https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9132-6206
References
- Anderson, W. and Adams, V. (2008) Pramoedya’s chickens: Postcolonial studies of technoscience, in: Edward Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman (Eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed. pp. 181–204 (Cambridge: The MIT Press).
- De la Cadena, M. (2015) Earth Beings. Ecologies of Practice across Andean Worlds (Durham: Duke University Press).
- Dicenta, M. (2020) Can ‘southernized’ science have authority?, Science as Culture, 29(4), pp. 621–624.
- Harding, S. (ed.) (2011) The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader (Durham: Duke University Press).
- Hayden, C. (2003) When Nature Goes Public (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
- Hecht, G. (2012) Being Nuclear. Africans and the Global Uranium Trade (Cambridge: The MIT Press).
- Holbrook, J. R. and Frodeman, R. (2011) Peer review and the ex ante assessment of societal impacts, Research Evaluation, 20(3), pp. 239–246.
- Kreimer, P. (2019) Science and Society in Latin America. Peripheral Modernities (New York: Routledge).
- Kreimer, P. and Vessuri, H. (2017) Latin American science, technology, and society: A historical and reflexive approach, Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 1(1), pp. 17–37.
- Law, J. and Lin, W.-Y. (2014) Provincializing STS: Postcoloniality, symmetry, and method, East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 11(2), pp. 211–227.
- Mignolo, W. (2002) The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference, The South Atlantic Quarterly, 101(1), pp. 57–96.
- Perrotta, D. and Alonso, M. (2020) Cross-national research partnerships in international relations: A study of research groups’ practices of MERCOSUR—Re-envisioning scholarly activities beyond the global north–global south divide, Journal of Studies in International Education, 24(1), pp. 79–96.