1,396
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

How Policy Marginalizes Diversity: Politics of Knowledge in India’s Biodiesel Promotion

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Agoramoorthy, G. and Patel, P. (2011) India’s biofuel development: Swings and roundabouts, Environmental Science & Technology, 46, pp. 589–590.
  • Agrawal, A. (1995) Dismantling the divide between indigenous and western knowledge, Development and Change, 26(3), pp. 413–439.
  • Altenburg, T., Dietz, H., Hahl, M., Nikolidakis, N., Rosendahl, C. and Seelige, K. (2009) Biodiesel in India: Value Chain Organisation and Policy Options for Rural Development, Report (Bonn, Germany: German Development Institute).
  • Ariza-Montobbio, P., Lélé, S., Kallis, G. and Martinez-Alier, J. (2010) The political ecology of Jatropha plantations for biodiesel in Tamil Nadu, India, Journal of Peasant Studies, 37/4, pp. 875–897.
  • Arora, S. (2012) Farmers’ participation in knowledge circulation and the promotion of agroecological methods in South India, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 36/2, pp. 207–235.
  • Arora, S. (2019) Admitting uncertainty, transforming engagement: Towards caring practices for sustainability beyond climate change, Regional Environmental Change, 19/6, pp. 1571–1584.
  • Arora, S., Baan Hofman, N., Koshti, V. and Ciarli, T. (2013) Cultivating compliance: Governance of North Indian organic basmati smallholders in a global value chain, Environment and Planning A, 45, pp. 1912–1928.
  • Arora, S., Vijayabaskar, M., Sharma, D. and Stirling, A. (2019) Sustainable development through diversifying pathways in India, Economic and Political Weekly, 54(46), pp. 32–37.
  • Baka, J. (2013) The political construction of wasteland: governmentality, land acquisition and social inequality in South India, Development and Change, 44/2, pp. 409–428.
  • Baka, J. (2014) What wastelands? A critique of biofuel policy discourse in South India, Geoforum, 54, pp. 315–323.
  • Barry, A., Born, G. and Weszkainys, G. (2008) Logics of interdisciplinarity, Economy and Society, 37/1, pp. 20–49.
  • Biswas, P. K., Pohit, S. and Kumar, R. (2010) Biodiesel from jatropha: Can India meet the 20% blending target?, Energy Policy, 38, pp. 1477–1484.
  • Boccagni, P. (2014) From the multi-sited to the in-between: ethnography as a way of delving into migrants’ transnational relationships, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(1), pp. 1–16.
  • Brugnach, M., Craps, M. and Dewulf, A. (2017) Including indigenous peoples in climate change mitigation: addressing issues of scale, knowledge and power, Climatic Change, 140/1, pp. 19–32.
  • Callon, M. (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay, in: J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? pp. 196–233 (London: Routledge Kegan Paul).
  • Callon, M. (2008) Economic markets and the rise of interactive agencements: from prosthetic agencies to habilitated agencies, in: T. Pinch and R Swedberg (Eds) Living in a Material World, pp. 29–56 (London: MIT Press).
  • Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy (London: MIT Press).
  • Carolan, M. (2010) Decentering Biotechnology: Assemblages Built and Assemblages Masked (Farnham: Ashgate).
  • Chaliganti, R. and Müller, U. (2016) Policy discourses and environmental rationalities underpinning India’s biofuel programme, Environmental Policy and Governance, 26, pp. 16–28.
  • Chambers, R. (1983) Rural Development: Putting the Last First (Harlow: Prentice Hall).
  • De Hoop, E. (2018) Understanding marginal changes in ecosystem services from biodiesel feedstock production: A study of Hassan Bio-fuel park, India, Biomass and Bioenergy, 114, pp. 55–62.
  • Dalemans, F., Muys, B. and Maertens, M. (2019) Adoption constraints for small-scale agroforestry-based biofuel systems in India. Ecological Economics, 157, pp. 27–39.
  • De Hoop, E. and Arora, S. (2017) Material meanings: ‘waste’ as a performative category of land in colonial India, Journal of Historical Geography, 55, pp. 82–92.
  • De Hoop, E., Pols, A. J. K. and Romijn, H. A. (2016) Limits to responsible innovation, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 3/2, pp. 110–134.
  • Dewangan, A., Yadav, A. K. and Mallick, A. (2018) Current scenario of biodiesel development in India: prospects and challenges, Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 40, pp. 2494–2501.
  • Franco, J., Levidow, L., Fig, D., Goldfarb, L., Hönicke, M. and Luisa Mendonça, M. (2010) Assumptions in the European Union biofuels policy: frictions with experiences in Germany, Brazil and Mozambique, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(4), pp. 661–698.
  • Freeman, R. (2012) Reverb: policy making in wave form, Environment and Planning A, 44, pp. 13–20.
  • German, L., Goetz, A., Searchinger, T., de L.T. Oliveira, G., Tomei, J., Hunsberger, C., and Weigelt, J. (2017) Sine Qua Nons of sustainable biofuels: Distilling implications of under-performance for national biofuel programs, Energy Policy, 108, pp. 806–817.
  • Gonzalez, C. G., (2018) An environmental justice critique of biofuels, in: R Salter et al. (Ed.) Energy Justice: US and International Perspectives (Edward Elgar Publishing). Available at SSRN: ssrn.com/abstract=3274097.
  • Gidwani, V. K. (1992) ‘Waste' and the permanent settlement in Bengal, Economic and Political Weekly, 27(4), PE39-PE46.
  • Gopinathan, M. C. and Sudhakaran, R. (2009) Biofuels: opportunities and challenges in India, In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology – Plant, 45, pp. 350–371.
  • Government of India. 2009. National policy on biofuels.
  • Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York: Routledge).
  • Holmes, J. and Clark, R. (2008) Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation, Environmental Science & Policy, 11, pp. 702–711.
  • Jasanoff, S. (ed.) (2004) States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order (London: Routledge).
  • Jasanoff, S. and Kim, S.-H. (2009) Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear regulation in the U.S. and South Korea, Minerva, 47(2), pp. 119–146.
  • Jungman, A. A., Bhat, M. G., Jayachandran, K. and Gowda, B. (2016) An assessment of biodiesel feedstock conversion efficiency: a case study of decentralised biofuel production program in rural India, International Journal of Renewable Energy Technology, 8(1), pp. 47–63.
  • Kanninen, M., Murdiyarso, D., Seymour, F., Angelsen, A., Wunder, S. and German, L. (2007) Do Trees Grow on Money? The Implications of Deforestation Research for Policies to Promote RRED (Bogor: Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)).
  • Klaus, D., Derek, B., Jonathan, L., Andrew, N., Harris, S., and Mercedes, S. (2011) Rising Global Interest in Farmland: Can it Yield Sustainable and Equitable Benefits? Agriculture and Rural Development (Washington, DC: World Bank).
  • Kant, P. and Wu, S. (2011) The extraordinary collapse of Jatropha as a global biofuel, Environmental Science & Technology, 45/17, pp. 7114–7115.
  • Kothari, B. (2002) Theoretical streams in marginalized peoples’ knowledge(s): systems, asystems, and subaltern knowledge(s), Agriculture and Human Values, 19(3), pp. 225–237.
  • Kumar, S., Chaube, A. and Jain, S. K. (2012) Critical review of jatropha biodiesel promotion policies in India, Energy Policy, 41, pp. 775–781.
  • Lahiri, S. 2009. Losing the plot: The threats to community land and the rural poor through the spread of biofuel jatropha in India. Report ( Brussels, Belgium: Friends of the Earth Europe).
  • Latour, B. (1988) The Pasteurization of France (London: Harvard University Press).
  • Latour, B. (1999) Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies (London: Harvard University Press).
  • Latour, B. (2003) What if we talked politics a little, Contemporary Political Theory, 2, pp. 143–164.
  • Latour, B. (2004) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Latour, B. (2010) An attempt at a “Compositionist manifesto”, New Literary History, 41, pp. 471–490.
  • Latour, B. and Wiebel, P. (eds.) 2005 Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).
  • Lavanya, S. N. 2007. National consultation on “Bio”fuels in India: will they deliver or destroy? Report (Hyderabad, India: Deccan Development Society).
  • Lave R. (2015) Introduction to special issue on critical physical geography. Progress in Physical Geography, Earth and Environment, 39(5), pp. 571–575.
  • Levidow, L., Papaioannou, T. and Birch, K. (2012) Neoliberalism, technoscience and the environment, in: L. Pellizoni and M Ylönen (Eds) Neoliberalism and Technoscience: Critical Assessments, pp. 159–186 (London: Routledge).
  • Li, T. M. (2007) The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics (London: Duke University Press).
  • Lövbrand, E. (2011) Co-producing European climate science and policy: a cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge, Science and Public Policy, 38/3, pp. 225–236.
  • Mabeza, C. (2013) Metaphors for climate adaptation from Zimbabwe: Zephaniah Phiri Maseko and the marriage of water and soil, in: L Green (Ed) Contested Ecologies: Dialogues in the South on Nature and Knowledge, pp. 126–139 (Cape Town: HSRC Press).
  • Misra, R. D. and Murthy, M. S. (2011) Jatropa-the future fuel of India, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, pp. 1350–1359.
  • Mitchell, T. (2002) Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, Modernity (Berkeley: University of California press.
  • Mol, A. (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice (Durham: Duke University Press).
