Google Scholar
• Sandretto, S., and J. Tilson. 2017. “Discursive Constructions of Literacies: Shifting Sands in Aotearoa New Zealand.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 38 (2): 222–234. doi:10.1080/01596306.2015.1075472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmerberk, N., and F. Lucht. 2017. “Creating Meaning through Multimodality: Multiliteracies Assessment and Photo Projects for Online Portfolios.” Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 50 (1): 32–44. doi:10.1111/tger.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipka, J. 2013. “Including, But Not Limited to, the Digital: Composing Multimodal Texts.” In Multimodal Literacies and Emerging Genres, edited by T. Bowen and C. Whithaus, 73–89. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silseth, K., and Ø. Gilje. 2019. “Multimodal Composition and Assessment: A Sociocultural Perspective.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 26 (1): 26–42. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2017.1297292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaftun, A., M. Igland, D. Husebø, S. Nome, and A. Nygard. 2018. “Glimpses of Dialogue: Transitional Practices in Digitalised Classrooms.” Learning, Media and Technology 43 (1): 42–55. doi:10.1080/17439884.2017.1369106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, B. 2001. “The New Literacy Studies.” In Literacy: A Critical Sourcebook, edited by E. Cushman, E. R. Kintgen, B. M. Kroll, and M. Rose. 430–442. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Svärdemo Åberg, E., and A. Åkerfeldt. 2017. “Design and Recognition of Multimodal Texts: Selection of Digital Tools and Modes on the Basis of Social and Material Premises?” Journal of Computers in Education 4 (3): 283–306. doi:10.1007/s40692-017-0088-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, L., and L. B. Guo. 2014. “Multiliteracies in an Outcome-Driven Curriculum: Where is Its Fit?” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 23 (1): 29–36. doi:10.1007/s40299-013-0082-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towndrow, P., M. Nelson, and W. Yusuf. 2013. “Squaring Literacy Assessment with Multimodal Design: An Analytic Case for Semiotic Awareness.” Journal of Literacy Research 45 (4): 327–355. doi:10.1177/1086296X13504155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, L. 2014. “Toward a Metalanguage for Multimedia Narrative Interpretation and Authoring Pedagogy: A National Curriculum Perspective from Australia.” In English Teaching and New Literacies Pedagogy: Interpreting and Authoring Digital Multimedia Narratives, L. Unsworth and A. Thomas. 1–22. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• VanKooten, C. 2013. “Toward a Rhetorically Sensitive Assessment Model for New Media Composition.” In Digital Writing: Assessment and Evaluation (Chapter 9), edited by H. A. McKee and D. N. DeVoss. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. http://ccdigitalpress.org/dwae
   Google Scholar
• Wessel‐Powell, C., T. Kargin, and K. Wohlwend. 2016. “Enriching and Assessing Young Children’s Multimodal Storytelling.” The Reading Teacher 70 (2): 167–178. doi:10.1002/trtr.1491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierszewski, E. 2013. “Something Old, Something New”: Evaluative Criteria in Teacher Responses to Student Multimodal Texts.” In Digital Writing Assessment and Evaluation (Chapter 5), edited by H. A. McKee & D. N. DeVoss. Logan, UT: Computers and Composition Digital Press/Utah State University Press. Retrieved from http://ccdigitalpress.org/dwae
   Google Scholar
• Xu, F., and P. K. Matsuda. 2017. “Disciplinary Dialogues Section: Perspectives on Multimodal Composition.” Journal of Second Language Writing 38: 79. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2017.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, D., and J. Curwood. 2015. “Boys’ Literacy Development: Navigating the Intersection of Popular Culture, New Literacies, and High-Stakes Assessments.” English in Australia 50 (2): 21–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Y. 2014. “Possibilities and Challenges of Multimodal Literacy Practices in Teaching and Learning English as an Additional Language.” Language and Linguistics Compass 8 (4): 158–169. doi:10.1111/lnc3.12076.
   Google Scholar
• Yi, Y., and T. Angay-Crowder. 2016. “Multimodal Pedagogies for Teacher Education in TESOL.” TESOL Quarterly 50 (4): 988–998. doi:10.1002/tesq.326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Y., and J. Choi. 2015. “Teachers’ Views of Multimodal Practices in K–12 Classrooms: Voices from Teachers in the United States.” TESOL Quarterly 49 (4): 838–847. doi:10.1002/tesq.219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, Y., N. King, and A. Safriani. 2017. “Reconceptualizing Assessment for Digital Multimodal Literacy.” TESOL Journal 8 (4): 878–885. doi:10.1002/tesj.354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zammit, K. 2010. “The New Learning Environments Framework; Scaffolding the Development of Multiliterate Students.” Pedagogies: An International Journal 5 (4): 325–337. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2010.509479.
   Google Scholar