Experimenting with the Social Life of Homes: Sensor Governmentality and Its Frictions

References

• Akrich, M. (1992) The de-scription of technical objects, in: W. E. Bijker and J. Law (Eds) Shaping Technology / Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, pp. 205–224 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Andrejevic, M. and Burdon, M. (2015) Defining the sensor society, Television & New Media, 16(1), pp. 19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becerra, M., Jerez, A., Valenzuela, M., Garcés, H. O. and Demarco, R. (2018) Life quality disparity: analysis of indoor comfort gaps for Chilean households, Energy Policy, 121, pp. 190–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulos, M. N. K., Resch, B., Crowley, D. N., Breslin, J. G., Sohn, G., Burtner, R., … Chuang, K. Y. S. (2011) Crowdsourcing, citizen sensing and sensor web technologies for public and environmental health surveillance and crisis management: trends, OGC standards and application examples, International Journal of Health Geographics, 10(67), pp. 1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., Lascoumes, P. and Barthe, Y. (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Calvillo, N. (2018) Political airs: from monitoring to attuned sensing air pollution, Social Studies of Science, 48(3), pp. 372–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvillo, N. and Garnett, E. (2019) Data intimacies: building infrastructures for intensified embodied encounters with air pollution, The Sociological Review, 67(2), pp. 340–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, L., Bell, C. and Bell, S. (2017) Can the crowdsourcing data paradigm take atmospheric science to a new level? A case study of the urban heat island of London quantified using Netatmo weather stations, International Journal of Climatology, 37(9), pp. 3597–3605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, K., Weight, J., Berry, M. and MacDonald, H. (2010) At home with media technology, Home Cultures: The Journal of Architecture, Design and Domestic Space, 7(3), pp. 263–286.
   Google Scholar
• Delvenne, P. and Macq, H. (2020) Breaking bad with the participatory turn? Accelerating time and intensifying value in participatory experiments, Science as Culture, 29(2), pp. 245–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, F., Wentland, A. and Pfotenhauer, S. M. (2019) Testing future societies? Developing a framework for test beds and living labs as instruments of innovation governance, Research Policy, 48(9), 103826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. and Karvonen, A. (2011) Living laboratories for sustainability. Exploring the politics and epistemology of urban transition, in: H. Bulkeley, V. Castán Broto, M. Hodson and S. Marvin (Eds) Cities and Low Carbon Transitions, pp. 126–141 (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., Karvonen, A. and Raven, R. (2016) The experimental city: new modes and prospects of urban transformation, in: J. Evans, A. Karvonen and R. Raven (Eds) The Experimental City, pp. 1–12 (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–78 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–79 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J. (2016) Program Earth: Environmental Sensing Technology and the Making of a Computational Planet (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J. (2019) Sensors and sensing practices: reworking experience across entities, environments, and technologies, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(5), pp. 723–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H. and Barratt, B. (2016) Just good enough data: figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories, Big Data & Society, 3(2), pp. 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M. F. (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography, GeoJournal, 69, pp. 211–221.
   Google Scholar
• Gromme, F. (2015) Turning aggression into an object of intervention: tinkering in a crime control pilot study, Science as Culture, 24(2), pp. 227–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M. (2016) Give me an experiment and I will raise a laboratory, Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(4), pp. 613–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Introna, L. D. (2016) Algorithms, governance, and governmentality: on governing academic writing, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(1), pp. 17–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Li, K., Tian, L., Piedrahita, R., Yun, X., Mansata, O., … Shang, L. (2011, September). MAQS: a personalized mobile sensing system for indoor air quality monitoring, In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, pp. 271–280.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. (2014) The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism, GeoJournal, 79(1), pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Klimburg-Witjes, N., Poechhacker, N. and Bowker, G. C. (Eds) (2020) Sensing In/Security. Sensors as Transnational Security Infrastructures (Manchester, UK: Mattering Press).
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, B. (2017) Democratic Experiments: Problematizing Nanotechnology and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lezaun, J., Marres, N. and Tironi, M. (2017) Experiments in participation, in: U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller and L. Smith-Doerr (Eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies: Fourth Edition, pp. 195–221 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Maalsen, S. and Sadowski, J. (2019) The smart home on FIRE: amplifying and accelerating domestic surveillance, Surveillance & Society, 17(1/2), pp. 118–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2012) Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. (2017) Digital Sociology: The Reinvention of Social Research (Cambridge, UK: Polity Press).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1990) Governing economic life, Economy and Society, 19, pp. 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, F., Fenner, D., Grassmann, T., Otto, M. and Scherer, D. (2017) Crowdsourcing air temperature from citizen weather stations for urban climate research, Urban Climate, 19, pp. 170–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, C., Kent, M., Hall, I. and Jones, B. (2020) A data analysis of the Chilean housing stock and the development of modelling archetypes, Energy and Buildings, 206, 109568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, C. L., Chapman, L., Johnston, S., Kidd, C., Illingworth, S., Foody, G., … Leigh, R. R. (2015) Crowdsourcing for climate and atmospheric sciences: current status and future potential, International Journal of Climatology, 35(11), pp. 3185–3203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A. (2018) The data walkshop and radical bottom-up data knowledge, in: H. Knox and D. Nafus (Eds) Ethnography for a Data-Saturated World, pp. 212–232 (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, T. (1993) Testing—one, two, three … testing!”: toward a sociology of testing, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 18(1), pp. 25–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard, H. and Gabrys, J. (2016) From citizen sensing to collective monitoring: working through the perceptive and affective problematics of environmental pollution, GeoHumanities, 2(2), pp. 354–371.
   Google Scholar
• Rouvroy, A. and Berns, T. (2013) Gouvernementalité algorithmique et perspectives d’émancipation: Le disparate comme condition d’individuation par la relation? Réseaux, 177(1), pp. 163–196.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Berkhout, F., Wieczorek, A. J. and Raven, R. (2016) Experimenting in the city: unpacking notions of experimentation for sustainability, in: J. Evans, A. Karvonen and R. Raven (Eds) The Experimental City, pp. 15–31 (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. and Hirsch, E. (Eds.) (1994) Consuming Technologies. Media and Information in Domestic Spaces (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. (2013) Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia? (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, E. G., Watkins, T. H., Solomon, P. A., Thoma, E. D., Williams, R. W., Hagler, G. S., … Preuss, P. W. (2013) The changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring, Environmental Science and Technology, 47, pp. 11369–11377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tironi, M. (2020) Prototyping public friction: exploring the political effects of design testing in urban space, The British Journal of Sociology, 71(3), pp. 503–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tironi, M. and Criado, T. S. (2015) Of sensors and sensitivities. Towards a cosmopolitics of “smart cities”? Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 6(1), pp. 89–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tironi, M. and Valderrama, M. (2018) Unpacking a citizen self-tracking device: smartness and idiocy in the accumulation of cycling mobility data, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 36(2), pp. 294–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. L. (2005) Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Urquiza, A., Amigo, C., Billi, M. and Leal, T. (2017) Pobreza energética en Chile: ¿Un problema invisible? Análisis de fuentes secundarios disponibles de alcance nacional, Technical Report (Santiago de Chile: Red de Pobreza Energética).
   Google Scholar