Productive classroom dialogue and its association with student achievement in knowledge-building environments

References

• Al-Adeimi S, O’Connor C. 2021. Exploring the relationship between dialogic teacher talk and students’ persuasive writing. Learn Instruct. 71:101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander R. 2006. Towards dialogic teaching. (3rd ed.). York: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander R. 2018. Developing dialogic teaching: genesis, process, trial. Res Papers Educ. 33(5):561–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askell-Williams H, Lawson MJ. 2005. Students’ knowledge about the value of discussions for teaching and learning. Soc Psychol Educ. 8(1):83–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-004-5489-2.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin M. 1986. The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson and M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays (trans. V.W. McGee). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter C, Scardamalia M. 2003. Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Mer Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments. Unravelling basic components and dimensions, (p. 55–68). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter C, Scardamalia M. 2016. “Good powerful learning environments. Unraveling basic components and dimensions moves” in knowledge-creating dialogue. QWERTY. 11(2):12–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böheim R, Schnitzler K, Gröschner A, Weil M, Knogler M, Schindler A-K, Alles M, Seidel T. 2021. How changes in teachers’ dialogic discourse practice relate to changes in students’ activation, motivation and cognitive engagement. Learn Cult Soc Interact. 28:100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CKK, Chan Y-Y. 2011. Students’ views of collaboration and online participation in Knowledge Forum. Comput Educ. 57(1):1445–1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CKK, Tong Y, van Aalst J. 2019. Progressive dialogue in computer-supported collaborative knowledge building. In N. Mercer, R. Wegerif, & L. Major (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education, (p. 469–484). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen B, Hong HY. 2016. Schools as knowledge-building organizations: thirty years of design research. Educ Psychol. 51(2):266–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1175306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C-H, Tsai C-C. 2021. In-service teachers’ conceptions of mobile technology-integrated instruction: tendency towards student-centered learning. Comput Educ. 170:104224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui R, Teo P. 2023. Thinking through talk: using dialogue to develop students’ critical thinking. Teach Teach Educ. 125:104068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiFrancesca D, Nietfeld JL, Cao L. 2016. A comparison of high and low achieving students on self-regulated learning variables. Learn Individual Differ. 45:228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis RA, Han F. 2019. Identifying consistent patterns of quality learning discussions in blended learning. Internet Higher Educ. 40:12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald A, Hackling M, Dawson V. 2013. Through the viewfinder: reflecting on the collection and analysis of classroom video data. Int J Qual Methods. 12(1):52–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200127.
   Google Scholar
• Guo D, Wang A. 2020. Is vocational education a good alternative to low-performing students in China. Int J Educ Dev. 75:102187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen K. 2003. Progressive inquiry in a computer-supported biology class. J Res Sci Teach. 40(10):1072–1088. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennessy S, Rojas-Drummond S, Higham R, Márquez AM, Maine F, Ríos RM, García-Carrión R, Torreblanca O, Barrera MJ. 2016. Developing a coding scheme for analyzing classroom dialogue across educational contexts. Learn Cult Soc Interact. 9:16–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong H-Y, Lee Y-H. 2023. Computer-supported knowledge building to enhance reading motivation and comprehension. Brit J Educ Technol. 54(1):375–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe C, Abedin M. 2013. Classroom dialogue: a systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge J Educ. 43(3):325–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe C, Hennessy S, Mercer N, Vrikki M, Wheatley L. 2019. Teacher-student dialogue during classroom teaching: does it really impact on student outcomes? J Learn Sci. 28(4–5):462–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ing M, Webb NM, Franke ML, Turrou AC, Wong J, Shin N, Fernandez CH. 2015. Student ­participation in elementary mathematics classrooms: the missing link between teacher practices and student achievement? Educ Stud Math. 90(3):341–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9625-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M-Y, Wilkinson IAG. 2019. What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learn Cult Soc Interact. 21:70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton K, Howe C. 2010. Educational dialogues: understanding and promoting productive interaction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton K, Mercer N. 2013. Interthinking: putting talk to work. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan H. 1979. Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer N. 2000. Words and minds: how we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer N, Dawes L. 2014. The study of talk between teachers and students, from the 1970s until the 2010s. Oxford Rev Educ. 40(4):430–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.934087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer N, Littleton K. 2007. Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: a sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Major, L. (Eds.). 2019. The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels S, O’Connor C, Resnick LB. 2008. Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Stud Philos Educ. 27(4):283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhonen H, Pakarinen E, Poikkeus A-M, Lerkkanen M-K, Rasku-Puttonen H. 2018. Quality of educational dialogue and association with students’ academic performance. Learn Instruct. 55:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne JF, Borko H, Fishman E, Gomez Zaccarelli F, Berson E, Busch KC, Reigh E, Tseng A. 2019. Impacts of a practice-based professional development program on elementary teachers’ facilitation of and student engagement with scientific argumentation. Am Educ Res J. 56(4):1067–1112. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218812059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paavola S, Lipponen L, Hakkarainen K. 2004. Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Rev Educ Res. 74(4):557–576. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resendes M, Scardamalia M, Bereiter C, Chen B, Halewood C. 2015. Group-level formative feedback and metadiscourse. Intern J Comput-Support Collab Learn. 10(3):309–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-015-9219-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick LB, Asterhan CSC, Clarke SN, Schantz F. 2018. Next generation research in dialogic learning. In G. E. Hall, L. F. Quinn, & D. M. Gollnick (Eds.), Wiley handbooks in education. The Wiley handbook of teaching and learning (1st ed., p. 323–338). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Reznitskaya A, Wilkinson IAG. 2015. Professional development in dialogic teaching: helping teachers promote argument literacy in their classrooms. In D. Scott, & E. Hargreaves (Eds.), Sage handbook of learning (pp. 219–232). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia M, Bereiter C. 2014. Knowledge building and knowledge creation: theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (p. 397–417). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedova K, Sedlacek M, Svaricek R, Majcik M, Navratilova J, Drexlerova A, Kychler J, Salamounova Z. 2019. Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement. Learn Instruct. 63:101217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair JM, Coulthard M. 1975. Towards an analysis of discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Song Y, Chen X, Hao T, Liu Z, Lan Z. 2019. Exploring two decades of research on classroom dialogue by using bibliometric analysis. Comput Educ. 137:12–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao D, Zhang J. 2018. Forming shared inquiry structures to support knowledge building in a grade 5 community. Instr Sci. 46(4):563–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9462-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y, Chan CKK. 2020. Characterizing metacognitive and progressive dialogue in knowledge-building classroom. In Gresalfi, M. and Horn, I. S. (Eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences, 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020, Volume 3 (p. 1453–1460). Nashville, Tennessee: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai C-C. 2009. Conceptions of learning versus conceptions of web-based learning: the differences revealed by college students. Comput Educ. 53(4):1092–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Aalst J. 2009. Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses. Int J Comput Support Collab Learn. 4(3):259–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9069-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Veen C, de Mey L, van Kruistum C, van Oers B. 2017. The effect of productive classroom talk and metacommunication on young children’s oral communicative competence and subject matter knowledge: an intervention study in early childhood education. Learn Instruct. 48:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrikki M, Wheatley L, Howe C, Hennessy S, Mercer N. 2019. Dialogic practices in primary school classrooms. Lang Educ. 33(1):85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1509988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky LS. 1978. Mind insociety: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif R. 2011. Towards a dialogic theory of how children learn to think. Think Skills Creat. 6(3):179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells G, Arauz RM. 2006. Dialogue in the classroom. J Learn Sci. 15(3):379–428. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson IAG, Reznitskaya A, Bourdage K, Oyler J, Glina M, Drewry R, Kim M-Y, Nelson K. 2017. Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms. Lang Educ. 31(1):65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson IAG, Reznitskaya A, D’Agostino JV. 2023. Professional development in classroom discussion to improve argumentation: teacher and student outcomes. Learn Instruct. 85:101732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan F. 2019. System and structure of Chinese higher education. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory (p. 1–8). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y-F, Tsai C-C. 2017. Exploring in-service preschool teachers’ conceptions of and approaches to online education. AJET. 33(1):134–147. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar