Brand New or More of the Same Nuclear? (De)Constructing the Economic Promise of the European Pressurised Reactor in France and the UK

References

• Alvial-Palavicino, C. (2015) The future as practice: A framework to understand anticipation in science and technology, TECNOSCIENZA – Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 6(2), pp. 135–172.
   Google Scholar
• Assemblée nationale. (2014) Coût de de la filière nucléaire et durée d’exploitation des réacteurs. Rapport d’une commission d’enquête. Available at: https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/14/rap-enq/r2007-tI.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Berti, P. and Levidow, L. (2014) Fuelling expectations: A policy-promise lock-in of UK biofuel policy, Energy Policy, 66, pp. 135–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K. and Van Lente, H. (2006) The sociology of expectations in science and technology, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18(3), pp. 285–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantoni, R., Klaes, M. S., Lackerbauer, S. I., Foltyn, C. and Keller, R. (2018) Shale tales: Politics of knowledge and promises in Europe’s shale gas discourses, The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(4), pp. 535–546.
   Google Scholar
• Chateauraynaud, F. (2003) Prospéro. Une Technologie Littéraire Pour les Sciences Humaines (Paris: CNRS).
   Google Scholar
• Chateauraynaud, F. (2011) Argumenter Dans un Champ de Forces: Essai de Balistique Sociologique (Paris: Pétra).
   Google Scholar
• Chateauraynaud, F. and Debaz, J. (2017) Aux bords de l'irréversible. Sociologie pragmatique des transformations (Paris: Pétra).
   Google Scholar
• Cour des comptes. (2020) La filière EPR. Rapport public thématique. Available at: https://www.ccomptes.fr/system/files/2020-08/20200709-rapport-filiere-EPR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, E., Johnstone, P. and Stirling, A. (2016) Understanding the intensity of UK policy commitments to nuclear power. SPRU Working Paper Series SWPS 2016-16.
   Google Scholar
• DTI. (2003) Our Energy Future: Creating a Low Carbon Economy (London: Department of Trade and Industry).
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2014) What you should know about megaprojects and why: an overview, Project Management Journal, 45(2), pp. 6–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folz, J. M. 2019. Rapport au Président Directeur Général d’EDF. (La construction de l’EPR de Flamanville, Octobre).
   Google Scholar
• Grubler, A. (2010) The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: a case of negative learning by doing, Energy Policy, 38(9), pp. 5174–5188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IRSN (2017) Baromètre IRSN: La Perception des Risques et de la Sécurité par les Français. (Fontenay-aux-Roses: IRSN – Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. and Kim, S.-H. (2013) Sociotechnical imaginaries and national energy policies, Science as Culture, 22(2), pp. 189–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, P. (2012) From inquiry to consultation: contested spaces of public engagement with nuclear power, PhD thesis in Geography, University of Exeter, January.
   Google Scholar
• Joly, P. B. (2010) On the economics of techno-scientific promises, in: M. Akrich, Y. Barthe, F. Muniesa, and P. Mustar (Eds) Débordements. Mélanges Offerts à Michel Callon, pp. 203–222 (Paris: Presse des Mines).
   Google Scholar
• Joly, P. B. (2015) Le régime des promesses technoscientifiques, in: M. Audétat (Eds) Pourquoi Tant de Promesses, pp. 31–48 (Paris: Hermann).
   Google Scholar
• Joly, P. B. and Le Renard, C. (2021) The past futures of techno-scientific promises, Science and Public Policy, 48(6), pp. 900–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaijser, A., Lehtonen, M., Meyer, J.-H. and Rubio Varas, M. (2021) Engaging the Atom: The History of Nuclear Energy and Society in Europe from the 1950s to the Present (Morgantown: West Virginia University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kalmbach, K. (2015) From Chernobyl to Fukushima: The impact of the accidents on the French nuclear discourse, in: T. M. Bohn, T. Feldhoff, L. Gebhardt, and A. Graf (Eds) The Impact of Disaster: Social and Cultural Approaches to Fukushima and Chernobyl, pp. 67–95 (Berlin: EB Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• King, D. (2005) Memorandum Submitted to the UK Parliament Select Committee on Environmental Audit by Government Chief Scientific Adviser, Sir David King.
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, K. (2006) The Social dynamics of expectations: the interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 18(3/4), pp. 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, K., Markard, J., Ruef, A. and Truffer, B. (2012) Strategic responses to fuel cell hype and disappointment, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79, pp. 1084–1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. (2010) Deliberative decision-making on radioactive waste management in Finland, France and the UK: Influence of mixed forms of deliberation in the macro discursive context. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 7(3), pp. 175–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. (2019) France short country report (version 2019). History of Nuclear Energy and Society (HoNESt) Consortium Deliverable 3.6 (peer reviewed). Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2454/38269.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. (2021) NEA framing nuclear megaproject ‘pathologies’: vices of the modern Western society?, Nuclear Technology. doi:10.1080/00295450.2021.1885952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. (2022) The discursive construction of economic sustainability of megaprojects: role of the state in British, French, and Finnish debates on state support for nuclear energy, Journal of Mega Infrastructure and Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. and Martiskainen, M. (2015) Nuclear power after Fukushima: prospects and implications, in: P. Ekins, M. Bradshaw, and J. Watson (Eds) Global Energy: Issues, Potentials, and Policy Implications, pp. 306–330 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M., Prades, A., Espluga, J. and Konrad, W. (2021) The emergence of mistrustful civic vigilance in Finnish, French, German and Spanish nuclear policies: ideological trust and (de)politicization, Journal of Risk Research. doi:10.1080/13669877.2021.1957986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKerron, G. (2004) Nuclear power and the characteristics of ‘ordinariness’ – the case of UK energy policy, Energy Policy, 32(17), pp. 1957–1965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marignac, Y. (2003) L’EPR: un choix du passé qui fermerait l’avenir? Notes de WISE-Paris, November. Available at: http://www.wise-paris.org/francais/rapports/notes/031109NoteCadrageEPR-Wise-Paris.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Maurel, V. (2006) EPR, spearhead of the European nuclear renaissance, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 236(14-16), pp. 1447–1454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAO. (2017) Hinkley Point C (London: National Audit Office). Available at: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Hinkley-Point-C.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NEA. (2020) Unlocking Reductions in the Construction Costs of Nuclear: A Practical Guide for Stakeholders, Nuclear Energy Agency, Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Report No. 7530 (Paris: NEA).
   Google Scholar
• Parks, D. (2020) Promises and techno-politics: renewable energy and Malmö’s vision of a climate-smart city, Science as Culture, 29(3), pp. 388–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapport Besson. (2003) Une stratégie énergétique pour la France. Rapport de Jean Besson, Parlementaire en mission sur le Débat national sur les énergies, remis à Nicole Fontaine, ministre déléguée à l’Industrie, Paris. 8 Octobre.
   Google Scholar
• Renner, A. and Giampietro, M. (2020) Socio-technical discourses of European electricity decarbonization: contesting narrative credibility and legitimacy with quantitative story-telling, Energy Research & Social Science, 59, pp. 101279. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.101279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussely, F. (2010) Avenir de la filière française du nucléaire civil, synthèse du rapport, 16 June. Report commissioned by President Sarkozy.
   Google Scholar
• Rubio-Varas, M., De laTorre, J. and Connors, D. P. (2021) The atomic business: structures and strategies, Business History. doi:10.1080/00076791.2020.1856080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S. (2007) Democratic ‘misfit’? Conceptions of civil society participation in France and the European union, Political Studies, 55(2), pp. 384–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M. (2008) Nuclear Power in France: Systemic Issues Influencing Costs. http://npolicy.org/article_file/Nuclear_Power_in_France-Systemic_Issues_Influencing_Costs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scrase, I. and Ockwell, D. (2009) Energy issues: framing and policy change, in: I. Scrase, and G. MacKerron (Eds) Energy for the Future: A New Agenda, pp. 35–53 (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• SDC. (2006) Is Nuclear the Answer? (London: Sustainable Development Commission).
   Google Scholar
• Szarka, J. (2013) From exception to norm – and back again? France, the nuclear revival, and the post-Fukushima landscape, Environmental Politics, 22(4), pp. 646–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tait, M. (2011) Trust and the public interest in the micropolitics of planning practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(2), pp. 157–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2016) The Fall and Rise of Nuclear Power in Britain (Cambridge: UIT Cambridge).
   Google Scholar
• Teräväinen, T., Lehtonen, M. and Martiskainen, M. (2011) Climate change, energy security and risk – debating new nuclear build in Finland, France and the UK, Energy Policy, 39(6), pp. 3434–3442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. (2010) The EPR in Crisis (London: PSIRU Business School, University of Greenwich). Available at: https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/4699/3/(ITEM_4699)_THOMAS_2010-11-E-EPR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. (2016) The Hinkley Point decision: an analysis of the policy process, Energy Policy, 96(September), pp. 421–431.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, S. (2019) Is it the end of the line for light water reactor technology or can China and Russia save the day?, Energy Policy, 125(February), pp. 216–226.
   Google Scholar
• Winskel, M. (2002) Autonomy’s end: nuclear power and the privatization of the British electricity supply industry, Social Studies of Science, 32(3), pp. 439–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WNA. (2020) Nuclear power in the United Kingdom. World Nuclear Association. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-t-z/united-kingdom.aspx.
   Google Scholar