320
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘From Bench to Stage’: How Life Scientists’ Leisure Groups Build Collective Self-Care

References

  • Acker, J. (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations, Gender & Society, 4(2), pp. 139–158.
  • Åkerlind, G. S. (2005) Postdoctoral researchers: roles, functions and career prospects, Higher Education Research & Development, 24(1), pp. 21–40.
  • Bauman, Z. (2001) Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers).
  • Beck, U. (1986) Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in Eine Andere Moderne (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag).
  • Bioland, P. A. (1987) Leisure as a campus resource for fostering student development, Journal of Counseling & Development, 65, pp. 291–294.
  • Cech, E. A. and Blair-Loy, M. (2014) Consequences of flexibility stigma among academic scientists and engineers, Work and Occupations, 41(1), pp. 86–110.
  • Charmaz, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory (London: Thousand Oaks; CA: Sage Publications).
  • Cox, A., Herrick, T. and Keating, P. (2012) Accommodations: staff identity and university space, Teaching in Higher Education, 17(6), pp. 697–709.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. and LeFevre, J. (1989) Optimal experience in work and leisure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), pp. 815–822.
  • Dahlstrom, M. F. and Ho, S. S. (2012) Ethical considerations of using narrative to communicate science, Science Communication, 34(5), pp. 592–617.
  • Davies, S. R. and Horst, M. (2015) Crafting the group: care in research management, Social Studies of Science, 45(3), pp. 371–393.
  • de la Bellacasa, M. P. (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: assembling neglected things, Social Studies of Science, 41(1), pp. 85–106.
  • Dumazedier, J. and Latouche, N. (1962) Work and leisure in French sociology, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 1(2), pp. 13–30.
  • Etzkowitz, H. (1992) Individual investigators and their research groups, Minerva, 30(1), pp. 28–50.
  • Fochler, M. and de Rijcke, S. (2017) Implicated in the indicator game? An experimental debate, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 3, pp. 21–40.
  • Fochler, M., Felt, U. and Müller, R. (2016) Unsustainable growth, hyper-competition, and worth in life science research: Narrowing evaluative repertoires in doctoral and postdoctoral scientists’ work and lives, Minerva, 54(2), pp. 175–200.
  • Friese, C. (2013) Realizing potential in translational medicine: The uncanny emergence of care as science, Current Anthropology, 54(S7), pp. S129–S138.
  • Hackett, E. J. (1990) Science as a vocation in the 1990s: The changing organizational culture of academic science, The Journal of Higher Education, 61(3), pp. 241–279.
  • Hackett, E. J. (2005) Essential tensions: identity, control, and risk in research, Social Studies of Science, 35(5), pp. 787–826.
  • Hammarfelt, B. M. S. and de Rijcke, S. (2015) Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University, Research Evaluation, 24(1), pp. 63–77.
  • Haworth, J. T. and Veal, A. J. (2004) Work and Leisure (London: Routledge).
  • Holden, K. (2015) Lamenting the golden age: Love, labour and loss in the collective memory of scientists, Science as Culture, 24(1), pp. 24–45.
  • Kerr, A. and Garforth, L. (2016) Affective practices, care and bioscience: a study of two laboratories, The Sociological Review, 64(1), pp. 3–20.
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999) Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).
  • Lave, R., Mirowski, P. and Randalls, S. (2010) Introduction: STS and neoliberal science, Social Studies of Science, 40(5), pp. 659–675.
  • Law, J. (1994) Organizing Modernity (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers).
  • Lewis, J. (2016) Matchmaking mechanisms: collaborative arrangements in proteomics and bioinformatics, in: J. Parker, N. Vermeulen, and B Penders (Eds) Collaboration in the new Life Sciences, pp. 179–200 (London: Routledge).
  • Lorenz-Meyer, D. (2010) Possibilities of enacting and researching epistemic communities, Sociological Research Online, 15(2), pp. 1–13.
  • Michael, M. (1996) Inoculating gadgets against ridicule, Science as Culture, 6(2), pp. 167–193.
  • Mirowski, P. and Van Horn, R. (2005) The contract research organization and the commercialization of scientific research, Social Studies of Science, 35(4), pp. 503–548.
  • Mol, A. M., Moser, I. and Pols, J. (Eds.) (2010) Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms (Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag).
  • Müller, R. (2012) Collaborating in life science research groups: The question of authorship, Higher Education Policy, 25(3), pp. 289–311.
  • Müller, R. and Kenney, M. (2014) Agential conversations: Interviewing postdoctoral life scientists and the politics of mundane research practices, Science as Culture, 23(4), pp. 537–559.
  • Mumby, D. K. (1987) The political function of narrative in organizations, Communications Monographs, 54(2), pp. 113–127.
  • Myers, N. (2012) Dance your PhD: embodied animations, body experiments, and the affective entanglements of life science research, Body & Society, 18(1), pp. 151–189.
  • Parker, S. (1975) The Sociology of leisure: progress and problems, The British Journal of Sociology, 26(1), pp. 91–101.
  • Parker, S. (1982) Work and Retirement (London: Allen & Unwin).
  • Powell, K. (2017) Work–life balance: Break or burn out, Nature, 545(7654), pp. 375–377.
  • Rojek, C. (2000) Leisure and Culture (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Rojek, C. (Ed.) (1989) Leisure for Leisure: Critical Essas (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
  • Rojek, C., Shaw, S. and Veal, A. (Eds.) (2006) A Handbook of Leisure Studies (New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Schönbauer, S. (2017) How biologists ‘meet’, in: M. Jonas, B. Littig, and A. Wroblewski (Eds) Methodological Reflections on Practice Oriented Theories, pp. 221–234 (Cham: Springer).
  • Schönbauer, S. (2019) We are standing together in front. How scientists and research groups form identities in the life sciences, Science & Technology Studies, 32(1), pp. 60–80.
  • Sennett, R. (2000) Der flexible Mensch. Die Kultur des neuen Kapitalismus (Berlin: Berliner Taschenbuchverlag).
  • Shapin, S. (2008) The Scientific Life. A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
  • Shore, C. (2008) Audit culture and illiberal governance: universities and the politics of accountability, Anthropological Theory, 8(3), pp. 278–298.
  • Sigl, L. (2016) On the tacit governance of research by uncertainty. How early stage researchers contribute to the governance of life science research, Science, Technology & Human Values, 41, pp. 347–374.
  • Slaughter, S. and Leslie, L. L. (1999) Academic Capitalism. Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University (Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press).
  • Slaughter, S. and Rhoades, G. (2004) Academic Capitalism and the new Economy: Markets, State, and Higher Education (Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press).
  • Traweek, S. (1988) Beamtimes and Lifetimes. The World of High Energy Phycisists (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
  • Vermeulen, N. (2017) The choreography of a new research field: Aggregation, circulation and oscillation, Environment and Planning, A., 0(0), pp. 1–21.
  • Vermeulen, N., Parker, J. N. and Penders, B. (2013) Understanding life together: A brief history of collaboration in biology, Endeavour, 37(3), pp. 162–171.
  • Watson, T. J. (2008) Work experiences, identities and meanings, in: T.J Watson (Ed) Sociology, Work and Industry, pp. 226–275 (London: Routledge).
  • Wilson, J. (1980) Sociology of leisure, Annual Review of Sociology, 6(1), pp. 21–40.
  • Woolston, C. (2015) Leisure activities: The power of a pastime, Nature, 523(7558), pp. 117–119.
  • Yarnal, C., Qian, X., Hustad, J. and Sims, D. (2013) Intervention for positive use of leisure time among college students, Journal of College and Character, 14(2), pp. 171–176.
  • Ylijoki, O. H. (2005) Academic nostalgia: A narrative approach to academic work, Human Relations, 58(5), pp. 555–576.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.