From Ethnography to Engagement: The Lab as a Site of Intervention

References

• Barben, D., Fisher, E., Selin, C. and Guston, D. H. (2008) Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: Foresight, engagement, and integration, in: E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch and J. Wajcman (Eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed., pp. 979–1000 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Calleja-López, A. and Fisher, E. (2009) Dialogues from the lab: Contemporary maieutics for socio-technical inquiry, in: Converging Technologies, Changing Societies. Proceedings of Society for Philosophy and Technology, July 7–10, The Netherlands, University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M. and Evans, R. (2002) The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience, Social Studies of Science, 32(2), pp. 235–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M. and Evans, R. (2007) Rethinking Expertise (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Conley, S. N. (2014) Negotiating socio-technical contracts anticipatory governance and reproductive technologies, Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, G. (2007) What is political in sub-politics? How Aristotle might help STS, Social Studies of Science, 37(5), pp. 781–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doing, P. (2008) Give me a laboratory and i will raise a discipline: The past, present, and future politics of laboratory studies, in: E. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch and J. Wajcman (Eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed., pp. 279–295 (Cambridge: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Doubleday, R. and Viseu, A. (2010) Questioning interdisciplinarity: What roles for laboratory based social science, in: K. Kjølberg and F. Wickson (Eds) Nano meets macro: Social perspectives on nanoscale sciences and technologies, pp. 55–84 (Singapore: Pan Stanford Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2001) European governance: A white paper, COM (2001) 428 final. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52001DC0428&qid=1398784556210&from=EN (accessed 29 April 2014).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2002) Improving the knowledge base for better policies. Communication from the Commission on the Collection and Use of Expertise by the Commission: Principles and Guidelines COM(2002) 713 final. Available at ec.europa.eu/governance/docs/comm_expertise_en.pdf (accessed 29 April 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U. (2014) Within, across and beyond: Reconsidering the role of social sciences and humanities in Europe, Science as Culture, 23(3), pp. 384–396. Available at http://horizons.mruni.eu/speakers/ulrike-felt/ (accessed 29 April 2014).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. (2007) Ethnographic invention: Probing the capacity of laboratory decisions, NanoEthics, 1(2), pp. 155–165.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. (2014) Invited testimony. The presidential commission for the study of bioethical issues, Sixteenth Meeting, February 11, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. and Mahajan, R. L. (2010) Embedding the humanities in engineering: Art, dialogue, and a laboratory, in: M. E. Gorman (Ed) Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration, pp. 209–230 (Cambridge: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. and Maricle, G. (in press) Higher-level responsiveness? Socio-technical integration within U.S. and U.K. Nanotechnology research priority setting, Science and Public Policy, Available online 28 April, 2014, doi:10.1093/scipol/scu017.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. and Schuurbiers, D. (2013) Socio-technical integration research: Collaborative inquiry at the midstream of research and development, in: N. Doorn, D. Schuurbiers, I. van de Poel and M. E. Gorman (Eds) Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening Up the Laboratory, pp. 97–110 (Dordrecht: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., Biggs, S., Lindsay, S. and Zhao, J. (2010) Research thrives on integration of natural and social sciences, Nature, 463, p. 1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flipse, S. M., van der Sanden, M. C. A. and Osseweijer, P. (2013) Midstream modulation in bio-technology industry: Redefining what is ‘part of the job’ of researchers in industry, Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), pp. 1141–1164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flipse, S. M., van der Sanden, M. C. A., and Osseweijer, P. (2014) Improving industrial R&D practices with social and ethical aspects: Aligning key performance indicators with social and ethical aspects in food technology R&D, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, pp. 185–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1995) Boundaries of science, in: S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen and T. Pinch (Eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 393–443 (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc).
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. (2014) Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’, Social Studies of Science, 44(2), pp. 218–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackett, E. J. (2014) The vilnius declaration, Science, Technology & Human Values, 39(1), pp. 3–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2005) Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2011) Constitutional moments in governing science and technology, Science and engineering ethics, 17(4), pp. 621–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2012) Science and Public Reason (New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. and Kim, S. H. (2009) Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea, Minerva, 47(2), pp. 119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981) The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science (Oxford: Pergamon).
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1995) Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science, in: S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Petersen and T. Pinch (Eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, pp. 140–166 (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc).
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, R. E. (2008) Lab history: Reflections, Isis, 99(4), pp. 761–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1983) Give me a laboratory and i will raise the world, in: K. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (Eds) Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, pp. 141–170 (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1979) Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, Paperback ed. (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (1991) A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2007) The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy, Social Studies of Science, 37(5), pp. 759–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (NSF). (2013) FY 2014 NSF Budget Request to Congress Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/about/budget/fy2014/pdf/47_fy2014.pdf (accessed 28 April 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. and Bennett, G. (2012) Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. and Stavrianakis, A. (2013) Demands of the Day: On the Logic of Anthropological Inquiry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ribes, D. and Baker, K. (2007) Modes of social science engagement in community infrastructure design, in: Communities and Technologies 2007: Proceedings of the Third Communities and Technologies Conference, East Lansing: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, H., Fisher, E. and Schuurbiers, D. (2013) Integrating science and society in European framework programmes: Trends in project-level solicitations, Research Policy, 42(5), pp. 1126–1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurbiers, D. (2011) What happens in the lab: Applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory, Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), pp. 769–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shilton, K. (2012) Values levers: Building ethics into design, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(3), pp. 374–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., and Macnaghten, P. (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation, Research Policy, 42(9), pp. 1568–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traweek, S. (1988) Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Valve, H. and McNally, R. (2013) Articulating scientific practice with PROTEE: STS, loyalties, and the limits of reflexivity, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(4), pp. 470–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilnius Declaration. (2013) Vilnius Declaration—Horizons for Social Sciences and Humanities, Available at: http://horizons.mruni.eu/vilnius-declaration-horizons-for-social-sciences-and-humanities/ (accessed 28 April 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. (2011) Lab work goes social, and vice versa: Strategising public engagement processes, Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), pp. 791–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenzen, M. and Restivo, S. (1982) The mysterious morphology of immiscible liquids: A study of scientific practice, Social Science Information, 21(3), pp. 447–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar