German language support in Austria: feasibility, effectiveness and legitimacy from the perspective of public administration

References

• Alexiadou N, Essex J. 2016. Teacher education for inclusive practice - responding to policy. Eur J Teach Educ. 39(1):5–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2015.1031338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alisaari J, Heikkola LM, Commins N, Acquah EO. 2019. Monolingual ideologies confronting multilingual realities. Finnish teachers’ beliefs about linguistic diversity. Teach Teach Educ. 80:48–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez L, De Loney M, Capitelli S, Valdés G, Julia Biernacki P. 2023. Expanding participation: supporting newcomer students’ language development through disciplinary practices. Lang Educ. 37(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2022.2028825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avramidis E, Norwich B. 2002. Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: a review of the literature. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 17(2):129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250210129056.
   Google Scholar
• Bleidick U. 1985. Theorie der Behindertenpädagogik : mit mehreren Tabellen. Berlin: Marhold.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. 2022. Thematic analysis: a practical guide. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. 2018. Thematic analysis. In Liamputtong P, editor. Handbook of research methods in health social sciences. Singapore: Springer; 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_103-1.
   Google Scholar
• Brisk M, Kaveh YM. 2019. Teacher education for bi/multilingual students. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.280.
   Google Scholar
• Buchner T, Proyer M. 2020. From special to inclusive education policies in Austria - developments and implications for schools and teacher education. Eur J Teach Educ. 43(1):83–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1691992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunar N, Juvonen P. 2022. ‘Not (Yet) ready For the mainstream’ – newly arrived migrant students in a separate educational program. J Educ Policy. 37(6):986–1008. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2021.1947527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium Für Bildung, Wissenschaft Und Forschung (BMBWF). 2019. Deutschförder­klassen und Deutschförderkurse. Leitfaden für Schulleiterinnen und Schulleiter. Bundesministerium Für Bildung, Wissenschaft Und Forschung. https://www.bmbwf.gv.at/dam/jcr:f0e708af-3e17-4bf3-9281-1fe7098a4b23/deutschfoerderklassen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bushati B, Kedia G, Rotter D, Christensen AP, Krammer G, Corcoran K, Schmölzer-Eibinger S. 2023. Friends as a language learning resource in multilingual primary school classrooms. Soc Psychol Educ. 26(3):833–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09770-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell S, Greenwood M, Prior S, Shearer T, Walkem K, Young S, Bywaters D, Walker K. 2020. Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. J Res Nurs. 25(8):652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhill-Poza A. 2017. “If you don’t find a friend in here, it’s gonna be hard for you”: Structuring bilingual peer support for language learning in urban high schools. Linguist Educ. 37:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier VP, Thomas WP. 2017. Validating the power of bilingual schooling: thirty-two years of large-scale, longitudinal research. Ann Rev Appl Linguist. 37:203–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190517000034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins J. 2015. How to reverse a legacy of exclusion? Identifying high-impact educational responses. Lang Educ. 29(3):272–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2014.994528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong E, Gao J. 2023. Preparing teacher candidates for bilingual practices: Toward a multilingual stance in mainstream teacher education. Int J Biling Educ Biling. 26(4):472–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2119072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorji R, Bailey J, Paterson D, Graham L, Miller J. 2021. Bhutanese teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. Int J Incl Educ. 25(5):545–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1563645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson A. 1999. Inclusion and inclusions: theories and discourses in inclusive education. In Daniels H, Garner P, editors. Inclusive education. World Yearbook of Education 1999. London: Kogan Page; 36–53.
   Google Scholar
• Erling EJ, Gitschthaler M, Schwab S. 2022. Is segregated language support fit for purpose? Insights from German language support classes in Austria. Eur J Educ Res. ume-11-2022(volume-11-issue-1-january-2022):573–586. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.573.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. 2019.Integrating Students from Migrant Backgrounds into Schools in Europe: National Policies and Measures. Eurydice Report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2797/819077.
   Google Scholar
• Flick U. 2022. An introduction to qualitative research. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Giano Z, Williams AL, Becnel JN. 2022. Grade retention and school dropout: comparing specific grade levels across childhood and early adolescence. J Early Adolesc. 42(1):33–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316211010332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitschthaler M, Erling E, Schwab S. 2024. Segregation or Integration? German language support teachers’ beliefs about ‘ideal’ language support models in Austria. Multiling Multicult Dev:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2024.2301990.
   Google Scholar
• Gogolin I. 2021. Multilingualism: A threat to public education or a resource in public education? – European histories and realities. Eur Educ Res J. 20(3):297–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904120981507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göransson K, Nilholm C. 2014. Conceptual diversities and empirical shortcomings - a critical analysis of research on inclusive education. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 29(3):265–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2014.933545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassani S, Schwab S, Resch K, Gitschthaler M. submitted. Language assessment of students with emerging German skills deploying the MIKA-D screening instrument – empirical findings from Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Hilt LT. 2017. Education without a shared language: dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in Norwegian introductory classes for newly arrived minority language students. Int J Incl Educ. 21(6):585–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2016.1223179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hos R, Murray-Johnson K, Correia A. 2019. Cultivating capital for high school newcomers. J Ethn Cult Stud. 6(1):101–116. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/233.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes JN, West SG, Kim H, Bauer SS. 2018. Effect of early grade retention on school completion: A prospective study. J Educ Psych. 110(7):974–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janesick VJ. 2015. Peer debriefing. The Blackwell Enciclopedia of Sociology. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosp014.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Fang F. 2022. Translanguaging theory and practice: how stakeholders perceive translanguaging as a practical theory of language. RELC J. 53(2):391–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220939222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moberg S, Muta E, Korenaga K, Kuorelahti M, Savolainen H. 2020. Struggling for inclusive education in Japan and Finland: teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education. Eur J Spec Needs Educ. 35(1):100–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1615800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller B, Schweiger H. 2022. Abschlussbericht Forschungsprojekt. Deutschförderklassen an der VS 1220, Deckergasse 1. https://www.arbeiterkammer.at/interessenvertretung/arbeitundsoziales/bildung/Abschlussbericht_Deutschfoederklassen_VS_Deckergasse.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. The Resilience of Students with an Immigrant Background: Factors that Shape Well-being. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264292093-en.
   Google Scholar
• Rothe D. 2015. Lebensbegleitendes Lernen für alle”. Chancengleichheit – Chancengerechtigkeit – Bildungsgerechtigkeit. Zur ambivalenten Produktivität einer begrifflichenTransformation. In Fegter S, Kessl F, Langer A, Ott M, Rothe D, Wrana D, editors. Erziehungswissenschaftliche Diskursforschung. Empirische Analysen zu Bildungs- und Erziehungsverhältnissen. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.; 363–384.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña J. 2021. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Saloviita T, Consegnati S. 2019. Teacher attitudes in Italy after 40 years of inclusion. Br J Special Edu. 46(4):465–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab S, Resch K, Gitschthaler M, Hassani S, Latzko D, Peter A, Walczuch S. 2023. From policy to practice: how schools implement German language support policy in Austria. Curr Issues Lang Plan. 25(2):176–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2023.2269726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweiger H, Müller B. 2021. Mangelhaft und unzureichend. Deutschförderklassen aus der Sicht von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern. In Resch K, Lindner K-T, Streese B, Proyer M, Schwab S, editors. Inklusive Schule und Schulentwicklung: Theoretische Grundlagen, empirische Befunde und Praxisbeispiele aus Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Münster: Waxmann; 43–45.
   Google Scholar
• Short DJ. 2017. How to integrate content and language learning effectively for English language learners. Eurasia J Math Sci Tech. 13(7b):4237–4260. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00806a.
   Google Scholar
• Spiel C, Popper V, Holzer J. 2022. Evaluation der Implementierung des Deutschfördermodells. ttps://www.bmbwf.gv.at/dam/jcr:2ba5ac1e-3be9-4dd2-8d04-c2465169e726/deutschfoerdermodell_eval.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Statistik Austria. 2022. Bildung in Zahlen (Tabellenband 2020/21). Retrieved December 1, 2023, from https://www.statistik.at/fileadmin/pages/325/Bildung_in_Zahlen_20_21_Tabellenband.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Steiner C. 2019. Bridge or hurdle? Social relationships in preparatory classes and beyond within German schools. Intersections. 5(4):139–158. https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v5i4.578.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson M, Eastmond M. 2013. “Betwixt and between”: hope and the meaning of school for asylum-seeking children in Sweden. Nord J Migr Res. 3(3):162–170. https://doi.org/10.2478/njmr-2013-0007.
   Google Scholar
• Syring M, Tillmann T, Weiß S, Kiel E. 2018. Positive attitudes towards inclusion negative attitudes towards its implementation in schools: investigation of a contradiction by analyzing an adapted scale from heterogeneity research in the field of inclusion with pre-service teachers. Psychol Erz Unterr. 65(3):206–220. https://doi.org/10.2378/peu2018.art12d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2017. A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002482/248254e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 2019. Global education monitoring report, 2019: Migration, displacement and education: building bridges, not walls. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265866.
   Google Scholar
• VERBI Software. 2021. MAXQDA 2022 online manual. Retrieved from https://www.maxqda.com.
   Google Scholar
• Vogtenhuber S, Lassnig L, Bruneforth M, Herzog-Punzenberger B, Auer C, Gumpoldsberger H, Schmich J. 2012. B: Inputs – Personelle und finanzielle Ressourcen. In Brunefort M, Lassnigg L, editors. Nationaler Bildungsbericht Österreich 2012. Band 1. Das Schulsystem im Spiegel von Daten und Indikatoren. Graz: Leykam; 31–60.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock S, Woolfson LM. 2019. Are leaders leading the way with inclusion? Teachers’ perceptions of systemic support and barriers towards inclusion. Int J Educ Res. 93:232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yada A, Savolainen H. 2017. Japanese in-service teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education and self-efficacy for inclusive practices. Teach Teach Educ. 64:222–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar