The shaping of an idea as temporal, multimodal, and collaborative activity: exploring how students develop a board game in L1

References

• Apperley T, Beavis C. 2011. Literacy into action: digital games as action and text in the English and literacy classroom. Pedagogies. 6(2):130–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2011.554620.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer J, Kress G. 2016. Multimodality, learning and communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bremholm J, Kabel K, Liberg C, Skar GBU. 2022. A review of Scandinavian writing research ­between 2010 and 2020. Writ Pedagog. 13(1–3):7–49. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.21637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Ivanič R. 2010. Writing and being written: issues of identity across timescales. Writ Commun. 27(2):228–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088310363447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton-Lilly C, Halverson E. 2014. Time and space in literacy research. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Compton-Lilly C. 2017. Reading students’ lives: literacy learning across time. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Craft A. 2000. Creativity across the primary curriculum: framing and developing practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe O. 1993. Writing and talking to learn: a theory-based, interpretive study in three classrooms in the USA and Norway. Tromsø: School of Languages and Literature, University of Tromsø.
   Google Scholar
• Dysthe O. 1995. Det flerstemmige klasserommet: skriving og samtale for å lære [The polyphonic classroom: writing and talking in order to learn]. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Elf N, Bulfin S, Koutsogiannis D. 2020. The ongoing technocultural production of L1: current practices and future prospects. In: Green B, Erixon P-O, editors. Rethinking L1 education in a global era: understanding the (post-)national L1 subjects in new and difficult times. Cham: Springer; p. 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55997-7_10.
   Google Scholar
• Elf N. 2017. Taught by bitter experience: a timescales analysis of Amalie’s development of writer identity. In: Cremin T, Locke T, editors. Writer identity and the teaching and learning of writing. Abingdon: Routledge; p. 215–231. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315669373-24.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson F. 1977. Some approaches to inquiry in school-community ethnography. Anthropol Edu Q. 8(2):58–69. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1977.8.2.05x1396r.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson F. 1986. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: Wittrockk M, editor. Handbook of research on teaching. 3rd ed. New York: MacMillan; p. 119–161.
   Google Scholar
• Falchi L, Siegel M. 2014. Write on time! The role of timescales in defining and disciplining young writers. In: Compton-Lilly C, Halverson E, editors. Time and space in literacy research. New York: Routledge; p. 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia A. 2020. Gaming literacies: spatiality, materiality, and analogue learning in a digital age. Read Res Q. 55(1):9–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green B, Erixon P-O, editors. 2020. Rethinking L1 education in a global era. Understanding the (post-)national L1 subjects in new and difficult times. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Green J, Bloome D. 1997. Ethnography and ethnographers of and in education: a situated perspective. In: Flood J, Lapp D, Heath SB, editors. Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts. New York: Macmillan; p. 167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Igland M-A, Ongstad S. 2002. Introducing Norwegian research on writing. Writ Commun. 19(3):339–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/074108802237748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt C. 2006. Technology, literacy, and learning: a multimodal approach. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch H. 2005. Focused ethnography. Forum Qual Soc Res. 6(3):14.
   Google Scholar
• Kress G. 2010a. Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress G. 2010b. A grammar for meaning-making. In: Locke T, editors. Beyond the grammar wars. New York: Routledge; p. 233–253.
   Google Scholar
• Krogh E, Jakobsen KS, editors. 2019. Understanding young people’s writing development. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Krogh E, Penne S. 2015. Introduction to ‘languages, literatures, and literacies’: re-searching paradoxes and negotiations in Scandinavian L1 subjects. L1-Educ Stud Lang Lit. 15(3):1–16. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2015.15.01.12.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke J. 2002. Language development and identity: multiple timescales in the social ecology of learning. In: Kramsch C, editor. Language acquisition and language socialization. London: Continuum; p. 68–87.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke JL. 2000. Across the scales of time: artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind Cult Act. 7(4):273–290. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer N, Wegerif R, Dawes L. 1999. Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. Br Educ Res J. 25(1):95–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer N. 2013. The social brain, language, and goal-directed collective thinking: a social conception of cognition and its implications for understanding how we think, teach, and learn. Educ Psychol. 48(3):148–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Children and Education. 2019. Faghæfte for dansk [National curriculum for Danish L1]. [accessed 2024 May]. http://www.emu.dk.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill D, Newman R, Watson A. 2020. Going meta: dialogic talk in the writing classroom. Aust J Lang Lit. 43:5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ness IJ, Dysthe O. 2020. Polyphonic imagination: understanding idea generation in multidisciplinary groups as a multivoiced stimulation of fantasy. Creat Res J. 32(1):30–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1712163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. TALIS 2018 results (volume I): teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. Paris: OECD publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl K. 2007. Timescales and ethnography: understanding a child’s meaning-making across three sites, a home, a classroom and a family literacy class. Ethnogr Educ. 2(2):175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457820701350558.
   Google Scholar
• Pifarré M. 2019. Using interactive technologies to promote a dialogic space for creating collaboratively: a study in secondary education. Think Skills Creat. 32:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusmann A, Ejsing-Duun S. 2022. When design thinking goes to school: a literature review of design competences for the K-12 level. Int J Technol Des Educ. 32(4):2063–2091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09692-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slot MF, Hansen R, Bremholm J. 2016. Elevopgaver og elevproduktion i det 21. århundrede [Student assignments and productions in the 21st century]. Læremiddel.dk. [accessed 2024 May]. http://laeremiddel.dk/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/2605_rapport_kvantitativanalyse_enk.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif R. 2005. Reason and creativity in classroom dialogues. Lang Educ. 19(3):223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780508668676.
   Google Scholar
• Wegerif R. 2011. Towards a dialogic theory of how children learn to think. Think Skills Creat. 6(3):179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2011.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortham S. 2003. Curriculum as a resource for the development of social identity. Sociol Educ. 76(3):228–246. https://doi.org/10.2307/3108467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortham S. 2008. The objectification of identity across events. Linguist Educ. 19(3):294–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.05.010.
   Google Scholar