“The spirit is willing, but the content is weak?” Enacting the mother tongue policy in teaching information and communication technology to preschoolers in Zimbabwe

References

• Akram H, Yingxiu Y, Al-Adwan AS, Alkhalifah A. 2021. Technology integration in higher education during COVID-19: An assessment of online teaching competencies through technological pedagogical content knowledge model. Front Psychol. 12:736522. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Liang X. 2017. Teachers’ literal and inferential questions and children’s responses: A study of teacher-child linguistic interactions during whole-group instruction in Hong Kong kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Educ J. 45(5):671–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-016-0807-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chimbi GT, Jita LC. 2020. Putting the cart before the horse: Curriculum reform policy and teachers’ pedagogical preferences. Bulgarian Comp Educ Soc. 18:102–108. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED608400.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen DK. 1990. A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 12(3):311–329. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737012003
   Google Scholar
• Dehghan F. 2020. Teachers’ perspectives of professionalism: A top-down or bottom-up decision-­making process? Prof Dev Educ. 46(1):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Demir A. 2021. Book review: ICT and changing education. J Educ Technol Online Learn. 4(2):368–372. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.896659
   Google Scholar
• Essien AA. 2018. The role of language in the teaching and learning of early grade mathematics: An 11-year account of research in Kenya, Malawi and South Africa. Afr J Res Math Sci Technol Educ. 22(1):48–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2018.1434453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn N, Curdt-Christiansen XL. 2018. Intentions versus enactment: Making sense of policy and practice for teaching English as an additional language. Language Educ. 32(5):410–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1475484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyksen S. 2011. A digital literacy for the future: ICT as separate subject. IJeLS. 1(2):71–80. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijels.2046.4568.2011.0009
   Google Scholar
• Gudmundsdottir GB. 2010. When does ICT support education in South Africa? The importance of teachers’ capabilities and the relevance of language. Inform Technol Dev. 16(3):174–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2010.498409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamam D, Hysaj A. 2021. Technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK): Higher education teachers. Perspectives on the Use of TPACK in Online Academic Writing Classes [Conference Session]. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer; p. 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond M. 2014. Introducing ICT in schools in England: Rationale and consequences. Br J Educ Technol. 45(2):191–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond M, Gamlo N. 2015. How and why do language teachers use ICT in a university in Saudi Arabia?. [Conference proceedings]. Global Learn. Berlin, Germany: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE); p. 248–257.
   Google Scholar
• Hornberger NH. 2020. Reflect, revisit, and reimagine: Ethnography of language policy and planning. Ann Rev Appl Linguist. 40:119–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719052000001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornberger NH, Tapia AA, Hanks DH, Duenas KF, Lee S. 2018. Ethnography of language planning and policy. Lang Teach. 51(2):152–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444817000428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornberger NH, Johnson DC. 2011. The ethnography of language policy. In: McCarty TL, editors, Ethnography and language policy. New York: Routledge; p. 273–289.
   Google Scholar
• Hornberger NH, Johnson DC. 2007. Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Q. 41(3):509–532. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40264383. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00083.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifinedo E, Kankaanranta M. 2021. Understanding the influence of context in technology integration from teacher educators’ perspective. Technol Pedagogy Educ. 30(2):201–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1867231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jita T. 2018. Exploring pre-service teachers’ opportunities to learn to teach science with ICTs during teaching practice. J Educ. 71(71):73–90. https://doi.org/10.17159/2520-9868/i71a05
   Google Scholar
• Johnson DC. 2009. Ethnography of language policy. Lang Policy. 8(2):139–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-009-9136-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DC, Johnson EJ. 2015. Power and agency in language policy appropriation. Lang Policy. 14(3):221–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9333-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler MJ, Mishra P. 2005. What happens when teachers design educational technology? The ­development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. J Educ Comput Res. 32(2):131–152. https://doi.org/10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV
   Google Scholar
• Kostaris C, Sergis S, Sampson DG, Giannakos MN, Pelliccione L. 2017. Investigating the potential of the flipped classroom model in K-12 ICT teaching and learning: An action research study. Educ Technol Soc. 20(1):261–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm IG. 1979. The West Australian Aboriginal child and classroom interaction: A sociolinguistic approach. J Pragmatics. 3(3-4):305–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(79)90036-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcolm IG. 1982. Speech events of the Aboriginal classroom. Int J Sociol Lang. 36:115–134.
   Google Scholar
• Menken, K., & García, O. (Eds.) 2010. Negotiating language policies in schools: Educators as policymakers. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mndzebele NM, Dludlu MN. 2018. Explanatory factors associated with ICT integration in teaching secondary school agriculture: case of Southern Africa (Swaziland). ASSRJ. 5(5):580–591. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.55.4473
   Google Scholar
• Mumhure G, Jita LC, Chimbi GT. 2020. Subject panels as sustainable innovation for teacher professional development. PEC. 78(5):799–814. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.799
   Google Scholar
• Parcerisa L. 2021. To align or not to align: The enactment of accountability and data-use in disadvantaged school contexts. Educ Asse Eval Acc. 33(3):455–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09341-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratheeswari K. 2018. Information communication technology in education. JAAR. 3(1):S45–S47. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.169
   Google Scholar
• Reddy RCM. 2022. International mother language day 2022- For a multilingual education system in India. CSR J. 9. https://thecsrjournal.in/mother-language-day-education-multilingual-india/.
   Google Scholar
• Sangrà A, González-Sanmamed M. 2010. The role of information and communication technologies in improving teaching and learning processes in primary and secondary schools. Assoc Learning Technol J. 18(3):207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687769.2010.529108
   Google Scholar
• Shulman L. 1986. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educ Res. 15(2):4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair JM, Coulthard M. 1975. Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane JP, Reiser BJ, Reimer T. 2002. Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Rev Educ Res. 72(3):387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern S. 2016. Principled neglect and compliance: Responses to NCLB and the CCSS at an expeditionary learning middle school. Leadership Policy Schools. 15(4):448–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2015.1047034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenorio AD. 2022. When language gets into the equation: Mother tongue-based multilingual education (MTB-MLE) policy appropriation in elementary mathematics instruction. J Multiling Multicult Dev. :1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2039673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmons K, Cooper A, Bozek E, Braund H. 2021. The impacts of COVID-19 on early childhood education: Capturing the unique challenges associated with remote teaching and learning in K-2. Early Child Educ J. 49(5):887–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01207-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonui B, Kerich E, Koross R. 2016. An investigation into implementation of ICT in primary schools, in Kenya, in the light of free laptops at primary one: a case study of teachers implementing ICT into their teaching practice. J Educ Pract. 7(13):12–16.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2018. MTB MLE resource kit. Including the excluded: Promoting multilingual education. Bangkok: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Valtonen T, Sointu E, Kukkonen J, Kontkanen S, Lambert MC, Makitalo-Siegl K. 2017. TPACK updated to measure teachers’ twenty-first century skills. AJET. 33(3):15–31. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls J. 2017. Sensemaking and school failure: Lessons from two cases. J Organ Theory Educ. 2:1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbabwe. Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education (MoPSE). 2016. Zimbabwe Curriculum Framework for primary and secondary education (ZCF) 2015–2022. Harare: Government Printers.
   Google Scholar
• Zimbabwe. Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education (MoPSE) (Zimbabwe). 2018. Curriculum framework 2015-2022: Implementation formative evaluation report. Harare: MoPSE.
   Google Scholar