To what extent do affective variables correlate with content learning achievement in CLIL programmes?

References

• Alejo, R., and A. Piquer-Píriz. 2016. “Urban vs. rural CLIL: An Analysis of Input-Related Variables, Motivation and Language Attainment.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 29 (3): 245–262. doi:10.1080/07908318.2016.1154068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apsel, C. 2012. “Coping with CLIL: Dropouts from CLIL Streams in Germany.” International CLIL Research Journal 1 (4): 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. 2009. “Affect in L2 Learning and Teaching.” Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada 9: 145–151.
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz, J., F. Genesee, and D. Gorter. 2014. “Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Applied Linguistics 35 (3): 243–262. doi:10.1093/applin/amt011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2013. “Listening to Learners: An Investigation into ‘Successful Learning’ across CLIL Contexts.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16 (3): 244–266. doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D., P. Hood, and D. Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dallinger, S., K. Jonkmann, J. Hollm, and C. Fieg. 2016. “The Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning on Students’ English and History Competences – Killing Two Birds with One Stone?.” Learning and Instruction 41: 23–31. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2007. Discourse in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C. 2011. “Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles?” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 182–204. doi:10.1017/S0267190511000092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer, C., and U. Smit. 2013. “Thinking Allowed: Content and Language Integrated Learning: A Research Agenda.” Language Teaching 46 (4): 545–549. doi:10.1017/S0261444813000256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Smet, A., L. Mettewie, B. Galand, Ph. Hiligsmann, and L. V. Mensel. 2018. “Classroom Anxiety and Enjoyment in CLIL and non-CLIL: Does the Target Language Matter?” Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 8 (1): 47–71. doi:10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. M. 2012. “Interactions between Individual Differences, Treatments, and Structures in SLA.” Language Learning 62 (2): 189–200. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00712.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doiz, A., D. Lasagabaster, and J. M. Sierra. 2014. “CLIL and Motivation: The Effect of Individual and Contextual Variables.” The Language Learning Journal 42 (2): 209–224. doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.889508.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2001. Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2005. The Psychology of Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. 2009. “The L2 Motivational Self-System.” In Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, edited by Z. Dörnyei and E. Ushioda, 9–42. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z., and E. Ushioda. 2011. Teaching and Researching Motivation. Harlow: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Fontecha, A., and A. Canga-Alonso. 2014. “A Preliminary Study on Motivation and Gender in CLIL and non-CLIL Types of Instruction.” International Journal of English Studies 14 (1): 21–36. doi:10.6018/ijes/14/1/156681.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. C. 2010. Motivation and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Heras, A., and D. Lasagabaster. 2015. “The Impact of CLIL on Affective Factors and Vocabulary Learning.” Language Teaching Research 19 (1): 70–88. doi:10.1177/1362168814541736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, M. 2011. “Learners’ Perceptions of Their Experiences of Learning Subject Content through a Foreign Language.” Educational Review 63 (3): 365–378. doi:10.1080/00131911.2011.571765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. 2011. “English Achievement and Student Motivation in CLIL and EFL Settings.” Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 5 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1080/17501229.2010.519030.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D. 2013. “The Use of the L1 in CLIL Classes: The Teachers’ Perspective.” Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning 2 (6): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., and A. Doiz. 2017. “A Longitudinal Study on the Impact of CLIL on Affective Factors.” Applied Linguistics 38 (5): 688–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagabaster, D., and J. M. Sierra. 2009. “Language Attitudes in CLIL and Traditional EFL Classes.” International CLIL Research Journal 1 (2): 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, F., S. Casal, and P. Moore. 2009. “The Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in European Education: Key Findings from the Andalusian Bilingual Sections Evaluation Project.” Applied Linguistics 31 (3): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P., S. Mackinnon, and R. Clément. 2009. “The Baby, the Bathwater, and the Future of Language Learning Motivation Research.” In Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, edited by Z. Dörnyei and E. Ushioda, 43–65. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. 2000. Using Languages to Learn and Learning to Use Languages. Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez, J. d. D. 2019. “Which Instructional Programme (EFL or CLIL) Results in Better Oral Communicative Competence? Updated Empirical Evidence from a Monolingual Context.” Linguistics and Education 51: 69–78. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2019.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, J. d. D. 2020. “To What Extent Does Parental Educational Background Affect CLIL Learners’ Content Subject Learning? Evidence from Research in Spain.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13670050.2020.1715916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearns, T., R. de Graaff, and D. Coyle. 2020. “Motivation for or from Bilingual Education? A Comparative Study of Learner Views in The Netherlands.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 23 (6): 724–737. doi:10.1080/13670050.2017.1405906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, V. 2018. “Promoting Bilingualism at the Primary and Secondary Level: The Role of Intelligence, Motivation and Anxiety.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13670050.2018.1559795.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, M., and E. García. 2018. “Are CLIL Students More Motivated? An Analysis of Affective Factors and Their Relation to Language Attainment.” Porta Linguarum 29: 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Otwinowska, A. 2013. “CLIL Lessons in the Upper-Primary: The Interplay of Affective Factors and CALP.” In Affective Dimension in Second Language Acquisition, edited by D. Gabryś-Barker and J. Bielska, 211–225. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Otwinowska, A., and M. Foryś. 2017. “They Learn the CLIL Way, but Do They like It? Affectivity and Cognition in Upper-Primary CLIL Classes.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 20 (5): 457–480. doi:10.1080/13670050.2015.1051944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paran, A. 2013. “Content and Language Integrated Learning: Panacea or Policy Borrowing Myth?.” Applied Linguistics Review 4 (2): 317–342. doi:10.1515/applirev-2013-0014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelechano, V. 1994. Prueba MA. Análisis y Modificación de la Conducta 20, 71–72.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado, M. L. 2016. “Are Teachers Ready for CLIL? Evidence from a European Study.” European Journal of Teacher Education 39 (2): 79–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfenninger, S. 2016. “All Good Things Come in Threes: Early English Learning, CLIL and Motivation in Switzerland.” Cahiers de l’ILSL 48: 119–147.
   Google Scholar
• Rumlich, D. 2014. “Prospective CLIL and non-CLIL Students’ Interest in English (Classes): A Quasi-Experimental Study on German Sixthgraders.” In Integration of Theory and Practice in CLIL, edited by R. Breeze, C. Martínez, C. Llamas, and C. Tabernero, 75–96. New York: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Rumlich, D. 2017. “CLIL Theory and Empirical Reality – Two Sides of the Same Coin? A Quantitative-Longitudinal Evaluation of General EFL Proficiency and Affective-Motivational Dispositions in CLIL Students at German Secondary Schools.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 5 (1): 110–134. doi:10.1075/jicb.5.1.05rum.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santamaría, P., D. Arribas, J. Pereña, and N. Seisdedos. 2016. EFAI. Evaluación Factorial de Las Aptitudes Intelectuales. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
   Google Scholar
• Seikkula-Leino, J. 2007. “CLIL Learning: Achievement Levels and Affective Factors.” Language and Education 21 (4): 328–341. doi:10.2167/le635.0.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, T., and A. Llinares. 2018. “Students’ Motivation for Content and Language Integrated Learning and the Role of Programme Intensity.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13670050.2018.1517722.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvén, L. K. 2017. “Motivation, Second Language Learning and CLIL.” In Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL, edited by A. Llinares and T. Morton, 51–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvén, L. K., and A. S. Thompson. 2015. “Language Learning Motivation and CLIL: Is There a Connection?” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 3 (1): 28–50. doi:10.1075/jicb.3.1.02syl.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. S., and L. K. Sylvén. 2015. “Does English Make You Nervous? Anxiety Profiles of CLIL and non-CLIL Students in Sweden.” Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies 9 (2): 1–23. doi:10.17011/apples/urn.201512093950.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. S., and L. K. Sylvén. 2019. “CLIL and Motivation Revisited: A Longitudinal Perspective.” In Investigating Content and Language Integrated Learning. Insights from Swedish High Schools, edited by L. K. Sylvén, 76–95. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R. 2018. “What is the Effect of Content Language Integrated Learning on Pupil Motivation to Learn a Foreign Language?” Scottish Languages Review 34: 29–38.
   Google Scholar