Learning to teach science genres and language of science writing: Key change processes in a teacher’s critical SFL praxis

References

• Accurso, K., and M. Gebhard. 2020. “SFL Praxis in US Teacher Education: A Critical Literature Review.” Language and Education. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1781880.
   Google Scholar
• Avalos, M. A., W. G. Secada, M. G. Zisselsberger, and M. Gort. 2017. “Hey! Today I Will Tell You about the Water Cycle!”: Variations of Language and Organizational Features in Third-Grade Science Explanation Writing.” The Elementary School Journal 118 (1): 149–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/692987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisk, M. E. 2015. Engaging Students in Academic Literacies: Genre-Based Pedagogy for K-5 Classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brisk, M. E., T. Hodgson-Drysdale, and C. O’Connor. 2011. “A Study of a Collaborative Instructional Project Informed by Systemic Functional Linguistic Theory: Report Writing in Elementary Grades.” Journal of Education 191 (1): 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741119100102.
   Google Scholar
• Brisk, M. E., Z. Tian, and E. Ballard. 2021. “Autobiography Writing Instruction: The Journey of a Teacher Participating in a Systemic Functional Linguistics Genre Pedagogy Professional Development.” System 97: 102429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, F., and B. Derewianka. 2008. School Discourse: Learning to Write across the Years of Schooling. New York, NY: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & S. L. Lytle, eds. 1993. “Learning from Teacher Research: A Working Typology (Ch. 2).” In Inside/outside: Teacher Research and Knowledge. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daniello, F., G. Turgut, and M. E. Brisk. 2014. “Applying Systemic Functional Linguistics to Build Educators’ Knowledge of Academic English for the Teaching of Writing.” In Englishes in Multilingual Contexts, 183–203. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Daniello, F. 2012. “Systemic Functional Linguistics Theory in Practice: A Longitudinal Study of a School-University Partnership Reforming Writing Instruction in an Urban Elementary School.” Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations (UMI 3503397).
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, L. C., and M. A. Avalos. 2018. “Critical SFL Praxis among Teacher Candidates: Using Systemic Functional Linguistics in K-12 Teacher Education.” In Bilingual Learners and Social Equity, 109–123. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Oliveira, L. C., and S. W. Lan. 2014. “Writing Science in an Upper Elementary Classroom: A Genre-Based Approach to Teaching English Language Learners.” Journal of Second Language Writing 25: 23–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droga, L., and S. Humphrey. 2003. Grammar and Meaning: An Introduction for Primary Teachers. New South Wales: Target Texts.
   Google Scholar
• Fitts, S., L. Gross, and B. Ramirez. 2020. “We Observed That the Magnetic Field is Stronger than Gravity”: Exploring Linguistically Diverse Fourth-Grade Students’ Written Explanations in Science Notebooks.” Linguistics and Education 56: 100809. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 1991. The New Meaning of Educational Change. 2nd ed. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. 2007. The New Meaning of Educational Change. 4th ed. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhard, M. 2019. Teaching and Researching ELLs’ Disciplinary Literacies: Systemic Functional Linguistics in Action in the Context of US School Reform. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhard, Meg, I-An Chen, Holly Graham, and Wawan Gunawan. 2013. “Teaching to Mean, Writing to Mean: SFL, L2 Literacy, and Teacher Education.” Journal of Second Language Writing 22 (2): 107–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhard, M., R. Harman, and W. Seger. 2007. “Reclaiming Recess: Learning the Language of Persuasion.” Language Arts 84 (5): 419. https//:researchgate.net.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhard, M., J. Willett, J. Jimenez, and A. Piedra. 2010. “Systemic Functional Linguistics, Teachers’ Professional Development, and ELLs’ Academic Literacy Practices.” In Preparing All Teachers to Teach English Language Learners, edited by T. Lucas, 91–110. New York, NY: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis. .
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, P. 2015. Scaffolding Language, Scaffolding Literacy. 2nd ed. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1993. “Towards a Language-Based Theory of Learning.” Linguistics and Education. 5(2): 93–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 2007. Language and Education. Vol. 9. New York, NY: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and C. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. P., and D. L. Shirley, eds. 2009. The Fourth Way: The Inspiring Future for Educational Change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, R., ed. 2018. Bilingual Learners and Social Equity. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, R., C. Buxton, L. Cardozo-Gaibisso, L. Jiang, and K. Bui. 2021. “Culturally Sustaining Systemic Functional Linguistics Praxis in Science Classrooms.” Language and Education, 35 (2): 106–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1782425.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson-Drysdale, T. 2014. “Concepts and Language: Developing Knowledge in Science.” Linguistics and Education 27: 54–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson-Drysdale, T., and H. Rosa. 2015. “Go with the Flow: Fifth Grade Students Write about the Flow of Energy and Matter through an Ecosystem.” Science and Children 052 (06): 32. doi:https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc15_052_06_32.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 2007. “Genre Pedagogy: Language, Literacy and L2 Writing Instruction.” Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (3): 148–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lather, P. 1986. “Research as Praxis.” Harvard Educational Review 56 (3): 257–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.56.3.bj2h231877069482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykes, M. B., and A. Crosby. 2012. “Creative Methodologies as a Resource for Mayan Women’s Protagonism.” Paper Presented at Creative Practice, Activism, and Place-Identities Conference. Bristol, England.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. 1992. “Genre and Literacy – Modeling Context in Educational Linguistics.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13: 141–272. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190500002440.
   Google Scholar
• Nadler, R. S. 1993. “Therapeutic Process of Change.” In Adventure Therapy: Therapeutic Applications of Adventure Programming, edited by M. A. Gass, 57–69. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2007. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothery, J. 1996. “Making Changes: Developing an Educational Linguistics.” In Literacy in Society, 86–123. New York, NY: Longman Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2013. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Washington, DC: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell, M. J. 2004. The Language of Schooling: A Functional Linguistics Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, E. T. 2007. Action Research. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Troyan, F. J., R. Harman, and X. Zhang. 2020. “Critical SFL Praxis in Teacher Education: Insights from Australian SFL Scholars.” Language and Education. 1–19. Advance online publication. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1807563.
   Google Scholar
• Turkan, S., L. C. De Oliveira, O. Lee, and G. Phelps. 2014. “Proposing a Knowledge Base for Teaching Academic Content to English Language Learners: Disciplinary Linguistic Knowledge.” Teachers College Record 116 (3): 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2012. Case study methods. In APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology, Vol. 2: Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, edited by H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, and K. J. Sher, 141–155. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. .
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. 2001. “Educational Action Research.” In Handbook of Action Research, edited by P. Reason and H. Bradbury, 273–284. SAGE.
   Google Scholar