‘It is Really Important That We Sometimes Remember the Children and Their Views Rather than Just Our Own’: The Presentation and Representation of Children’s Views in the Child Protection Conference

References

• Alanen, L. 2009. “Generational Order in J Qvortrup.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Childhood Studies, edited by W. A. Corsaro and M. S. Honig, 159–174. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, J. V., E. Terlektsi, and L. Coombes. 2015. “Implementing the Strengthening Families Approach to Child Protection Conferences.” British Journal of Social Work 45 (5): 1395–1414. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbeiter, E., and K. Toros. 2017. “Participatory Discourse: Engagement in the Context of Child Protection Assessment Practices from the Perspectives of Child Protection Workers, Parents and Children.” Children and Youth Services Review 74: 17–27. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, C. 2020. “The Child in Child Protection: Invisible and Unheard.” Child & Family Social Work 25 (1): 135–143. doi:10.1111/cfs.12671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett, C., J. Dickens, G. Schofield, G. Philip, and J. Young. 2016. “Independence and Effectiveness: Messages from the Role of Independent Reviewing Officers in England.” Children and Youth Services Review 71: 148–156. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N. 2007. Approaches to Social Enquiry. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolin, A. 2016. “Children’s agency in interprofessional meetings in child welfare work.” Child and Family Social Work 21 (4): 502–511. doi:10.1111/cfs.12167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burman, E. 2017. Deconstructing Developmental Psychology. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collings, S., R. Grace, and G. Llewellyn. 2016. “Negotiating with Gatekeepers in Research with Disadvantaged Children: A Case Study of Children with Intellectual Disability.” Children & Society 30 (6): 499–509. doi:10.1111/chso.12163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, T. M. 2017. “A Child’s Right to Participate: Implications for International Child Protection.” The International Journal of Human Rights 21 (1): 14–46. doi:10.1080/13642987.2016.1248122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corsaro, W. A. 2015. The Sociology of Childhood. 4th ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cossar, J., M. Brandon, and P. Jordan. 2016. “‘You’ve Got to Trust Her, and She’s Got to Trust You’: Children’s Views on Participation in the Child Protection System.” Child & Family Social Work 21 (1): 103–112. doi:10.1111/cfs.12115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education (DfE). 2018. Working Together to Safeguard Children: A Guide to Inter-agency Working to Safeguard and Promote the Welfare of Children. http://www.gov.uk/government/publications.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (DoH). 2000. Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Devlieghere, J., and R. Roose. 2018. “Electronic Information Systems: In Search of Responsive Social Work.” Journal of Social Work 18 (6): 650–665. doi:10.1177/1468017318757296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, B., A. Gupta, K. Morris, and J. Warner. 2018. “Let's Stop Feeding the Risk Monster: Towards a Social Model of 'Child Protection’.” Families, Relationships and Societies 7 (1): 7–22. doi:10.1332/204674316X14552878034622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, H. 2017. “How Children Become Invisible in Child Protection Work: Findings from Research into Day-to-Day Social Work Practice.” British Journal of Social Work, 47 (4): 1007–1023. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1997. “Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth.” In Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984. Vol. 1. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K., G. Samuels, and J. Pryce. 2018. “Authors of Accountability: Paperwork and Social Work in Contemporary Child Welfare Practice.” Children and Youth Services Review 85: 43–52. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, M. 2015. “Shame and Guilt in Child Protection Social Work: New Interpretations and Opportunities for Practice.” Child & Family Social Work 20 (3): 333–343. doi:10.1111/cfs.12081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N., N. Parton, and M. Skivenes. 2011. Child Protection Systems: International Trends and Orientations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gillingham, P. 2015. “Electronic Information Systems in Human Services Organisations: The What, Who, Why and How of Information.” British Journal of Social Work 45 (5): 1598–1613. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcu030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groundwater-Smith, S., S. Dockett, and D. Bottrell. 2015. Participatory Research with Children and Young People. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Handley, P., and C. Doyle. 2014. “Ascertaining the Wishes and Feelings of Young Children: Social Workers Perceptions on Skills and Training.” Child & Family Social Work 19 (4): 443–454. doi:10.1111/cfs.12043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, K., and Y. Mulholland. 2015. “Discourse Analysis and Activist Social Work: Investigating Practice Processes.” The Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 25 (3): 3–27. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/jssw/vol25/iss3/2.
   Google Scholar
• Heimer, M., and J. Palme. 2016. “Rethinking Child Policy Post-UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: Vulnerable Children’s Welfare in Sweden.” Journal of Social Policy 45 (3): 435–452. doi:10.1017/S0047279415000744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huuskonen, S., and P. Vakkari. 2015. “Selective Clients’ Trajectories in Case Files Filtering Out Information in the Recording Process in Child Protection.” British Journal of Social Work 45 (3): 798–808. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A., and A. Prout. 2015. Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood. 3rd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCafferty, P. 2017. “Implementing Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in Child Protection Decision-Making: a Critical Analysis of the Challenges and Opportunities for Social Work.” Child Care in Practice 23 (4): 327–341. doi:10.1080/13575279.2016.1264368.
   Google Scholar
• Muench, K., C. Diaz, and R. Wright. 2017. “Children and Parent Participation in Child Protection Conferences: A Study in One English Local Authority.” Child Care in Practice 23 (1): 49–63. doi:10.1080/13575279.2015.1126227.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, E., A. Turnell, and T. Murphy. 2016. “You Can’t Grow Roses in Concrete.” Action Research Final Report Signs of Safety Innovations Project. November 2014–March 2016. http://wwwmunroturnellmurphy.com.
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. 2017. Framework and Evaluation Schedule for the Inspections of Services for Children in Need of Help and Protection, Children Looked After and Care Leavers. Manchester: Ofsted. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/662784/Framework_and_evaluation_schedule_for_inspections_of_services_for_children_in_need_of_help_and_protection.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ogle, J., S. Vincent, and M. Hawkes. 2022. “Authenticity, Power and the Case Record: A Textual Analysis of the Participation of Children and Young People in Their Child Protection Conference.” Child & Family Social Work 27 (2): 278–279. doi:10.1111/cfs.12881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswell, D. 2013. The Agency of Children: From Family to Global Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, S., C. Abbott, L. McKnight, and C. Davies. 2015. “High risk yet invisible: conflicting narratives on social research involving children and young people, and the role of research ethics committees.” British Educational Research Journal 41 (4): 709–729. doi:10.1002/berj.3160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roets, G., K. Rutten, R. Roose, C. Vandekinderen, and R. Soetaert. 2015. “Constructing the ‘Child at Risk’ in Social Work Reports: A Way of Seeing is a Way of Not Seeing.” Children & Society 29 (3): 198–208. doi:10.1111/chso.12115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skotte, P. S. 2020. “On Caseworkers’ Writing in Child Welfare − When Less is More.” European Journal of Social Work 23 (1): 131–143. doi:10.1080/13691457.2018.1469474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. 2005. Institutional Ethnography. A Sociology for People. Lanham: Altmira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2004. “Underpinning Knowledge for Child Care Practice: Reconsidering Child Development Theory.” Child & Family Social Work 9 (3): 225–235. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2004.00330.x.
   Google Scholar
• Turnell, A., and S. Edwards. 1999. Signs of Safety: A Solution and Safety Orientated Approach to Child Protection Casework. London: W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 1989. Convention on the Rights of the Child. https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38f.html
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2009. General Comment No 12: The Right of the Child to Be Heard. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/AdvanceVersions/CRC-C-GC-12.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van Bijleveld, G. G., J. F. G. Bunders-Aelen, and C. W. M. Dedding. 2020. “Exploring the Essence of Enabling Child Participation within Child Protection Services.” Child & Family Social Work 25 (2): 286–293. doi:10.1111/cfs.12684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vis, S. A., A. Holtan, and N. Thomas. 2012. “Obstacles for Child Participation in Care and Protection Cases - Why Norwegian Social Workers Find It Difficult.” Child Abuse Review 21 (1): 7–23. doi:10.1002/car.1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webber, M. 2015. Applying Research Evidence in Social Work Practice. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss-Gal, I., L. Levin, and M. Krumer-Nevo. 2014. “Applying Critical Social Work in Direct Practice with Families.” Child & Family Social Work 19 (1): 55–64. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00880.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weld, N., and M. Greening. 2003. The Three Houses Model: A Tool for Gathering Information. www.mefirst.org.uk/…/Weld-and-Greening-the-3-Houses-model-a-tool-for-gathering.
   Google Scholar