Glycosaminoglycans as polyelectrolytes: implications in bioactivity and assembly of biomedical devices

References

• Barthelat F. Architectured materials in engineering and biology: fabrication, structure, mechanics and performance. Int Mater Rev. 2015;60:413–430. doi:10.1179/1743280415Y.0000000008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu WH, Zheng J, Feldman JL, et al. Multivalent interactions drive nucleosome binding and efficient chromatin deacetylation by SIRT6. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5244. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19018-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rood MTM, Spa SJ, Welling MM, et al. Obtaining control of cell surface functionalizations via pre-targeting and supramolecular host guest interactions. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39908. doi:10.1038/srep39908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villone D, Fritsch A, Koch M, et al. Supramolecular interactions in the dermo-epidermal junction zone: anchoring fibril-collagen VII tightly binds to banded collagen fibrils. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:24506–24513. doi:10.1074/jbc.M802415200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal N, Khan AS, Asif A, et al. Recent concepts in biodegradable polymers for tissue engineering paradigms: a critical review. Int Mater Rev. 2019;64:91–126. doi:10.1080/09506608.2018.1460943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt JR, Kliemt S, Preissler C, et al. Osteoblast-released matrix vesicles, regulation of activity and composition by sulfated and non-sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016;15:558–572. doi:10.1074/mcp.M115.049718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares da Costa D, Reis RL, Pashkuleva I. Sulfation of glycosaminoglycans and its implications in human health and disorders. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;19:1–26. doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen T-H, Wesche J, Raschke R, et al. Reactivity of platelet-activating and nonplatelet-activating anti-PF4/heparin antibodies in enzyme immunosorbent assays under different conditions. J Thromb Haemostasis. 2019;17:1113–1119. doi:10.1111/jth.14455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpi N, Tarugi P. Influence of chondroitin sulfate charge density, sulfate group position, and molecular mass on Cu2+-mediated oxidation of human Low-density lipoproteins: effect of normal human plasma-derived chondroitin sulfate. J Biochem. 1999;125:297–304. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a022286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann N, Schirmer L, Atallah P, et al. Glycosaminoglycan-based hydrogels capture inflammatory chemokines and rescue defective wound healing in mice. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:eaai9044. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aai9044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller E, Pompe T, Freudenberg U, et al. Solvent-assisted micromolding of biohybrid hydrogels to maintain human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells Ex vivo. Adv Mater. 2017;29:1703489. doi:10.1002/adma.201703489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terauchi M, Tamura A, Tonegawa A, et al. Polyelectrolyte complexes between polycarboxylates and BMP-2 for enhancing osteogenic differentiation: effect of chemical structure of polycarboxylates. Polymers 2019;11:1327. doi:10.3390/polym11081327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsson G, Reeves EP, McNally P, et al. LL-37 complexation with glycosaminoglycans in cystic fibrosis lungs inhibits antimicrobial activity, which can be restored by hypertonic saline. J Immunol. 2009;183:543–551. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0803959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardin AD, Weintraub HJ. Molecular modeling of protein-glycosaminoglycan interactions. Arteriosclerosis. 1989;9:21–32. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.9.1.21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gandhi NS, Mancera RL. The structure of glycosaminoglycans and their interactions with proteins. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2008;72:455–482. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0285.2008.00741.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petitou M, van Boeckel CAA. A Synthetic antithrombin III binding pentasaccharide is now a drug! what comes next? Angew Chem Int Ed. 2004;43:3118–3133. doi:10.1002/anie.200300640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyrek E, Dubin P. Glycosaminoglycans as polyelectrolytes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2010;158:119–129. doi:10.1016/j.cis.2010.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassell JR, Newsome DA, Krachmer JH, et al. Macular corneal dystrophy: failure to synthesize a mature keratan sulfate proteoglycan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77:3705–3709. doi:10.1073/pnas.77.6.3705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caterson B, Melrose J. Keratan sulfate, a complex glycosaminoglycan with unique functional capability. Glycobiology. 2018;28:182–206. doi:10.1093/glycob/cwy003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solakyildirim K. Recent advances in glycosaminoglycan analysis by various mass spectrometry techniques. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019;411:3731–3741. doi:10.1007/s00216-019-01722-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenberg U, Liang Y, Kiick KL, et al. Glycosaminoglycan-based biohybrid hydrogels: a sweet and smart choice for multifunctional biomaterials. Adv Mater. 2016;28:8861–8891. doi:10.1002/adma.201601908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenkamp HF, Vela Ramirez JE, Peppas NA. Re-evaluating the importance of carbohydrates as regenerative biomaterials. Regener Biomater. 2018;6:1–12. doi:10.1093/rb/rby023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morla S. Glycosaminoglycans and glycosaminoglycan mimetics in cancer and inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1963. doi:10.3390/ijms20081963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiselli G. Drug-mediated regulation of glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis. Med Res Rev. 2017;37:1051–1094. doi:10.1002/med.21429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor SL, Hogwood J, Guo W, et al. By-products of heparin production provide a diverse source of heparin-like and heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2679. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39093-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capila I, Linhardt RJ. Heparin–protein interactions. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2002;41:390–412. doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20020201)41:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y-H, Narimatsu Y, Clausen TM, et al. The GAGOme: a cell-based library of displayed glycosaminoglycans. Nat Methods. 2018;15:881–888. doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0086-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira R, Reis RL, Pashkuleva I. Influence of the sulfation degree of glycosaminoglycans on their multilayer assembly with poly-l-lysine. Colloids Surf, B. 2016;145:567–575. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.05.069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashkuleva I, Reis RL. Sugars: burden or biomaterials of the future? J Mater Chem. 2010;20:8803–8818. doi:10.1039/C0JM01605E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gama CI, Tully SE, Sotogaku N, et al. Sulfation patterns of glycosaminoglycans encode molecular recognition and activity. Nat Chem Biol. 2006;2:467–473. doi:10.1038/nchembio810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein DR, Leach FE, Amster IJ, et al. Structural characterization of glycosaminoglycan carbohydrates using ultraviolet photodissociation. Anal Chem. 2019;91:6019–6026. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.9b00521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada M, Hamaguchi T. The sulfation code for propagation of neurodegeneration. J Biol Chem. 2018;293:10841–10842. doi:10.1074/jbc.H118.003970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss RJ, Esko JD, Tor Y. Targeting heparin and heparan sulfate protein interactions. Org Biomol Chem. 2017;15:5656–5668. doi:10.1039/C7OB01058C.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noti C, Seeberger PH. Synthetic approach to define structure-activity relationship of heparin and heparan sulfate. In: Garg HG, Linhardt RJ, Hales CA, editor. Chemistry and biology of heparin and heparan sulfate. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 2005. p. 79–142. Chap. 4
   Google Scholar
• Sasisekharan R, Venkataraman G. Heparin and heparan sulfate: biosynthesis, structure and function. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2000;4:626–631. doi:10.1016/S1367-5931(00)00145-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toida T, Yoshida H, Toyoda H, et al. Structural differences and the presence of unsubstituted amino groups in heparan sulphates from different tissues and species. Biochem J. 1997;322:499–506. doi:10.1042/bj3220499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon Davis DA, Parish CR. Heparan sulfate: a ubiquitous glycosaminoglycan with multiple roles in immunity. Front Immunol. 2013;4:Article number 470. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2013.00470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faham S, Hileman RE, Fromm JR, et al. Heparin structure and interactions with basic fibroblast growth factor. Science. 1996;271:1116–1120. doi:10.1126/science.271.5252.1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi NS, Mancera RL. Prediction of heparin binding sites in bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Proteins Proteom. 2012;1824:1374–1381. doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramdin P, Sheron S. Regulation of interleukin-8 binding and function by heparin and α2-macroglobulin. Clin Exp Allergy. 1998;28:616–624. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00283.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandi N, Mostafavi E, Shokrgozar MA, et al. Biomimetic proteoglycan nanoparticles for growth factor immobilization and delivery. Biomater Sci. 2020;8:1127–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyrek E, Dubin PL, Henriksen J. Nonspecific electrostatic binding characteristics of the heparin-antithrombin interaction. Biopolymers. 2007;86:249–259. doi:10.1002/bip.20731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons RB, Newton GR, Doctor VM. Effect of sulfated xylans during the interaction of [125I]-thrombin with antithrombin III or heparin cofactor II of human plasma. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1995;20:73–77. doi:10.1007/BF03192291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobczak AIS, Pitt SJ, Stewart AJ. Influence of zinc on glycosaminoglycan neutralisation during coagulation. Metallomics. 2018;10:1180–1190. doi:10.1039/C8MT00159F.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaumenhaft R, Moscatelli D, Rifkin DB. Heparin and heparan sulfate increase the radius of diffusion and action of basic fibroblast growth factor. J Cell Biol. 1990;111:1651–1659. doi:10.1083/jcb.111.4.1651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers AL, Jackson GE. Determination of thermodynamic parameters for complexation of calcium and magnesium with chondroitin sulfate isomers using isothermal titration calorimetry: Implications for calcium kidney-stone research. J Cryst Growth. 2017;463:14–18. doi:10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.01.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashida Y, Akama TO, Beecher N, et al. Matrix morphogenesis in cornea is mediated by the modification of keratan sulfate by GlcNAc 6-O-sulfotransferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:13333–13338. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605441103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlechild SL, Young RD, Caterson B, et al. Keratan sulfate phenotype in the β-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-7–null mouse cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Visual Sci. 2018;59:1641–1651. doi:10.1167/iovs.17-22716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim S, da Costa DS, Freitas D, et al. Molecular weight of surface immobilized hyaluronic acid influences CD44-mediated binding of gastric cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8:16058. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34445-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho AM, Teixeira R, Novoa-Carballal R, et al. Redox-responsive micellar nanoparticles from glycosaminoglycans for CD44 targeted drug delivery. Biomacromolecules. 2018;19:2991–2999. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haskin CL, Fullerton GD, Cameron IL. Molecular basis of articular disk biomechanics: fluid flow and water content in the temporomandibular disk as related to distribution of sulfur. In: Pollack GH, Cameron IL, Wheatley DN, editor. Water and the cell. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006. p. 53–69.
   Google Scholar
• Henrotin Y, Mathy M, Sanchez C, et al. Chondroitin sulfate in the treatment of osteoarthritis: from in vitro studies to clinical recommendations. Ther Adv Musculoskeletal Dis. 2010;2:335–348. doi:10.1177/1759720 ( 10383076.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maroudas A. Balance between swelling pressure and collagen tension in normal and degenerate cartilage. Nature. 1976;260:808–809. doi:10.1038/260808a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu L-n, Jee SE, Jiao K, et al. Collagen intrafibrillar mineralization as a result of the balance between osmotic equilibrium and electroneutrality. Nat Mater. 2017;16:370–378. doi:10.1038/nmat4789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroto M, Fernández-Morales J-C, Padín JF, et al. Chondroitin sulfate, a major component of the perineuronal net, elicits inward currents, cell depolarization, and calcium transients by acting on AMPA and kainate receptors of hippocampal neurons. J Neurochem. 2013;125:205–213. doi:10.1111/jnc.12159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajisaka K, Oyanagi Y, Miyazaki T, et al. Effect of the chelation of metal cation on the antioxidant activity of chondroitin sulfates. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2016;80:1179–1185. doi:10.1080/09168451.2016.1141036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatara Y, Suto S, Itoh K. Novel roles of glycosaminoglycans in the degradation of type I collagen by cathepsin K. Glycobiology. 2017;27:1089–1098. doi:10.1093/glycob/cwx083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JJ, Temenoff JS. The effect of desulfation of chondroitin sulfate on interactions with positively charged growth factors and upregulation of cartilaginous markers in encapsulated MSCs. Biomaterials. 2013;34:5007–5018. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuboyama K, Fujikawa A, Suzuki R, et al. Role of chondroitin sulfate (CS) modification in the regulation of protein-tyrosine phosphatase receptor type Z (PTPRZ) activity: pleiotrophin-PTPRZ-A signaling is involved in oligodendrocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:18117–18128. doi:10.1074/jbc.M116.742536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penc SF, Pomahac B, Winkler T, et al. Dermatan sulfate released after injury is a potent promoter of fibroblast growth factor-2 function. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:28116–28121. doi:10.1074/jbc.273.43.28116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostoulas G, Hörler D, Naggi A, et al. Electrostatic interactions between human leukocyte elastase and sulfated glycosaminoglycans: physiological implications. Biol Chem. 1997;378:1481. doi:10.1515/bchm.1997.378.12.1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griese M, Kappler M, Gaggar A, et al. Inhibition of airway proteases in cystic fibrosis lung disease. Eur Respir J. 2008;32:783–795. doi:10.1183/09031936.00146807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurice P, Blaise S, Gayral S, et al. Elastin fragmentation and atherosclerosis progression: the elastokine concept. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2013;23:211–221. doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2012.12.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolucci C, Cellai L, Iannelli MA, et al. Inhibition of human leukocyte elastase by chemically and naturally oversulfated galactosaminoglycans. Carbohydr Res. 1995;276:401–408. doi:10.1016/0008-6215(95)00179-W.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández JA, Petäjä J, Griffin JH. Dermatan sulfate and LMW heparin enhance the anticoagulant action of activated protein C. Thromb Haemostasis. 1999;82:1462–1468. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1614856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim S, Reis CA, Reis RL, et al. Extracellular matrix mimics using hyaluronan-based biomaterials. Trends Biotechnol. 2021;39:90–104. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.06.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf KJ, Kumar S. Hyaluronic acid: incorporating the bio into the material. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5:3753–3765. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim S, da Costa D S, Pashkuleva I, et al. Hyaluronic acid of low molecular weight triggers the invasive “hummingbird” phenotype on gastric cancer cells. Adv Biosyst. 2020;4:2000122. doi:10.1002/adbi.202000122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim S, Soares da Costa D, Mereiter S, et al. Multilayer platform to model the bioactivity of hyaluronic acid in gastric cancer. Mater Sci Eng, C. 2021;119:111616. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2020.111616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintuluoto M, Horioka Y, Hongo S, et al. Molecular dynamics simulation study on allosteric regulation of CD44-hyaluronan binding as a force sensing mechanism. ACS Omega. 2021;6:8045–8055. doi:10.1021/acsomega.0c05502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho AM, da Costa D S, Paulo PMR, et al. Co-localization and crosstalk between CD44 and RHAMM depend on hyaluronan presentation. Acta Biomater. 2021;119:114–124. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra S, Hascall VC, Markwald RR, et al. Interactions between Hyaluronan and its receptors (CD44, RHAMM) regulate the activities of inflammation and cancer. Front Immunol. 2015;6. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2015.00201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azevedo HS, Pashkuleva I. Biomimetic supramolecular designs for the controlled release of growth factors in bone regeneration. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2015;94:63–76. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil ES, Hudson SM. Stimuli-reponsive polymers and their bioconjugates. Prog Polym Sci. 2004;29:1173–1222. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seog J, Dean D, Plaas AHK, et al. Direct measurement of glycosaminoglycan intermolecular interactions via high-resolution force spectroscopy. Macromolecules. 2002;35:5601–5615. doi:10.1021/ma0121621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalevée G, David L, Montembault A, et al. Highly stretchable hydrogels from complex coacervation of natural polyelectrolytes. Soft Matter. 2017;13:6594–6605. doi:10.1039/C7SM01215B.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, In B, Mehta PK, et al. Dual role of a fluorescent peptidyl probe based on self-assembly for the detection of heparin and for the inhibition of the heparin-digestive enzyme reaction. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:2282–2290. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b15411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remko M, Broer R, Van Duijnen PT. How acidic are monomeric structural units of heparin? Chem Phys Lett. 2013;590:187–191. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2013.10.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Ren X-W, Cui J-H, et al. Multistimuli responsive supramolecular polymeric nanoparticles formed by calixpyridinium and chondroitin 4-sulfate. ChemistrySelect. 2018;3:2789–2794. doi:10.1002/slct.201800570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha PK, Desai PS, Li J, et al. Ph and salt effects on the associative phase separation of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes. Polymers. 2014;6:1414–1436. doi:10.3390/polym6051414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Cremer PS. Interactions between macromolecules and ions: the Hofmeister series. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2006;10:658–663. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.09.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follmann HDM, Naves AF, Martins AF, et al. Advanced fibroblast proliferation inhibition for biocompatible coating by electrostatic layer-by-layer assemblies of heparin and chitosan derivatives. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;474:9–17. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2016.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisch A, Tirado P, Roger E, et al. Compact saloplastic poly(acrylic acid)/poly(allylamine) complexes: kinetic control over composition, microstructure, and mechanical properties. Adv Funct Mater. 2013;23:673–682. doi:10.1002/adfm.201201413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa RR, Soares da Costa D, Reis RL, et al. Bioinspired baroplastic glycosaminoglycan sealants for soft tissues. Acta Biomater. 2019;87:108–117. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddohi S, Moore N, Johnson PA, et al. Polysaccharide-based polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles from chitosan, heparin, and hyaluronan. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:1402–1409. doi:10.1021/bm801513e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillot R, Gilde F, Becquart P, et al. The stability of BMP loaded polyelectrolyte multilayer coatings on titanium. Biomaterials. 2013;34:5737–5746. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretero A, da Costa D S, Reis RL, et al. Extracellular matrix-inspired assembly of glycosaminoglycan–collagen fibers. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5:3103–3106. doi:10.1039/C7TB00704C.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picart C, Mutterer J, Richert L, et al. Molecular basis for the explanation of the exponential growth of polyelectrolyte multilayers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:12531–5. doi:10.1073/pnas.202486099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva C, Carretero A, Soares da Costa D, et al. Design of protein delivery systems by mimicking extracellular mechanisms for protection of growth factors. Acta Biomater. 2017;63:283–293. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattori T, Kimura K, Seyrek E, et al. Binding of bovine serum albumin to heparin determined by turbidimetric titration and frontal analysis continuous capillary electrophoresis. Anal Biochem. 2001;295:158–167. doi:10.1006/abio.2001.5129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moerke NJ. Fluorescence polarization (FP) assays for monitoring peptide-protein or nucleic acid-protein binding. Curr Protoc Chem Biol. 2009;1:1–15. doi:10.1002/9780470559277.ch090102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Köhling S, Blaszkiewicz J, Ruiz-Gómez G, et al. Syntheses of defined sulfated oligohyaluronans reveal structural effects, diversity and thermodynamics of GAG–protein binding. Chem Sci. 2019;10:866–878. doi:10.1039/C8SC03649G.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorim S, Pashkuleva I, Reis CA, et al. Tunable layer-by-layer films containing hyaluronic acid and their interactions with CD44. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8:3880–3885. doi:10.1039/D0TB00407C.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novoa-Carballal R, Carretero A, Pacheco R, et al. Star-like glycosaminoglycans with superior bioactivity assemble with proteins into microfibers. Chem-Eur J. 2018;24:14341–14345. doi:10.1002/chem.201802243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Water JJ, Schack MM, Velazquez-Campoy A, et al. Complex coacervates of hyaluronic acid and lysozyme: effect on protein structure and physical stability. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;88:325–331. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2014.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouzier T, Picart C. Ion pairing and hydration in polyelectrolyte multilayer films containing polysaccharides. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:433–442. doi:10.1021/bm8012378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudou T, Crouzier T, Auzély-Velty R, et al. Internal composition versus the mechanical properties of polyelectrolyte multilayer films: the influence of chemical cross-linking. Langmuir. 2009;25:13809–13819. doi:10.1021/la9018663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Li X, McClements DJ, et al. Physicochemical and functional properties of lactoferrin-hyaluronic acid complexes: effect of non-covalent and covalent interactions. LWT. 2021;151:112121. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu F-M, Hu M-H, Jiang Y-S, et al. Antibacterial polypeptide/heparin composite hydrogels carrying growth factor for wound healing. Mater Sci Eng, C. 2020;112:110923. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2020.110923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues MN, Oliveira MB, Costa RR, et al. Chitosan/chondroitin sulfate membranes produced by polyelectrolyte complexation for cartilage engineering. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17:2178–2188. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.6b00399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohtashamian S, Boddohi S, Hosseinkhani S. Preparation and optimization of self-assembled chondroitin sulfate-nisin nanogel based on quality by design concept. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;107:2730–2739. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campo GM, Avenoso A, Campo S, et al.. Antioxidant activity of chondroitin sulfate. Adv Pharmacol. 2006;53:417–431. doi:10.1016/S1054-3589(05)53020-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marchettini N, Barbucci R, Bonechi C, et al. Structural study of hyaluronic acid oligomers and their complexes with copper in water by NMR and IR and molecular dynamics calculations. Macromol Symp. 1999;138:203–208. doi:10.1002/masy.19991380126.
   Google Scholar
• Winter WT, Arnott S. Hyaluronic acid: the role of divalent cations in conformation and packing. J Mol Biol. 1977;117:761–784. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(77)90068-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar H, Akal E, Sarper O, et al. Modeling glycosaminoglycans—hyaluronan, chondroitin, chondroitin sulfate A, chondroitin sulfate C and keratan sulfate. J Mol Struct: Theochem. 2004;683:121–132. doi:10.1016/j.theochem.2004.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remko M, Van Duijnen PT, Broer R. Effect of metal ions (Li+, Na+, K+, Mg2+ and Ca2+) and water on the conformational changes of glycosidic bonds in heparin oligosaccharides. RSC Adv. 2013;3:9843–9853. doi:10.1039/C3RA40566D.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter GK. An ion-exchange mechanism of cartilage calcification. Connect Tissue Res. 1987;16:111–120. doi:10.3109/03008208709001999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Z, Liu Z, Tian H, et al. Scalable production of core–shell nanoparticles by flash nanocomplexation to enhance mucosal transport for oral delivery of insulin. Nanoscale. 2018;10:3307–3319. doi:10.1039/C7NR08047F.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lallana E, de la Rosa JM R, Tirella A, et al. Chitosan/hyaluronic acid nanoparticles: rational design revisited for RNA delivery. Mol Pharmaceutics. 2017;14:2422–2436. doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.7b00320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao D, Liu L, Chen Y, et al. Potency of a Scalable nanoparticulate subunit vaccine. Nano Lett. 2018;18:3007–3016. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasente RY, Imperiale JC, Lázaro-Martínez JM, et al. Dermatan sulfate/chitosan polyelectrolyte complex with potential application in the treatment and diagnosis of vascular disease. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;144:362–370. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.02.046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman OY, Alameh MG, De Cresenzo G, et al. Efficiency of chitosan/hyaluronan-based mRNA delivery systems In vitro: influence of composition and structure. J Pharm Sci. 2020;109:1581–1593. doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2019.12.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J-S, Imai T, Otagiri M. Effects of a cisplatin-chondroitin sulfate A complex in reducing the nephrotoxicity of cisplatin. Arch Toxicol. 2000;74:300–307. doi:10.1007/s002040000124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J-S, Anraku M, Kadowaki D, et al. Spectroscopic studies of interactions of chondroitin sulfates with cisplatin. Carbohydr Res. 2011;346:631–637. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2011.01.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blocher WC, Perry SL. Complex coacervate-based materials for biomedicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2017;9:e1442. doi:10.1002/wnan.1442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreev M, Prabhu VM, Douglas JF, et al. Complex coacervation in polyelectrolytes from a coarse-grained model. Macromolecules. 2018;51:6717–6723. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adhikari S, Leaf MA, Muthukumar M. Polyelectrolyte complex coacervation by electrostatic dipolar interactions. J Chem Phys. 2018;149:163308. doi:10.1063/1.5029268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalevée G, Sudre G, Montembault A, et al. Polyelectrolyte complexes via desalting mixtures of hyaluronic acid and chitosan—physicochemical study and structural analysis. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;154:86–95. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaeli I, Overbeek JTG, Voorn MJ. Phase separation of polyelectrolyte solutions. J Polym Sci A. 1957;23:443–450. doi:10.1002/pol.1957.1202310337.
   Google Scholar
• Overbeek JTG, Voorn MJ. Phase separation in polyelectrolyte solutions. theory of complex coacervation. J Cell Comp Physiol. 1957;49:7–26. doi:10.1002/jcp.1030490404.
   Google Scholar
• Gucht J, Spruijt E, Lemmers M, et al. Polyelectrolyte complexes: bulk phases and colloidal systems. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;361:407–422. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2011.05.080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng S, Liu Y, Yeo J, et al. Effect of mixed solvents on polyelectrolyte complexes with salt. Colloid Polym Sci. 2020;298:887–894. doi:10.1007/s00396-020-04637-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry SL, Li Y, Priftis D, et al. The effect of salt on the complex coacervation of vinyl polyelectrolytes. Polymers. 2014;6:1756–1772. doi:10.3390/polym6061756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkekhia D, Hammond PT, Shukla A. Layer-by-layer biomaterials for drug delivery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2020;22:1–24. doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-060418-052350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antipina MN, Kiryukhin MV, Skirtach AG, et al. Micropackaging via layer-by-layer assembly: microcapsules and microchamber arrays. Int Mater Rev. 2014;59:224–244. doi:10.1179/1743280414Y.0000000030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa RR, Mano JF. Polyelectrolyte multilayered assemblies in biomedical technologies. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43:3453–3479. doi:10.1039/C3CS60393H.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monge C, Almodóvar J, Boudou T, et al. Spatio-temporal control of LbL films for biomedical applications: from 2D to 3D. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2015;4:811–830. doi:10.1002/adhm.201400715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui Z, Salloum D, Schlenoff JB. Effect of molecular weight on the construction of polyelectrolyte multilayers:  stripping versus sticking. Langmuir. 2003;19:2491–2495. doi:10.1021/la026531d.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale AC, Pereira P, Barbosa AM, et al. Antibacterial free-standing polysaccharide composite films inspired by the sea. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;133:933–944. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavalle P, Picart C, Mutterer J, et al. Modeling the buildup of polyelectrolyte multilayer films having exponential growth. J Phys Chem B. 2004;108:635–648. doi:10.1021/jp035740j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picart C, Lavalle P, Hubert P, et al. Buildup mechanism for poly(l-lysine)/hyaluronic acid films onto a solid surface. Langmuir. 2001;17:7414–7424. doi:10.1021/la010848g.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggarwal N, Altgärde N, Svedhem S, et al. Effect of molecular composition of Heparin and cellulose sulfate on multilayer formation and cell response. Langmuir. 2013;29:13853–13864. doi:10.1021/la4028157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikulina AS, Anissimov YG, Singh P, et al. Temperature effect on the build-up of exponentially growing polyelectrolyte multilayers. An exponential-to-linear transition point. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2016;18:7866–7874. doi:10.1039/C6CP00345A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaike M, Senoo Y, Yamamoto H. Sphere, honeycomb, regularly spaced droplet and fiber structures of polyion complexes of chitosan and gellan. Macromol Rapid Commun. 1998;19:287–289. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3927(19980601)19:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan ACA, Cutiongco MFA, Tai BCU, et al. Fibers by interfacial polyelectrolyte complexation – processes, materials and applications. Mater Today. 2016;19:437–450. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2016.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivonen MS, Kurki-Suonio S, Wagermaier W, et al. Interfacial polyelectrolyte complex spinning of cellulose nanofibrils for advanced bicomponent fibers. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18:1293–1301. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui Q, Bell DJ, Rauer SB, et al. Wet-Spinning of biocompatible core–shell polyelectrolyte complex fibers for tissue engineering. Adv Mater Interfaces. 2020;7:2000849. doi:10.1002/admi.202000849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohkawa K, Takahashi Y, Yamada M, et al. Polyion complex fiber and capsule formed by self-assembly of chitosan and poly(α,L-glutamic acid) at solution interfaces. Macromol Mater Eng. 2001;286:168–175. doi:10.1002/1439-2054(20010301)286:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capito RM, Azevedo HS, Velichko YS, et al. Self-assembly of large and small molecules into hierarchically ordered sacs and membranes. Science. 2008;319:1812–1816. doi:10.1126/science.1154586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes AC, Smith KH, Tejeda-Montes E, et al. Co-assembled and microfabricated bioactive membranes. Adv Funct Mater. 2013;23:430–438. doi:10.1002/adfm.201201065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima K, Tsuji Y, Kuriki I, et al. Control of cell adhesion and proliferation utilizing polysaccharide composite film scaffolds. Colloids Surf, B. 2017;160:228–237. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.09.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Leon JA, Acar MH, Ryu S-W, et al. Low-temperature processing of ‘baroplastics’ by pressure-induced flow. Nature. 2003;426:424–428. doi:10.1038/nature02140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv Z, Qiao J-N, Song Y-N, et al. Baroplastics with robust mechanical properties and reserved processability through hydrogen-bonded interactions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11:12008–12016. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b20676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porcel CH, Schlenoff JB. Compact polyelectrolyte complexes: “saloplastic” candidates for biomaterials. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:2968–2975. doi:10.1021/bm900373c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang K-T, Ishihara K, Huang C-J. Polyelectrolyte and antipolyelectrolyte effects for dual salt-responsive interpenetrating network hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2019;20:3524–3534. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.9b00796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markarian MZ, Hariri HH, Reisch A, et al. A small-angle neutron scattering study of the equilibrium conformation of polyelectrolytes in stoichiometric saloplastic polyelectrolyte complexes. Macromolecules. 2012;45:1016–1024. doi:10.1021/ma2022666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamoun RF, Reisch A, Schlenoff JB. Extruded saloplastic polyelectrolyte complexes. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22:1923–1931. doi:10.1002/adfm.201102787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Gao S, Asghar S, et al. Hyaluronic acid/chitosan nanoparticles for delivery of curcuminoid and its in vitro evaluation in glioma cells. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;72:1391–1401. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.10.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lookene A, Chevreuil O, Østergaard P, et al. Interaction of lipoprotein lipase with heparin fragments and with heparan sulfate:  stoichiometry, stabilization, and kinetics. Biochemistry. 1996;35:12155–12163. doi:10.1021/bi960008e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Weert M, Andersen MB, Frokjaer S. Complex coacervation of lysozyme and heparin: complex characterization and protein stability. Pharm Res. 2004;21:2354–2359. doi:10.1007/s11095-004-7689-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan H, Donovan M, Hernandez F, et al. Hyaluronic-acid-presenting self-assembled nanoparticles transform a hyaluronidase HYAL1 substrate into an efficient and selective inhibitor. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59:13591–13596. doi:10.1002/anie.202005212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blachman A, Funez F, Birocco AM, et al. Targeted anti-inflammatory peptide delivery in injured endothelial cells using dermatan sulfate/chitosan nanomaterials. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;230:115610. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan K, Duquette M, Liu J-h, et al. The structures of the thrombospondin-1 N-terminal domain and its complex with a synthetic pentameric heparin. Structure. 2006;14:33–42. doi:10.1016/j.str.2005.09.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb LM, Ehrengruber MU, Clark-Lewis I, et al. Binding to heparan sulfate or heparin enhances neutrophil responses to interleukin 8. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:7158–7162. doi:10.1073/pnas.90.15.7158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Johnson DJD, Esmon CT, et al. Structure of the antithrombin–thrombin–heparin ternary complex reveals the antithrombotic mechanism of heparin. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11:857–862. doi:10.1038/nsmb811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso MJ, Caridade SG, Costa RR, et al. Enzymatic degradation of polysaccharide-based layer-by-layer structures. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17:1347–1357. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novoa-Carballal R, Silva C, Möller S, et al. Tunable nano-carriers from clicked glycosaminoglycan block copolymers. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2:4177–4184. doi:10.1039/C4TB00410H.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volodkin D, Ball V, Schaaf P, et al. Complexation of phosphocholine liposomes with polylysine. stabilization by surface coverage versus aggregation. Biochim Biophys Acta, Biomembr. 2007;1768:280–290. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.09.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro TG, Chávez-Fumagalli MA, Valadares DG, et al. Novel targeting using nanoparticles: an approach to the development of an effective anti-leishmanial drug-delivery system. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:877–890. doi:10.2147/IJN.S55678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielsen S, Strand S, de Lange Davies C, et al. Glycosaminoglycan destabilization of DNA–chitosan polyplexes for gene delivery depends on chitosan chain length and GAG properties. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj. 2005;1721:44–54. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.10.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moret I, Esteban Peris J, Guillem VM, et al. Stability of PEI–DNA and DOTAP–DNA complexes: effect of alkaline pH, heparin and serum. J Controlled Release. 2001;76:169–181. doi:10.1016/S0168-3659(01)00415-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landázuri N, Le Doux JM. Complexation of retroviruses with charged polymers enhances gene transfer by increasing the rate that viruses are delivered to cells. J Gene Med. 2004;6:1304–1319. doi:10.1002/jgm.618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germershaus O, Lühmann T, Rybak JC, et al. Application of natural and semi-synthetic polymers for the delivery of sensitive drugs. Int Mater Rev. 2015;60:101–131. doi:10.1179/1743280414Y.0000000045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duceppe N, Tabrizian M. Factors influencing the transfection efficiency of ultra low molecular weight chitosan/hyaluronic acid nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2009;30:2625–2631. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Almeida R, Gasperini L, Borges J, et al. Microengineered multicomponent hydrogel fibers: combining polyelectrolyte complexation and microfluidics. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3:1322–1331. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby IA, Hewitson TD.. Fibroblast differentiation in wound healing and fibrosis. Int Rev Cytol. 2007: 143–179. doi:10.1016/S0074-7696(07)57004-X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vishwakarma A, Bhise NS, Evangelista MB, et al. Engineering immunomodulatory biomaterials to tune the inflammatory response. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:470–482. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francesko A, Soares da Costa D, Reis RL, et al. Functional biopolymer-based matrices for modulation of chronic wound enzyme activities. Acta Biomater. 2013;9:5216–5225. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2012.10.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu M, Long S, Huang Y, et al. High strength and antibacterial polyelectrolyte complex CS/HS hydrogel films for wound healing. Soft Matter. 2019;15:7686–7694. doi:10.1039/C9SM01380F.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francesko A, Ivanova K, Hoyo J, et al. Bottom-up layer-by-layer assembling of antibacterial freestanding nanobiocomposite films. Biomacromolecules. 2018;19:3628–3636. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova A, Ivanova K, Hoyo J, et al. Layer-by-layer decorated nanoparticles with tunable antibacterial and antibiofilm properties against both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:3314–3323. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b16508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francesko A, Fernandes MM, Ivanova K, et al. Bacteria-responsive multilayer coatings comprising polycationic nanospheres for bacteria biofilm prevention on urinary catheters. Acta Biomater. 2016;33:203–212. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolami CN, Messadi DV. The role of proteoglycans in hard and soft tissue repair. Crit Rev Oral Biol M. 1994;5:311–337. doi:10.1177/10454411940050030601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hachim D, Whittaker TE, Kim H, et al. Glycosaminoglycan-based biomaterials for growth factor and cytokine delivery: making the right choices. J Controlled Release. 2019;313:131–147. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach J, Rachner TD, Rauner M, et al. Regenerative potential of glycosaminoglycans for skin and bone. J Mol Med. 2012;90:625–635. doi:10.1007/s00109-011-0843-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira DS, Marques AP, Reis RL, et al. Hyaluronan and self-assembling peptides as building blocks to reconstruct the extracellular environment in skin tissue. Biomater Sci. 2013;1:952–964. doi:10.1039/C3BM60019J.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radhakrishnan J, Subramanian A, Sethuraman S. Injectable glycosaminoglycan–protein nano-complex in semi-interpenetrating networks: a biphasic hydrogel for hyaline cartilage regeneration. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;175:63–74. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.07.063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouzier T, Szarpak A, Boudou T, et al. Polysaccharide-blend multilayers containing hyaluronan and heparin as a delivery system for rhBMP-2. Small. 2010;6:651–662. doi:10.1002/smll.200901728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisiel M, Klar AS, Ventura M, et al. Complexation and sequestration of BMP-2 from an ECM mimetic hyaluronan gel for improved bone formation. PLoS One. 2013;8:e78551. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi A, Seo KD, Kim DW, et al. Recent advances in engineering microparticles and their nascent utilization in biomedical delivery and diagnostic applications. Lab Chip. 2017;17:591–613. doi:10.1039/C6LC01023G.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Y, Wang S, Zhang F. Optical multiplexed bioassays for improved biomedical diagnostics. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;58:13208–13219. doi:10.1002/anie.201901964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel G, Malmsten M, Klüßendorf D, et al. A receptor-based biosensor for lipoprotein docking at the endothelial surface and vascular matrix. Biosens Bioelectron. 2001;16:895–904. doi:10.1016/S0956-5663(01)00235-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasik D, Mulchandani A, Yates MV. A heparin-functionalized carbon nanotube-based affinity biosensor for dengue virus. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;91:811–816. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2017.01.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma SC, Yang VC, Fu B, et al. Electrochemical sensor for heparin: further characterization and bioanalytical applications. Anal Chem. 1993;65:2078–2084. doi:10.1021/ac00063a024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng F, Liang W, Sun H, et al. A peptide-based electrochemical biosensor for facile measurement of whole-blood heparin. ChemElectroChem. 2017;4:472–475. doi:10.1002/celc.201600680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Qin J, Lv J, et al. “Turn on” room-temperature phosphorescent biosensors for detection of hyaluronic acid based on manganese-doped ZnS quantum dots. RSC Adv. 2018;8:2873–2879. doi:10.1039/C7RA11858A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu K-Y, Liu B. Conjugated polyelectrolytes as light-up macromolecular probes for heparin sensing. Adv Funct Mater. 2009;19:277–284. doi:10.1002/adfm.200800960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Geng W-C, Gao J, et al. Differential calixarene receptors create patterns that discriminate glycosaminoglycans. Org Chem Front. 2018;5:2685–2691. doi:10.1039/C8QO00606G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar