Engaging ‘silent’ students in classroom discussions: a micro-analytic view on teachers’ embodied enactments of cold-calling practices

References

• Ayaß, R. 2020. “Doing Waiting: An Ethnomethodological Analysis.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 49 (4): 419–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, R. A. 2006. “Teacher Talk During Whole-Class Lessons: Engagement Strategies to Support the Verbal Participation of Students with Learning Disabilities.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 21 (4): 211–232.
   Google Scholar
• Böheim, R., M. Knogler, Ch. Kosel, and T. Seidel. 2020. “Exploring Student Hand-Raising Across Two School Subjects Using Mixed Methods: An Investigation of an Everyday Classroom Behavior from a Motivational Perspective.” Learning and Instruction 65: 101250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T., and R. Wylie. 2014. “The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes.” Educational Psychologist 49 (4): 219–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. N. 2015. “The Right to Speak.” In Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue, edited by L. B. Resnick, C. S. Asterhan, and S. Clarke, 167–180. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, K. S. 2014. “Eliciting Engagement in the High School Classroom: A Mixed-Methods Examination of Teaching Practices.” American Educational Research Journal 51 (2): 363–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallimore, E. J., J. H. Hertenstein, and M. B. Platt. 2013. “Impact of Cold-Calling on Student Voluntary Participation.” Journal of Management Education 37 (3): 305–341.
   Google Scholar
• Dallimore, E. J., J. H. Hertenstein, and M. B. Platt. 2019. “Leveling the Playing Field: How Cold-Calling Affects Class Discussion Gender Equity.” Journal of Education and Learning 8 (2): 14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Decristan, J., B. Fauth, E. L. Heide, F. M. Locher, B. Troll, C. Kurucz, and M. Kunter. 2020. “Individuelle Beteiligung am Unterrichtsgespräch in Grundschulklassen: Wer ist (nicht) beteiligt und welche Konsequenzen hat das für den Lernerfolg?” Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 34 (3–4): 171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolezal, S., L. Mohan Welsh, M. Pressley, and M. M. Vincent. 2003. “How Nine Third-Grade Teachers Motivate Student Academic Engagement.” The Elementary School Journal 103 (3): 239–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasel Lauzon, V., and E. Berger. 2015. “The Multimodal Organization of Speaker Selection in Classroom Interaction.” Linguistics and Education 31: 14–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., P. C. Blumenfeld, and A. Paris. 2004. “School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 74 (1): 59–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, Th., R. Slavings, K. Harel, and H. Emerson. 1987. “Student Passivity: A Study of Question Asking in K-12 Classrooms.” Sociology of Education 60 (3): 181–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Ch. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., and Ch. Goodwin. 1986. “Gesture and Co-participation in the Activity of Searching for a Word.” Semiotica 62: 51–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumperz, J. J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausendorf, H., and U. Quasthoff. 1992. “Patterns of Adult-Child-Interaction as a Mechanism of Discourse Acquisition.” Journal of Pragmatics 17: 241–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, V. 2018. “Embodying Epistemic Responsibility. The Interplay of Gaze and Stance-Taking in Children's Collaborative Reasoning.” Research on Children and Social Interaction 2 (2): 262–285.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, V. 2021. “Embodied Displays of ‘Doing Thinking’. Epistemic and Interactive Functions of Thinking Displays in Children's Argumentative Activities.” Frontiers in Psychology 12: 636671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, V., and F. Kern. 2021. “The Co-construction of Competence: Trusting Autistic Children's Abilities in Interactions with Peers and Teachers.” Linguistics and Education 65: 100975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, V., and M. Morek. 2015. “Academic Discourse as Situated Practice.” Linguistics and Education 31: 174–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., E. Calcagni, A. Leung, and N. Mercer. 2021. “An Analysis of the Forms of Teacher-Student Dialogue That Are Most Productive for Learning.” Language and Education: 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishino, M. 2021. “Teachers’ Embodied Mitigation Against Allocating Turns to Unwilling Students.” Classroom Discourse 12: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. 2007. “Classroom Discourse and the Distribution of Student Engagement.” Social Psychology Education 10 (3): 331–352.
