1,159
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Judging Post-Controversy Expertise: Judicial Discretion and Scientific Marginalisation in the Courtroom

&

Bibliography

  • American Academy of Sleep Medicine. (2014) International Classification of Sleep Disorders Third Edition (Darien: AASM Foundation).
  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition (Washington DC: APA).
  • Bal, R. (2005) How to kill with a ballpoint: credibility in Dutch forensic science, Science, Technology and Human Values, 30, pp. 52–75.
  • Barnes, B., Bloor, D. and Henry, J. (1996) Scientific Knowledge: A Sociological Analysis (London: Athlone).
  • Beecher-Monas, E. (2007) Evaluating Scientific Evidence: An Interdisciplinary Framework for Intellectual due Process (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Bloor, D. (1991) Knowledge and Social Imagery (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
  • Cartwright, R. D. (2014) Alcohol and NREM parasomnias: evidence versus opinions in the international classification of sleep disorders 3rd edition, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 10(9), pp. 1039–1040.
  • Caudill, D. S. and LaRue, L. H. (2006) No Magic Wand: The Idealization of Science in law (Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc).
  • Collins, H. M. (1985) Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice (London: Sage Publications).
  • Collins, H. M. and Evans, R. (2007) Rethinking Expertise (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
  • Cramer Bornemann, M. A. (2013) Sexsomnia: A medico-legal case-based approach to analyzing potential sleep-related abnormal sexual behaviors, in: A. Ivanenko, and S.V Kothare (Eds) Parasomnias: Clinical Characteristics and Treatment, pp. 431–461 (New York: Springer Science & Business).
  • Crozier, I. and Rees, G. (2012) Making a space for medical expertise: medical knowledge of sexual assault and the construction of boundaries between forensic medicine and the law in nineteenth-century England, Law, Culture and the Humanities, 8, pp. 285–304.
  • Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2007) Objectivity (New York: Zone Books).
  • Delborne, J. A. (2008) Transgenes and transgressions: scientific dissent as heterogeneous practice, Social Studies of Science, 38, pp. 509–541.
  • DiManno, R. 2020. Will Striking Down the Law’s Intoxication Ruling End Up Hurting Women? The Star, 7 June 2020. Available at: https://www.thestar.com/opinion/star-columnists/2020/06/07/will-striking-down-the-laws-intoxication-rule-end-up-hurting-women.html.
  • Doherty, J. A. 2015. R. v. Hartman (2015 ONCA 498).
  • Ebrahim, I. O. (2006) Somnambulistic sexual behaviour (sexsomnia), Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 13, pp. 219–224.
  • Ebrahim, I. O. and Fenwick, P. (2007) Response to pressman ‘factors that predispose, prime and precipitate NREM parasomnias in adults: clinical and forensic implications’, Sleep Med. Rev, 11, pp. 5–9. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 11, pp. 241-243.
  • Ebrahim, I. O. and Fenwick, P. (2012) Sleep related violence, alcohol and sleepwalking, Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 135(11), pp. e219.
  • Ebrahim, I. O., Fenwick, P., Marks, R. and Peacock, K. W. (2005 August) Violence, sleepwalking and the criminal Law: part 1: the medical aspects, Criminal Law Review, pp. 601–613.
  • Ebrahim, I. O., Shapiro, C. M., Williams, A. J. and Fenwick, P. (2013) Alcohol and sleep 1: effects on normal sleep, Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 37(4), pp. 539–549.
  • Edmond, G. (1999) Science, Law and narrative: helping the ‘facts’ to speak for themselves, Southern Illinois University Law Review, 23, pp. 555–583.
  • Edmond, G. (2001) The Law-Set: The legal-scientific production of medical propriety, Science, Technology and Human Values, 26, pp. 191–226.
  • Edmond, G. and Mercer, D. (1998) Trashing “junk science”, Stanford Technology Law Review, 3, pp. 1–31.
  • Golan, T. (1999) The history of scientific expert testimony in the English courtroom, Science in Context, 12(1), pp. 7–32.
  • Haack, S. (2014) Evidence Matters: Science, Proof and Truth in the law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Hans, V. P. and Saks, M. J. (2018) Improving judge and jury evaluation of scientific evidence, Daedalus, 147(4), pp. 164–180.
  • Jackson, A., Rees, G. and Wortley, N. (2015) Sleep disorders/sexsomnia: The role of the expert and the external/internal factor dichotomy, in: B. Livings, A. Reed, and N Wake (Eds) Mental Condition Defences and the Criminal Justice System: Perspectives from law and Medicine, pp. 236–274. (Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing).
  • Jasanoff, S. (1995) Science at the Bar: Law, Science and Technology in America (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).
  • Jones, C. A. G. (1994) Expert Witnesses: Science, Medicine and the Practice of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
  • Kroker, K. (2007) The Sleep of Others and the Transformations of Sleep Research (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).
  • Lynch, M., Cole, S. A., McNally, R. and Jordan, K. (2008) The Truth Machine: The Contentious History of DNA Profiling (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
  • Moore, K. E. M. 2018. R. v. Hartman (Ontario Courts of Justice 899).
  • Munro, N. A. (2020) Alcohol and parasomnias: The statistical evaluation of the parasomnia defense in sexual assault, where alcohol is involved, Journal of Forensic Sciences, 65(4), pp. 1235–1241.
  • Pressman, M. (2007) Factors that predispose, prime and precipitate NREM parasomnias in adults: clinical and forensic implications, Sleep Medicine Reviews, 11, pp. 5–30.
  • Pressman, M. (2013) Sleepwalking, amnesia, comorbid conditions and triggers: effects of recall and other methodological biases, Sleep, 36(11), pp. 1757–1758.
  • Pressman, M. and Cramer Bornemann, M. (2015) The ICSD-3 NREM parasomnias section is evidence-based resulting from international collaboration, consensus and best practices, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 11(2), pp. 187–188.
  • Pressman, M., Mahowald, M. W., Schenck, C. H. and Cramer Bornemann, M. (2007a) Alcohol-Induced sleepwalking or confusional arousal as a defense to criminal behavior: A review of the scientific evidence and forensic considerations, Journal of Sleep Research, 16, pp. 198–212.
  • Pressman, M., Schenck, C. H., Mahowald, M. W. and Cramer Bornemann, M. (2007b) Sleep science in the courtroom, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 14(2), pp. 108–111.
  • Pressman, M. R., Mahowald, M. W., Schenck, C. H., Cramer Bornemann, M. A., Banerjee, D., Buchanan, P. and Zadra, A. (2013) Alcohol, sleepwalking and violence: lack of reliable scientific evidence, Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 136(2), pp. e229.
  • Rees, G. (2011) ‘Morphology is a witness which doesn’t lie’: diagnosis by similarity relation and analogical inference in forensic medicine, Social Science and Medicine, 73(6), pp. 866–872.
  • Rees, G. 2019. Strong Programme in the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge, in Atkinson, P., Delamont, S., Cernat, A., Sakshaug, J.W. and Williams, R.A. (eds.) SAGE Research Methods Foundations. Available at: https://methods.sagepub.com/foundations/strong-programme-in-the-sociology-of-scientific-knowledge [Accessed 6 November 2020].
  • Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J. (2004) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (London: Sage).
  • Rumbold, J. and Wasik, M. (2015) Special feature on automatism, Medicine, Science and Law, 55(3), pp. 147–149.
  • Scheffer, T. (2010) Knowing How to sleepwalk: placing expert evidence in the midst of an English jury trial, Science, Technology and Human Values, 35(5), pp. 620–644.
  • Schenck, C. H. and Mahowald, M. W. (1995) A polysomnographically documented case of adult somnambulism with long-distance automobile driving and frequent nocturnal violence: parasomnia with continuing danger as a non-insane automatism?, Sleep, 18, pp. 765–772.
  • Simester, A. P. (2009) Intoxication is never a defence, Criminal Law Review, pp. 3–14.
  • Taipale, J. (2019a) Predefined criteria and interpretive flexibility in legal courts’ evaluation of expertise, Public Understanding of Science, 28(8), pp. 883–896.
  • Taipale, J. (2019b) Judges’ socio-technical review of contested expertise, Social Studies of Science, 49, pp. 310–332.
  • Taipale, J. and Hautamäki L. (2021) Clinical practice guidelines in courts’ representation of medical evidence and testimony, Social Science and Medicine, 275, pp. 1–9.
  • Wazeck, M. (2013) Marginalization process in science: The controversy about the theory of relativity in the 1920s, Social Studies of Science, 43, pp. 163–190.
  • Wilson, W., Ebrahim, I., Fenwick, P. and Marks, R. (2005 August) Violence, sleepwalking and the criminal Law: part 2: the legal aspects, Criminal Law Review, pp. 614–623.
  • Wolf-Meyer, M. J. (2012) The Slumbering Masses: Sleep, Medicine and Modern American Life (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).