  • Neville, K. J. (2015) The contentious political economy of biofuels, Global Environmental Politics, 15(1), pp. 21–40.
  • Ng’ombe, A., Keivani, R. and Stubbs, M. (2012) Participatory approaches to land policy reform in Zambia: potential and challenges, Environment and Planning A, 44, pp. 1785–1800.
  • Nowlin, M. C. (2011) Theories of the policy process: state of the research and emerging trends, The Policy Studies Journal, 39(S1), pp. 41–60.
  • Oliveira, G., McKay, B. and Plank, C. (2017) How biofuel policies backfire: misguided goals, inefficient mechanisms, and political-ecological blind spots, Energy Policy, 108, pp. 765–775.
  • Palmer, J. R. (2014) Biofuels and the politics of land-use change: tracing the interactions of discourse and place in European policy making, Environment and Planning A, 46, pp. 337–352.
  • Parkhurst, J. (2017) The Politics of Evidence: From Evidence-based Policy to the Good Governance of Evidence (Oxford: Routledge).
  • Planning Commission. (2003) Report of the Committee on Development of Bio-Fuel (Delhi, India: Government of India.
  • Pradhan, S. and Ruysenaar, S. (2014) Burning desires: untangling and interpreting ‘pro-poor’ biofuel policy processes in India and South Africa, Environment and Planning A, 46(2), pp. 299–317.
  • Prince, R. (2010) Policy transfer as policy assemblage: making policy for the creative industries in New Zealand, Environment and Planning A, 42, pp. 169–186.
  • Rajagopal, D. (2008) Implications of India’s biofuel policies for food, water and the poor, Water Policy, 10/S1, pp. 95–106.
  • Reinhardt, G., Gärtner, S., Nettenmaier, N., Munch, J. and Falkenstein, E. 2007. Screening Life Cycle Assessment of Jatropha Biodiesel. Report (Stuttgart, Germany: Dailmer AG).
  • Rietig, K. (2016) The links among contested knowledge, beliefs, and learning in European climate governance: from consensus to conflict in reforming biofuels policy, Policy Studies Journal, 46(1), pp. 137–159.
  • Rittenburg, R. A., Kummel, M. and Perramond, E. P. (2011) The local climate-development nexus: Jatropha and smallholder adaptation in Tamil Nadu, India, Climate and Development, 3/4, pp. 328–343.
  • Rometsch, J. J. (2012) India’s agrofuel policies from a feminist-environmentalist perspective, in: T. Potthast, and S. Meisch (Eds) Climate Change and Sustainable Development: Ethical Perspectives on Land Use and Food Production, pp. 233–238 (Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers).
  • Romijn, H. A. (2011) Land clearing and greenhouse gas emissions from Jatropha biofuels on African Miombo woodlands, Energy Policy, 39, pp. 5751–5762.
  • Scott, J. C. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed (New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Shahare, M. and Thayyil, N. (2020) Responsibility, representation and participation: Burueacratic steering of biofuel research, Science, Technology & Society, doi: 10.1177/0971721820903003
  • Shiva, V. and Shankar, M. (2008) Biofuel Hoax: Jatropha and Land Grab (New Delhi: Navdanya).
  • Singh, B., Swaminathan, R. and Ponraj, V. 2006. Biodiesel Conference Towards Energy Independence – Focus on Jatropha. Report with papers presented at the Conference Rashtrapati Nilayam, Bolaram, Hyderabad, India.
  • Stirling, A. (2008) “Opening up” and “closing down” power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology, Science, Technology and Human Values, 33/2, pp. 262–294.
  • Stirling, A. 2015. Towards Innovation Democracy? Participation, responsibility and precaution in innovation governance. STEPS Working Paper 78, Brighton, UK.
  • Strassheim, H. and Kettunen, P. (2014) When does evidence-based policy turn into policy-based evidence? Configurations, contexts and mechanisms, Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 10(2), pp. 259–277.
  • Ureta, S. (2014) Policy assemblages: proposing an alternative conceptual framework to study public action, Policy Studies, 35/3, pp. 303–318.
  • Verran, H. (2009) On assemblage, Journal of Cultural Economy, 2/1-2, pp. 169–182.
  • Wesselink, A. and Paavola, J. (2011) Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: practitioners’ perspectives, Environment and Planning A, 4, pp. 2688–2704.
  • Wetzstein, S. and Le Heron, R. (2010) Regional economic policy ‘In-the-making’: Imaginaries, political projects and institutions for Auckland's economic transformation, Environment and Planning A, 42(8), pp. 1902–1924.
  • White, B. and Dasgupta, A. (2010) Agrofuels capitalism: a view from political economy, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(4), pp. 593–607.
  • Wynne, B. (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm, Global Environmental Change, 2(2), pp. 111–127.