   Google Scholar
• Lipowsky, F., K. Rakoczy, Ch. Pauli, K. Reusser, and E. Klieme. 2007. “Gleicher Unterricht - gleiche Chancen für alle? Die Verteilung von Schülerbeiträgen im Klassenunterricht.” Unterrichtswissenschaft 35 (2): 125–147.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., R. Wegerif, and L. Major. (eds). 2020. The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morek, M. 2015. “Show That You Know – Explanations, Interactional Identities and Epistemic Stance-Taking in Family Talk and Peer Talk.” Linguistics and Education 31: 238–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, C., S. Michaels, S. Chapin, and A. G. Harbaugh. 2017. “The Silent and the Vocal. Participation and Learning in Whole-Class Discussion.” Learning and Instruction 48: 5–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauli, Ch., and K. Reusser. 2015. “Discursive Cultures of Learning in (Everyday) Mathematics Teaching: A Video-Based Study on Mathematics Teaching in German and Swiss Classrooms.” In Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue, edited by L. B. Resnick, C. S. Asterhan, and S. Clarke, 181–193. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Pielmeier, M., S. Huber, and T. Seidel. 2018. “Is Teacher Judgment Accuracy of Students’ Characteristics Beneficial for Verbal Teacher-Student Interactions in Classroom?” Teaching and Teacher Education 76: 255–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quasthoff, U., V. Heller, and M. Morek. (eds.). 2021. Diskurserwerb in Familie, Peergroup und Unterricht. Passungen und Teilhabechancen. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Quasthoff, U., V. Heller, and M. Morek. 2017. “On the Sequential Organization and Genre-Orientation of Discourse Units in Interaction. An Analytic Framework.” Discourse Studies 19 (1): 84–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quasthoff, U., V. Heller, S. Prediger, and K. Erath. 2022. “Learning in and Through Classroom Interaction: On the Convergence of Language and Content Learning Opportunities in Subject-Matter Learning.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 10 (1): 57–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. B., C. S. Asterhan, and S. Clarke. (eds). 2015. Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Roskos, K. A., S. Boehlen, and B. J. Walker. 2000. “Learning the Art of Instructional Conversation: The Influence of Self-Assessment on Teachers’ Instructional Discourse in a Reading Clinic.” The Elementary School Journal 100: 229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. 1995. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford, UK, Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., and E. A. Schegloff. 1979. “Two Preferences in the Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation and their Interaction.” In In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited by G. Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Schnitzler, K., D. Holzberger, and T. Seidel. 2020. “All Better Than Being Disengaged: Student Engagement Patterns and Their Relations to Academic Self-Concept and Achievement.” European Journal of Psychology of Education 36 (3): 627–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedova, K., and J. Navratilova. 2020. “Silent Students and the Patterns of their Participation in Classroom Talk.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 29 (4–5): 681–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selting, M., et al. 2011. “A System for Transcribing Talk-in-Interaction: GAT 2. Translated and Adapted for English by E. Couper-Kuhlen and D. Barth-Weingarten.” Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12: 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O. 2019. “Mutual Gaze, Embodied Go-Aheads and Their Interactional Consequences in Second Language Classrooms.” In The Embodied Work of Teaching, edited by J. K. Hall and St. Looney, 142–159. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Snell, J., and A. Lefstein. 2018. ““Low Ability,” Participation, and Identity in Dialogic Pedagogy.” American Educational Research Journal 55 (1): 40–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., Ch. Goodwin, and C. D. LeBaron. 2011. “Embodied Interaction in the Material World: An Introduction.” In Embodied Interaction. Language and Body in the Material World, edited by J. Streeck, Ch. Goodwin, and C. D. LeBaron, 1–26. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. 1988. The Classroom and the Language Learner. Ethnography and Second-Language Classroom Research. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Waggoner, M. A., C. Chinn, H. Yi, R. C. Anderson. 1995. “Collaborative Reasoning About Stories.” Language Arts 72 (8): 582–589.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z., and L. Carpenter. 2019. “Gaze Shifts as a Resource for Managing Attention and Recipiency.” In The Embodied Work of Teaching, edited by J. K. Hall and St. Looney, 122–141. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Willemsen, A., M. Goosen, M. van Braak, T. Koole, and K. de Glopper. 2018. “Teachers’ Open Invitations in Whole-Class Discussions.” Linguistics and Education 45: 40–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar