Six decades of UHMWPE in reconstructive surgery

References

• Kurtz SM. UHMWPE biomaterials handbook: ultra high molecular weight polyethylene in total joint replacement and medical devices. Cambridge (MA): Academic Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain M, Naqvi RA, Abbas N, et al. Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight-Polyethylene (UHMWPE) as a promising polymer material for biomedical applications: a concise review. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(2):323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pietrzak WS. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for total hip acetabular liners: a brief review of current status. J Invest Surg. 2021;34(3):321–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Prever EMB, Bistolfi A, Bracco P, et al. UHMWPE for arthroplasty: past or future? J Orthop Traumatol. 2009;10(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Patil NA, Njuguna J, Kandasubramanian B. UHMWPE for biomedical applications: performance and functionalization. Eur Polym J. 2020;125:109529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegelberg S, Kozak A, Braithwaite G. Characterization of physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of UHMWPE. In: UHMWPE Biomaterials handbook. Norwich (NY): Elsevier; 2016. p. 531–552.
   Google Scholar
• Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Mears SC, et al. Hip arthroplasty. Lancet. 2012;380(9855):1768–1777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liphardt A-M, Windahl SH, Sehic E, et al. Changes in mechanical loading affect arthritis-induced bone loss in mice. Bone. 2020;131:115149.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1323–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busija L, Bridgett L, Williams SR, et al. Osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010;24(6):757–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Yang C, Zhao H, et al. New developments of Ti-based alloys for biomedical applications. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2014;7(3):1709–1800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scales J, Stinson N. Tissue reactions to polytetrafluorethylene. The Lancet. 1964;283(7325):169.
   Google Scholar
• Waugh W. The plan fulfilled: Wrightington 1959–1969. In: John Charnley: the man and the hip. London: Springer; 1990. p. 113–138.
   Google Scholar
• Charnley J. Arthroplasty of the hip: a new operation. Lancet. 1961;1(7187):1129–1132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnley J. Low friction arthroplasty of the hip: theory and practice. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007;370(9597):1508–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apostu D, Lucaciu O, Berce C, et al. Current methods of preventing aseptic loosening and improving osseointegration of titanium implants in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a review. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(6):2104–2119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bitar D, Parvizi J. Biological response to prosthetic debris. World J Orthop. 2015;6(2):172–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johan Kärrholm CR, Nauclér E, Vinblad J, et al. (2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kärrholm J. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (www.shpr.se). Acta Orthop. 2010;81(1):3–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, et al. The Swedish total hip replacement register. JBJS. 2002;84(suppl_2):2–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merola M, Affatato S. Materials for hip prostheses: a review of wear and loading considerations. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(3):495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu B. Biomaterials science and tissue engineering: principles and methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Puértolas J, Kurtz S. Evaluation of carbon nanotubes and graphene as reinforcements for UHMWPE-based composites in arthroplastic applications: a review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;39:129–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm SK, Henrichsen JL, Siljander M, et al. Polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty: where are we now? J Orthop Surg. 2018;26(3):230949901880835.
   Google Scholar
• Sobieraj M, Rimnac C. Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene: mechanics, morphology, and clinical behavior. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2009;2(5):433–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brostow W, Lobland HEH. Materials: introduction and applications. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM. A primer on UHMWPE. In: Kurtz SM, editor. UHMWPE biomaterials handbook. Burlington: Elsevier; 2009. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Lin L, Argon A. Structure and plastic deformation of polyethylene. J Mater Sci. 1994;29(2):294–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron D, Birkinshaw C. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene – evidence for a three-phase morphology. Polymer. 2008;49(13-14):3111–3115.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Muratoglu OK, Evans M, et al. Advances in the processing, sterilization, and crosslinking of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for total joint arthroplasty. Biomaterials. 1999;20(18):1659–1688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellare A, Schnablegger H, Cohen R. A small-angle X-ray scattering study of high-density polyethylene and ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. Macromolecules. 1995;28(23):7585–7588.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM. From ethylene gas to UHMWPE component: the process of producing orthopedic implants. In: Kurtz SM, editor. UHMWPE Biomaterials handbook. Burlington: Elsevier; 2016. p. 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Li S. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. The material and its use in total joint implants. J Bone Joint Surg. 1994;76(7):1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Burstein AH. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. The material and its use in total joint implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(7):1080–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyerer P, Frank A, Jin R. Plastverarbeiter. 1985;36:46–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Pruitt L, Jewett CW, et al. The yielding, plastic flow, and fracture behavior of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene used in total joint replacements. Biomaterials. 1998;19(21):1989–2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edidin A, Kurtz S. Development and validation of the small punch test for UHMWPE used in total joint replacements, Key Engineering Materials, 2001, Trans Tech Publ, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner H, Dillon J. Viscosity and molecular weight distribution of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene using a high temperature low shear rate rotational viscometer. J Appl Polym Sci. 1988;36(3):567–582.
   Google Scholar
• Kusy R, Whitley J. Use of a sequential extraction technique to determine the MWD of bulk UHMWPE. J Appl Polym Sci. 1986;32(3):4263–4269.
   Google Scholar
• Wood W, Li B, Zhong WH. Influence of phase morphology on the sliding wear of polyethylene blends filled with carbon nanofibers. Polym Eng Sci. 2010;50(3):613–623.
   Google Scholar
• Premnath V, Harris W, Jasty M, et al. Gamma sterilization of UHMWPE articular implants: an analysis of the oxidation problem. Biomaterials. 1996;17(18):1741–1753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha M, Mansur A, Mansur H. Characterization and accelerated ageing of UHMWPE used in orthopedic prosthesis by peroxide. Materials (Basel). 2009;2(2):562–576.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson D, Brousseau R, Zhang C, et al. Polyolefin oxidation: Quantification of alcohol and hydroperoxide products by nitric oxide reactions. Polym Degrad Stab. 1987;17(4):303–318.
   Google Scholar
• Costa L, Luda M, Trossarelli L, et al. Oxidation in orthopaedic UHMWPE sterilized by gamma-radiation and ethylene oxide. Biomaterials. 1998;19(7-9):659–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha M, Mansur A, Mansur H. Characterization and accelerated ageing of UHMWPE used in orthopedic prosthesis by peroxide. Materials. (2009);2(2):562-576.
   Google Scholar
• Han K, Wallace J, Truss R, et al. Powder compaction, sintering, and rolling of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene and its composites. J Macromol Sci, Part B: Phys. 1981;19(3):313–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnetson A, Hornsby P. Observations on the sintering of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) powders. J Mater Sci Lett. 1995;14(2):80–84.
   Google Scholar
• Gul RM. Improved UHMWPE for use in total joint replacement. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Zachariades AE, Kanamoto T. The effect of initial morphology on the mechanical properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Polym Eng Sci. 1986;26(10):658–661.
   Google Scholar
• Gul RM, McGarry FJ. Processing of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene by hot isostatic pressing, and the effect of processing parameters on its microstructure. Polym Eng Sci. 2004;44(10):1848–1857.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner MG, Whiteside LA, White SE. Effect of polyethylene quality on wear in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical orthopaedics and related research®. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;317:83–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bellare A, Cohen R. Morphology of rod stock and compression-moulded sheets of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene used in orthopaedic implants. Biomaterials. 1996;17(24):2325–2333.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Truss R, Han K, Wallace J, et al. Cold compaction molding and sintering of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. Polym Eng Sci. 1980;20(11):747–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K-C, Ellis EJ, Crugnola A. Effects of molding cycle on the molecular structure and abrasion resistance of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. ANTEC. 1981;39:270–272.
   Google Scholar
• Han S, Jin X, Wang J, et al. The three dimensional numerical analysis and validation of compression molding process. Boston (MA): SPE ANTEC; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Peng T. Analysis of energy utilization in 3D printing processes. Procedia Cirp. 2016;40:62–67.
   Google Scholar
• Mount EM. 15 - Extrusion processes. In: M Kutz, editor. Applied plastics engineering handbook. Oxford: William Andrew; 2011. p. 227–222.
   Google Scholar
• Fang L, Leng Y, Gao P. Processing and mechanical properties of HA/UHMWPE nanocomposites. Biomaterials. 2006;27(20):3701–3707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhusari SA, Sharma V, Bose S, et al. HDPE/UHMWPE hybrid nanocomposites with surface functionalized graphene oxide towards improved strength and cytocompatibility. J R Soc Interface. 2019;16(150):20180273.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panin S, Buslovich D, Kornienko L, et al. Comparative analysis of tribological and mechanical properties of extrudable polymer–polymer UHMWPE composites fabricated by 3D printing and hot-pressing methods. J Frict Wear. 2020;41(3):228–235.
   Google Scholar
• Basu B, Ghosh S. Biomaterials for musculoskeletal regeneration. Berlin: Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson M, Flivik G, Juliusson R, et al. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H. J Eng Med. 2004;218(6):425–429.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, et al. Future Young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 2009;467(10):2606–2612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracco P, Bellare A, Bistolfi A, et al. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: influence of the chemical, physical and mechanical properties on the wear behavior. A review. Materials (Basel). 2017;10(7):791.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa L, Bracco P, M E, et al. Oxidation and oxidation potential in contemporary packaging for polyethylene total joint replacement components. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2006;78B(1):20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Streicher RM. Plast Rubber Process Appl. 1988;10(4):221–229.
   Google Scholar
• Premnath V, Bellare A, Merrill E, et al. Molecular rearrangements in ultra high molecular weight polyethylene after irradiation and long-term storage in air. Polymer. 1999;40(9):2215–2229.
   Google Scholar
• Peacock A. Handbook of polyethylene: structures: properties, and applications. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Jahan M, Thomas D, Trieu H, et al. Investigation of free radicals in shelf-aged polyethylene tibial components, Transactions of the Fifth World Biomaterials Congress, 1996, 298.
   Google Scholar
• Rabek J, Ranby B. ESR applications to polymer research. Stockholm: Almqvist-Wiksell Forlag AB; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Meurant G. Atmospheric oxidation and antioxidants. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Oral E, Wannomae KK, Hawkins N, et al. α-Tocopherol-doped irradiated UHMWPE for high fatigue resistance and low wear. Biomaterials. 2004;25(24):5515–5522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracco P, Del Prever EB, Cannas M, et al. Oxidation behaviour in prosthetic UHMWPE components sterilised with high energy radiation in a low-oxygen environment. Polym Degrad Stab. 2006;91(9):2030–2038.
   Google Scholar
• Sutula LC, Collier JP, Saum KA, et al. Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:28–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streicher R. Sterilization and long-term aging of medical-grade UHMWPE. Radiat Phys Chem. 1995;46(4-6):893–896.
   Google Scholar
• Goosen J, Verheyen C, Kollen B, et al. In vivo wear reduction of argon compared to air sterilized UHMW-polyethylene liners. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129(7):879–885.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu S, Orr J, Buchanan F. The influence of inert packaging on the shelf ageing of gamma-irradiation sterilised ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Biomaterials. 2003;24(1):139–145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Currier BH, Currier JH, Mayor MB, et al. In vivo oxidation of γ-barrier–sterilized ultra–high-molecular-weight polyethylene bearings. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(5):721–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKellop H, Shen F, Lu B, et al. Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polythylene for total hip replacements. J Orthop Res. 1999;17(2):157–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson J, Cicek R. Silane crosslinked polyethylene for prosthetic applications. Biomaterials. 1984;5(6):326–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourne RB, Barrack R, Rorabeck CH, et al. Arthroplasty options for the young patient. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1976-2007). 2005;441:159–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi J, Zhu W, Liang S, et al. Cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene for long-term clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Invest Surg. 2021;34(3):307–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burusco IO, Romero R, Brun M, et al. Cross-linked ultra-high-molecular weight polyethylene liner and ceramic femoral head in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study at 5 years follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(12):1711–1716.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muratoglu OK. Highly crosslinked and melted UHMWPE. In: Kurtz SM, editor. UHMWPE biomaterials handbook. Burlington: Academic Press; 2009. p. 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, O’Connor DO, et al. Erratum to ‘unified wear model for highly crosslinked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylenes (UHMWPE)’. Biomaterials. 2003;24(8):1527–1527.
   Google Scholar
• Ries MD, Pruitt L. Effect of cross-linking on the microstructure and mechanical properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:149–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oral E, Malhi AS, Muratoglu OK. Mechanisms of decrease in fatigue crack propagation resistance in irradiated and melted UHMWPE. Biomaterials. 2006;27(6):917–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oral E, Muratoglu OK. Radiation cross-linking in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for orthopaedic applications. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B. 2007;265(1):18–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomoll A, Wanich T, Bellare A. J-integral fracture toughness and tearing modulus measurement of radiation cross-linked UHMWPE. J Orthop Res. 2002;20(6):1152–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker D, Bellare A, Pruitt L. The effects of degree of crosslinking on the fatigue crack initiation and propagation resistance of orthopedic-grade polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2003;66A(1):146–154.
   Google Scholar
• Gencur SJ, Rimnac CM, Kurtz SM. Fatigue crack propagation resistance of virgin and highly crosslinked, thermally treated ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Biomaterials. 2006;27(8):1550–1557.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simis KS, Bistolfi A, Bellare A, et al. The combined effects of crosslinking and high crystallinity on the microstructural and mechanical properties of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. Biomaterials. 2006;27(9):1688–1694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratoglu O, Bragdon CR, O’Connor D, et al. A novel method of crosslinking UHMWPE to improve wear with little or no sacrifice of mechanical properties. Annual Meeting-Society for Biomaterials in Conjunction with the International Biomaterials Symposium. 1999;22:496–496.
   Google Scholar
• Digas G, Kärrholm J, Thanner J, et al. 5-year experience of highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented and uncemented sockets: two randomized studies using radiostereometric analysis. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(6):746–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Bragdon CR, O’Connor DO, et al. A novel method of cross-linking ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene to improve wear, reduce oxidation, and retain mechanical properties. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(2):149–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wannomae KK, Christensen SD, Freiberg AA, et al. The effect of real-time aging on the oxidation and wear of highly cross-linked UHMWPE acetabular liners. Biomaterials. 2006;27(9):1980–1987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton G, Ingold K. Autoxidation of biological molecules. 1. Antioxidant activity of vitamin E and related chain-breaking phenolic antioxidants in vitro. J Am Chem Soc. 1981;103(21):6472–6477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal-Eldin A, Appelqvist L-Å. The chemistry and antioxidant properties of tocopherols and tocotrienols. Lipids. 1996;31(7):671–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipper J, Galvin A, Williams S, et al. Isolation and characterization of UHMWPE wear particles down to ten nanometers in size fromin vitro hip and knee joint simulators. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2006;78A(3):473–480.
   Google Scholar
• Costa L, Bracco P. Mechanisms of crosslinking, oxidative degradation and stabilization of UHMWPE. In: Kurtz SM, editor. UHMWPE biomaterials handbook. Cambridge (MA): Elsevier; 2009. p. 309–323.
   Google Scholar
• Oral E, Muratoglu OK. Vitamin e diffused, highly crosslinked UHMWPE: a review. Int Orthop. 2011;35(2):215–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oral E, Muratoglu OK. Highly cross-linked UHMWPE doped with vitamin E. In: Kurtz SM, editor. UHMWPE biomaterials handbook. Norwich (NY): Elsevier; 2016. p. 307–325.
   Google Scholar
• Knahr K. Total hip arthroplasty: wear behaviour of different articulations. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Bichara DA, Suhardi J, et al. Effects of vitamin E-diffused highly cross-linked UHMWPE particles on inflammation, apoptosis and immune response against S. aureus. Biomaterials. 2017;143:46–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamal-Eldin A, Appelqvist LÅ. The chemistry and antioxidant properties of tocopherols and tocotrienols. Lipids. 1996;31(7):671–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oral E, Greenbaum ES, Malhi AS, et al. Characterization of irradiated blends of α-tocopherol and UHMWPE. Biomaterials. 2005;26(33):6657–6663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oral E, Wannomae KK, Rowell SL, et al. Diffusion of vitamin E in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Biomaterials. 2007;28(35):5225–5237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oral E, Beckos CG, Malhi AS, et al. The effects of high dose irradiation on the cross-linking of vitamin E-blended ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. Biomaterials. 2008;29(26):3557–3560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz S, Dumbleton J, Siskey R, et al. Trace concentrations of vitamin E protect radiation crosslinked UHMWPE from oxidative degradation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2009;90A(2):549–563.
   Google Scholar
• Lerf R, Zurbrügg D, Delfosse D. Use of vitamin E to protect cross-linked UHMWPE from oxidation. Biomaterials. 2010;31(13):3643–3648.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mallegol J, Carlsson D, Deschenes L. Post-γ-irradiation reactions in vitamin E stabilised and unstabilised HDPE. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B. 2001;185(1-4):283–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto K, Yamaguchi M, Tani M, et al. Degradation diagnosis of ultrahigh-molecular weight polyethylene with terahertz-time-domain spectroscopy. Appl Phys Lett. 2004;85(22):5194–5196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowell SL, Oral E, Muratoglu OK. Comparative oxidative stability of α-tocopherol blended and diffused UHMWPEs at 3 years of real-time aging. J Orthop Res. 2011;29(5):773–780.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakoda H, Okamoto Y, Haishima Y. In vitro estimation of reduction in strength and wear resistance of UHMWPE for joint prostheses due to lipid-induced degradation. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater. 2020;108(8):3155–3161.
   Google Scholar
• Costa L, Luda M, Trossarelli L, et al. In vivo UHMWPE biodegradation of retrieved prosthesis. Biomaterials. 1998;19(15):1371–1385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay R, Naskar S, Bhaskar N, et al. Modulation of protein adsorption and cell proliferation on polyethylene immobilized graphene oxide reinforced HDPE bionanocomposites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(19):11954–11968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou DG, Li Z, Liu M, et al. Mechanisms of mechanical reinforcement by graphene and carbon nanotubes in polymer nanocomposites. Nanoscale. 2020;12(4):2228–2267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omidi M, A HRDT, Milani S, et al. Prediction of the mechanical characteristics of multi-walled carbon nanotube/epoxy composites using a new form of the rule of mixtures. Carbon N Y. 2010;48(11):3218–3228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young RJ, Liu M, Kinloch IA, et al. The mechanics of reinforcement of polymers by graphene nanoplatelets. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;154:110–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maksimkin A, Kharitonov A, Mostovaya K, et al. Bulk oriented nanocomposites of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene reinforced with fluorinated multiwalled carbon nanotubes with nanofibrillar structure. Compos Part B: Eng. 2016;94:292–298.
   Google Scholar
• Yang BX, Pramoda KP, Xu GQ, et al. Mechanical reinforcement of polyethylene using polyethylene-grafted multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Adv Funct Mater. 2007;17(13):2062–2069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzhong T, Michael HS, Suresh GA. Melt processing and mechanical property characterization of multi-walled carbon nanotube/high density polyethylene (MWNT/HDPE) composite films. Carbon N Y. 2003;41(14):2779–2785.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao K, Zhang L, Zarudi I. Mechanical and rheological properties of carbon nanotube-reinforced polyethylene composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2007;67(2):177–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Wang W, Liu T, et al. Melt rheological properties of nylon 6/multi-walled carbon nanotube composites. Compos Sci Technol. 2008;68(12):2498–2502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong L, Kinloch IA, Young RJ, et al. Interfacial stress transfer in a graphene monolayer nanocomposite. Adv Mater. 2010;22(24):2694–2697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Affdl JH, Kardos J. The Halpin-Tsai equations: a review. Polymer Engineering & Science. 1976;16(5):344–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori T, Tanaka K. Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusions. Acta Metall. 1973;21(5):571–574.
   Google Scholar
• Ramprasad R, Batra R, Pilania G, et al. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. NPJ Comput Mater. 2017;3(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Raccuglia P, Elbert KC, Adler PD, et al. Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments. Nature. 2016;533(7601):73–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim C, Chandrasekaran A, Huan TD, et al. Polymer genome: a data-powered polymer informatics platform for property predictions. J Phys Chem C. 2018;122(31):17575–17585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audus DJ, de Pablo JJ. Polymer informatics: opportunities and challenges. Chicago (IL): ACS; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Adams N, Murray-Rust P. Engineering polymer informatics: towards the computer-aided design of polymers. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2008;29(8):615–632.
   Google Scholar
• Galetz M, Blaβ T, Ruckdäschel H, et al. Carbon nanofibre-reinforced ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene for tribological applications. J Appl Polym Sci. 2007;104(6):4173–4181.
   Google Scholar
• Zoo Y-S, An J-W, Lim D-P, et al. Effect of carbon nanotube addition on tribological behavior of UHMWPE. Tribol Lett. 2004;16(4):305–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Morlanes M, Castell P, Martínez-Nogués V, et al. Effects of gamma-irradiation on UHMWPE/MWNT nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol. 2011;71(3):282–288.
   Google Scholar
• Pang W, Ni Z, Chen G, et al. Mechanical and thermal properties of graphene oxide/ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene nanocomposites. RSC Adv. 2015;5(77):63063–63072.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira AE, Ribeiro MR, Cramail H, et al. Extraordinary mechanical performance in disentangled UHMWPE films processed by compression molding. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;90:202–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei M, Ebrahimi NG, Kontopoulou M. Thermal properties, rheology and sintering of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene and its composites with polyethylene terephthalate. Polymer Engineering & Science. 2005;45(5):678–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan S, Gao P, Yang XG, et al. Toughening high performance ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene using multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Polymer. 2003;44(19):5643–5654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang L, Gao P, Leng Y. High strength and bioactive hydroxyapatite nano-particles reinforced ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2007;38(3):345–351.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong D, Lin J, Fan D, et al. Wear of nano-TiO2/UHMWPE composites radiated by gamma ray under physiological saline water lubrication. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2007;18(11):2131–2135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Senatov F, Gorshenkov M, Kaloshkin S, et al. Biocompatible polymer composites based on ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene perspective for cartilage defects replacement. J Alloys Compd. 2014;586:S544–S547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang B, Akil HM, Nasir RM, et al. Mechanical and antibacterial properties of treated and untreated zinc oxide filled UHMWPE composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2011;24(5):653–667.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong DS, Wang N, Lin JM, et al. Tribological properties of UHMWPE composites filled with nano-powder of SiO2 sliding against Ti-6Al-4V, Key Engineering Materials, 2005, Trans Tech Publ, 629-632.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Sinha SK. Wear performances and wear mechanism study of bulk UHMWPE composites with nacre and CNT fillers and PFPE overcoat. Wear. 2013;300(1–2):44–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei M, Shirzad A, Golshan Ebrahimi N, et al. Surface modification of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene. II. Effect on the physicomechanical and tribological properties of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate) composites. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006;99(5):2352–2358.
   Google Scholar
• Golchin A, Villain A, Emami N. Tribological behaviour of nanodiamond reinforced UHMWPE in water-lubricated contacts. Tribol Int. 2017;110:195–200.
   Google Scholar
• Aliyu IK, Mohammed AS, Al-Qutub A. Tribological performance of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene nanocomposites reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. Polym Compos. 2019;40(S2):E1301–E1311.
   Google Scholar
• Chang BP, Akil HM, Nasir RM. Mechanical and tribological properties of zeolite-reinforced UHMWPE composite for implant application. Procedia Eng. 2013;68:88–94.
   Google Scholar
• Xue Y, Wu W, Jacobs O, et al. Tribological behaviour of UHMWPE/HDPE blends reinforced with multi-wall carbon nanotubes. Polym Test. 2006;25(2):221–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim K, Ishak ZM, Ishiaku U, et al. High-density polyethylene/ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene blend. I. The processing, thermal, and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci. 2005;97(1):413–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui G, Zhong W, Ren X, et al. Structure, mechanical properties and friction behavior of UHMWPE/HDPE/carbon nanofibers. Mater Chem Phys. 2009;115(1):404–412.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas A, Ambrósio JD, et al. Abrasive wear of HDPE/UHMWPE blends. Wear. 2011;270(9–10):576–583.
   Google Scholar
• Khasraghi SS, Rezaei M. Preparation and characterization of UHMWPE/HDPE/MWCNT melt-blended nanocomposites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater. 2015;28(3):305–326.
   Google Scholar
• Melk L, Emami N. Mechanical and thermal performances of UHMWPE blended vitamin E reinforced carbon nanoparticle composites. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2018;146:20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim K, Ishak ZM, Ishiaku U, et al. High density polyethylene/ultra high molecular weight polyethylene blend. II. Effect of hydroxyapatite on processing, thermal, and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci. 2006;100(5):3931–3942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, He H, Ma Y, et al. Rheological and mechanical properties of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene/high density polyethylene/polyethylene glycol blends. Adv Ind Eng Polym Res. 2019;2(1):51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Costa H, Hutchings I. Hydrodynamic lubrication of textured steel surfaces under reciprocating sliding conditions. Tribol Int. 2007;40(8):1227–1238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan-qing W, Gao-feng W, Qing-gong H, et al. Tribological properties of surface dimple-textured by pellet-pressing. Procedia Earth Planet Sci. 2009;1(1):1513–1518.
   Google Scholar
• Qian S, Zhu D, Qu N, et al. Generating micro-dimples array on the hard chrome-coated surface by modified through mask electrochemical micromachining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2010;47(9–12):1121–1127.
   Google Scholar
• Etsion I, Halperin G, Brizmer V, et al. Experimental investigation of laser surface textured parallel thrust bearings. Tribol Lett. 2004;17(2):295–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jithin S, Shetye SS, Rodrigues JJ, et al. Analysis of electrical discharge texturing using different electrode materials. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2018;4(3):466–479.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou R, Cao J, Wang QJ, et al. Effect of EDT surface texturing on tribological behavior of aluminum sheet. J Mater Process Technol. 2011;211(10):1643–1649.
   Google Scholar
• Firouzi D, Youssef A, Amer M, et al. A new technique to improve the mechanical and biological performance of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene using a nylon coating. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;32:198–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berumen J, De la Mora T, López-Perrusquia N, et al. Structural, chemical and mechanical study of TiAlV film on UHMWPE produced by DC magnetron sputtering. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;93:23–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azam MU, Samad MA. A novel organoclay reinforced UHMWPE nanocomposite coating for tribological applications. Prog Org Coat. 2018;118:97–107.
   Google Scholar
• Ruan F, Bao L. Mechanical enhancement of UHMWPE fibers by coating with carbon nanoparticles. Fibers Polym. 2014;15(4):723–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puértolas J, Martínez-Nogués V, Martínez-Morlanes M, et al. Improved wear performance of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene coated with hydrogenated diamond like carbon. Wear. 2010;269(5–6):458–465.
   Google Scholar
• Firouzi D, Foucher DA, Bougherara H. Nylon-coated ultra high molecular weight polyethylene fabric for enhanced penetration resistance. J Appl Polym Sci. 2014;131(11). DOI:10.102/app.40350
   Google Scholar
• Navarro C, Moreno K, Chávez-Valdez A, et al. Friction and wear properties of poly(methyl methacrylate)–hydroxyapatite hybrid coating on UHMWPE substrates. Wear. 2012;282-283:76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Sun Z, Guo P, et al. Effect of ion implantation on surface energy of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. J Appl Phys. 2003;93(9):5103–5108.
   Google Scholar
• Grubova IY, Surmeneva MA, Shugurov VV, et al. Effect of electron beam treatment in air on surface properties of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene. J Med Biol Eng. 2016;36(3):440–448.
   Google Scholar
• Perni S, Kong MG, Prokopovich P. Cold atmospheric pressure gas plasma enhances the wear performance of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(3):1357–1365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mändl S, Rauschenbach B. Improving the biocompatibility of medical implants with plasma immersion ion implantation. Surf Coat Technol. 2002;156(1):276–283.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller TL, Sheeja D, McKenzie DR, et al. Plasma immersion ion implantation of poly(tetrafluoroethylene). Surf Coat Technol. 2004;177-178:483–488.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Huang W, Wang J, et al. Comparison of the effects of surface texture on the surfaces of steel and UHMWPE. Tribol Int. 2013;65:138–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty PS, Srivastava G, Onler R, et al. Lubrication enhancement for UHMWPE sliding contacts through surface texturing. Tribol Trans. 2015;58(1):79–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddoumy F, Addiego F, Celis J-P, et al. Reciprocating sliding of uniaxially-stretched ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for medical device applications. Wear. 2011;272(1):50–61.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Zhang X, Matsoukas G. Numerical study of surface texturing for improving tribological properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Biosurface and Biotribology. 2015;1(4):270–277.
   Google Scholar
• Kustandi TS, Choo JH, Low HY, et al. Texturing of UHMWPE surface via NIL for low friction and wear properties. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 2009;43(1):015301.
   Google Scholar
• Sufyan M, Hussain M, Ahmad H, et al. Bulge micro-textures influence on tribological performance of ultra-high-molecular-weight-polyethylene (UHMWPE) under phosphatidylcholine (Lipid) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) solutions. Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express. 2019;5(3):035021.
   Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen C, Meyer H, Lemstra P. Memory effects in polyethylenes: influence of processing and crystallization history. Polymer. 1990;31(8):1435–1440.
   Google Scholar
• Muratoglu OK, Merrill EW, Bragdon CR, et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res^®. 2003;417:253–262.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf C, Krivec T, Blassnig J, et al. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2002;13(2):185–189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oral E, Christensen SD, Malhi AS, et al. Wear resistance and mechanical properties of highly cross-linked, ultrahigh–molecular weight polyethylene doped With Vitamin E. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(4):580–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM E2647-08 Standard Test Method for Quantification of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Grown using a Drip Flow Biofilm Reactor with Low Shear and Continuous Flow, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sathasivam S, Walker PS. Optimization of the bearing surface geometry of total knees. J Biomech. 1994;27(3):255–264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beck RT, Illingworth KD, Saleh KJ. Review of periprosthetic osteolysis in total joint arthroplasty: an emphasis on host factors and future directions. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(4):541–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandahari AM, Yang X, Laroche KA, et al. A review of UHMWPE wear-induced osteolysis: the role for early detection of the immune response. Bone Res. 2016;4(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Di Puccio F, Mattei L. Biotribology of artificial hip joints. World J Orthop. 2015;6(1):77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ali M, Al-Hajjar M, Jennings LM. Tribology of UHMWPE in the hip. In: Kurtz SM, editor. UHMWPE biomaterials handbook. Norwich (NY): Elsevier; 2016. p. 579–598.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart T. Tribology of artificial joints. Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(6):435–440.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher J, Dowson D. Tribology of total artificial joints. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: J Eng Med. 1991;205(2):73–79.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang A, Sun D, Stark C, et al. Wear mechanisms of UHMWPE in total joint replacements. Wear. 1995;181–183:241–249.
   Google Scholar
• Wroblewski B.. 15-21-year results of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;1(211):30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher J. Curr Orthop. 1994;8(3):164–169.
   Google Scholar
• Ebnesajjad S, Khaladkar P. Fluoropolymers applications in chemical processing industries. Cambridge: William Andrew, Applied Science publisher; 2005. p. 15–112.
   Google Scholar
• Archard J, Hirst W. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Math Phys Sci. 1956;236(1206):397–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JA S, Overcamp L, Black J. Size and shape of biomaterial wear debris. Clin Mater. 1994;15(2):101–147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Essner A, Wang A. Tribological assessment of UHMWPE in the hip. In: Kurtz SM, editor. UHMWPE biomaterials handbook. Cambridge (MA): Elsevier; 2009. p. 369–379.
   Google Scholar
• Benz EB, Federman M, Godleski JJ, et al. Transmission electron microscopy of intracellular particles of polyethylene from joint replacement prostheses: size distribution and cellular response. Biomaterials. 2001;22(21):2835–2842.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mabrey JD, Afsar-Keshmiri A, Engh GA, et al. Standardized analysis of UHMWPE wear particles from failed total joint arthroplasties. J Biomed Mater Res: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2002;63(5):475–483.
   Google Scholar
• Hongtao L, Shirong G, Shoufan C, et al. Comparison of wear debris generated from ultra high molecular weight polyethylene in vivo and in artificial joint simulator. Wear. 2011;271(5–6):647–652.
   Google Scholar
• Zolotarevova E, Entlicher G, Pavlova E, et al. Distribution of polyethylene wear particles and bone fragments in periprosthetic tissue around total hip joint replacements. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(9):3595–3600.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang SB, Ge SR, Liu HT, et al. Wear behaviour and wear debris characterization of UHMWPE on alumina ceramic, stainless steel, CoCrMo and Ti6Al4 V hip prostheses in a hip joint simulator. J Biomim, Biomater Tissue Eng. 2010;7:7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Lapcikova M, Slouf M, Dybal J, et al. Nanometer size wear debris generated from ultra high molecular weight polyethylene in vivo. Wear. 2009;266(1-2):349–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards L, Brown C, Stone M, et al. Identification of nanometre-sized ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles in samples retrievedin vivo. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90-B(8):1106–1113.
   Google Scholar
• Koseki H, Matsumoto T, Ito S, et al. Analysis of polyethylene particles isolated from periprosthetic tissue of loosened hip arthroplasty and comparison with radiographic appearance. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10(3):284–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Visentin M, Stea S, Squarzoni S, et al. A new method for isolation of polyethylene wear debris from tissue and synovial fluid. Biomaterials. 2004;25(24):5531–5537.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Golchin A, Wikner A, Emami N. An investigation into tribological behaviour of multi-walled carbon nanotube/graphene oxide reinforced UHMWPE in water lubricated contacts. Tribol Int. 2016;95:156–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai Z, Chen Y, An Y, et al. Tribological Behavior of UHMWPE reinforced with graphene oxide nanosheets. Tribol Lett. 2012;46(1):55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong D, Ge S. Friction and wear properties of UHMWPE/Al2O3 ceramic under different lubricating conditions. Wear. 2001;250(1–12):242–245.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma V, Bose S, Kundu B, et al. Probing the influence of γ-sterilization on the oxidation, crystallization, sliding wear resistance, and cytocompatibility of chemically modified graphene-oxide-reinforced HDPE/UHMWPE nanocomposites and wear debris. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(3):1462–1475.
   Google Scholar
• Besong A, Hailey J, Ingham E, et al. A study of the combined effects of shelf ageing following irradiation in air and counterface roughness on the wear of UHMWPE. Bio-Med Mater Eng. 1997;7(1):59–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basu B. Biomaterials for musculoskeletal regeneration: concepts. Singapore: Springer; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Williams DF. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2008;29(20):2941–2953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CH, Ho FY, Ma HM, et al. Particle size and morphology of UHMWPE wear debris in failed total knee arthroplasties – a comparison between mobile bearing and fixed bearing knees. J Orthop Res. 2002;20(5):1038–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tipper J, Ingham E, Hailey J, et al. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2000;11(2):117–124.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nine MJ, Choudhury D, Hee AC, et al. Wear debris characterization and corresponding biological response: artificial hip and knee joints. Materials (Basel). 2014;7(2):980–1016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu A, Richards L, Bladen CL, et al. The biological response to nanometre-sized polymer particles. Acta Biomater. 2015;23:38–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maitra R, Clement CC, Scharf B, et al. Endosomal damage and TLR2 mediated inflammasome activation by alkane particles in the generation of aseptic osteolysis. Mol Immunol. 2009;47(2-3):175–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anwar IB, Saputra E, Jamari J, et al. Preliminary study on the biocompatibility of stainless steel 316L and UHMWPE material. Adv Mat Res. 2015;1123:160–163.
   Google Scholar
• Vu NB, Truong NH, Dang LT, et al. Biomed Res Therapy. 2016;3(3):567–577.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall A, Ries MD, Paprosky W. How prevalent are implant wear and osteolysis, and how has the scope of osteolysis changed since 2000? JAAOS - J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008;16:S1–S6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho YJ, Lee JH, Sagong ES. Comparison of linear wear rate according to femoral head sizes in metal on conventional UHMWPE liner. In: Knahr K, editor. Tribology in total hip and knee arthroplasty. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlin A, Selvik G. Socket wear assessment. J Arthroplasty. 1993;8(4):427–431.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmalzried TP, Callaghan JJ. Current concepts review – wear in total hip and knee replacements*. JBJS. 1999;81(1):115–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scherge M, Shakhvorostov D, Pöhlmann K. Fundamental wear mechanism of metals. Wear. 2003;255(1–6):395–400.
   Google Scholar
• Fu J, Jin Z-M, Wang J-W. UHMWPE Biomaterials for Joint Implants. Singapore: Springer; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Jones S, Pinder I, Moran C, et al. Polyethylene wear in uncemented knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74-B(1):18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Callaghan JJ, Pedersen DR, Olejniczak JP, et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;1(317):14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich K. Friction and wear of polymer composites. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Basu B, Kalin M, Kumar BM. Friction and wear of ceramics: principles and case studies. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Alhassan S, Goswami T. Wear rate model for UHMWPE in total joint applications. Wear. 2008;265(1-2):8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster J. Abrasive wear of polymers. Wear. 1969;14(4):223–239.
   Google Scholar
• Galliera E, Ragone V, Marazzi MG, et al. Vitamin E-stabilized UHMWPE: biological response on human osteoblasts to wear debris. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;486:18–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matthews JB, Green TR, Stone MH, et al. Comparison of the response of primary human peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes from different donors to challenge with model polyethylene particles of known size and dose. Biomaterials. 2000;21(20):2033–2044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieving A, Wu B, Mayton L, et al. Morphological characteristics of total joint arthroplasty-derived ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear debris that provoke inflammation in a murine model of inflammation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2003;64A(3):457–464.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews JB, Besong AA, Green TR, et al. Evaluation of the response of primary human peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes to challenge within vitro generated clinically relevant UHMWPE particles of known size and dose. J Biomed Mater Res: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2000;52(2):296–307.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman AM, Alabre CI, Rubash HE, et al. Human macrophage response to UHMWPE, TiAlV, CoCr, and alumina particles: analysis of multiple cytokines using protein arrays. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;84A(2):464–474.
   Google Scholar
• Martınez M, Medina S, Del Campo M, et al. Effect of polyethylene particles on human osteoblastic cell growth. Biomaterials. 1998;19(1–3):183–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Illgen II RL, Forsythe TM, Pike JW, et al. Highly crosslinked vs conventional polyethylene particles – an In vitro comparison of biologic activities, J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(5):721–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang L, Haddouti E-M, Welle K, et al. The effects of biomaterial implant wear debris on osteoblasts. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:352–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Amer Y, Darwech I, Clohisy JC. Aseptic loosening of total joint replacements: mechanisms underlying osteolysis and potential therapies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9(S1):S6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatton A, Nevelos J, Matthews J, et al. Effects of clinically relevant alumina ceramic wear particles on TNF-α production by human peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes. Biomaterials. 2003;24(7):1193–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazzaglia U, Dell’Orbo C, Wilkinson M. The foreign body reaction in total hip arthroplasties. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1987;106(4):209–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke I, Campbell P. Progress in bioengineering. Glasgow: Strathclyde University; 1989. 104–115
   Google Scholar
• Murray D, Rushton N. Macrophages stimulate bone resorption when they phagocytose particles. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;72-B(6):988–992.
   Google Scholar
• P. Revell and N. Al-Saffar, In: Downes S, Dabestani N, editors. Failure of joint replacement. A biological, mechanical or surgical problem, 1994, p. 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher J, Bell J, Barbour P, et al. A novel method for the prediction of functional biological activity of polyethylene wear debris. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine. 2001;215(2):127–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Besong A. The influence of tribological conditions on the wear and morphology of UHMWPE wear particles in total artificial joints. Leeds: University of Leeds; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher J, Stone M, Ingham E. Functional biological activity of wear debris generated in artificial hip joints; 2001. na.
   Google Scholar
• Vallés G, Vilaboa N. Osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty: basic science. In: García-Rey E, García-Cimbrelo E, editors. Acetabular revision surgery in major bone defects. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Harris WH. The problem is osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995;311:46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris WH. Osteolysis and particle disease in hip replacement: a review. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65(1):113–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi A, Freeman M, Bonfield W, et al. Number of polyethylene particles and osteolysis in total joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79-B(5):844–848.
   Google Scholar
• Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA. A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17(5):649–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward C. Iowa Orthop J. 2009;29:127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurtz SM. The origins of UHMWPE in total hip arthroplasty. In: Kurtrz SM, editor. UHMWPE biomaterials handbook. Burlington: Elsevier; 2016. p. 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Wilke A, Orth J, Lomb M, et al. Biocompatibility analysis of different biomaterials in human bone marrow cell cultures. J Biomed Mater Res: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and the Australian Society for Biomaterials. 1998;40(2):301–306.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman EK, Magid D, Ney DR, et al. Three-dimensional imaging. Radiology. 1991;181(2):321–337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar A, Mandal S, Barui S, et al. Low temperature additive manufacturing of three dimensional scaffolds for bone-tissue engineering applications: processing related challenges and property assessment. Mater Sci Eng: R: Reports. 2016;103:1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barui S, Chatterjee S, Mandal S, et al. Microstructure and compression properties of 3D powder printed Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds with designed porosity: experimental and computational analysis. Mater Sci Eng: C. 2017;70:812–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, et al. 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: a review and prospective. Compos Part B: Eng. 2017;110:442–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem Rev. 2017;117(15):10212–10290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrov D, Schreve K, de Beer N. Advances in three dimensional printing - State of the art and future perspectives. Rapid Prototyp J. 2006;12(3):136–147.
   Google Scholar
• Mercuri LG, Wolford LM, Sanders B, et al. Custom CAD/CAM total temporomandibular joint reconstruction system. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;53(2):106–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes ML, Kuo Y-M, Rothman SL, et al. An application of computer graphics and networks to anatomic model and prosthesis manufacturing. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 1987;7(2):12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu B, Katti DS, Kumar A. Advanced biomaterials: fundamentals, processing, and applications. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Yang Q. Sintering the feasibility improvement and mechanical property of UHMWPE via selective laser sintering. Plast, Rubber Compos. 2020;49(3):116–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwanprateeb J, Kerdsook S, Boonsiri T, et al. Evaluation of heat treatment regimes and their influences on the properties of powder-printed high-density polyethylene bone implant. Polym Int. 2011;60(5):758–764.
   Google Scholar
• Suwanprateeb J, Chumnanklang R. Three-dimensional printing of porous polyethylene structure using water-based binders. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Applied Biomaterials: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2006;78(1):138–145.
   Google Scholar
• Dechet MA, Goblirsch A, Romeis S, et al. Production of polyamide 11 microparticles for Additive Manufacturing by liquid-liquid phase separation and precipitation. Chem Eng Sci. 2019;197:11–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloos S, Dechet MA, Peukert W, et al. Production of spherical semi-crystalline polycarbonate microparticles for additive manufacturing by liquid-liquid phase separation. Powder Technol. 2018;335:275–284.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt J, Sachs M, Blümel C, et al. A novel process route for the production of spherical LBM polymer powders with small size and good flowability. Powder Technol. 2014;261:78–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hapgood KP, Khanmohammadi B. Granulation of hydrophobic powders. Powder Technol. 2009;189(2):253–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams D. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rimell JT, Marquis PM. Selective laser sintering of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for clinical applications. J Biomed Mater Res: An Official Journal of The Society for Biomaterials, The Japanese Society for Biomaterials, and The Australian Society for Biomaterials and the Korean Society for Biomaterials. 2000;53(4):414–420.
   Google Scholar
• Goodridge RD, Hague RJ, Tuck CJ. An empirical study into laser sintering of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). J Mater Process Technol. 2010;210(1):72–80.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Yang Q, Ma H, et al. An investigation of post treatment on properties and structure of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene parts prepared by selective laser sintering for biomedical application. Polym Adv Technol. 2020;31(7):1484–1495.
   Google Scholar
• Borges RA, Choudhury D, Zou M. 3D printed PCU/UHMWPE polymeric blend for artificial knee meniscus. Tribol Int. 2018;122:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Schirmeister CG, Hees T, Licht EH, et al. 3D printing of high density polyethylene by fused filament fabrication. Addit Manuf. 2019;28:152–159.
   Google Scholar
• Basu B. Biomaterials Science and Implants Status, Challenges and Recommendations. Singapore: Springer Publication; 2020.
   Google Scholar