Refused-knowledge during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mobilising Experiential Expertise for Care and Well-being

References

• Armstrong, P. W. and Naylor, C. D. (2019) Counteracting health misinformation: A role for medical journals?, JAMA, 321, pp. 1863–1864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, J. (2017) Post-truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World (London: Biteback Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, S. and Milan, S. (2019) Do not harm in private chat apps: Ethical issues for research on and with WhatsApp, Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 14(1), pp. 49–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bory, P., Crabu, S., Morsello, B., Tomasi, M. and Tosoni, S. (2022a) Rethinking the nexus between science, politics and society in the age of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 12(2), pp. 141–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bory, P., Giardullo, P., Tosoni, S. and Turrini, V. (2022b) We will multiply the fires of resistance: The catalysts of dissent against institutional science and their interplay with refused knowledge communities. Public Understanding of Science, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221113524
   Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society (2009) Code of Ethics and Conduct Guidance Published by the Ethics Committee of the British Psychological Society (Leicester: The British Psychological Society).
   Google Scholar
• British Sociological Association 2016. Ethics guidelines and collated resources for digital research. statement of ethical practice annexe. Available at https://www.britsoc.co.uk/media/24309/bsa_statement_of_ethical_practice_annexe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brosnan, C., Vuolanto, P. and Brodin Danell, J-A. (Eds) (2018) Complementary and Alternative Medicine: Knowledge Production and Social Transformation (London: Palgrave Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, E. and Corbellini, G. (2014) Stem cells: Taking a stand against pseudoscience, Nature, 510, pp. 333–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2009) Shifting the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory methods, in: J. M. Morse, P. N. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, A. E. Clarke, and K. Charmaz (Eds) Developing Grounded Theory: The Second Generation, pp. 127–193 (Walnut Creek, CA: University of Arizona Press).
   Google Scholar
• Cloatre, E. (2019) Traditional medicines, law, and the (dis)ordering of temporalities, in: S. M. Beynon-Jones, and E. Grabham (Eds) Law and Time, pp. 128–144 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• D’Amato, I. (2019) Dossier Hamer: The role of investigative journalism in exposing pseudomedicine, in: A. Lavorgna, and A. Di Ronco (Eds) Medical Misinformation and Social Harm in Non-Science-Based Health Practices, pp. 162–177 (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• D’Ancona, M. (2017) Post-truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back (London: Ebury Press).
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. (2017) Post-truth: Why We Have Reached Peak Bullshit and What We Can Do About It (London: Hachette UK).
   Google Scholar
• De Graaff, M. B. and Bröer, C. (2012) We are the canary in a coal mine’: Establishing a disease category and a new health risk, Health, Risk & Society, 14(2), pp. 129–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E. and Quattrociocchi, W. (2016) Echo chambers in the age of misinformation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), pp. 554–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desta, T. and Mulgeta, T. (2020) Living with COVID-19-triggered pseudoscience and conspiracies, International Journal of Public Health, 65(6), pp. 713–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcioni, L., Bua, L., Tibaldi, E., Lauriola, M., De Angelis, L., Gnudi, F., Mandrioli, D., Manservigi, M., Manservisi, F., Manzoli, I. and Menghetti, I. (2018) Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission, Environmental Research, 165, pp. 496–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, J. and Schou, J. (2018) Fake news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood, Javnost – The Public, 25(3), pp. 298–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton, T. R. and Huang, T. (2016) Systematic review of the association between dietary acid load, alkaline water and cancer, BMJ Open, 6, pp. e010438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck, L. (1935) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact (Basel: Benno Schwabe). (English translation by F. Bardley and T. J. Trenn, University of Chicago Press, 1979)).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1973) The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception (New York: Pantheon).
   Google Scholar
• Fuch, C. (2013) Social Media: A Critical Introduction (London: SAGE).
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. (2018) Post-truth: Knowledge as a Power Game (London: Anthem Press).
   Google Scholar
• Gentilcore, D. (2006) Medical Charlatanism in Early Modern Italy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Genuis, S. J. and Lipp, C. T. (2012) Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: Fact or fiction?, Science of the Total Environment, 414, pp. 103–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, Z. (1984) Cumulated Index to the Bibliography of Reported Biological Phenomena (‘Effects’) and Clinical Manifestations Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation: Report, Supplements (no. 1–9), BEMS Newsletter (Riverside, CA: Julie Moore & Associates).
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, M. J. (2016) Public misunderstanding of science? Reframing the problem of vaccine hesitancy, Perspectives on Science, 24(5), pp. 552–581.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson, A. and Rice, R. E. (2020) A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication, Public Understanding of Science, 29(6), pp. 614–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1992) Style’ for historians and philosophers, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 23(1), pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, T. M., Chou, W. Y. S., Cotten, S. R. and Khilnani, A. (Eds) (2018) eHealth: Current Evidence, Promises, Perils and Future Directions (Emerald Publishing Limited: Bingley).
   Google Scholar
• Hamer, R. G. (2005) The Five Biological Laws of the New Medicine (Malaga: Amici di Dirk, Ediciones de la Nueva Medicina SL).
   Google Scholar
• Harambam, J. (2020a) Contemporary Conspiracy Culture Truth and Knowledge in an Era of Epistemic Instability (New York, NY: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Harambam, J. (2020b) The corona truth wars where have all the sts’ers gone when we need them most?, Science & Technology Studies, 33(4), pp. 60–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harambam, J. and Aupers, S. (2015) Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy theories on the boundaries of science, Public Understanding of Science, 24(4), pp. 466–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harambam, J. and Aupers, S. (2017) I am not a conspiracy theorist’: Relational identifications in the Dutch conspiracy milieu, Cultural Sociology, 11(1), pp. 113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyen, N. B. (2020) From self-tracking to self-expertise: The production of self-related knowledge by doing personal science, Public Understanding of Science, 29(2), pp. 124–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman, B., Alaszewski, A., Shaw, M. and Titterton, M. (2010) Risk, Safety, and Clinical Practice: Health Care Through the Lens of Risk (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2004) Social research methods and the internet: A thematic review. Sociological Research Online, 9(2), pp. 110–116. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2017) Ethnographies of online communities and social media: Modes, varieties, affordances, in: N. G. Fielding, R. M. Lee, and G. Blank (Eds) The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods, pp. 401–415 (London: Sage).
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. E. (1990) I am a fieldnote’: Fieldnotes as a symbol of professional identity, in: R. Sanjek (Eds) Fieldnotes: The Makings of Anthropology, pp. 3–33 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Larson, H. J. (2018) The biggest pandemic risk? Viral misinformation, Nature, 562, pp. 309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasco, G. (2020) Medical populism and the COVID-19 pandemic, Global Public Health, 15(10), pp. 1417–1429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavorgna, A. and Di Ronco, A. (Eds) (2019) Medical Misinformation and Social Harm in Non-Science-Based Health Practices (London: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J., Hughes, J. and Atkinson, P. (2014) Relocation, realignment and standardisation: Circuits of translation in Huntington’s disease, Social Theory & Health, 12(4), pp. 396–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löwy, I. (1990) The Polish School of Philosophy of Medicine: From Tytus Chalubinski (1820–1889) to Ludwik Fleck (1896–1961) (Boston, MA: Dordrecht).
   Google Scholar
• Löwy, I. (2004) Ludwik Fleck: Epistemology and biomedical sciences, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 35(3), pp. 437–559.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2017) STS, symmetry and post-truth, Social Studies of Science, 47(4), pp. 593–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. (2020) We have never been anti-science: Reflections on science wars and post-truth, Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 6, pp. 49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancosu, M. and Vegetti, F. (2020) What you can scrape and what is right to scrape: A proposal for a tool to collect public Facebook data, Social Media + Society, 6(3), pp. 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, L. (2018) Post-truth (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Morganti, E., Bolelli, L., Novelli, G., Freeman, C. and Girotti, S. (2017) Alkaline water better than plain water? A critical review, in: V. Popescu, and S. Dobrinas (Eds) International Conference “Chemia” Book of Abstracts, pp. 74 (Constanta: Ovidius University Press).
   Google Scholar
• National Toxicology Program (NTP). (2018) Technical Report on the Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies in Sprague Dawley (Hsd:Sprague Dawley® SD®) Rats Exposed to Whole-Body Radio Frequency Radiation at a Frequency (900 MHz) and Modulations (GSM and CDMA) Used by Cell Phones Technical Report No. 595 (Research Triangle Park, NC: National Toxicology Program).
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. (2019) Why Trust Science? (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Peine, A. (2011) Challenging incommensurability: What we can learn from Ludwik Fleck for the analysis of configurational innovation, Minerva, 49(4), pp. 489–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, L. (2019) Innocent, guilty or reluctant midwife? On the reciprocal relevance of STS and post-truth, Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 10(1), pp. 115–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polichetti, A. 2019. Emissioni elettromagnetiche del 5g e rischi per la salute. Available at https://www.iss.it/documents/20126/2265547/5G_e_rischi_per_la_salute.pdf/d50f25e6-25e4-48c8-b8c3-7da28cc57827?t=1575725274470https://www.iss.it/documents/20126/2265547/5G_e_rischi_per_la_salute.pdf/d50f25e6-25e4-48c8-b8c3-7da28cc57827?t=1575725274470. (accessed 18 February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Prasad, A. (2021) Anti-science misinformation and conspiracies: COVID–19, post-truth, and science & technology studies (STS), Science, Technology and Society, 7(1), pp. 88–112.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, R. (2011) Chasing science: Children’s brains, scientific inquiries and family labors, Science, Technology and Human Values, 36(5), pp. 662–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (2007) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Sadchikova, M. (1960) State of the nervous system under the influence of UHF, in: A. A. Letavet, and Z. V. Gordon (Eds) The Biological Action of Ultrahigh Frequencies, pp. 25–29 (Moscow: Academy of Medical Sciences).
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1994) Case studies, in: N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 443–466 (Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: SAGE).
   Google Scholar
• Topol, E. (2015) The Patient will See You Now: The Future of Medicine is in Your Hands (New York, NY: Basic Books).
   Google Scholar
• Trethewey, S. P. (2020) Strategies to combat medical misinformation on social media, Postgraduate Medical Journal, 96, pp. 4–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zoonen, L. (2012) I-pistemology: Changing truth claims in popular and political culture, European Journal of Communication, 27(1), pp. 56–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuolanto, P., Bergroth, H., Nurmi, J. and Salmenniemi, S. (2020) Reconfiguring health knowledges? Contemporary modes of self-care as ‘everyday fringe medicine’, Public Understanding of Science, 29(5), pp. 508–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlberg, A. and Rose, N. (2015) The governmentalization of living: Calculating global health, Economy and Society, 44(1), pp. 60–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, J. D. and Bergstrom, C. T. (2021) Misinformation in and about science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), pp. e1912444117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2020. Radiation: 5G mobile networks and health. Available at https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/radiation-5g-mobile-networks-and-health (accessed 24 February 2021).
   Google Scholar
• Zayed, H. (2021) Researching digital sociality: Using WhatsApp to study educational change, Journal of Digital Social Research, 3(2), pp. 44–69.
   Google Scholar