To integrate a language focus in a linguistically diverse physics classroom

References

• Bernstein, B. 2000. Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R. 2010. Terminology in English Language Teaching: Nature and Use. Linguistic Insights. Studies in Language and Communication [Electronic Resource]. Bern: Peter Lang Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M. M. W., K. Danielsson, and A. M. Y. Lin. 2020. “Resolving Puzzling Phenomena by the Simple Particle Model: Examining Thematic Patterns of Multimodal Learning and Teaching.” Learning: Research and Practice 6 (1): 70–87.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 2012. Language Education throughout the School Years: A Functional Perspective. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Creese, A. 2005. “Is This Content-Based Language Teaching?” Linguistics and Education 16 (2): 188–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.01.007.
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, L. C., and M. J. Schleppegrell. 2015. Focus on Grammar and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., and S. Coatoam. 2013. “Disciplinary Literacy: What You Want to Know about It.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 56 (8): 627–632. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/JAAL.190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forey, G., and L. M. E. Cheung. 2019. “The Benefits of Explicit Teaching of Language for Curriculum Learning in the Physical Education Classroom.” English for Specific Purposes 54: 91–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1993. “Towards a Language-Based Theory of Learning.” Linguistics and Education 5 (2): 93–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howes, E. V., M. Lim, and J. Campos. 2009. “Journeys into Inquiry-Based Elementary Science: Literacy Practices, Questioning, and Empirical Study.” Science Education 93 (2): 189–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobson, B., and M. Axelsson. 2017. “Building a Web in Science Instruction: Using Multiple Resources in a Swedish Multilingual Middle School Class.” Language and Education 31 (6): 479–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2017.1344701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, K., and A. Simpson. 2005. “Online Discussion in Schools: Towards a Pedagogical Framework.” International Journal of Educational Research 43 (7-8): 446–463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.07.009.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., and D. Rose. 2008. Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E., and P. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson Bruna, K., R. Vann, and M. Perales Escudero. 2007. “What’s Language Got to Do with It?: A Case Study of Academic Language Instruction in a High School “English Learner Science” Class.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6 (1): 36–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.006.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson Bruna, K., R. Vann, and M. Perales Escudero. 2010. “You Got the Word Now: Problematizing Vocabulary-Based Academic Language Instruction for English Learners in Science.” Tapestry Journal 2 (1): 19–36.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. 2013. “The Role of Metalanguage in Supporting Academic Language Development.” Language Learning 63 (1): 153–170. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00742.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J., and J. Moore. 2018. “Linguistic Tools for Supporting Emergent Critical Language Awareness in the Elementary School.” In Bilingual Learners and Social Equity. Critical Approaches to Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited by R. Harman, 23–43. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Seah, L. H. 2016. “Elementary Teachers’ Perception of Language Issues in Science Classrooms.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (6): 1059–1078. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9648-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seah, L. H., D. J. Clarke, and C. Hart. 2015. “Understanding Middle School Students’ Difficulties in Explaining Density Differences from a Language Perspective.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (14): 2386–2409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1080879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seah, L. H., and R. E. Silver. 2020. “Attending to Science Language Demands in Multilingual Classrooms: A Case Study.” International Journal of Science Education 42 (14): 2453–2471. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1504177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seah, L. H., and L. D. Yore. 2017. “The Roles of Teachers’ Science Talk in Revealing Language Demands within Diverse Elementary School Classrooms: A Study of Teaching Heat and Temperature in Singapore.” International Journal of Science Education 39 (2): 135–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1270477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifeddine Ehdwall, D., and P.-O. Wickman. 2018. “Hur lärare kan stödja andraspråkselever på gymnasiet att tala kemi.” Nordic Studies in Science Education 14 (3): 299–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.5870.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., and C. Shanahan. 2008. “Teaching Disciplinary Literacy to Adolescents: Rethinking Content-Area Literacy.” Harvard Educational Review 78 (1): 40–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., and T. Shanahan. 2020. “Disciplinary Literacy.” In The SAT® Suite Classroom Practice: English Language Arts/Literacy, edited by J. Patterson, 91–125. New York: College Board.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, K.-S. 2016. “Constructing Scientific Explanations through Premise–Reasoning–Outcome (PRO): An Exploratory Study to Scaffold Students in Structuring Written Explanations.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (9): 1415–1440. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1192309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Agency for Education. 2019/2020. [Skolverket]. SIRIS data base, Skolverket, Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Uddling, J. 2019. “Textsamtalens möjligheter och begränsningar i språkligt heterogena fysikklassrum [Opportunities and Limitations of Text-Talks in Linguistically Diverse Physics Classrooms].” Doctoral diss., Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Weinburgh, M., C. Silva, K. H. Smith, J. Groulx, and J. Nettles. 2014. “The Intersection of Inquiry-Based Science and Language: Preparing Teachers for ELL Classrooms.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 25 (5): 519–541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9389-9.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., and R. Jesson. 2018. “A Case Study of Literacy Teaching in Six Middle- and High-School Science Classes in New Zealand.” In Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education, edited by K.-S. Tang and K. Danielsson, 133–147. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar