Molten salt reactors and electrochemical reprocessing: synthesis and chemical durability of potential waste forms for metal and salt waste streams

References

• Brook B, Alonso A, Meneley D, et al. Why nuclear energy is sustainable and has to be part of the energy mix. Sustainable Mater Technol. 2014;1-2:8–16.
   Google Scholar
• United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2020. Available at: https://www.nrc.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Li N, Brossard D, Scheufele D, et al. Policymakers and stakeholders’ perception of science-driven nuclear energy policy. Nucl Eng Technol. 2018;50:773–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapp V, Pevec D, Matijević M. The potential of fission nuclear power in resolving global climate change under the constraints of nuclear fuel resources and once-through fuelcycles. Energy Policy. 2010;38:6793–6803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serp J, Allibert M, Benes O, et al. The molten salt reactor (MSR) in generation IV: overview and perspectives. Prog Nucl Energy. 2014;77:308–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes WR. Chemical research and development for molten-salt breeder reactors. Oak Ridge (TN): Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal MW, Kasten PR, Briggs RB. Molten-salt reactors – history, status, and potential. Nucl Appl Technol. 1970;8(2):107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer MB. Abundant thorium as an alternative nuclear fuel important waste disposal and weapon proliferation advantages. Energy Policy. 2013;60:4–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettis E, Robertson R. The design and performance features of a single-fluid molten-salt breeder reactor. Nucl Appl Technol. 1970;8:190–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes W. Molten-salt reactor chemistry. Nucl Appl Technol. 1970;8:137–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley BJ, McFarlane J, DelCul GD, et al. Molten salt reactor waste and effluent management strategies: a review. Nucl Eng Des. 2019;345:94–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley BJ, McFarlane J, DelCul GD, et al. Identification of potential waste processing and waste form options for molten salt reactors. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-27723; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Waste Materials Handbook (Test Methods). Technical Information Center, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C1220–17. ASTM international book of standards volume 12.01. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials International; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C1285–14. ASTM international book of standards volume 12.01. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials International; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C1308–14. ASTM international book of standards volume 12.01. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials International; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Vienna J, Fluegel A, Kim D, et al. Glass property data and models for estimating high-level waste glass volume. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert W. DOE high-level waste glass corrosion model and its implementation in safety analysis. U.S. Department of Energy; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jantzen CM, Trivelpiece CL, Crawford CL, et al. Accelerated leach testing of glass (ALTGLASS): I. informatics approach to high level waste glass gel formation and aging. Int J Appl Glass Sci. 2017;8(1):69–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM C1663–18. ASTM international book of standards volume 12.01. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials International; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C1174–17. ASTM international book of standards volume 12.01. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials International; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Goff K, Wass J, Marsden K, et al. Electrochemical processing of used nuclear fuel. Nucl Eng Technol. 2011;43:335–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson M. Projected salt waste production from a commercial pyroprocessing facility. Sci Technol Nucl Ins. 2013;2013:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley B. Electrochemical salt waste form development: a review of recent work of salt treatment and immobilization options. Ind Eng Chem Under Rev. 2020;59:9760–9774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi E, Jeong S. Electrochemical processing of spent nuclear fuels: an overview of oxide reduction in pyroprocessing technology. Pro Nat Sci-Mater. 2015;25:572–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal BR, Vaden D, Li SX, et al. Fate of noble metals during the pyroprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. Paris (France): Global 2009; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Materials and Fuels Complex, 2020. Available at; https://mfc.inl.gov/SitePages/Instruments/Fuel%20Conditioning%20Facility/Mark%20IV%20electrorefiner.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover R, Phongikaroon S, Simpson MF, et al. Computational Model of the Mark-IV Electrorefiner – 2D Potential and Current Distributions, Nucl Tech. 2011;173:176–182.
   Google Scholar
• Crum JV, Strachan D, Rohatgi A, et al. Epsilon metal waste form for immobilization of noble metals from used nuclear fuel. J Nucl Mater. 2013;441:103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui D, Rondinella VV, Fortner JA, et al. Characterization of alloy particles extracted from spent nuclear fuel. J Nucl Mater. 2012;420(1):328–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleykamp H. The chemical state of fission products in oxide fuels at different stages of the nuclear fuel cycle. Nucl Technol. 1988;80(3):412–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compere EL, Kirslis SS, Bohlmann EG, et al. Fission product behavior in the molten salt reactor experiment. Oak Ridge (TN): Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1975. ORNL-4865.
   Google Scholar
• Kedl RJ. Migration of a class of fission products (noble metals) in the molten-salt reactor experiment. (TN) USA: Oak Ridge National Lab; 1972, ORNL-TM-3884.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal MW, Briggs RB, Kasten PR. Molten-Salt reactor program semiannual progress report for period ending February 28, 1969. Oak Ridge (TN): Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1969. ORNL-4396.
   Google Scholar
• Darab JG, Smith PA. Chemistry of technetium and rhenium species during low-level radioactive waste vitrification. Chem Mater. 1996;8(5):1004–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caurant D, Majérus O, Fadel E, et al. Effect of molybdenum on the structure and on the crystallization of SiO2–Na2O–CaO–B2O3 glasses. J Am Ceram Soc. 2007;90(3):774–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goff KM, Benedict RW, Johnson SG, et al. Electrometallurgical treatment demonstration at ANL-West, Proceedings of embedded topical meeting DOE spent nuclear fuel and fissile material management, 58–64, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hrma P. Retention of halogens in waste glass. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Disposal of Radioactive Waste on Land. National Academy of Sciences – National Research Council, 1957.
   Google Scholar
• Gallegos DP. A performance assessment methodology for high-level radio active waste disposal in unsaturated, fractured tuff. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Verney-Carron A, Gin S, Libourel G. Archaeological analogs and the future of nuclear waste glass. J Nucl Mater. 2010;406:365–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sykes JF. Sensitivity analysis for steady state groundwater flow using adjoint operators. Water Resour Res. 1985;21(3):359–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rechard RP, Freeze GA, Perry FV. Hazards and scenarios examined for the Yucca mountain disposal system for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2014;122:74–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rechard RP, Wilson ML, Sevougian SD. Progression of performance assessment modeling for the Yucca mountain disposal system for spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2014;122:96–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang C-F, Neretnieks I, Tsang Y. Hydrologic issues associated with nuclear waste repositories. Water Resour Res. 2015;51(9):6923–6972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vienna JD, Neeway JJ, Ryan JV, et al. Impacts of glass composition, pH, and temperature on glass forward dissolution rate. npj Mater Degrad. 2018;2:22.
   Google Scholar
• Debure M, Linard Y, Martin C, et al. In situ nuclear-glass corrosion under geological repository conditions. npj Mater Degrad. 2019;3:11.
   Google Scholar
• Loye H, Besmann T, Amoroso J, et al. Hierarchical materials as tailored nuclear waste forms: a perspective. Chem Mater. 2018;30:4475–4488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel GS, Vienna JD, Lian J, et al. A comparative review of the aqueous corrosion of glasses, crystalline ceramics, and metals. npj Mater Degrad. 2018;2(1):15.
   Google Scholar
• Vaswani GA, Yeotikar RG, Rastogi RC, et al. Development of improved leaching techniques for vitrified radioactive waste products. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Draft International Standard Report, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Oversby VM, Ringwood AE. Leaching studies on SYNROC at 95°C and 200°C. Radioact Waste Manage. 1982;2(3):223–237.
   Google Scholar
• Kahl L, Ruiz-Lopez MC, Said J, et al. Preparation and characterization of an improved borosilicate glass. For solidification of high-level radioactive fission product solutions, part 2: characterization of the borosilicate glass product GP 98/12, Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Isenburg J, Moore M. Generalized acid neutralization capacity test. In: Gilham TM, Wales CC, editors. Stabilization and solidification of hazardous, radioactive, and mixed wastes. ASTM STP 1123, American Society for Testing and Materials; 1992. p. 361–377.
   Google Scholar
• Angus M, Tyson A. Combined waste equilibrium leach tests, Amec Foster Wheeler plc, UK, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• SW-846 Test Method 1311. Hazardous waste test methods, environmental protection agency, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• SW-846 Test Method 1312. Hazardous waste test methods, environmental protection agency, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• SW-846 Test Method 1313. Hazardous waste test methods, environmental protection agency, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• SW-846 Test Method 1314. Hazardous waste test methods, environmental protection agency, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• SW-846 Test Method 1320. Hazardous waste test methods, environmental protection agency, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Marshack JB. The designated level methodology for waste classification and cleanup level determination. California Regional Water Quality Control Board; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura H, Tashiro S. Progress report on safety research of high-level waste management for the period April 1982 to march 1983. Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain M, Kahl L. Incorporation of precipitation from treatment of medium-level liquid radioactive waste in glass matrix or ceramics together with high-level waste. International symposium on ceramics in nuclear waste management; 1979; Cincinnati, OH, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Malow G. Testing and evaluation of solidified high-level waste forms. Commission of the European Communities; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Senoo M, Banba T, Ashiro ST, et al. High pressure Soxhlet type leachability testing device and leaching test of simulated high-level waste glass at high temperature. Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C1662–18. ASTM international book of standards volume 12.01. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials International; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Waste Form Testing. Waste forms technology and performance, final report 2011. Washington (DC): The National Academic Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. SW-846 Test method 1315: mass transfer rates of constituents in monolithic or compacted granular materials using a semi-dynamic tank leaching procedure. Washington (DC): Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Crank J. The mathematics of diffusion. London, UK: Oxford University Press; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Serne RJ, Wood MI. Hanford waste-form release and sediment interaction. Pacific Northwest Laboratory; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Nestor CW. Diffusion from solid cylinders. Oak Ridge (TN): Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Grambow B. A general rate equation for nuclear waste glass corrosion. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc. 1984;44:15.
   Google Scholar
• Groot GJ, Sloot HA. Determination of leaching characteristics of waste materials leading to environmental product certification. In: Gillian TM, editor. Stabilization and solidification of hazardous, radioactive and mixed wastes. American Society for Testing and Materials; 1992. p. 149–170.
   Google Scholar
• Côtê PL, Constable TW, Moreira A. An evaluation of cement-based waste forms using the results of approximately two years of dynamic leaching. Nucl Chem Waste Manage. 1987;7(2):129–139.
   Google Scholar
• McDeavitt SM, Park JY, Ackerman JP. Defining a metal-based waste form for IFR pyroprocessing wastes. Argonne National Lab; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal BR, Keiser DD, Rigg RH, et al. Production of metal waste forms from spent fuel treatment. Argonne National Lab, IL (United States); 1995.
   Google Scholar
• McDeavitt SM, Abraham DP, Park JY. Evaluation of stainless steel–zirconium alloys as high-level nuclear waste forms. J Nucl Mater. 1998;257(1):21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keiser DD, Abraham DP, Sinkler W, et al. Actinide distribution in a stainless steel-15 wt% zirconium high-level nuclear waste form. J Nucl Mater. 2000;279(2):234–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert WL. Testing to evaluate the suitability of waste forms developed for electrometallurgically treated spent sodium-bonded nuclear fuel for disposal in the Yucca mountain repository. Argonne (IL): Argonne National Laboratory-East; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Asmussen RM, Zagidulin D, et al. Electrochemical and corrosion behavior of a 304 stainless-steel-based metal alloy wasteform in dilute aqueous environments. Corros Sci. 2013;66:142–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bairi LR, Ningshen S, Mudali UK, et al. Microstructural analysis and corrosion behaviour of D9 stainless steel – zirconium metal waste form alloys. Corros Sci. 2010;52(7):2291–2302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson M, Mickalonis J, Fisher D, et al. Passivation layer stability of a metallic alloy waste form. SRS, SRNL-STI-2010-00477; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert WL, Kolman D. Alloy waste form testing strategy roadmap. FCRD-SWF-2013-000226; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Asmussen RM, Shoesmith DW. Microscale investigation of multi-phase metal alloy waste forms (60SS[316]-12Zr-12Mo). Corrosion. 2014;70(12):1177–1180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westphal BR, Frank SM, McCartin WM, et al. Characterization of irradiated metal waste from the pyrometallurgical treatment of used EBR-II fuel. Metall Mater Trans: Phys Metall Mater Sci A. 2015;46(1):83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert WL, Cruse TA, Indacochea JE, et al. Corrosion tests with alloyed waste forms made with type 316L stainless steel. FCRD-MRWFD-2015-000146; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert WL. Production and initial testing of HT9-based alloy waste forms, FCRD-MRWFD-2015-000144, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Olson LN. Chemical durability and degradation mechanisms of HT9 based alloy waste forms with variable Zr content. Aiken (SC): Savannah River Site (SRS); 2015. SRNL-STI-2015-00607.
   Google Scholar
• Olson L. Durability and degradation of HT9 based alloy waste forms with variable Ni and Cr content. Aiken (SC): Savannah River Site (SRS); 2016. SRNL-STI-2016-00719.
   Google Scholar
• Gattu VK. Role of alloying elements in the electrochemical corrosion behavior of multiphase alloys. Illinois: University of Illinois at Chicago; 2017; p. 295.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert WL, Gattu VK, Indacochea JE. Characterization and electrochemical testing of RAW-6 alloys made with Re, U, and Tc, NTRD-MRWFD-2017-000447, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman T, Ebert WL, Indacochea JE. Effect of molybdenum additions on the microstructures and corrosion behaviours of 316L stainless steel-based alloys, corrosion engineering. Sci Technol. 2018;53(3):226–233.
   Google Scholar
• Spitsyn VI, Grishina SP, Balakhovskii OA, et al. Investigation of Ni-Tc alloys (a superconducting material). Russ Metall. 1975;6:156–158.
   Google Scholar
• Utsunomiya S, Ewing RC. The fate of the epsilon phase (Mo-Ru-Pd-Tc-Rh) in the UO2 of the Oklo natural fission reactors. Radiochim Acta. 2006;94(9-11):749–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohatgi A, Strachan DM. An initial assessment of potential production technologies for epsilon-metal waste forms, PNNL-20313, 1021287, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan D, Crum JV, Bovaird CC, et al. Epsilon metal: a waste form for noble metals from used nuclear fuel. J Nucl Mater. 2020;532:152040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui D, Low J, Rondinella VV, et al. Hydrogen catalytic effects of nanostructured alloy particles in spent fuel on radionuclide immobilization. Appl Catal B. 2010;94(1):173–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley BJ, Vienna JD, Frank SM, et al. Glass binder development for a glass-bonded sodalite ceramic waste form. J Nucl Mater. 2017;489:42–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasnik MS, Grant AK, Carlson K, et al. Dechlorination of molten chloride waste salt from electrorefining via ion-exchange using pelletized ultra-stable H-Y zeolite in a fluidized particle reactor. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2019;320(2):309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley BJ, Peterson JA, Vienna JD, et al. Dehalogenation of electrochemical processing salt simulants with ammonium phosphates and immobilization of salt cations in an iron phosphate glass waste form. J Nucl Mater. 2020;529:151949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemer DD. Improving the integeral fast reactor's proposed salt waste management system. Nucl Technol. 2012;178(3):341–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues D, Durán-Klie G, Delpech S. Pyrochemical reprocessing of molten salt fast reactor fuel: focus on the reductive extraction step. Nukleonika. 2015;60(4):907–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stika M, Rappleye D, Simpson MF, et al. Development of on-line pyroprocessing for liquid thorium fueled reactors. AIChE J. 2016;62(4):1236–1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merk B, Litskevich D, Gregg R, et al. Demand driven salt clean-up in a molten salt fast reactor – defining a priority list. PLOS One. 2018;13(3):e0192020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gin S, Jollivet P, Tribet M, et al. Radionuclides containment in nuclear glasses: an overview. Radiochim Acta. 2017;105(11):927–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutze W, Ewing RC. Radioactive waste forms for the future. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Sales BC, Boatner LA. Lead-iron phosphate glass: a stable storage medium for high-level nuclear waste. Science. 1984;226(4670):45–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance ER, Davis J, Olufson K, et al. Candidate waste forms for immobilisation of waste chloride salt from pyroprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. J Nucl Mater. 2012;420(1-3):396–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner LD, Wasnik MS, Riley BJ, et al. Synthesis and characterization of sintered H-Y zeolite-derived waste forms for dehalogenated electrorefiner salt. Ceram Int. 2020;46(11):17707–17716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloy JS, Riley BJ, Lipton AS, et al. Structure and chemistry in halide lead–tellurite glasses. J Phys Chem C. 2013;117(7):3456–3466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley BJ, Kroll JO, Peterson JA, et al. Assessment of lead tellurite glass for immobilizing electrochemical salt wastes from used nuclear fuel reprocessing. J Nucl Mater. 2017;495:405–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley BJ, Pierce DA, Crum JV, et al. Waste form evaluation for RECl3 and REOx fission products separated from used electrochemical salt. Prog Nucl Energy. 2018;104:102–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley BJ, Rieck BT, McCloy JS, et al. Tellurite glass as a waste form for mixed alkali-chloride waste streams: candidate materials selection and initial testing. J Nucl Mater. 2012;424(1-3):29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn BG, Park HS, Kim IT, et al. Immobilization of lanthanide oxides waste from pyrochemical process. Energy Procedia. 2011;7:529–533.
   Google Scholar
• Riley B, Park H-S, Choi J-H, et al. Zinc-in-titania waste form for immobilizing lanthanide fission products from electrochemical reprocessing. J Nucl Mater. 2020;539:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd Fadzil S, Hrma P, Schweiger MJ, et al. Component effects on crystallization of RE-containing aluminoborosilicate glass. J Nucl Mater. 2016;478:261–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd Fadzil S, Hrma P, Schweiger MJ, et al. Liquidus temperature and chemical durability of selected glasses to immobilize rare earth oxides waste. J Nucl Mater. 2015;465:657–663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum JV, Billings A, Lang JB, et al. Baseline glass development for combined fission products waste streams. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2009. AFCI-WAST-WAST-MI-DV-2009-000075, PNNL-18524
   Google Scholar
• Youchak-Billings AL, Crum JV, Marra JC, et al. Waste/storage form baseline-fission products & lanthanides. Aiken (SC): Savannah River National Laboratory; 2008. GNEP-WAST-PMO-MI-DV-2008-000151
   Google Scholar
• Riley BJ. Electrochemical salt waste form development: A comparison with iron phosphate glass. Richland (WA): Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2019. PNNL-28745.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman KJ, Knight CJ, Solbrig CW. Current status of ceramic waste form development. Idaho Falls (ID): Idaho National Laboratory; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Riley BJ, Peterson JA, Kroll JO, et al. Immobilization of LiCl-Li2O pyroprocessing salt wastes in chlorosodalite using glass-bonded hydrothermal and salt-occlusion methods. J Nucl Mater. 2018;502:236–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong S, Peterson J, Nam J, et al. Synthesis and characterization of iodosodalite. J Am Ceram Soc. 2017;100(5):2273–2284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strachan DM, Babad H. Iodide and iodate sodalites for long-term storage of I-129. Am Ceram Soc Bull. 1979;58(3):327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babad H, Strachan DM. Method for immobilizing radioactive iodine. In: W.D.C. The United States of America as represented by the United States Department of Energy (Ed.) US, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Lepry WC, Riley BJ, Crum JV, et al. Solution-based approaches for making high-density sodalite waste forms to immobilize spent electrochemical salts. J Nucl Mater. 2013;442(1-3):350–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardez I, Campayo L, Rigaud D, et al. Investigation of sodalites for conditioning halide salts (NaCl and NaI): comparison of two synthesis routes. ATALANTE. 2008;O4_19-1-7.
   Google Scholar
• Burger L, Scheele R, Wiemers K. Selection of a form for fixation of iodine-129. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI); 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert WL, Riley BJ, Frank SM. Assessment of advanced ceramic waste forms for EChem processing salt wastes. U.S. Department of Energy Materials Recovery & Waste Form Development Campaign; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Riley BJ, Rieck BT, Crum JV, et al. Alternative electrochemical salt waste forms, summary of FY2010 results. U.S. Department of Energy; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Park H-S, Kim I-T, Cho Y-Z, et al. Stabilization/solidification of radioactive salt waste by using xSiO2-yAl2O3-zP2O5 (SAP) material at molten salt state. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:9357–9362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacobbo F, Ros MD, Macerata E, et al. An experimental study on sodalite and SAP matrices for immobilization of spent chloride salt waste. J Nucl Mater. 2018;499:512–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capone M, Angelis GD, Fedeli C, et al. Leaching behavior of salt wastes conditioned with sodalite blended with two different glass powders. Adv Sci Technol. 2014;94:131–136.
   Google Scholar
• Day DE, Ray CS. A review of iron phosphate glasses and recommendations for vitrifying Hanford waste. Idaho Falls (ID): Idaho National Laboratory; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brow RK, Kim CW, Reis ST. Iron polyphosphate glasses for waste immobilization. Int J Appl Glass Sci. 2019;11:4–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloy J, Washton N, Gassman P, et al. Nepheline crystallization in boron-rich alumino-silicate glasses as investigated by multi-nuclear NMR, Raman, & Mössbauer spectroscopies. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2015;409:149–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert WL, Fortner JA. Corrosion tests with developmental iron phosphate glass waste forms. Argonne National Laboratory; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ebert WL, Fortner JA. Analysis of iron phosphate glasses for dehalogenated salt waste. Argonne National Laboratory; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Cho Y-J, Yang H-C, Eun H-C, et al. Characteristics of oxidation reaction of rare-earth chlorides for precipitation in LiCl-KCl molten salt by oxygen sparging. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2006;43(10):1280–1286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgès G, Godot A, Valot C, et al. Pyro-oxidation of plutonium spent salts with sodium carbonate. Avignon (France): Pyrochemical Separations; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Caravaca C, Córdoba GD, Gutiérrez L. Salt decontamination treatment from a pyrochemical spent fuel. Nîmes (France): Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Riley BJ, Vienna JD, Schweiger MJ, et al. Liquidus temperature of rare earth-aluminoborosilicate glasses for treatment of americium and curium. In: Smith RW, Shoesmith DW, editors. Proceedings of the scientific basis for nuclear waste management XXIII. Warrendale (PA): Materials Research Society; 1999. p. 677–682.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, ASTM C1720-17E1. Standard test method for determining liquidus temperature of waste glasses and simulated waste glasses. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials International, ASTM International Book of Standards Volume 12.01; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Eun H, Choi J, Cho I, et al. Purification of LiCl–KCl eutectic waste salt containing rare earth chlorides delivered from the pyrochemical process of used nuclear fuel using a reactive distillation process. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2016;307:1419–1427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boatner LA, Beall GW, Abraham MM, et al. Monazite and other lanthanide orthophosphates as alternate actinide waste forms. In: C.J.M.N. Jr, editor. Scientific basis for nuclear waste management, advances in nuclear science & technology. Boston (MA): Springer; 1980. p. 289–296.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy GJ, White WB, Pfoertsch DE. Synthesis of nuclear waste monazites, ideal actinide hosts for geologic disposal. Mater Res Bull. 1978;13(11):1239–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishida M, Yanagi T, Terai R. Leach rates of composite waste forms of monazite- and zirconium phosphate-type. J Nucl Sci Technol. 1987;24(5):404–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar