Sustainable Technologies and Transdisciplinary Futures: From Collaborative Design to Digital Fabrication

References

• Banzi, M. (2009) Getting Started with Arduino (Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media).
   Google Scholar
• Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2001) A genealogy of the increasing gap between science and the public, Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), pp. 99–113. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2009) A historical perspective on science and its ‘others’, Isis, 100(2), pp. 359–368. doi: 10.1086/599547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., Betsil, M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., Schroeder, H., Siebenhuner, B. and Zondervan, R. (2010) Earth system governance: A research framework, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), pp. 277–298. doi: 10.1007/s10784-010-9137-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carew, A. L. and Wickson, F. (2010) The TD wheel: A heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research, Futures, 42(10), pp. 1146–1155. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COST Action Cultural Sustainability (2010) Memorandum of Understanding for the Implementation of a European Concerted Research Action Designated as COST Action IS1007: Investigating Cultural Sustainability (Brussels: COST/European Cooperation in Science and Technology). Available at http://w3.cost.eu/fileadmin/domain_files/ISCH/Action_IS1007/mou/IS1007-e.pdf (accessed 29 January 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Diez, T. (2014) Distributed and open creation platforms as key enablers for smarter cities, Journal of Peer Production, 5. Available at: http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/ (accessed 29 January 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Doorn, N., Schuurbiers, D., Van de Poel, I. and Gorman, M. E. (2013) Early engagement and new technologies: Towards comprehensive technology engagement? in: D. Schuurbiers, N. Doorn, I. Van de Poel and M. E. Gorman (Eds) Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening Up the Laboratory, pp. 233–251 (London: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U. (2014) Within, across and beyond: Reconsidering the role of social sciences and humanities in Europe, Science as Culture, 23(3), pp. 384–396. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2014.926146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, U., Igelsböck, J., Schikowitz, A. and Völker, T. (2012) Challenging participation in sustainability research, International Journal of Deliberative Mechanisms in Science, 1(1), pp. 4–34.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. and Ravetz, J. (2008) Values and uncertainties, in: G. H. Hadorn, H. Hoffman-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann and E. Zemp (Eds) Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, pp. 361–368. (Berlin: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• Gershenfeld, N. (2007) Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop, from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication (Cambridge, MA: Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M. and Nowotny, H. (2001) The potential of transdisciplinarity, in: J. Thompson-Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Haberli, A. Bill, R. W. Scholz and M. Welti (Eds) Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving Among Science, Technology and Society, pp. 67–80 (Basel: Birkhauser-Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Gramazio, F. and Kohler, M. (2008) Digital materiality in architecture: Bridging the realms of the virtual and physical, in: R. Geiser (Ed) Explorations in Architecture, pp. 179–199 (Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Herst, D. (2011) Form follows user: Participatory design, the open form and art education, in: B. Abel, L. Evers, R. Klassen and P. Troxler (Eds) Open Design Now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive (Amsterdam: BIS Publishers). Available at: http://opendesignnow.org/index.php/case/form-follows-user-deanna-herst/ (accessed 29 January 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. (2001) Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences, Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/10/1/301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jegou, F. and Manzini, E. (Eds) (2008) Collaborative Services: Social Innovation and Design for Sustainability (Milan: Edizioni POLI.design).
   Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T. (2007) Interdisciplinary approaches in social science research, in: W. Outwaite and S. P. Turner (Eds) Sage Handbook of Social Science Methodology, pp. 32–49 (Los Angeles, CA: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Levidow, L. (2014) Introduction to Sac Forum: ‘Embedding social sciences?’, Science as Culture, 23(3), pp. 382–383. doi: 10.1080/09505431.2014.926148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento, S. and Polvora, A. (2013) Opening up technologies to the social: Between interdisciplinarity and citizen participation, Design Issues, 29(4), pp. 31–40. doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento, S. and Polvora, A. (2016) Social sciences in the transdisciplinary making of sustainable artifacts, Social Science Information, 55(1), pp. 28–42. doi: 10.1177/0539018415609173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieusma, D. (2004) Alternative design scholarship: Working toward appropriate design, Design Issues, 20(3), pp. 13–23. doi: 10.1162/0747936041423280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. (2006) The Potential of Transdisciplinarity. Available at http://www.helga-nowotny.eu/downloads/helga_nowotny_b59.pdf (accessed 29 January 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Rethinking Science: Knowledge in an Age of Uncertainty (Cambridge: Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Paio, A., Eloy, S., Rato, V., Resende, R. and de Oliveira, M. J. (2012) Prototyping Vitruvius, new challenges: Digital education, research and practice, Nexus Network Journal, 14(3), pp. 409–429. doi: 10.1007/s00004-012-0124-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, C. (2009) Make: Electronics (Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media).
   Google Scholar
• Ravetz, J., Funtowicz, S. and O’Connor, M. (1998) Challenges in the use of science for sustainable development, International Journal for Sustainable Development, 1(1), pp. 99–107. doi: 10.1504/IJSD.1998.004206
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, L. and Stappers, P. J. (2012) Convivial Design Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design (Amsterdam: BIS Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Schaub, A., Herst, D., Surya, T. and Agrivina, I. (2011) Fifty dollar leg prosthesis, in: B. Abel, L. Evers, R. Klassen and P. Troxler (Eds) Open Design Now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive (Amsterdam: BIS Publishers). Available at: http://opendesignnow.org/index.php/case/fifty-dollar-leg-prosthesis-alex-schaub-et-al/ (accessed 29 January 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Schuurbiers, D., Doorn, N., Van de Poel, I. and Gorman, M. E. (2013) Mandates and methods for early engagement, in: D. Schuurbiers, N. Doorn, I. Van de Poel and M. E. Gorman (Eds) Early Engagement and New Technologies: Opening Up the Laboratory, pp. 3–14 (London: Springer).
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (2005) World Summit Outcome, Resolution A/60/1, adopted by the General Assembly on September 15.
   Google Scholar
• Wickson, F., Carew, A. L. and Russell, A. W. (2006) Transdisciplinary research: Characteristics, quandaries and quality, Futures, 38(9), pp. 1046–1059. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2006.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhouse, E., Hess, D., Breyman, S. and Martin, B. (2002) Science studies and activism: Possibilities and problems for reconstructivist agendas, Social Studies of Science, 32(2), pp. 297–319. doi: 10.1177/0306312702032002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar