The ups and downs of CLIL lessons: a qualitative study on 21st century skills promotion in physical education

References

• Aguinis H, Solarino AM. 2019. Transparency and replicability in qualitative research: The case of interviews with elite informants. Strategic Manage J. 40(8):1291–1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghafary NA. 2020. The availability of the 21st century skills in the sport and health for all curriculum of the undergraduate university students in Al-Balqaa Applied University, Jordan. Int J Hum Mov Sports Sci. 8(5):217–228. https://doi.org/10.13189/saj.2020.080509
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto RA, Kaufman JC, eds. 2016. Nurturing creativity in the classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bereczki EO, Kárpáti A. 2018. Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture: a systematic review of the recent research literature. Educ Res Rev. 23:25–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta GJJ. 2010. Good education in an age of measurement: ethics, politics, democracy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315634319
   Google Scholar
• Birdsell BJ, Sandu R. 2015. Japanese students’ interest in CLIL: the role of individual differences. Asian EFL J. (87):20–47.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørke L, Moen KM. 2020. Cooperative learning in physical education: a study of students’ learning journey over 24 lessons. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 25(6):600–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1761955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bores-García D, Hortigüela-Alcalá D, Fernandez-Rio FJ, González-Calvo G, Barba-Martín R. 2021. Research on cooperative learning in physical education: systematic review of the last five years. Res Q Exerc Sport. 92(1):146–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2020.1719276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton A. 2015. CLIL: detail matters in the whole picture. More than a reply to J. Hüttner and U. Smit (2014). System. 53:119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruton A. 2019. Questions about CLIL which are unfortunately still not outdated: a reply to Pérez-Cañado. Appl Ling Rev. 10(4):591–602. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campillo-Ferrer JM, Miralles-Martínez P, Sánchez-Ibáñez R. 2020. CLIL teachers’ views on cognitive development in primary education. Palgrave Commun. 6(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0480-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey A, Quennerstedt M. 2020. Cooperative learning in physical education encountering Dewey’s educational theory. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 26(4):1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X20904075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalcante MT, Riberas G, Rosa G. 2016. Fostering innovation in social work and social education degrees: multilingual environment and tools for social change. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 13(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0031-0
   Google Scholar
• Cenoz J, Genesee F, Gorter D. 2014. Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Appl Ling. 35(3):243–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzipanteli A, Digelidis N, Papaioannou AG. 2015. Self-regulation, motivation and teaching styles in physical education classes: an intervention study. J Teach Phys Educ. 34(2):333–344. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2013-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimermanová I. 2021. A review of European research on content and language integrated learning. IntegrEdu. 25(2):192–213. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.103.025.202102.192-213
   Google Scholar
• Cohen L, Manion L, Morrison K. 2011. Research methods in education. 7th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coral J, Urbiola M, Sabaté E, Bofill J, Lleixà T, Vilà Baños R. 2020. Does the teaching of physical education in a foreign language jeopardise children’s physical activity time? A pilot study. Int J Bilingual Educ Bilingualism. 23(8):839–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1407289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle D, Hood P, Marsh D. 2010. CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coyle D. 2015. Strengthening integrated learning: towards a new era for pluriliteracies and intercultural learning. LACLIL. 8(2):84–103. https://doi.org/10.5294/5915
   Google Scholar
• Cross R. 2012. Creative in finding creativity in the curriculum: the CLIL second language classroom. Aust Educ Res. 39(4):431–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0074-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton-Puffer C, Bauer-Marschallinger S, Brückl-Mackey K, Hofmann V, Hopf J, Kröss L, Lechner L. 2018. Cognitive discourse functions in Austrian CLIL lessons: towards an empirical validation of the CDF construct. Eur J Appl Ling. 6(1):5–29. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2017-0028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Diezmas E. 2016. The impact of CLIL on the acquisition of the learning to learn competence in secondary school education in the bilingual programmes of Castilla-La Mancha. Porta Linguarum. (25):21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin NK. 2017. The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duivenvoorden J, Van Der Kamp J, Van Hilvoorde I, Savelsbergh G. 2021. Self-regulated learning strategies during self-controlled practice in physical education. J Phys Educ Sport. 21(2):894–903. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2021.02111
   Google Scholar
• Durán-Martínez R. 2018. Análisis comparativo de la percepción de los docentes sobre los programas bilingües en la Educación Primaria y Secundaria. Rev Complutense Educ. 29(3):865. https://doi.org/10.5209/RCED.54066
   Google Scholar
• Ellison S, Anderson AB, Aronson B, Clausen C. 2018. From objects to subjects: repositioning teachers as policy actors doing policy work. Teach Teach Educ. 74:157–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evnitskaya N, Berger E. 2017. Learners’ multimodal displays of willingness to participate in classroom interaction in the L2 and CLIL contexts. Classroom Discourse. 8(1):71–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2016.1272062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evnitskaya N, Dalton-Puffer C. 2020. Cognitive discourse functions in CLIL classrooms: Eliciting and analysing students’ oral categorizations in science and history. Int J Bilingual Educ Bilingualism. 26(3):311–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1804824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finco MD, Bittencourt MZ, Reategui EB, Zaro MA. 2013 Sept. Collaboration and social interaction in Physical Education classes: Experience with the use of exergames. In: IEEE International Games Innovation Conference, Vancouver; p. 50–56.
   Google Scholar
• Goris JA, Denessen E, Verhoeven L. 2019. Effects of content and language integrated learning in Europe A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies. Eur Educ Res J. 18(6):675–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119872426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch JA. 2002. Doing qualitative research in educational settings. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huertas CA, Shashken A. 2021. Exploring the potential of CLIL in Kazakhstan: a qualitative study. Rev Complut Educ. 32(2):261–271. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.68345
   Google Scholar
• Hughes SP, Madrid D. 2019. The effects of CLIL on content knowledge in monolingual contexts. Lang Learn J. 48(1):48–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1671483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb P, King G. 2020. Another platform and a changed context: Student experiences of developing spontaneous speaking in French through physical education. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 26(2):515–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X198697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laverty SM. 2003. Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: a comparison of historical and methodological considerations. Int J Qual Methods. 2(3):21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690300200303
   Google Scholar
• Lavin J, ed. 2008. Creative approaches to physical education: helping children to achieve their true potential. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee MC, Chow JY, Button C, Tan CW. 2017. Nonlinear Pedagogy and its role in encouraging twenty-first century competencies through physical education: a Singapore experience. Asia Pac J Educ. 37(4):483–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2017.1386089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo FM, Mouratidis A, Pulido JJ, López-Gajardo MA, Sánchez-Oliva D. 2022. Perceived teachers’ behavior and students’ engagement in physical education: the mediating role of basic psychological needs and self-determined motivation. Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy. 27(1):59–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1850667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley Orgánica 3/2020, de 29 de diciembre, por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 2/2006, de 3 de mayo, de Educación. BOE, 340, de 30 de diciembre de 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Li L, Huang F, Chen S, Pan L, Zeng W, Wu X. 2020. Exploring the curriculum development in content and language integrated learning: a systematic review. IJERE. 9(4):1102–1113. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20705
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba E. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lleixà T. 2017. Didáctica de la Educación Física: Nuevos temas, nuevos contextos. Didacticae: Revista de Investigación en Didácticas Específicas. 2:2–5. https://doi.org/10.1344/did.2017.2.2-
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Soto T, Prendes-Espinosa P. 2023. A systematic review on the role of ICT and CLIL in compulsory education. Educ Sci. 13(1):73. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010073
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy E, Heikinaro-Johansson P, MacPhail A. 2017. Physical education teacher educators’ views regarding the purpose (s) of school physical education. Sport Educ Soc. 22(7):812–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2015.1075971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehisto P, Marsh D, Frigols MJ. 2008. Uncovering CLIL content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Oxford: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Merino J. 2016. Non-linguistic content in CLIL: is its learning diminished? In: Lasagabaster D, Doiz A, editors. CLIL experiences in secondary and tertiary education: in search of good practices. Bern: Peter Lang; p. 17–43.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer O, Coyle D, Imhof M, Connolly T. 2018. Beyond CLIL: Fostering student and teacher engagement for personal growth and deeper learning. In: Martínez-Agudo JD, editor. Emotions in second language teaching. Cham: Springer; p. 277–297.
   Google Scholar
• Muszyńska A, Urpí C, Gałązka A. 2017. Teacher education through drama. CLIL practice in the spanish context. Estudios Sobre Educ. 32:179–195. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.32.179-195
   Google Scholar
• Neville RD, Makopoulou K. 2021. Effect of a six-week dance-based physical education intervention on primary school children’s creativity: a pilot study. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 27(1):203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X20939586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 2019. OECD future of education and skills 2030. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/education/2030/.
   Google Scholar
• Paran A. 2013. Content and language integrated learning: Panacea or policy borrowing myth? Appl Ling Rev. 4(2):317–342. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 2019. Framework for 21st century learning definitions. Battelle for Kids publishing. http://www.battelleforkids.org/networks/p21/frameworks-resources.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. 2015. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Cañado ML. 2017. Stopping the “pendulum effect” in CLIL research: finding the balance between Pollyanna and Scrooge. Appl Ling Rev. 8(1):79–99. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-2001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Gracia E, Serrano R, Carpio AJ. 2020. Bilingualism and interculture: what are teachers doing? Culture Educ. 32(4):621–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2020.1819119
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Negro J, Yanci J. 2021. Effects of two different physical education instructional models on creativity, attention and impulse control among primary school students. Educ Psychol. 42(6):787–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1988059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roure C, Lentillon‐Kaestner V, Pasco D. 2021. Students’ individual interest in physical education: Development and validation of a questionnaire. Scand J Psychol. 62(1):64–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel S, Joulia D, Tricot A, Sweller J. 2017. Learning subject content through a foreign language should not ignore human cognitive architecture: a cognitive load theory approach. Learn Instr. 52:69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel S, Tricot A, Sweller J. 2021. The advantages of listening to academic content in a second language may be outweighed by disadvantages: a cognitive load theory approach. Br J Educ Psychol. 92(2):e12468. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutta CB, Schiavo G, Zancanaro M, Rubegni E. 2021. Comic-based digital storytelling for content and language integrated learning. Educ Media Int. 58(1):21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2021.1908499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvador-García C, Chiva-Bartoll O, Capella-Peris C. 2022. Bilingual physical education: the effects of CLIL on physical activity levels. Int J Bilingual Educ Bilingualism. 25(1):156–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1639131
   Google Scholar
• Salvador-García C, Chiva-Bartoll O, Hortigüela-Alcalá D. 2023. Finding the place of content and language integrated learning in physical education within the models-based practice framework. Eur Phys Educ Rev. 30(1):3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X231172488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvador-García C, Chiva-Bartoll O. 2017. CLIL in teaching physical education: views of the teachers in the Spanish context. J Phys Educ Sport. 17(3):1130–1138. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2017.03174
   Google Scholar
• Salvador-García C, Chiva-Bartoll O. 2022. The nature of integration in physical education through CLIL: an analysis of cognitive discourse functions. J Lang Identity Educ.:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2022.2085107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang H, Mao L, Wang F, Zhang H. 2021. A validation study for a short-version scale to assess 21st century skills in flipped EFL classrooms. Oxford Rev Educ. 48(2):148–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.1935226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolgfors B. 2020. Promoting integration through physical education (?). Sport Educ Soc. 25(9):1029–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1687442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidaci A, Vega-Ramírez L, Cortell-Tormo JM. 2021. Development of creative intelligence in physical education and sports science students through body expression. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 18(10):5406. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlasenko K, Chumak O, Sitak I, Kalashnykova T, Achkan V. 2020. CLIL method to increase students’ motivation in studying mathematics at higher technical school. Univ J Educ Res. 8(2):362–370. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080205
   Google Scholar
• WMA Declaration of Helsinki. 1964. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, 301. [accessed 2020 April 5]. https://www.wma.net/what-we-do/medical-ethics/declaration-of-helsinki/.
   Google Scholar
• Yang W-H, Yang L-Z. 2021. Evaluating learners’ satisfaction with a distance online CLIL lesson during the pandemic. English Teach Learn. 46(2):179–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-021-00091-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar