Linguistic complexity of elementary mathematics word problems and their translations

References

• Abedi J, Lord C. 2001. The language factor in Mathematics tests. Appl Measurement in Educ. 14(3):219–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1403_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amanti C. 2019. The (invisible) work of dual language bilingual education teachers. Bilingual Res J. 42(4):455–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2019.1687111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Councils Research Center. 2021. 2021 canvass of dual language and immersion (DLI) programs in US public schools. American Councils for International Education. https://www.americancouncils.org/sites/default/files/documents/pages/2021-10/Canvass%20DLI%20-%20October%202021-2_ac.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ban A. 2015. Books in translation in the United States. Pub Res Q. 31(3):160–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-015-9406-7.
   Google Scholar
• Barbu OC, Beal CR. 2010. Effects of linguistic complexity and math difficulty on word problem solving by English learners. IJE. 2(2):1–19. https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v2i2.508.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes EM, Stephens SJ. 2019. Supporting mathematics vocabulary instruction through mathematics curricula. The Curriculum J. 30(3):322–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1614470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barwell R. 2009. Mathematical word problems and bilingual learners in England. In: Barwell R, editor. Multilingualism in Mathematics classrooms: Global perspectives. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters; p. 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Buono S, Jang EE. 2021. The effect of linguistic factors on assessment of English language learners’ Mathematical ability: A differential item functioning analysis. Educ Assessment. 26(2):125–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1858783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler FA, Bailey AL, Stevens R, Huang B, Lord C. 2004. Academic English in fifth-grade mathematics, science, and social studies textbooks. In: Center for Research on Evaluation Standards and Student Testing CRESST (CSE Report 642). Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE)/National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED483409.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright KB, Taboada Barber A, Archer CJ. 2022. What’s the difference? Contributions of lexical ambiguity, reading comprehension, and executive functions to math word problem solving in linguistically diverse 3rd to 5th graders. Scientific Stud Reading. 26(6):565–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2022.2084399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chace TF. 2010. Point of departure. In: Wolf SA, Coats K, Enciso P, Jenkins CA, editors. Handbook of research on children’s and young adult literature. New York: Routledge; p. 417–418.
   Google Scholar
• Chval KB, Pinnow RJ, Thomas A. 2015. Learning how to focus on language while teaching mathematics to English language learners: A case study of Courtney. Math Ed Res J. 27(1):103–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0101-8.
   Google Scholar
• Daroczy G, Wolska M, Meurers WD, Nuerk H-C. 2015. Word problems: A review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Front Psychol. 6(Article 348):348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Araujo Z, Roberts SA, Willey C, Zahner W. 2018. English learners in k–12 mathematics education: A review of the literature. Rev Educ Res. 88(6):879–919. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318798093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Araujo Z, Smith E. 2022. Examining English language learners’ learning needs through the lens of algebra curriculum materials. Educ Stud Math. 109(1):65–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10081-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doabler CT, Fien H, Nelson-Walker NJ, Baker SK. 2012. Evaluating three elementary mathematics programs for presence of eight research-based instructional design principles. Learning Disability Quarterly. 35(4):200–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712438557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doan S, Fernandez M-P, Grant D, Kaufman JH, Setodji CM, Snoke J, Strawn M, Young CJ. 2021. American instructional resources surveys: 2021 technical documentation and survey results (Research Report RRA134-10). RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA134-10.html.
   Google Scholar
• Gerofsky S. 1996. A linguistic and narrative view of word problems in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics. 16(2):36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gökçe S, Berberoğlu G, Wells CS, Sireci SG. 2021. Linguistic distance and translation differential item functioning on trends in international mathematics and science study mathematics assessment items. J Psychoeduc Assess. 39(6):728–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829211010537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall CJ, Smith PH, Wicaksono R. 2011. Translation. In: Mapping applied linguistics: A guide for students and practitioners. London & New York: Routledge; p. 223–248.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday MAK. 1978. Sociolinguistics aspects of mathematical education. In: Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold Ltd; p. 194–204.
   Google Scholar
• Huang J, Sheeran TJ. 2011. Identifying causes of English-Chinese translation differential item functioning. Int J Appl Educ Stud. 12(1):16–33.
   Google Scholar
• KIDS COUNT Data Center. 2023. Children who speak a language other than English at home. Baltimore, MD: The Anne E. Casey Foundation KIDS COUNT Data Center. https://datacenter.aecf.org/data/tables/81-children-who-speak-a-language-other-than-english-at-home.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. 2013. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lager CA. 2006. Types of mathematics-language reading interactions that unnecessarily hinder algebra learning and assessment. Reading Psychol. 27(2–3):165–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710600642475.
   Google Scholar
• Lin X, Peng P, Zeng J. 2021. Understanding the relation between mathematics vocabulary and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School J. 121(3):504–540. https://doi.org/10.1086/712504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martiniello M. 2008. Language and the performance of English-language learners in math word problems. Harvard Educ Rev. 78(2):333–368. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.2.70783570r1111t32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martiniello M. 2009. Linguistic complexity, schematic representations, and differential item functioning for English language learners in math tests. Educational Assessment. 14(3–4):160–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627190903422906.
   Google Scholar
• Moschkovich J. 2007. Bilingual mathematics learners: How views of language, bilingual learners, and mathematical communication impact instruction. In: Nasir NS, Cobb P, editors. Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press; p. 89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Novotná J, Moraová H. 2005. Cultural and linguistic problems in the use of authentic textbooks when teaching mathematics in a foreign language. ZDM. 37(2):109–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655720.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce DL, Bruun F, Skinner K, Lopez-Mohler C. 2013. What teachers say about student difficulties solving mathematical word problems in grades 2–5. Int Elect J Math Ed. 8(1):3–19. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/271.
   Google Scholar
• Pongsakdi N, Kajamies A, Veermans K, Lertola K, Vauras M, Lehtinen E. 2020. What makes mathematical word problem solving challenging? Exploring the roles of word problem characteristics, text comprehension, and arithmetic skills. ZDM Mathematics Education. 52(1):33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01118-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remillard JT, Harris B, Agodini R. 2014. The influence of curriculum material design on opportunities for student learning. ZDM Mathematics Education. 46(5):735–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0585-z.
   Google Scholar
• Schleppegrell MJ. 2007. The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly. 23(2):139–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560601158461.
   Google Scholar
• Solano-Flores G, Backhoff E, Contreras-Niño LÁ. 2009. Theory of test translation error. Int J Testing. 9(2):78–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305050902880835.
   Google Scholar
• Solano-Flores G, Trumbull E. 2003. Examining language in context: The need for new research and practice paradigms in the testing of English-language learners. Educational Res. 32(2):3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032002003.
   Google Scholar
• Trinick T, May S. 2013. Developing a Māori language mathematics lexicon: Challenges for corpus planning in indigenous language contexts. Curr Issues in Language Planning. 14(3-04):457–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.835149.
   Google Scholar
• Verschaffel L, Schukajlow S, Star J, Van Dooren W. 2020. Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM Mathematics Education. 52(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4.
   Google Scholar
• Watts-Taffe S, Fisher P, Blachowicz C. 2018. Vocabulary instruction: Research and practice. In: Lapp D, Fisher D, editors. Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts. 4th ed. New York: Routledge; p. 130–161.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf MK, Leon S. 2009. An investigation of the language demands in content assessments for English language learners. Educational Assessment. 14(3–4):139–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627190903425883.
   Google Scholar