2,200
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Constituting ‘Visual Attention’: On the Mediating Role of Brain Stimulation and Brain Imaging Technologies in Neuroscientific Practice

, &

References

  • Aagaard, J. (2015) Media multitasking, attention, and distraction: A critical discussion, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), pp. 885–896. doi: 10.1007/s11097-014-9375-x
  • Aagaard, J. et al. (2018) An introduction to postphenomenological methodologies, in: J. Aagaard, J. K. B. Friis, J. Sorenson, O. Tafdrup and C. Hasse (Eds) Postphenomenological Methodologies: New Ways in Mediating Techno-Human Relationships, pp. xi–xxv (London: Lexington Books).
  • Akrich, M. (1992) The de-scription of technical objects, in: W. E. Bijker and J. Law (Eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, pp. 205–224 (Cambridge: The MIT Press).
  • Alaç, M. (2008) Working with brain scans: Digital images and gestural interaction in fMRI laboratory, Social Studies of Science, 38(4), pp. 483–508. doi: 10.1177/0306312708089715
  • Albus, J. S., et al. (2007) A proposal for a decade of the mind initiative, Science, 317(5843), p. 1321b. doi: 10.1126/science.317.5843.1321b
  • Allgaier, J., et al. (2013) Medialized science? Journalism Practice, 7(4), pp. 413–429. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2013.802477
  • Beaulieu, A. (2002) Images are not the (only) truth: Brain mapping, visual knowledge, and iconoclasm, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(1), pp. 53–86. doi: 10.1177/016224390202700103
  • Brosnan, C. and Michael, M. (2014) Enacting the ‘neuro’ in practice: Translational research, adhesion and the promise of porosity, Social Studies of Science, 44(5), pp. 680–700. doi: 10.1177/0306312714534333
  • Choudhury, S. and Slaby, J. (2012) Introduction: critical neuroscience – between lifeworld and laboratory, in: S. Choudhury and J. Slaby (Eds) Critical Neuroscience: A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Contexts of Neuroscience, pp. 1–26 (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell).
  • Dumit, J. (2004) Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical America (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Forss, A. (2012) Cells and the (imaginary) patient: The multistable practitioner-technology-cell interface in the cytology laboratory, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 15(3), pp. 295–308. doi: 10.1007/s11019-011-9325-0
  • Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall).
  • Garfinkel, H. (2002) Ethnomethodology’s Program: Working Out Durkheim’s Aphorism (New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers).
  • Gilbert, N. G. and Mulkay, M. (1984) Opening Pandora’s Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientist’s Discourse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Gross, S. (2009) Experts and ‘knowledge that counts’: A study into the world of brain cancer diagnosis, Social Science & Medicine, 69, pp. 1819–1826. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.017
  • Hasse, C. (2008) Postphenomenology: Learning cultural perception in science, Human Studies, 31(1), pp. 43–61. doi: 10.1007/s10746-007-9075-4
  • Heritage, J. (1984) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology (Cambridge: Polity Press).
  • Herrmann, C. S., et al. (2016) EEG oscillations: From correlation to causality, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 103(1), pp. 12–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.003
  • Heiberg Engel, P. J.-. (2008) Tacit knowledge and visual expertise in medical diagnostic reasoning: Implications for medical education, Medical Teacher, 30(7), pp. e184–e188. doi: 10.1080/01421590802144260
  • Ihde, D. (1991) Instrumental Realism: The Interface between Philosophy of Science and Philosophy of Technology (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press).
  • Ihde, D. (1998) Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science (Evanston: Northwestern University Press).
  • Ihde, D. (2009) Postphenomenology and Technoscience: The Peking Lectures (New York: The State University of New York Press).
  • Jefferson, G. (2004) Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction, in: G. H. Lerner (Ed) Conversation Analysis: Studies From the First Generation, pp. 13–31 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
  • Joyce, K. A. (2006) From numbers to pictures: The development of magnetic resonance imaging and the visual turn in medicine, Science as Culture, 15(1), pp. 1–22. doi: 10.1080/09505430600639322
  • Koch, C. et al. (2015) Project Mindscope, in: G. Marcus and J. Freeman (Eds) The Future of the Brain: Essays by the World’s Leading Neuroscientists, pp. 25–39 (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Koschmann, T. and Zemel, A. (2014) Instructed objects, in: M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann and M. Rauniomaa (Eds) Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, pp. 357–377 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. and Mulkay, M. (Eds) (1983) Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. (London: SAGE).
  • Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986) Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts, 2nd ed., (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
  • Littlefield, M. (2009) Constructing the organ of deceit: The rhetoric of fMRI and brain fingerprinting in post-9/11 America, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 34(3), pp. 365–392. doi: 10.1177/0162243908328756
  • Littlefield, M. and Johnson, J.M. (Eds) (2012) The Neuroscientific Turn: Transdisciplinarity in the Age of the Brain. (Michigan: The University of Michigan Press).
  • Lynch, M. (1985) Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).
  • Lynch, M. (1988) The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences, Human Studies, 11(2), pp. 201–234.
  • Lynch, M. (1993) Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Miniussi, C., et al. (2013) Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(8), pp. 1702–1712. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.014
  • Nevile, M. et al. (2014) On the interactional ecology of objects, in: M. Nevile, P. Haddington, T. Heinemann and M. Rauniomaa (Eds) Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity, pp. 3–26 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).
  • Pickersgill, M. and Van Keulen, I. (Eds) (2012) Sociological Reflections on the Neurosciences. (Bingley: Emerald).
  • Rosenberger, R. (2008) Perceiving other planets: Bodily experience, interpretation, and the Mars orbiter camera, Human Studies, 31(1), pp. 63–75. doi: 10.1007/s10746-007-9078-1
  • Rosenberger, R. (2011) A case study in the applied philosophy of imaging: The synaptic vesicle debate, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 36(1), pp. 6–32. doi: 10.1177/0162243909337117
  • Rosenberger, R. (2013) Mediating Mars: Perceptual experience and scientific imaging technologies, Foundations of Science, 18(1), pp. 75–91. doi: 10.1007/s10699-012-9286-7
  • Roskies, A. L. (2007) Are neuroimages like photographs of the brain?, Philosophy of Science, 74(5), pp. 860–872. doi: 10.1086/525627
  • Roth, W. M. (2009) Radical uncertainty in scientific discovery work, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 34(3), pp. 313–336. doi: 10.1177/0162243907309627
  • Sack, A. (2006) Transcranial magnetic stimulation, causal structure-function mapping and networks of functional relevance, Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(5), pp. 593–599. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.06.016
  • Sacks, H. (1992) Lectures on Conversation Volumes I & II, edited by G. Jefferson. (Oxford: Blackwell).
  • Te Molder, H. and Potter, J. (Eds) (2005) Conversation and Cognition. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Verbeek, P. P.-. (2005) What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania University Press).
  • Verbeek, P.P-. (2016). Toward a theory of technological mediation: A program for postphenomenological research, in: J. K. B. Friis and R. P. Crease (Eds) Technoscience and Postphenomenology: The Manhattan Papers, pp. 189–204 (London: Lexington Books).
  • Walsh, V. and Cowey, A. (2000) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1(1), pp. 73–80. doi: 10.1038/35036239
  • Ward, L. M. (2003) Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes, Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(12), pp. 553–559. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.012
  • Wittenburg, P., et al. 2006. ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Proceedings of LREC 2006, Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, pp. 1556–1559.