Binary polymer systems for biomedical applications

References

• Sionkowska A. Current research on the blends of natural and synthetic polymers as new biomaterials: review. Prog Polym Sci. 2011;36(9):1254–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumbar S, Laurencin C, Deng M. Natural and synthetic biomedical polymers. Elsevier; 2014. p. 1–402.
   Google Scholar
• Shoichet MS. Polymer scaffolds for biomaterials applications. Macromolecules. 2010;43(2):581–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei B, Guo BL, Rambhia KJ, et al. Hybrid polymer biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration. Front Med. 2019;13(2):189–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banoriya D, Purohit R, Dwivedi RK. Advanced application of polymer based biomaterials. Mater Today-Proc. 2017;4(2):3534–3541.
   Google Scholar
• Nair LS, Laurencin CT. Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32(8–9):762–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhumanchi S, Srichana T, Domb A. Polymeric biomaterials. In: Narayan R, editor. Biomedical materials. 2021. p. 49–100.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang HM, Zuo M, Zhang XY, et al. Effect of agglomeration on the selective distribution of nanoparticles in binary polymer blends. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2021;149:6.
   Google Scholar
• Grossen P, Witzigmann D, Sieber S, et al. PEG-PCL-based nanomedicines: a biodegradable drug delivery system and its application. J Controlled Release. 2017;260:46–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim CT. Nanofiber technology: current status and emerging developments. Prog Polym Sci. 2017;70:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajili SH, Ebrahimi NG, Soleimani M. Polyurethane/polycaprolactane blend with shape memory effect as a proposed material for cardiovascular implants. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(5):1519–1530.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gultekinoglu M, Sarisozen YT, Erdogdu C, et al. Designing of dynamic polyethyleneimine (PEI) brushes on polyurethane (PU) ureteral stents to prevent infections. Acta Biomater. 2015;21:44–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afjoul H, Shamloo A, Kamali A. Freeze-gelled alginate/gelatin scaffolds for wound healing applications: an in vitro, in vivo study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;113:110957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumar R, Lee NY. Chemically robust succinimide-group-assisted irreversible bonding of poly(dimethylsiloxane)–thermoplastic microfluidic devices at room temperature. Analyst. 2020;145(21):6887–6894.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castanheira A, dos Santos MB, Rodriguez-Lorenzo L, et al. Correction: a novel microfluidic system for the sensitive and cost-effective detection of okadaic acid in mussels. Analyst. 2021;146(24):7748–7749.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sibaja B, Culbertson E, Marshall P, et al. Preparation of alginate–chitosan fibers with potential biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;134:598–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu JW, Zhu YL, Guo ZX, et al. Electrospinning of sodium alginate with poly(ethylene oxide). Polymer. 2006;47(23):8026–8031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namkaew J, Laowpanitchakorn P, Sawaddee N, et al. Carboxymethyl cellulose entrapped in a poly(vinyl) alcohol network: plant-based scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Molecules. 2021;26(3):578.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu Z, Jiang Y, Li Z, et al. Bacterial cellulose nanofiber distribution on gelatin and silk fibroin scaffolds and the cell behavior. Cellulose. 2021;28(1):91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Mu X, Agostinacchio F, Xiang N, et al. Recent advances in 3D printing with protein-based inks. Prog Polym Sci. 2021;115:19.
   Google Scholar
• Chen YJ, Jia ZH, Shafiq M, et al. Gas foaming of electrospun poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone)/silk fibroin nanofiber scaffolds to promote cellular infiltration and tissue regeneration. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021;201:10.
   Google Scholar
• Eivazzadeh-Keihan R, Radinekiyan F, Aliabadi HAM, et al. Chitosan hydrogel/silk fibroin/Mg(OH)(2) nanobiocomposite as a novel scaffold with antimicrobial activity and improved mechanical properties. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu CY, Chuang WT, Hsu SH. A biodegradable chitosan-polyurethane cryogel with switchable shape memory. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(8):9702–9713.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• San Choi J, Lee SJ, Christ GJ, et al. The influence of electrospun aligned poly(ε-caprolactone)/collagen nanofiber meshes on the formation of self-aligned skeletal muscle myotubes. Biomaterials. 2008;29(19):2899–2906.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rekulapally R, Udayachandrika K, Hamlipur S, et al. Tissue engineering of collagen scaffolds crosslinked with plant based polysaccharides. Prog Biomater. 2021;10(1):29–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lv X, Li Z, Chen S, et al. Structural and functional evaluation of oxygenating keratin/silk fibroin scaffold and initial assessment of their potential for urethral tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2016;84:99–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarato G, Contardi M, Perotto G, et al. From fabric to tissue: recovered wool keratin/polyvinylpyrrolidone biocomposite fibers as artificial scaffold platform. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;116:111151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehnder T, Sarker B, Boccaccini AR, et al. Evaluation of an alginate–gelatine crosslinked hydrogel for bioplotting. Biofabrication. 2015;7(2):025001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bi H, Feng T, Li B, et al. In vitro and in vivo comparison study of electrospun PLA and PLA/PVA/SA fiber membranes for wound healing. Polymers. 2020;12(4):839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Sato T, Ohgushi H, et al. Culturing of skin fibroblasts in a thin PLGA–collagen hybrid mesh. Biomaterials. 2005;26(15):2559–2566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Zhu M, Li Z, et al. Cellular fate of deformable needle-shaped PLGA-PEG fibers. Acta Biomater. 2020;112:182–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croisier F, Atanasova G, Poumay Y, et al. Polysaccharide-coated PCL nanofibers for wound dressing applications. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2014;3(12):2032–2039.
   Google Scholar
• Tokarev A, Asheghali D, Griffiths IM, et al. Touch- and brush-spinning of nanofibers. Adv Mater. 2015;27(41):6526–6532.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gultekinoglu M, Orturk S, Chen BQ, et al. Preparation of poly(glycerol sebacate) fibers for tissue engineering applications. Eur Polym J. 2019;121:109297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robeson LM. Polymer blends: a comprehensive review. Munich: Hanser Gardner; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Namazi H. Polymers in our daily life. Bioimpacts. 2017;7(2):73–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gu LS, Shan TT, Ma YX, et al. Novel biomedical applications of crosslinked collagen. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37(5):464–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song R, Murphy M, Li CS, et al. Current development of biodegradable polymeric materials for biomedical applications. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2018;12:3117–3145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasperini L, Mano JF, Reis RL. Natural polymers for the microencapsulation of cells. J R Soc Interface. 2014;11(100):20140817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayram C, Jiang XY, Gultekinoglu M, et al. Biofabrication of gelatin tissue scaffolds with uniform pore size via microbubble assembly. Macromol Mater Eng. 2019;304(11):1970029.
   Google Scholar
• Maitz MF. Applications of synthetic polymers in clinical medicine. Biosurface Biotribology. 2015;1(3):161–176.
   Google Scholar
• Makadia HK, Siegel SJ. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers. 2011;3(3):1377–1397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron RE, Kamvari-Moghaddam A. Synthetic bioresorbable polymers. In: Buchanan FJ, editor. Degradation rate of bioresorbable materials. Cambridge: Woodhead Publ; 2008. p. 43–66.
   Google Scholar
• Amerongen M, Harmsen M, Petersen A, et al. The enzymatic degradation of scaffolds and their replacement by vascularized extracellular matrix in the murine myocardium. Biomaterials. 2006;27:2247–2257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicolas J, Magli S, Rabbachin L, et al. 3D extracellular matrix mimics: fundamental concepts and role of materials chemistry to influence stem cell fate. Biomacromolecules. 2020;21(6):1968–1994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utracki LA, Wilkie CA. Polymer blends handbook. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Peng XY, Shin YS, et al. Blend miscibility of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and aromatic polyesters from salicylic acid. J Phys Chem B. 2021;125(1):450–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian YF, Su Y, Li XQ, et al. Electrospinning of polymethyl methacrylate nanofibres in different solvents. Iran Polym J. 2010;19(2):123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott S. Chemical compatibility of poly(lactic acid): a practical framework using Hansen solubility parameters. In: Auras R, Lim L-T, Selke SEM, Tsuji H, editors. Poly(lactic acid): synthesis, structures, properties, processing, and applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010. p. 83–95.
   Google Scholar
• Veleirinho B, Rei MF, Lopes-da-Silva JA. Solvent and concentration effects on the properties of electrospun poly(ethylene terephthalate) nanofiber mats. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys. 2008;46(5):460–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Wang L, Yu H, et al. Effect of solvent on morphology of electrospinning ethyl cellulose fibers. J Appl Polym Sci. 2005;97(3):1292–1297.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira J, Brichi GS, Marconcini JM, et al. Effect of solvent on the physical and morphological properties of poly(lactic acid) nanofibers obtained by solution blow spinning. J Eng Fibers Fabr. 2014;9(4):117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanilmaz M. Effect of the solvent system on the morphology and performance of nylon 6 nanofibre membranes. Fibres Text East Eur. 2019;27(6):97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Wannatong L, Sirivat A, Supaphol P. Effects of solvents on electrospun polymeric fibers: preliminary study on polystyrene. Polym Int. 2004;53(11):1851–1859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasola R, Thomas NL, Trybala A, et al. Electrospun poly lactic acid (PLA) fibres: effect of different solvent systems on fibre morphology and diameter. Polymer. 2014;55:4728–4737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colmenares-Roldan GJ, Quintero-Martinez Y, Agudelo-Gomez LM, et al. Influence of the molecular weight of polymer, solvents and operational condition in the electrospinning of polycaprolactone. Rev Fac Ing Univ Antioquia. 2017;84:35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Liechty WB, Kryscio DR, Slaughter BV, et al. Polymers for drug delivery systems. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng. 2010;1:149–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamaly N, Yameen B, Wu J, et al. Degradable controlled-release polymers and polymeric nanoparticles: mechanisms of controlling drug release. Chem Rev. 2016;116(4):2602–2663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan JA, Liu R, Freedman JD, et al. Prevention of lung cancer recurrence using cisplatin-loaded superhydrophobic nanofiber meshes. Biomaterials. 2016;76:273–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharifi F, Sooriyarachchi AC, Altural H, et al. Fiber based approaches as medicine delivery systems. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(9):1411–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebe I, Szabo P, Kallai-Szabo B, et al. Incorporating small molecules or biologics into nanofibers for optimized drug release: a review. Int J Pharm. 2015;494(1):516–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou SF, Carson D, Woodrow KA. Current strategies for sustaining drug release from electrospun nanofibers. J Controlled Release. 2015;220:584–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaji A, Vellayappan MV, John AA, et al. An insight on electrospun-nanofibers-inspired modern drug delivery system in the treatment of deadly cancers. RSC Adv. 2015;5(71):57984–58004.
   Google Scholar
• Dubey P, Gopinath P. Fabrication of electrospun poly(ethylene oxide)–poly(capro lactone) composite nanofibers for co-delivery of niclosamide and silver nanoparticles exhibits enhanced anti-cancer effects in vitro. J Mat Chem B. 2016;4(4):726–742.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wei JC, Hu J, Li M, et al. Multiple drug-loaded electrospun PLGA/gelatin composite nanofibers encapsulated with mesoporous ZnO nanospheres for potential postsurgical cancer treatment. RSC Adv. 2014;4(53):28011–28019.
   Google Scholar
• Morgado PI, Aguiar-Ricardo A, Correia IJ. Asymmetric membranes as ideal wound dressings: an overview on production methods, structure, properties and performance relationship. J Membr Sci. 2015;490:139–151.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou XJ, Chen L, Wang WZ, et al. Electrospun nanofibers incorporating self-decomposable silica nanoparticles as carriers for controlled delivery of anticancer drug. RSC Adv. 2015;5(81):65897–65904.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Choi K, Choi SO, et al. Early stage release control of an anticancer drug by drug-polymer miscibility in a hydrophobic fiber-based drug delivery system. RSC Adv. 2018;8(35):19791–19803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siepmann J, Siepmann F. Modeling of diffusion controlled drug delivery. J Controlled Release. 2012;161(2):351–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Hardy RJ, Gu X. Effect of drug solubility on polymer hydration and drug dissolution from polyethylene oxide (PEO) matrix tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2008;9(2):437–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler C, Williams BL, Patel HN, et al. Electrospun polycaprolactone/polyglyconate blends: miscibility, mechanical behavior, and degradation. Polymer. 2013;54(25):6824–6833.
   Google Scholar
• Siafaka PI, Barmbalexis P, Bikiaris DN. Novel electrospun nanofibrous matrices prepared from poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene adipate) blends for controlled release formulations of an anti-rheumatoid agent. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2016;88:12–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Luu YK, Chang C, et al. Incorporation and controlled release of a hydrophilic antibiotic using poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-based electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds. J Controlled Release. 2004;98(1):47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordin M, Bechtold T, Pham T. Effect of fibre orientation on the mechanical properties of polypropylene–lyocell composites. Cellulose. 2018;25(12):7197–7210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuvalci H, Erbay K, Ipek H. Investigation of the effect of glass fiber content on the mechanical properties of cast polyamide. Arab J Sci Eng. 2014;39(12):9049–9056.
   Google Scholar
• Salman SD, Leman Z, Sultan MTH, et al. Influence of fiber content on mechanical and morphological properties of Woven Kenaf reinforced PVB film produced using a hot press technique. Int J Polym Sci. 2016;2016:7828451.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman I, Ismail AE, Awang M. Influence of fiber volume fraction on the tensile properties and dynamic characteristics of coconut fiber reinforced composite. J Sci Technol. 2010;1:55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Aydogdu MO, Altun E, Ahmed J, et al. Fiber forming capability of binary and ternary compositions in the polymer system: bacterial cellulose–polycaprolactone–polylactic acid. Polymers. 2019;11(7):1148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jasso-Gastinel CF, Soltero-Martinez JFA, Mendizabal E. Introduction: modifiable characteristics and applications. In: Carlos F. Jasso-Gastinel and José M. Kenny, editors. Modification of polymer properties. Norwich: William Andrew Inc; 2017. p. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins WL. Polymer degradation. In: Harwood HJ, editor. Polymer degradation and stabilization. Berlin: Springer; 1984. p. 3–34.
   Google Scholar
• Guillet J, Huber H, Scott J. Biodegradable polymers and plastics. Proceedings of the Second International Scientific Workshop on Biodegradable Polymers and Plastics, Montpellier, 1992. p. 55–70.
   Google Scholar
• Barbeck M, Serra T, Booms P, et al. Analysis of the in vitro degradation and the in vivo tissue response to bi-layered 3D-printed scaffolds combining PLA and biphasic PLA/bioglass components – guidance of the inflammatory response as basis for osteochondral regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2017;2(4):208–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farah S, Anderson DG, Langer R. Physical and mechanical properties of PLA, and their functions in widespread applications – a comprehensive review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;107:367–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Wang Y, Ito Y, et al. A comparative study on the in vivo degradation of poly(L-lactide) based composite implants for bone fracture fixation. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):20770.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sánchez-González S, Diban N, Urtiaga A. Hydrolytic degradation and mechanical stability of poly(ϵ-caprolactone)/reduced graphene oxide membranes as scaffolds for in vitro neural tissue regeneration. Membranes. 2018;8(1):12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kingston C, Zepp R, Andrady A, et al. Release characteristics of selected carbon nanotube polymer composites. Carbon. 2014;68:33–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong J, Liu J, Li X, et al. Relationship between the Young’s modulus and the crystallinity of cross-linked poly(ϵ-caprolactone) as an immobilization membrane for cancer radiotherapy. Glob Chall. 2020;4(8):2000008.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humbert S, Lame O, Seguela R, et al. A re-examination of the elastic modulus dependence on crystallinity in semi-crystalline polymers. Polymer. 2011;52(21):4899–4909.
   Google Scholar
• Mileva D, Zia Q, Androsch R. Tensile properties of random copolymers of propylene with ethylene and 1-butene: effect of crystallinity and crystal habit. Polym Bull. 2010;65(6):623–634.
   Google Scholar
• Chamundeeswari M, Jeslin J, Verma ML. Nanocarriers for drug delivery applications. Environ Chem Lett. 2019;17(2):849–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin W. Introduction: nanoparticles in medicine. Chem Rev. 2015;115(19):10407–10409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elsabahy M, Wooley KL. Design of polymeric nanoparticles for biomedical delivery applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2012;41(7):2545–2561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Yang GZ, Baby T, et al. Stable polymer nanoparticles with exceptionally high drug loading by sequential nanoprecipitation. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(12):4720–4728.
   Google Scholar
• Hornig S, Heinze T, Becer CR, et al. Synthetic polymeric nanoparticles by nanoprecipitation. J Mater Chem. 2009;19(23):3838–3840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gultekinoglu M, Jiang X, Bayram C, et al. Self-assembled micro-stripe patterning of sessile polymeric nanofluid droplets. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;561:470–480.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao C, Melis S, Hughes EP, et al. Particle formation mechanisms in the nanoprecipitation of polystyrene. Langmuir. 2020;36(44):13210–13217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han FY, Liu Y, Kumar V, et al. Sustained-release ketamine-loaded nanoparticles fabricated by sequential nanoprecipitation. Int J Pharm. 2020;581:7.
   Google Scholar
• Baysal I, Ucar G, Gultekinoglu M, et al. Donepezil loaded PLGA-b-PEG nanoparticles: their ability to induce destabilization of amyloid fibrils and to cross blood brain barrier in vitro. J Neural Transm. 2017;124(1):33–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroglu I, Gultekinoglu M, Bayram C, et al. Gel network comprising UV crosslinked PLGA-b-PEG-MA nanoparticles for ibuprofen topical delivery. Pharm Dev Technol. 2019;24(9):1144–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kietzke T, Neher D, Kumke M, et al. Phase separation of binary blends in polymer nanoparticles. Small. 2007;3(6):1041–1048.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanumantharao SN, Rao S. Multi-functional electrospun nanofibers from polymer blends for scaffold tissue engineering. Fibers. 2019;7(7):66.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad K, Bazaka O, Chua M, et al. Metallic biomaterials: current challenges and opportunities. Materials. 2017;10(8):884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Pan D, He HK. Morphology development of polymer blend fibers along spinning line. Fibers. 2019;7(4):35.
   Google Scholar
• Luzi F, Torre L, Kenny JM, et al. Bio- and fossil-based polymeric blends and nanocomposites for packaging: structure–property relationship. Materials. 2019;12(3):471.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martinova L, Lubasova D. Reasons for using polymer blends in the electrospinning process. International Conference on Nanotechnology – Research and Commercialization (ICONT), Malaysia, Jun 6–9. American Institute of Physics, 2011. p. 115–128.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishna S, Fujihara K, Teo W-E, et al. Electrospun nanofibers: solving global issues. Mater Today. 2006;9(3):40–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu CM, Shivkumar S. N,N-dimethylformamide additions to the solution for the electrospinning of poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibers. Macromol Mater Eng. 2004;289(4):334–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li WJ, Laurencin CT, Caterson EJ, et al. Electrospun nanofibrous structure: a novel scaffold for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60(4):613–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viry L, Moulton SE, Romeo T, et al. Emulsion-coaxial electrospinning: designing novel architectures for sustained release of highly soluble low molecular weight drugs. J Mater Chem. 2012;22(22):11347–11353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes ME, Reis RL. Biodegradable polymers and composites in biomedical applications: from catgut to tissue engineering. Part 1 available systems and their properties. Int Mater Rev. 2004;49(5):261–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj N, Kundu SC. Electrospinning: a fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28(3):325–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XW, Lu Y. Centrifugal spinning: an alternative approach to fabricate nanofibers at high speed and low cost. Polym Rev. 2014;54(4):677–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagam Hanumantharao S, Rao S. Multi-functional electrospun nanofibers from polymer blends for scaffold tissue engineering. Fibers. 2019;7:66.
   Google Scholar
• de Cassan D, Sydow S, Schmidt N, et al. Attachment of nanoparticulate drug-release systems on poly(ϵ-caprolactone) nanofibers via a graftpolymer as interlayer. Colloids Surf B. 2018;163:309–320.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eriksen THB, Skovsen E, Fojan P. Release of antimicrobial peptides from electrospun nanofibres as a drug delivery system. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2013;9(3):492–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Wang M, Williams GR, et al. Electrospun gelatin nanofibers loaded with vitamins A and E as antibacterial wound dressing materials. RSC Adv. 2016;6(55):50267–50277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amariei G, Kokol V, Boltes K, et al. Incorporation of antimicrobial peptides on electrospun nanofibres for biomedical applications. RSC Adv. 2018;8(49):28013–28023.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martins A, Reis RL, Neves NM. Electrospinning: processing technique for tissue engineering scaffolding. Int Mater Rev. 2008;53(5):257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafar M, Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, et al. Potential of electrospun nanofibers for biomedical and dental applications. Materials. 2016;9(2):73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider A, Haider S, Kang IK. A comprehensive review summarizing the effect of electrospinning parameters and potential applications of nanofibers in biomedical and biotechnology. Arab J Chem. 2018;11(8):1165–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komur B, Bayrak F, Ekren N, et al. Starch/PCL composite nanofibers by co-axial electrospinning technique for biomedical applications. Biomed Eng Online. 2017;16(1):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gizaw M, Thompson J, Faglie A, et al. Electrospun fibers as a dressing material for drug and biological agent delivery in wound healing applications. Bioengineering. 2018;5(1).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khorshidi S, Solouk A, Mirzadeh H, et al. A review of key challenges of electrospun scaffolds for tissue-engineering applications. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;10(9):715–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Feng B, Zhu DQ, et al. Characteristics and toxicity assessment of electrospun gelatin/PCL nanofibrous scaffold loaded with graphene in vitro and in vivo. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:3669–3678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong J, Yeo M, Yang GH, et al. Cell-electrospinning and its application for tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(24):6208.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xia L, Lu LL, Liang YX, et al. Fabrication of centrifugally spun prepared poly(lactic acid)/gelatin/ciprofloxacin nanofibers for antimicrobial wound dressing. RSC Adv. 2019;9(61):35328–35335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song JX, Guo J, Liu YF, et al. A comparative study on properties of cellulose/antarctic krill protein composite fiber by centrifugal spinning and wet spinning. Fiber Polym. 2019;20(8):1547–1554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZM, Duan YS, Xu Q, et al. A review on nanofiber fabrication with the effect of high-speed centrifugal force field. J Eng Fibers Fabr. 2019;14:11.
   Google Scholar
• Amalorpava Mary L, Senthilram T, Suganya S, et al. Centrifugal spun ultrafine fibrous web as a potential drug delivery vehicle. Express Polym Lett. 2012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li Y, Chen F, Nie J, et al. Electrospun poly(lactic acid)/chitosan core–shell structure nanofibers from homogeneous solution. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;90(4):1445–1451.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen G, Shi T, Zhang X, et al. Polyacrylonitrile/polyethylene glycol phase-change material fibres prepared with hybrid polymer blends and nano-SiC fillers via centrifugal spinning. Polymer. 2020;186:122012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahalingam S, Huo S, Homer-Vanniasinkam S, et al. Generation of core–sheath polymer nanofibers by pressurised gyration. Polymers. 2020;12(8):1709.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heseltine PL, Ahmed J, Edirisinghe M. Developments in pressurized gyration for the mass production of polymeric fibers. Macromol Mater Eng. 2018;303(9):1800218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhou S, Gao Y, et al. Electrospun nanofibers as a wound dressing for treating diabetic foot ulcer. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2019;14(2):130–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ding B, Li B. Biomimetic electrospun nanofibrous structures for tissue engineering. Mater Today. 2013;16(6):229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan PA, Sasikanth K, Nama S, et al. Nanofibers - a new trend in nano drug delivery systems. Pharm Innov J. 2013;2:118–127.
   Google Scholar
• Brako F, Raimi-Abraham BT, Mahalingam S, et al. The development of progesterone-loaded nanofibers using pressurized gyration: a novel approach to vaginal delivery for the prevention of pre-term birth. Int J Pharm. 2018;540(1):31–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mahalingam S, Bayram C, Gultekinoglu M, et al. Co-axial gyro-spinning of PCL/PVA/HA core-sheath fibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci. 2021;21(10):2100177.
   Google Scholar
• Khalil NM, do Nascimento TCF, Casa DM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of curcumin-loaded PLGA and PLGA–PEG blend nanoparticles after oral administration in rats. Colloid Surf B-Biointerfaces. 2013;101:353–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parveen S, Sahoo SK. Long circulating chitosan/PEG blended PLGA nanoparticle for tumor drug delivery. Eur J Pharmacol. 2011;670(2–3):372–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayol L, Serri C, Menale C, et al. Curcumin loaded PLGA–poloxamer blend nanoparticles induce cell cycle arrest in mesothelioma cells. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015;93:37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjianfar M, Semnani D, Varshosaz J. Polycaprolactone/chitosan blend nanofibers loaded by 5-fluorouracil: an approach to anticancer drug delivery system. Polym Adv Technol. 2018;29(12):2972–2981.
   Google Scholar
• Kharaghani D, Gitigard P, Ohtani H, et al. Design and characterization of dual drug delivery based on in-situ assembled PVA/PAN core-shell nanofibers for wound dressing application. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su Y, Su Q, Liu W, et al. Dual-drug encapsulation and release from core–shell nanofibers. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2012;23(7):861–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Wang B, Wang Y, et al. Polymer-controlled core–shell nanoparticles: a novel strategy for sequential drug release. RSC Adv. 2014;4(57):30430–30439.
   Google Scholar
• Silva DM, Liu R, Goncalves AF, et al. Design of polymeric core-shell carriers for combination therapies. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;587:499–509.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gomes ME, Reis RL. Biodegradable polymers and composites in biomedical applications: from catgut to tissue engineering. Part 2 systems for temporary replacement and advanced tissue regeneration. Int Mater Rev. 2004;49(5):274–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziano A, Jaffer S, Sain M. Review on modification strategies of polyethylene/polypropylene immiscible thermoplastic polymer blends for enhancing their mechanical behavior. J Elastomers Plast. 2019;51(4):291–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serafin A, Murphy C, Rubio MC, et al. Printable alginate/gelatin hydrogel reinforced with carbon nanofibers as electrically conductive scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;122:111927.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dumont M, Villet R, Guirand M, et al. Processing and antibacterial properties of chitosan-coated alginate fibers. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;190:31–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu J, Shim JH, Jang J, et al. An additive manufacturing-based PCL-alginate-chondrocyte bioprinted scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2015;9(11):1286–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Z, Kim J. Bacterial cellulose/poly(ethylene glycol) composite: characterization and first evaluation of biocompatibility. Cellulose. 2010;17(1):83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh YK, Da Costa AD, Park YS, et al. Fabrication of bacterial cellulose-collagen composite scaffolds and their osteogenic effect on human mesenchymal stem cells. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;219:210–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahimirad S, Abtahi H, Satei P, et al. Wound healing performance of PCL/chitosan based electrospun nanofiber electrosprayed with curcumin loaded chitosan nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;259:117640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper A, Bhattarai N, Zhang M. Fabrication and cellular compatibility of aligned chitosan–PCL fibers for nerve tissue regeneration. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;85(1):149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafari H, Hassanpour M, Akbari A, et al. Characterization of pH-sensitive chitosan/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose composite nanoparticles for delivery of melatonin in cancer therapy. Mater Lett. 2021;282:128818.
   Google Scholar
• Stratesteffen H, Kopf M, Kreimendahl F, et al. GelMA-collagen blends enable drop-on-demand 3D printablility and promote angiogenesis. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4):045002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moxon SR, Corbett NJ, Fisher K, et al. Blended alginate/collagen hydrogels promote neurogenesis and neuronal maturation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;104:109904.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang YH, Ma M, Wang JN, et al. Development of a photo-crosslinking, biodegradable GelMA/PEGDA hydrogel for guided bone regeneration materials. Materials. 2018;11(8):12.
   Google Scholar
• Vatankhah E, Prabhakaran MP, Jin G, et al. Development of nanofibrous cellulose acetate/gelatin skin substitutes for variety wound treatment applications. J Biomater Appl. 2014;28(6):909–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Cao C, Ma X, et al. Electrospinning of silk fibroin and collagen for vascular tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2010;47(4):514–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Yang H, Liu X, et al. Electrospinning of carboxyethyl chitosan/poly(vinyl alcohol)/silk fibroin nanoparticles for wound dressings. Int J Biol Macromol. 2013;53:88–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kundu J, Poole-Warren LA, Martens P, et al. Silk fibroin/poly(vinyl alcohol) photocrosslinked hydrogels for delivery of macromolecular drugs. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(5):1720–1729.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanhueza C, Hermosilla J, Bugallo-Casal A, et al. One-step electrospun scaffold of dual-sized gelatin/poly-3-hydroxybutyrate nano/microfibers for skin regeneration in diabetic wound. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;119:111602.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azuraini MJ, Huong KH, Khalil H, et al. Fabrication and characterization of P(3HB-co-4HB)/gelatine biomimetic nanofibrous scaffold for tissue engineering application. J Polym Res. 2019;26(11):12.
   Google Scholar
• Mendibil X, González-Pérez F, Bazan X, et al. Bioresorbable and mechanically optimized nerve guidance conduit based on a naturally derived medium chain length polyhydroxyalkanoate and poly(ϵ-caprolactone) blend. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021;7(2):672–689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salehi S, Bahners T, Gutmann JS, et al. Characterization of structural, mechanical and nano-mechanical properties of electrospun PGS/PCL fibers. RSC Adv. 2014;4(33):16951–16957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She YL, Fan ZW, Wang L, et al. 3D Printed biomimetic PCL scaffold as framework interspersed with collagen for long segment tracheal replacement. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:14.
   Google Scholar
• Ekaputra AK, Prestwich GD, Cool SM, et al. The three-dimensional vascularization of growth factor-releasing hybrid scaffold of poly (ε-caprolactone)/collagen fibers and hyaluronic acid hydrogel. Biomaterials. 2011;32(32):8108–8117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evrova O, Hosseini V, Milleret V, et al. Hybrid randomly electrospun poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid):poly(ethylene oxide) (PLGA:PEO) fibrous scaffolds enhancing myoblast differentiation and alignment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(46):31574–31586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Zou L, Lu H, et al. Preparation and characterization of electrospun PHBV/PEO mats: The role of solvent and PEO component. J Mater Sci. 2016;51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banerjee SR, Foss CA, Horhota A, et al. 111In- and IRDye800CW-labeled PLA–PEG nanoparticle for imaging prostate-specific membrane antigen-expressing tissues. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18(1):201–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musumeci T, Ventura CA, Giannone I, et al. PLA/PLGA nanoparticles for sustained release of docetaxel. Int J Pharm. 2006;325(1):172–179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shin YC, Shin DM, Lee EJ, et al. Hyaluronic acid/PLGA core/shell fiber matrices loaded with EGCG beneficial to diabetic wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(23):3035–3045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebia RA, Rozet S, Tamada Y, et al. Biodegradable PHBH/PVA blend nanofibers: fabrication, characterization, in vitro degradation, and in vitro biocompatibility. Polym Degrad Stab. 2018;154:124–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altaf F, Niazi MBK, Jahan Z, et al. Synthesis and characterization of PVA/starch hydrogel membranes incorporating essential oils aimed to be used in wound dressing applications. J Polym Environ. 2021;29(1):156–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanca Y, Milner P, Dini D, et al. Tribological properties of PVA/PVP blend hydrogels against articular cartilage. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;78:36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra R, Varshney R, Das N, et al. Synthesis and characterization of gelatin-PVP polymer composite scaffold for potential application in bone tissue engineering. Eur Polym J. 2019;119:155–168.
   Google Scholar
• Li K, Wang DZ, Zhao KP, et al. Electrohydrodynamic jet 3D printing of PCL/PVP composite scaffold for cell culture. Talanta. 2020;211:11.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HS, Lee CG, Lee EY. Alginate lyase: structure, property, and application. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2011;16(5):843–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug A, Larsen B. Biosynthesis of alginate. Carbohydr Res. 1971;17(2):297–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smidsrød O, Glover RM, Whittington SG. The relative extension of alginates having different chemical composition. Carbohydr Res. 1973;27(1):107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans LR, Linker A. Production and characterization of the slime polysaccharide of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol. 1973;116(2):915–924.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Alginate: properties and biomedical applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2012;37(1):106–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain D, Bar-Shalom D. Alginate drug delivery systems: application in context of pharmaceutical and biomedical research. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2014;40(12):1576–1584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouhadir KH, Lee KY, Alsberg E, et al. Degradation of partially oxidized alginate and its potential application for tissue engineering. Biotechnol Prog. 2001;17(5):945–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raus RA, Nawawi W, Nasaruddin RR. Alginate and alginate composites for biomedical applications. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2021;16(3):280–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kong HJ, Kaigler D, Kim K, et al. Controlling rigidity and degradation of alginate hydrogels via molecular weight distribution. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5(5):1720–1727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipani R, Scheurer S, Florentin R, et al. Reinforcing interpenetrating network hydrogels with 3D printed polymer networks to engineer cartilage mimetic composites. Biofabrication. 2020;12(3):035011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gong XY, Dang GY, Guo J, et al. A sodium alginate/feather keratin composite fiber with skin-core structure as the carrier for sustained drug release. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;155:386–392.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ji MZ, Chen H, Yan YG, et al. Effects of tricalcium silicate/sodium alginate/calcium sulfate hemihydrate composite cements on osteogenic performances in vitro and in vivo. J Biomater Appl. 2020;34(10):1422–1436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choe G, Oh S, Seok JM, et al. Graphene oxide/alginate composites as novel bioinks for three-dimensional mesenchymal stem cell printing and bone regeneration applications. Nanoscale. 2019;11(48):23275–23285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Bakhshayesh AR, Annabi N, Khalilov R, et al. Recent advances on biomedical applications of scaffolds in wound healing and dermal tissue engineering. Artif Cell Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(4):691–705.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nawaz S, Khan S, Farooq U, et al. Biocompatible hydrogels for the controlled delivery of anti-hypertensive agent: development, characterization and in vitro evaluation. Des Monomers Polym. 2018;21(1):18–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labowska MB, Cierluk K, Jankowska AM, et al. A review on the adaption of alginate-gelatin hydrogels for 3D cultures and bioprinting. Materials. 2021;14(4):858.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su K, Wang C. Recent advances in the use of gelatin in biomedical research. Biotechnol Lett. 2015;37(11):2139–2145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur G, Rouseau D, Rafanan R. Gelatin-based matrices for drug delivery applications. In: Boran G, editor. Gelatin: production, applications and health implications. 2013. p. 49–70.
   Google Scholar
• Elzoghby AO. Gelatin-based nanoparticles as drug and gene delivery systems: reviewing three decades of research. J Control Release. 2013;172(3):1075–1091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndlovu SP, Ngece K, Alven S, et al. Gelatin-based hybrid scaffolds: promising wound dressings. Polymers. 2021;13(17):2959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello AB, Kim D, Kim D, et al. Engineering and functionalization of gelatin biomaterials: from cell culture to medical applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2020;26(2):164–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echave MC, Hernáez-Moya R, Iturriaga L, et al. Recent advances in gelatin-based therapeutics. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2019;19(8):773–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li JH, Wu CT, Chu PK, et al. 3D printing of hydrogels: Rational design strategies and emerging biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng R Rep. 2020;140:76.
   Google Scholar
• Sun M, Sun X, Wang Z, et al. Synthesis and properties of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels and their recent applications in load-bearing tissue. Polymers. 2018;10(11):1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccafoschi F, Ramella M, Fusaro L, et al. Biological grafts: surgical use and vascular tissue engineering options for peripheral vascular implants. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv; 2019. p. 310–321.
   Google Scholar
• Boontheekul T, Kong HJ, Mooney DJ. Controlling alginate gel degradation utilizing partial oxidation and bimodal molecular weight distribution. Biomaterials. 2005;26(15):2455–2465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan B, Jayakrishnan A. Self-cross-linking biopolymers as injectable in situ forming biodegradable scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005;26(18):3941–3951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigore A, Sarker B, Fabry B, et al. Behavior of encapsulated MG-63 cells in RGD and gelatine-modified alginate hydrogels. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20(15–16):2140–2150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dranseikiene D, Schrufer S, Schubert DW, et al. Cell-laden alginate dialdehyde–gelatin hydrogels formed in 3D printed sacrificial gel. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2020;31(3):5.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen TP, Lee BT. Fabrication of oxidized alginate-gelatin-BCP hydrogels and evaluation of the microstructure, material properties and biocompatibility for bone tissue regeneration. J Biomater Appl. 2012;27(3):311–321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuan L, Wu Y, Fang J, et al. Modified alginate and gelatin cross-linked hydrogels for soft tissue adhesive. Artif Cell Nanomed Biotechnol. 2017;45(1):76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker B, Papageorgiou DG, Silva R, et al. Fabrication of alginate–gelatin crosslinked hydrogel microcapsules and evaluation of the microstructure and physico-chemical properties. J Mat Chem B. 2014;2(11):1470–1482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruther F, Distler T, Boccaccini AR, et al. Biofabrication of vessel-like structures with alginate di-aldehyde – gelatin (ADA-GEL) bioink. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019;30(1):8.
   Google Scholar
• Aranaz I, Alcantara AR, Civera MC, et al. Chitosan: an overview of its properties and applications. Polymers. 2021;13(19):3256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Dunn ET, Grandmaison EW, et al. Applications and properties of chitosan. J Bioact Compat Polym. 1992;7(4):370–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam S, Bhuiyan MAR, Islam MN. Chitin and chitosan: structure, properties and applications in biomedical engineering. J Polym Environ. 2017;25(3):854–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croisier F, Jérôme C. Chitosan-based biomaterials for tissue engineering. Eur Polym J. 2013;49(4):780–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudarshan NR, Hoover DG, Knorr D. Antibacterial action of chitosan. Food Biotechnol. 1992;6(3):257–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SY, Wu J, Moochhala SM, et al. Development of a chitosan-based wound dressing with improved hemostatic and antimicrobial properties. Biomaterials. 2008;29(32):4323–4332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai TH, Tanaka M, Huang YY, et al. Corrigendum. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2013;11(8):866–866.
   Google Scholar
• Aranaz I, Mengíbar M, Harris R, et al. Functional characterization of Chitin and Chitosan. Curr Chem Biol. 2009;3:203–230.
   Google Scholar
• Lehr CM, Bouwstra JA, Schacht EH, et al. In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymers. Int J Pharm. 1992;78(1):43–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Tian F, Wang Z, et al. Effect of chitosan molecular weight and deacetylation degree on hemostasis. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008;84B(1):131–137.
   Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan MAR, Hossain MA, Zakaria M, et al. Chitosan coated cotton fiber: physical and antimicrobial properties for apparel use. J Polym Environ. 2017;25(2):334–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou CK, Chen SM, Li YC, et al. Low-molecular-weight chitosan scavenges methylglyoxal and N ϵ-(carboxyethyl)lysine, the major factors contributing to the pathogenesis of nephropathy. Springerplus. 2015;4:312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee BR, Lee KH, Kang E, et al. Microfluidic wet spinning of chitosan-alginate microfibers and encapsulation of HepG2 cells in fibers. Biomicrofluidics. 2011;5(2):9.
   Google Scholar
• Yang J, Goto M, Ise H, et al. Galactosylated alginate as a scaffold for hepatocytes entrapment. Biomaterials. 2002;23(2):471–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Li WM, Siu RK, et al. Biomimetic apatite-coated alginate/chitosan microparticles as osteogenic protein carriers. Biomaterials. 2009;30(30):6094–6101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng L, Romanov A, Rooney J, et al. Non-cytotoxic, in situ gelable hydrogels composed of N-carboxyethyl chitosan and oxidized dextran. Biomaterials. 2008;29(29):3905–3913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francesko A, Tzanov T. Chitin, chitosan and derivatives for wound healing and tissue engineering. In: Nyanhongo GS, Steiner W, Gübitz G, editors. Biofunctionalization of polymers and their applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin; 2011. p. 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Perez RA, Kim M, Kim TH, et al. Utilizing core–shell fibrous collagen-alginate hydrogel cell delivery system for bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;20(1–2):103–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW. The return of a forgotten polymer – polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35(10):1217–1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanajili S, Karami-Pour A, Oryan A, et al. Preparation and characterization of PLA/PCL/HA composite scaffolds using indirect 3D printing for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;104:109960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felice B, Sanchez MA, Socci MC, et al. Controlled degradability of PCL-ZnO nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering and their antibacterial activity. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018;93:724–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ristovski N, Bock N, Liao S, et al. Improved fabrication of melt electrospun tissue engineering scaffolds using direct writing and advanced electric field control. Biointerphases. 2015;10(1):011006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roder A, Garcia-Gareta E, Theodoropoulos C, et al. An assessment of cell culture plate surface chemistry for in vitro studies of tissue engineering scaffolds. J Funct Biomater. 2015;6(4):1054–1063.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paxton NC, Ren JY, Ainsworth MJ, et al. Rheological characterization of biomaterials directs additive manufacturing of strontium-substituted bioactive glass/polycaprolactone microfibers. Macromol Rapid Commun. 2019;40(11):1900019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren J, Kohli N, Sharma V, et al. Poly-ϵ-caprolactone/fibrin-alginate scaffold: a new pro-angiogenic composite biomaterial for the treatment of bone defects. Polymers. 2021;13:3399.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Recek N, Resnik M, Motaln H, et al. Cell adhesion on polycaprolactone modified by plasma treatment. Int J Polym Sci. 2016;2016:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French AD. Glucose, not cellobiose, is the repeating unit of cellulose and why that is important. Cellulose. 2017;24(11):4605–4609.
   Google Scholar
• Seddiqi H, Oliaei E, Honarkar H, et al. Cellulose and its derivatives: towards biomedical applications. Cellulose. 2021;28(4):1893–1931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barikani M, Oliaei E, Seddiqi H, et al. Preparation and application of chitin and its derivatives: a review. Iran Polym J. 2014;23(4):307–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, et al. Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40(7):3941–3994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan S, Mathew AP. 3D printed scaffolds with gradient porosity based on a cellulose nanocrystal hydrogel. Nanoscale. 2018;10(9):4421–4431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidale LC, Heinze T, El Seoud OA. Perichromism: a powerful tool for probing the properties of cellulose and its derivatives. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;93(1):129–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ansari F, Sjostedt A, Larsson PT, et al. Hierarchical wood cellulose fiber/epoxy biocomposites – materials design of fiber porosity and nanostructure. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2015;74:60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumitriu C, Voicu SI, Muhulet A, et al. Production and characterization of cellulose acetate – titanium dioxide nanotubes membrane fraxiparinized through polydopamine for clinical applications. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;181:215–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tilki T, Yavuz M, Karabacak Ç, et al. Investigation of electrorheological properties of biodegradable modified cellulose/corn oil suspensions. Carbohydr Res. 2010;345(5):672–679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials. 2003;24(24):4337–4351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal A, Clegg J, Anselmo A, et al. Hydrogels in the clinic. Hydrogels in the clinic. Bioeng Transl Med. 2020;5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teodorescu M, Bercea M, Morariu S. Biomaterials of PVA and PVP in medical and pharmaceutical applications: perspectives and challenges. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37(1):109–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Téllez DA, Téllez-Jurado L, Rodríguez-Lorenzo LM. Hydrogels for cartilage regeneration, from polysaccharides to hybrids. Polymers. 2017;9(12):671.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stocco E, Barbon S, Dalzoppo D, et al. Tailored PVA/ECM scaffolds for cartilage regeneration. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:12.
   Google Scholar
• Stocco E, Barbon S, Radossi P, et al. Autologous chondrocytes as a novel source for neo-chondrogenesis in haemophiliacs. Cell Tissue Res. 2016;366(1):51–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alhosseini SN, Moztarzadeh F, Kargozar S, et al. Development of polyvinyl alcohol fibrous biodegradable scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering applications: in vitro study. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomat. 2015;64(9):474–480.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HD, Lee Y, Kim Y, et al. A review of multiscale computational methods in polymeric materials. Polymers. 2017;9(12):16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teodorescu M, Bercea M, Morariu S. Biomaterials of poly(vinyl alcohol) and natural polymers. Polym Rev. 2018;58(2):247–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid A, Ullah H, Ul-Islam M, et al. Bacterial cellulose–TiO2 nanocomposites promote healing and tissue regeneration in burn mice model. RSC Adv. 2017;7(75):47662–47668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Jiang H, Zheng WF, et al. Bacterial cellulose–hyaluronan nanocomposite biomaterials as wound dressings for severe skin injury repair. J Mat Chem B. 2015;3(17):3498–3507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Catchmark JM, Zhu YJ, et al. Engineering of porous bacterial cellulose toward human fibroblasts ingrowth for tissue engineering. J Mater Res. 2014;29(22):2682–2693.
   Google Scholar
• Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, et al. Bacterial synthesized cellulose – artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Polym Sci. 2001;26(9):1561–1603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaja W, Krystynowicz A, Bielecki S, et al. Microbial cellulose – the natural power to heal wounds. Biomaterials. 2006;27(2):145–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portela R, Leal CR, Almeida PL, et al. Bacterial cellulose: a versatile biopolymer for wound dressing applications. Microb Biotechnol. 2019;12(4):586–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez MIA, Barroso LGR, Sanchez ML. Collagen: a review on its sources and potential cosmetic applications. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17(1):20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YB, Liu YZ, Li RH, et al. Collagen-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Mater Des. 2021;210:23.
   Google Scholar
• Nakayama A, Kakugo A, Gong JP, et al. High mechanical strength double-network hydrogel with bacterial cellulose. Adv Funct Mater. 2004;14(11):1124–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Backdahl H, et al. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(7):2540–2547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamanaka S, Watanabe K, Kitamura N, et al. The structure and mechanical properties of sheets prepared from bacterial cellulose. J Mater Sci. 1989;24(9):3141–3145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helenius G, Backdahl H, Bodin A, et al. In vivo biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2006;76A(2):431–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres FG, Commeaux S, Troncoso OP. Biocompatibility of bacterial cellulose based biomaterials. J Funct Biomater. 2012;3(4):864–878.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Noh YK, Dos Santos Da Costa A, Park YS, et al. Fabrication of bacterial cellulose-collagen composite scaffolds and their osteogenic effect on human mesenchymal stem cells. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;219:210–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri-Khoulenjani S, Taghizadeh SM, Mirzadeh H. An investigation on the short-term biodegradability of chitosan with various molecular weights and degrees of deacetylation. Carbohydr Polym. 2009;78(4):773–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vårum KM, Myhr MM, Hjerde RJ, et al. In vitro degradation rates of partially N-acetylated chitosans in human serum. Carbohydr Res. 1997;299(1–2):99–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VandeVord PJ, Matthew HW, DeSilva SP, et al. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59(3):585–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sashiwa H, Aiba SI. Chemically modified chitin and chitosan as biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci. 2004;29(9):887–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattarai N, Li Z, Gunn J, et al. Natural-synthetic polyblend nanofibers for biomedical applications. Adv Mater. 2009;21(27):2792–2797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jana S, Leung M, Chang JL, et al. Effect of nano- and micro-scale topological features on alignment of muscle cells and commitment of myogenic differentiation. Biofabrication. 2014;6(3):035012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalumon KT, Anulekha KH, Chennazhi KP, et al. Fabrication of chitosan/poly(caprolactone) nanofibrous scaffold for bone and skin tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2011;48(4):571–576.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou M, Qiao W, Liu Z, et al. Development and in vivo evaluation of small-diameter vascular grafts engineered by outgrowth endothelial cells and electrospun chitosan/poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofibrous scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;20.
   Google Scholar
• Chen SH, Chen CH, Fong YT, et al. Prevention of peritendinous adhesions with electrospun chitosan-grafted polycaprolactone nanofibrous membranes. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(12):4971–4982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Peng H, Wu Y, et al. The promotion of bone regeneration by nanofibrous hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds by effects on integrin-BMP/Smad signaling pathway in BMSCs. Biomaterials. 2013;34(18):4404–4417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedmore I, McManus JG, Pusateri AE, et al. A special report on the chitosan-based hemostatic dressing: experience in current combat operations. J Trauma. 2006;60(3):655–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şenel S, McClure SJ. Potential applications of chitosan in veterinary medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(10):1467–1480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueno H, Mori T, Fujinaga T. Topical formulations and wound healing applications of chitosan. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;52(2):105–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levengood SL, Zhang M. Chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(21):3161–3184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croisier F, Atanasova G, Poumay Y, et al. Polysaccharide-coated PCL nanofibers for wound dressing applications. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014;3(12):2032–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattarai N, Li ZS, Gunn J, et al. Natural-synthetic polyblend nanofibers for biomedical applications. Adv Mater. 2009;21(27):2792–2797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levengood SL, Erickson AE, Chang FC, et al. Chitosan–poly(caprolactone) nanofibers for skin repair. J Mat Chem B. 2017;5(9):1822–1833.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Prabhakaran MP, Morshed M, et al. Electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29(34):4532–4539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang X, Lim SH, Mao HQ, et al. Current applications and future perspectives of artificial nerve conduits. Exp Neurol. 2010;223(1):86–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valmikinathan CM, Defroda S, Yu X. Polycaprolactone and bovine serum albumin based nanofibers for controlled release of nerve growth factor. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10(5):1084–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eivazzadeh-Keihan R, Pashazadeh-Panahi P, Baradaran B, et al. Recent progress in optical and electrochemical biosensors for sensing of clostridium botulinum neurotoxin. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2018;103:184–197.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadinejad A, Oskuee RK, Eivazzadeh-Keihan R, et al. Development of biosensors for detection of alphafetoprotein: as a major biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2020;130(23).
   Google Scholar
• Eivazzadeh-Keihan R, Maleki A, de la Guardia M, et al. Carbon based nanomaterials for tissue engineering of bone: building new bone on small black scaffolds: a review. J Adv Res. 2019;18:185–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung RCF, Ng TB, Wong JH, et al. Chitosan: an update on potential biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. Mar Drugs. 2015;13(8):5156–5186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou ZK, Lin SQ, Yue TL, et al. Adsorption of food dyes from aqueous solution by glutaraldehyde cross-linked magnetic chitosan nanoparticles. J Food Eng. 2014;126:133–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arteche Pujana M, Pérez-Álvarez L, Cesteros Iturbe LC, et al. Biodegradable chitosan nanogels crosslinked with genipin. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;94(2):836–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YM, Wang J, Yuan ZY, et al. Chitosan cross-linked poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels: drug release control and mechanism. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017;152:252–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng M, Yuan X, Yang Z, et al. Novel macroporous palladium cation crosslinked chitosan membranes for heterogeneous catalysis application. Int J Biol Macromol. 2014;68:189–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Depan D, Singh R. Surface modification of chitosan and its implications in tissue engineering and drug delivery. In: Surface modification of biopolymers. New York (NY): Wiley; 2015. p. 20–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gu Y, Zhu J, Xue C, et al. Chitosan/silk fibroin-based, Schwann cell-derived extracellular matrix-modified scaffolds for bridging rat sciatic nerve gaps. Biomaterials. 2014;35(7):2253–2263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju HW, Lee OJ, Lee JM, et al. Wound healing effect of electrospun silk fibroin nanomatrix in burn-model. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;85:29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakabe H, Ito H, Miyamoto T, et al. In vivo blood compatibility of regenerated silk fibroin. Sen’i Gakkaishi. 1989;45(11):487–490.
   Google Scholar
• Santin M, Motta A, Freddi G, et al. In vitro evaluation of the inflammatory potential of the silk fibroin. J Biomed Mater Res. 1999;46(3):382–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guang SY, An Y, Ke FY, et al. Chitosan/silk fibroin composite scaffolds for wound dressing. J Appl Polym Sci. 2015;132(35):7.
   Google Scholar
• Keirouz A, Zakharova M, Kwon J, et al. High-throughput production of silk fibroin-based electrospun fibers as biomaterial for skin tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;112:110939.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ribeiro VP, Pina S, Oliveira JM, et al. Silk fibroin-based hydrogels and scaffolds for osteochondral repair and regeneration. In: Oliveira JM, Pina S, Reis RL, et al., editors. Osteochondral tissue engineering: nanotechnology, scaffolding-related developments and translation. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 305–325.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen TP, Nguyen QV, Nguyen VH, et al. Silk fibroin-based biomaterials for biomedical applications: a review. Polymers. 2019;11(12):1933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balan KK, Sundaramoorthy S. Hydroentangled nonwoven eri silk fibroin scaffold for tissue engineering applications. J Ind Text. 2019;48(8):1291–1309.
   Google Scholar
• Selvaraj S, Fathima NN. Fenugreek incorporated silk fibroin nanofibers – a potential antioxidant scaffold for enhanced wound healing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(7):5916–5926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cengiz IF, Pereira H, Espregueira-Mendes J, et al. Suturable regenerated silk fibroin scaffold reinforced with 3D-printed polycaprolactone mesh: biomechanical performance and subcutaneous implantation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019;30(6):17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cui BL, Zhang CC, Gan B, et al. Collagen-tussah silk fibroin hybrid scaffolds loaded with bone mesenchymal stem cells promote skin wound repair in rats. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;109:16.
   Google Scholar
• Jayakumar R, Prabaharan M, Sudheesh Kumar PT, et al. Biomaterials based on chitin and chitosan in wound dressing applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2011;29(3):322–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai ZX, Mo XM, Zhang KH, et al. Fabrication of chitosan/silk fibroin composite nanofibers for wound-dressing applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11(9):3529–3539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadi Z, Saber M, Akbari A, et al. Encapsulation of Satureja hortensis L. (Lamiaceae) in chitosan/TPP nanoparticles with enhanced acaricide activity against Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;161:111–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Işıklan N, Erol ÜH. Design and evaluation of temperature-responsive chitosan/hydroxypropyl cellulose blend nanospheres for sustainable flurbiprofen release. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;159:751–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghav N, Sharma M, Kennedy J. Nanocellulose: a mini-review on types and use in drug delivery systems. Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl. 2021;2:100031.
   Google Scholar
• Seddiqi H, Oliaei E, Honarkar H, et al. Cellulose and its derivatives: towards biomedical applications. Cellulose. 2021;28(4):1893–1931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friess W. Collagen – biomaterial for drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1998;45(2):113–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricard-Blum S, Ville G. Collagen cross-linking. Int J Biochem. 1989;21(11):1185–1189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan G, Zhou L, Ning C, et al. Biomimetically-mineralized composite coatings on titanium functionalized with gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;279:293–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drzewiecki KE, Parmar AS, Gaudet ID, et al. Methacrylation induces rapid, temperature-dependent, reversible self-assembly of type-I collagen. Langmuir. 2014;30(37):11204–11211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee CH, Singla A, Lee Y. Biomedical applications of collagen. Int J Pharm. 2001;221(1):1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoine EE, Vlachos PP, Rylander MN. Review of collagen I hydrogels for bioengineered tissue microenvironments: characterization of mechanics, structure, and transport. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2014;20(6):683–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch E, Schuh C, Hirth T, et al. Stiff gelatin hydrogels can be photo-chemically synthesized from low viscous gelatin solutions using molecularly functionalized gelatin with a high degree of methacrylation. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23(11):2607–2617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Bulcke AI, Bogdanov B, De Rooze N, et al. Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2000;1(1):31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YC, Lin RZ, Qi H, et al. Functional human vascular network generated in photocrosslinkable gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22(10):2027–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassanzadeh P, Kazemzadeh-Narbat M, Rosenzweig R, et al. Ultrastrong and flexible hybrid hydrogels based on solution self-assembly of chitin nanofibers in gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA). J Mat Chem B. 2016;4(15):2539–2543.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, et al. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2015;73:254–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurman W, Levett PA, Pot MW, et al. Gelatin-methacrylamide hydrogels as potential biomaterials for fabrication of tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. Macromol Biosci. 2013;13(5):551–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon O, Wolfson DW, Alsberg E. In-situ formation of growth-factor-loaded coacervate microparticle-embedded hydrogels for directing encapsulated stem cell fate. Adv Mater. 2015;27(13):2216–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young S, Wong M, Tabata Y, et al. Gelatin as a delivery vehicle for the controlled release of bioactive molecules. J Control Release. 2005;109(1–3):256–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig PE, Huff TJ, Zuniga JM. The potential role of bioengineering and three-dimensional printing in curing global corneal blindness. J Tissue Eng. 2018;9:10.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo YC, Wang CC. Guided differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells into neuronal lineage in alginate–chitosan–gelatin hydrogels with surface neuron growth factor. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;104:194–199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bozza A, Coates EE, Incitti T, et al. Neural differentiation of pluripotent cells in 3D alginate-based cultures. Biomaterials. 2014;35(16):4636–4645.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frampton JP, Hynd MR, Shuler ML, et al. Fabrication and optimization of alginate hydrogel constructs for use in 3D neural cell culture. Biomed Mater. 2011;6(1):015002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prang P, Müller R, Eljaouhari A, et al. The promotion of oriented axonal regrowth in the injured spinal cord by alginate-based anisotropic capillary hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2006;27(19):3560–3569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matyash M, Despang F, Mandal R, et al. Novel soft alginate hydrogel strongly supports neurite growth and protects neurons against oxidative stress. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18(1–2):55–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heino J. Cellular signaling by collagen-binding integrins. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014;819:143–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jokinen J, Dadu E, Nykvist P, et al. Integrin-mediated cell adhesion to type I collagen fibrils. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(30):31956–31963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder AJ, Badiei N, Hawkins K, et al. Control of collagen gel mechanical properties through manipulation of gelation conditions near the sol–gel transition. Soft Matter. 2018;14(4):574–580.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Velegol D, Lanni F. Cell traction forces on soft biomaterials. I. Microrheology of type I collagen gels. Biophys J. 2001;81(3):1786–1792.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baniasadi M, Minary-Jolandan M. Alginate-collagen fibril composite hydrogel. Materials. 2015;8(2):799–814.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu T, Wang WB, Nassiri S, et al. Temporal and spatial distribution of macrophage phenotype markers in the foreign body response to glutaraldehyde-crosslinked gelatin hydrogels. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2016;27(8):721–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayakumar V, Subramanian K. Diisocyanate mediated polyether modified gelatin drug carrier for controlled release. Saudi Pharm J. 2014;22(1):43–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Subramanian K, Vijayakumar V. Evaluation of isophorone diisocyanate crosslinked gelatin as a carrier for controlled delivery of drugs. Polym Bull. 2013;70(3):733–753.
   Google Scholar
• Powell HM, Boyce ST. Fiber density of electrospun gelatin scaffolds regulates morphogenesis of dermal–epidermal skin substitutes. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2008;84A(4):1078–1086.
   Google Scholar
• Czaja WK, Young DJ, Kawecki M, et al. The future prospects of microbial cellulose in biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8(1):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi HX, Hu P, Xu J, et al. Encapsulation of drug reservoirs in fibers by emulsion electrospinning: morphology characterization and preliminary release assessment. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7(8):2327–2330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KY, Jeong L, Kang YO, et al. Electrospinning of polysaccharides for regenerative medicine. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61(12):1020–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsioptsias C, Sakellariou KG, Tsivintzelis I, et al. Preparation and characterization of cellulose acetate–Fe2O3 composite nanofibrous materials. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;81(4):925–930.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy CM, O’Brien FJ. Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Cell Adh Migr. 2010;4(3):377–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Prabhakaran MP, Morshed M, et al. Electrospun poly(ε-caprolactone)/gelatin nanofibrous scaffolds for nerve tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29(34):4532–4539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vepari C, Kaplan DL. Silk as a biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32(8–9):991–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foo CWP, Kaplan DL. Genetic engineering of fibrous proteins: spider dragline silk and collagen. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54(8):1131–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman GH, Diaz F, Jakuba C, et al. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2003;24(3):401–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai T, Freddi G, Innocenti R, et al. Biodegradation of Bombyx mori silk fibroin fibers and films. J Appl Polym Sci. 2004;91(4):2383–2390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs S, Motta A, Migliaresi C, et al. Outgrowth endothelial cells isolated and expanded from human peripheral blood progenitor cells as a potential source of autologous cells for endothelialization of silk fibroin biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2006;27(31):5399–5408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horan RL, Antle K, Collette AL, et al. In vitro degradation of silk fibroin. Biomaterials. 2005;26(17):3385–3393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu K, Lv Q, Cui FZ, et al. Biocompatible fibroin blended films with recombinant human-like collagen for hepatic tissue engineering. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2006;21(1):23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim UJ, Park J, Kim HJ, et al. Three-dimensional aqueous-derived biomaterial scaffolds from silk fibroin. Biomaterials. 2005;26(15):2775–2785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CM, Vepari C, Jin HJ, et al. Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(16):3115–3124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minoura N, Aiba S, Gotoh Y, et al. Attachment and growth of cultured fibroblast cells on silk protein matrices. J Biomed Mater Res. 1995;29(10):1215–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motta A, Migliaresi C, Faccioni F, et al. Fibroin hydrogels for biomedical applications: preparation, characterization and in vitro cell culture studies. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2004;15(7):851–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vepari CP, Kaplan DL. Covalently immobilized enzyme gradients within three-dimensional porous scaffolds. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;93(6):1130–1137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arai T, Freddi G, Colonna GM, et al. Absorption of metal cations by modifiedB. Mori silk and preparation of fabrics with antimicrobial activity. J Appl Polym Sci. 2001;80(2):297–303.
   Google Scholar
• Moy RL, Lee A, Zalka A. Commonly used suture materials in skin surgery. Am Fam Physician. 1991;44(6):2123–2128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabska-Zielińska S, Sionkowska A. How to improve physico-chemical properties of silk fibroin materials for biomedical applications? Blending and cross-linking of silk fibroin – a review. Materials. 2021;14(6):1510.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Omenetto FG, Kaplan DL. New opportunities for an ancient material. Science. 2010;329(5991):528–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant SJ, Davis-Arehart KA, Luo N, et al. Synthesis and characterization of photopolymerized multifunctional hydrogels: water-soluble poly(vinyl alcohol) and chondroitin sulfate macromers for chondrocyte encapsulation. Macromolecules. 2004;37(18):6726–6733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens P, Holland T, Anseth KS. Synthesis and characterization of degradable hydrogels formed from acrylate modified poly(vinyl alcohol) macromers. Polymer. 2002;43(23):6093–6100.
   Google Scholar
• Martens P, Blundo J, Nilasaroya A, et al. Effect of poly(vinyl alcohol) macromer chemistry and chain interactions on hydrogel mechanical properties. Chem Mater. 2007;19(10):2641–2648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens P, Anseth KS. Characterization of hydrogels formed from acrylate modified poly(vinyl alcohol) macromers. Polymer. 2000;41(21):7715–7722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawad D, Poole-Warren LA, Martens P, et al. Synthesis and characterization of radiopaque iodine-containing degradable PVA hydrogels. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9(1):263–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khor E, Lim LY. Implantable applications of chitin and chitosan. Biomaterials. 2003;24(13):2339–2349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No HK, Park NY, Lee SH, et al. Antibacterial activity of chitosans and chitosan oligomers with different molecular weights. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002;74(1–2):65–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giménez V, Mantecón A, Cádiz V. Modification of poly(vinyl alcohol) with acid chlorides and crosslinking with difunctional hardeners. J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem. 1996;34(6):925–934.
   Google Scholar
• Basnett P, Matharu RK, Taylor CS, et al. Harnessing polyhydroxyalkanoates and pressurized gyration for hard and soft tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(28):32624–32639.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koller M, Maršálek L, de Sousa Dias MM, et al. Producing microbial polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) biopolyesters in a sustainable manner. New Biotechnol. 2017;37:24–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daranarong D, Chan RT, Wanandy NS, et al. Electrospun polyhydroxybutyrate and poly(L-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) composites as nanofibrous scaffolds. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:741408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams S, Martin D. Applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) in medicine and pharmacy. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hazer DB, Kılıçay E, Hazer B. Poly(3-hydroxyalkanoate)s: diversification and biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2012;32(4):637–647.
   Google Scholar
• Sangsanoh P, Israsena N, Suwantong O, et al. Effect of the surface topography and chemistry of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) substrates on cellular behavior of the murine neuroblastoma Neuro2a cell line. Polym Bull. 2017;74(10):4101–4118.
   Google Scholar
• Goonoo N, Bhaw-Luximon A, Passanha P, et al. Third generation poly(hydroxyacid) composite scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017;105(6):1667–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke Y, Zhang XY, Ramakrishna S, et al. Reactive blends based on polyhydroxyalkanoates: preparation and biomedical application. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;70:1107–1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine AC, Sparano A, Twigg FF, et al. Influence of cross-linking on the physical properties and cytotoxicity of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) scaffolds for tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2015;1(7):567–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye C, Hu P, Ma MX, et al. PHB/PHBHHx scaffolds and human adipose-derived stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30(26):4401–4406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian YZ, Wang Y, Aibaidoula G, et al. Evaluation of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) conduits for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials. 2009;30(2):217–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu XH, Wu Q, Liang J, et al. Effect of 3-hydroxyhexanoate content in poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) on in vitro growth and differentiation of smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials. 2006;27(15):2944–2950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu XH, Wu Q, Chen GQ. In vitro study on hemocompatibility and cytocompatibility of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate). J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006;17(10):1107–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cool SM, Kenny B, Wu A, et al. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) composite biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration: in vitro performance assessed by osteoblast proliferation, osteoclast adhesion and resorption, and macrophage proinflammatory response. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2007;82A(3):599–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Bian YZ, Wu Q, et al. Evaluation of three-dimensional scaffolds prepared from poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) for growth of allogeneic chondrocytes for cartilage repair in rabbits. Biomaterials. 2008;29(19):2858–2868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YW, Wu Q, Chen JC, et al. Evaluation of three-dimensional scaffolds made of blends of hydroxyapatite and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) for bone reconstruction. Biomaterials. 2005;26(8):899–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosahebi A, Fuller P, Wiberg M, et al. Effect of allogeneic Schwann cell transplantation on peripheral nerve regeneration. Exp Neurol. 2002;173(2):213–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volova T, Goncharov D, Sukovatyi A, et al. Electrospinning of polyhydroxyalkanoate fibrous scaffolds: effects on electrospinning parameters on structure and properties. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2014;25(4):370–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottin AC, Ayres E, Orefice RL, et al. What changes in Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) when processed as electrospun nanofibers or thermo-compression molded film?. Mater Res Ibero Am J Mater. 2016;19(1):57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sanhueza C, Acevedo F, Rocha S, et al. Polyhydroxyalkanoates as biomaterial for electrospun scaffolds. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;124:102–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanhueza C, Diaz-Rodriguez P, Villegas P, et al. Influence of the carbon source on the properties of poly-(3)-hydroxybutyrate produced by Paraburkholderia xenovorans LB400 and its electrospun fibers. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;152:11–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ray S, Kalia VC. Biomedical applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates. Indian J Microbiol. 2017;57(3):261–269.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagiah N, Madhavi L, Anitha R, et al. Development and characterization of coaxially electrospun gelatin coated poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid) thin films as potential scaffolds for skin regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013;33(7):4444–4452.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asran AS, Razghandi K, Aggarwal N, et al. Nanofibers from blends of polyvinyl alcohol and polyhydroxy butyrate as potential scaffold material for tissue engineering of skin. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11(12):3413–3421.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amini F, Semnani D, Karbasi S, et al. A novel bilayer drug-loaded wound dressing of PVDF and PHB/chitosan nanofibers applicable for post-surgical ulcers. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomat. 2019;68(13):772–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naghashzargar E, Fare S, Catto V, et al. Nano/micro hybrid scaffold of PCL or P3HB nanofibers combined with silk fibroin for tendon and ligament tissue engineering. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2015;13(2):E156–E168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi D, Karbasi S, Razavi S, et al. Electrospun poly(hydroxybutyrate)/chitosan blend fibrous scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. J Appl Polym Sci. 2016;133(47):9.
   Google Scholar
• Mirmusavi MH, Zadehnajar P, Semnani D, et al. Evaluation of physical, mechanical and biological properties of poly 3-hydroxybutyrate-chitosan-multiwalled carbon nanotube/silk nano-micro composite scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;132:822–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydari P, Varshosaz J, Kharazi AZ, et al. Preparation and evaluation of poly glycerol sebacate/poly hydroxy butyrate core-shell electrospun nanofibers with sequentially release of ciprofloxacin and simvastatin in wound dressings. Polym Adv Technol. 2018;29(6):1795–1803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YZ, Venugopal J, Huang ZM, et al. Crosslinking of the electrospun gelatin nanofibers. Polymer. 2006;47(8):2911–2917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson T, Kaufman E, Kline J, et al. The extraneural distribution of γ-hydroxybutyrate. J Neurochem. 1981;37(5):1345–1348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee YF, Sridewi N, Ramanathan S, et al. The influence of electrospinning parameters and drug loading on polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) nanofibers for drug delivery. Int J Biotechnol Wellness Ind. 2016;4:103–113.
   Google Scholar
• Vigneswari S, Murugaiyah V, Kaur G, et al. Simultaneous dual syringe electrospinning system using benign solvent to fabricate nanofibrous P(3HB-co-4HB)/collagen peptides construct as potential leave-on wound dressing. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;66:147–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma K, Huang D, Cai J, et al. Surface functionalization with strontium-containing nanocomposite coatings via EPD. Colloids Surf B. 2016;146:97–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alipal J, Pu’ad N, Lee TC, et al. A review of gelatin: properties, sources, process, applications, and commercialisation. 5th International Conference of Chemical Engineering and Industrial Biotechnology (ICCEIB), Aug 9–11. Kuala Lumpur: Elsevier; 2020, p. 240–250.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Ortiz O, Goyal R, et al. Chapter 23 – biodegradable polymers. In: Lanza R, Langer R, Vacanti J, editors. Principles of tissue engineering. 4th ed. Boston, MA: Academic Press; 2014. p. 441–473.
   Google Scholar
• Guo T, Zhang N, Huang J, et al. A facile fabrication of core–shell sodium alginate/gelatin beads for drug delivery systems. Polym Bull. 2019;76(1):87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Bello AB, Kim D, Kim D, et al. Engineering and functionalization of gelatin biomaterials: from cell culture to medical applications. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2020;26(2):164–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Hemar Y, Hilliou L, et al. Nonlinear behavior of gelatin networks reveals a hierarchical structure. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17(2):590–600.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Y, Ouyang H, Lim CT, et al. Electrospinning of gelatin fibers and gelatin/PCL composite fibrous scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;72B(1):156–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puppi D, Pirosa A, Lupi G, et al. Design and fabrication of novel polymeric biodegradable stents for small caliber blood vessels by computer-aided wet-spinning. Biomed Mater. 2017;12(3):035011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydz J, Sikorska W, Kyulavska M, et al. Polyester-based (bio)degradable polymers as environmentally friendly materials for sustainable development. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(1):564–596.
   Google Scholar
• Deb P, Deoghare AB, Borah A, et al. Scaffold development using biomaterials: a review. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5(5, Part 2):12909–12919.
   Google Scholar
• Bagdadi A, Safari M, Dubey P, et al. Poly(3-hydroxyoctanoate), a promising new material for cardiac tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;12.
   Google Scholar
• Arslantunali D, Dursun T, Yucel D, et al. Peripheral nerve conduits: technology update. Med Devices. 2014;7:405–424.
   Google Scholar
• Mathuriya AS, Yakhmi JV. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: biodegradable plastics and their applications. In: Martínez LMT, Kharissova OV, Kharisov BI, editors. Handbook of ecomaterials. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 2873–2900.
   Google Scholar
• Hazer DB, Bal E, Nurlu G, et al. In vivo application of poly-3-hydroxyoctanoate as peripheral nerve graft. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013;14(11):993–1003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mozejko-Ciesielska J, Szacherska K, Marciniak P. Pseudomonas species as producers of eco-friendly polyhydroxyalkanoates. J Polym Environ. 2019;27(6):1151–1166.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Shishatskaya EI, Volova TG, et al. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) for therapeutic applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2018;86:144–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Możejko-Ciesielska J, Kiewisz R. Bacterial polyhydroxyalkanoates: still fabulous? Microbiol Res. 2016;192:271–282.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pawelec KM, Hix J, Shapiro EM, et al. The mechanics of scaling-up multichannel scaffold technology for clinical nerve repair. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019;91:247–254.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jafari M, Paknejad Z, Rad MR, et al. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering: a literature review. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2017;105(2):431–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manavitehrani I, Fathi A, Badr H, et al. Biomedical applications of biodegradable polyesters. Polymers. 2016;8(1):20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizarraga-Valderrama LR, Nigmatullin R, Taylor C, et al. Nerve tissue engineering using blends of poly(3-hydroxyalkanoates) for peripheral nerve regeneration. Eng Life Sci. 2015;15(6):612–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basnett P, Nigmatullin R, Lukasiewicz B, et al. Polyhydroxyalkanoates: a family of natural polymers, for medical implant development and disease modelling. Transactions of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials and the Annual International Biomaterials Symposium, Seattle. 2019. p. 760.
   Google Scholar
• Charuchinda A, Molloy R, Siripitayananon J, et al. Factors influencing the small-scale melt spinning of poly(ϵ-caprolactone) monofilament fibres. Polym Int. 2003;52(7):1175–1181.
   Google Scholar
• Cipitria A, Skelton A, Dargaville TR, et al. Design, fabrication and characterization of PCL electrospun scaffolds – a review. J Mater Chem. 2011;21(26):9419–9453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimi B, Nourpanah P, Rabiee M, et al. Poly (∊-caprolactone) fiber: an overview. J Eng Fibers Fabr. 2014;9(3):74–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW. The return of a forgotten polymer – polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci. 2010;35(10):1217–1256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abedalwafa M, Wang FJ, Wang L, et al. Biodegradable poly-epsilon-caprolactone (PCL) for tissue engineering applications: A review. Rev Adv Mater Sci. 2013;34(2):123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Crapo P, Nerem R, et al. Co-expression of elastin and collagen leads to highly compliant engineered blood vessels. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2008;85A(4):1120–1128.
   Google Scholar
• Redenti S, Neeley WL, Rompani S, et al. Engineering retinal progenitor cell and scrollable poly(glycerol-sebacate) composites for expansion and subretinal transplantation. Biomaterials. 2009;30(20):3405–3414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundback CA, Shyu JY, Wang Y, et al. Biocompatibility analysis of poly(glycerol sebacate) as a nerve guide material. Biomaterials. 2005;26(27):5454–5464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Ameer GA, Sheppard BJ, et al. A tough biodegradable elastomer. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(6):602–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee EJ, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Wang Y, et al. A biocompatible endothelial cell delivery system for in vitro tissue engineering. Cell Transplant. 2009;18(7):731–743.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meyer M. Processing of collagen based biomaterials and the resulting materials properties. Biomed Eng Online. 2019;18(1):24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owczarzy A, Kurasiński R, Kulig K, et al. Collagen - structure, properties and application. Eng Biomater. 2020;156:17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Birk DE, Bruckner P. Collagen suprastructures. In: Brinckmann J, Notbohm H, Müller PK, editors. Collagen: primer in structure, processing and assembly. Berlin: Springer; 2005. p. 185–205.
   Google Scholar
• Bashur CA, Dahlgren LA, Goldstein AS. Effect of fiber diameter and orientation on fibroblast morphology and proliferation on electrospun poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid) meshes. Biomaterials. 2006;27(33):5681–5688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li WJ, Danielson KG, Alexander PG, et al. Biological response of chondrocytes cultured in three-dimensional nanofibrous poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;67(4):1105–1114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carampin P, Conconi MT, Lora S, et al. Electrospun polyphosphazene nanofibers for in vitro rat endothelial cells proliferation. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2007;80A(3):661–668.
   Google Scholar
• Badami AS, Kreke MR, Thompson MS, et al. Effect of fiber diameter on spreading, proliferation, and differentiation of osteoblastic cells on electrospun poly(lactic acid) substrates. Biomaterials. 2006;27(4):596–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He W, Ma Z, Yong T, et al. Fabrication of collagen-coated biodegradable polymer nanofiber mesh and its potential for endothelial cells growth. Biomaterials. 2005;26(36):7606–7615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin H-J, Chen J, Karageorgiou V, et al. Human bone marrow stromal cell responses on electrospun silk fibroin mats. Biomaterials. 2004;25(6):1039–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min BM, Lee G, Kim SH, et al. Electrospinning of silk fibroin nanofibers and its effect on the adhesion and spreading of normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials. 2004;25(7–8):1289–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo XM, Xu CY, Kotaki M, et al. Electrospun P(LLA-CL) nanofiber: a biomimetic extracellular matrix for smooth muscle cell and endothelial cell proliferation. Biomaterials. 2004;25(10):1883–1890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin HJ, Lee CH, Cho IH, et al. Electrospun PLGA nanofiber scaffolds for articular cartilage reconstruction: mechanical stability, degradation and cellular responses under mechanical stimulation in vitro. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2006;17(1–2):103–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venugopal JR, Zhang Y, Ramakrishna S. In vitro culture of human dermal fibroblasts on electrospun polycaprolactone collagen nanofibrous membrane. Artif Organs. 2006;30(6):440–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong SI, Lee AY, Lee YM, et al. Electrospun gelatin/poly(L-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) nanofibers for mechanically functional tissue-engineering scaffolds. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2008;19(3):339–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XB, Roach HI, Clarke NMP, et al. Human osteoprogenitor growth and differentiation on synthetic biodegradable structures after surface modification. Bone. 2001;29(6):523–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Mondrinos MJ, Chen X, et al. Co-electrospun poly(lactide-co-glycolide), gelatin, and elastin blends for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2006;79A(4):963–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Mondrinos MJ, Chen X, et al. Co-electrospun poly(lactide-co-glycolide), gelatin, and elastin blends for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;79A(4):963–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong SI, Lee AY, Lee YM, et al. Electrospun gelatin/poly(L-lactide-co-ϵ-caprolactone) nanofibers for mechanically functional tissue-engineering scaffolds. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2008;19(3):339–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XB, Roach HI, Clarke NM, et al. Human osteoprogenitor growth and differentiation on synthetic biodegradable structures after surface modification. Bone. 2001;29(6):523–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekaputra AK, Zhou Y, Cool SM, et al. Composite electrospun scaffolds for engineering tubular bone grafts. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(12):3779–3788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani F, Moradi L, Shadmehr MB, et al. In-vivo characterization of a 3D hybrid scaffold based on PCL/decellularized aorta for tracheal tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;81:74–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao M, Zhang H, Dong W, et al. Tissue-engineered trachea from a 3D-printed scaffold enhances whole-segment tracheal repair. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):5246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Townsend JM, Ott LM, Salash JR, et al. Reinforced electrospun polycaprolactone nanofibers for tracheal repair in an in vivo ovine model. Tissue Eng Part A. 2018;24(17–18):1301–1308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li Y, Li Q, Li H, et al. An effective dual-factor modified 3D-printed PCL scaffold for bone defect repair. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020;108(5):2167–2179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke DX, Yi HL, Est-Witte S, et al. Bioprinted trachea constructs with patient-matched design, mechanical and biological properties. Biofabrication. 2020;12(1):11.
   Google Scholar
• Xia D, Jin D, Wang Q, et al. Tissue-engineered trachea from a 3D-printed scaffold enhances whole-segment tracheal repair in a goat model. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019;13(4):694–703.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Omori K, Nakamura T, Kanemaru S, et al. In situ tissue engineering of the cricoid and trachea in a canine model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117(8):609–613.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu Y, Li Y, Liu Y, et al. Surface modification of decellularized trachea matrix with collagen and laser micropore technique to promote cartilage regeneration. Am J Transl Res. 2019;11(9):5390–5403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin LQ, Xu YW, Li YQ, et al. Nanofibrous Wharton's jelly scaffold in combination with adipose-derived stem cells for cartilage engineering. Mater Des. 2020;186:10.
   Google Scholar
• Kianfar P, Vitale A, Dalle Vacche S, et al. Enhancing properties and water resistance of PEO-based electrospun nanofibrous membranes by photo-crosslinking. J Mater Sci. 2021;56(2):1879–1896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrintaj P, Saeb MR, Jafari SH, et al. Chapter 18 – application of compatibilized polymer blends in biomedical fields. In: Ajitha AR, Thomas S, editors. Compatibilization of polymer blends. Elsevier; 2020. p. 511–537.
   Google Scholar
• Xu F, Gough I, Dorogin DJ, et al. Nanostructured degradable macroporous hydrogel scaffolds with controllable internal morphologies via reactive electrospinning. Acta Biomater. 2020;104:135–146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajam S, Ho CC. Graft coupling of PEO to mixed cellulose esters microfiltration membranes by UV irradiation. J Membr Sci. 2006;281(1–2):211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Aqil A, Vasseur S, Duguet E, et al. PEO coated magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical application. Eur Polym J. 2008;44(10):3191–3199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusco S, Borzacchiello A, Netti PA. Perspectives on: PEO-PPO-PEO triblock copolymers and their biomedical applications. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2006;21(2):149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papagiannopoulos A, Vlassi E, Pispas S, et al. Polyethylene oxide hydrogels crosslinked by peroxide for the controlled release of proteins. Macromol. 2021;1(1):37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Gentile P, Chiono V, Carmagnola I, et al. An overview of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA)-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(3):3640–3659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danhier F, Ansorena E, Silva JM, et al. PLGA-based nanoparticles: an overview of biomedical applications. J Controlled Release. 2012;161(2):505–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon YI, Park KE, Lee SJ, et al. Fabrication of microfibrous and nano-/microfibrous scaffolds: melt and hybrid electrospinning and surface modification of poly(L-lactic acid) with plasticizer. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:10.
   Google Scholar
• Wang BY, Fu SZ, Ni PY, et al. Electrospun polylactide/poly(ethylene glycol) hybrid fibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2012;100A(2):441–449.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Feng Y, Zhao H, et al. A potential nonthrombogenic small-diameter vascular scaffold with polyurethane/poly(ethylene glycol) hybrid materials by electrospinning technique. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2013;13(2):1578–1582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li X, Liu KL, Wang M, et al. Improving hydrophilicity, mechanical properties and biocompatibility of poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-(R)-3-hydroxyvalerate] through blending with poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate]-alt-poly(ethylene oxide). Acta Biomater. 2009;5(6):2002–2012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rivera-Briso AL, Serrano-Aroca A. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate): enhancement strategies for advanced applications. Polymers. 2018;10(7):28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bossu J, Angellier-Coussy H, Totee C, et al. Effect of the molecular structure of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (P(3HB-3HV)) produced from mixed bacterial cultures on its crystallization and mechanical properties. Biomacromolecules. 2020;21(12):4709–4723.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu YJ, Zou LM, Lu HW, et al. Preparation and characterization of electrospun PHBV/PEO mats: the role of solvent and PEO component. J Mater Sci. 2016;51(12):5695–5711.
   Google Scholar
• Pillai AB, Kumar AJ, Kumarapillai H. Biosynthesis of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) in Bacillus aryabhattai and cytotoxicity evaluation of PHBV/poly(ethylene glycol) blends. 3 Biotech. 2020;10(2):10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonartsev AP, Bonartseva GA, Reshetov IV, et al. Application of polyhydroxyalkanoates in medicine and the biological activity of natural poly(3-hydroxybutyrate). Acta Naturae. 2019;11(2):4–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sendil D, Gürsel I, Wise DL, et al. Antibiotic release from biodegradable PHBV microparticles. J Control Release. 1999;59(2):207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai ZW, Zou XH, Chen GQ. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) as an injectable implant system for prevention of post-surgical tissue adhesion. Biomaterials. 2009;30(17):3075–3083.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hogge J, Krasner D, Nguyen H, et al. The potential benefits of advanced therapeutic modalities in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2000;90(2):57–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muzzarelli RAA. Biomedical exploitation of chitin and chitosan via mechano-chemical disassembly, electrospinning, dissolution in imidazolium ionic liquids, and supercritical drying. Mar Drugs. 2011;9(9):1510–1533.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Veen VC, van der Wal MB, van Leeuwen MC, et al. Biological background of dermal substitutes. Burns. 2010;36(3):305–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nangia A, Gambhir R, Maibach H. Factors influencing the performance of temporary skin substitutes. Clin Mater. 1991;7(1):3–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siraj S, Sudhakar P, Mallikarjuna B, et al. Factors influencing the performance of temporary skin substitutes. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2014;25(2):103–109.
   Google Scholar
• Bianco A, Calderone M, Cacciotti I. Electrospun PHBV/PEO co-solution blends: microstructure, thermal and mechanical properties. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013;33(3):1067–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan SM, Ismail J, Kummerlowe C, et al. Crystallization and melting behavior of blends comprising poly(3-hydroxy butyrate-co-3-hydroxy valerate) and poly(ethylene oxide). J Appl Polym Sci. 2006;101(5):2776–2783.
   Google Scholar
• Gumus S, Ozkoc G, Aytac A. Plasticized and unplasticized PLA/organoclay nanocomposites: short- and long-term thermal properties, morphology, and nonisothermal crystallization behavior. J Appl Polym Sci. 2012;123(5):2837–2848.
   Google Scholar
• Pluta M, Paul MA, Alexandre M, et al. Plasticized polylactide/clay nanocomposites. I. The role of filler content and its surface organo-modification on the physico-chemical properties. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys. 2006;44(2):299–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sungsanit K, Kao N, Bhattacharya SN. Properties of linear poly(lactic acid)/polyethylene glycol blends. Polym Eng Sci. 2012;52(1):108–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Hu YS, Topolkaraev V, et al. Crystallization and phase separation in blends of high stereoregular poly(lactide) with poly(ethylene glycol). Polymer. 2003;44(19):5681–5689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gui Z, Xu Y, Gao Y, et al. Novel polyethylene glycol-based polyester-toughened polylactide. Mater Lett. 2012;71:63–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiardo M, Frisoni G, Scandola M, et al. Thermal and mechanical properties of plasticized poly(L-lactic acid). J Appl Polym Sci. 2003;90(7):1731–1738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrkach J, Von Hoff D, Ali MM, et al. Preclinical development and clinical translation of a PSMA-targeted docetaxel nanoparticle with a differentiated pharmacological profile. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(128):11.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hoff DD, Mita MM, Ramanathan RK, et al. Phase I study of PSMA-targeted docetaxel-containing nanoparticle BIND-014 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(13):3157–3163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes MS, Jardini AL, Maciel R. Poly (lactic acid) production for tissue engineering applications. 20th International Congress of Chemical and Process Engineering CHISA, Aug 25–29. Prague: Elsevier Science; 2012. p. 1402–1413.
   Google Scholar
• Singhvi MS, Zinjarde SS, Gokhale DV. Polylactic acid: synthesis and biomedical applications. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;127(6):1612–1626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gangapurwala G, Vollrath A, De San Luis A, et al. PLA/PLGA-based drug delivery systems produced with supercritical CO2 – a green future for particle formulation? Pharmaceutics. 2020;12(11):1118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shkodra-Pula B, Grune C, Traege A, et al. Effect of surfactant on the size and stability of PLGA nanoparticles encapsulating a protein kinase C inhibitor. Int J Pharm. 2019;566:756–764.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davda J, Labhasetwar V. Characterization of nanoparticle uptake by endothelial cells. Int J Pharm. 2002;233(1):51–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brigger I, Dubernet C, Couvreur P. Nanoparticles in cancer therapy and diagnosis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54(5):631–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu L, Feng SS. A novel controlled release formulation for the anticancer drug paclitaxel (Taxol®): PLGA nanoparticles containing vitamin E TPGS. J Controlled Release. 2003;86(1):33–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swider E, Koshkina O, Tel J, et al. Customizing poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) particles for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 2018;73:38–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varde NK, Pack DW. Microspheres for controlled release drug delivery. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2004;4(1):35–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas S, Merkle HP, Gander B. Microencapsulation by solvent extraction/evaporation: reviewing the state of the art of microsphere preparation process technology. J Controlled Release. 2005;102(2):313–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhold SE, Schwendeman SP. Effect of polymer porosity on aqueous self-healing encapsulation of proteins in PLGA microspheres. Macromol Biosci. 2013;13(12):1700–1710.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhee YS, Park CW, Mansour H. Sustained-release injectable drug delivery systems. An invited paper. Pharm Technol Special Issue Drug Delivery. 2010:6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwari S, Verma P. Microencapsulation technique by solvent evaporation method (study of effect of process variables). Int J Phar Life Sci. 2011;2:998–1005.
   Google Scholar
• Maruyama K, Asai J, Ii M, et al. Decreased macrophage number and activation lead to reduced lymphatic vessel formation and contribute to impaired diabetic wound healing. Am J Pathol. 2007;170(4):1178–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchliffe RJ, Valk GD, Apelqvist J, et al. A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to enhance the healing of chronic ulcers of the foot in diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2008;24:S119–S144.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moura LIF, Dias AMA, Carvalho E, et al. Recent advances on the development of wound dressings for diabetic foot ulcer treatment – a review. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(7):7093–7114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gooyit M, Peng Z, Wolter WR, et al. A chemical biological strategy to facilitate diabetic wound healing. ACS Chem Biol. 2014;9(1):105–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philandrianos C, Andrac-Meyer L, Mordon S, et al. Comparison of five dermal substitutes in full-thickness skin wound healing in a porcine model. Burns. 2012;38(6):820–829.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chattopadhyay S, Raines RT. Collagen-based biomaterials for wound healing. Biopolymers. 2014;101(8):821–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang E, Qin X, Wang S. Electrospun crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol membrane. Mater Lett. 2008;62(20):3555–3557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong XH, Tang CY, Pan L, et al. Characterization of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)/ZnO nanocomposites prepared by a one-pot method. Compos Part B Eng. 2014;60:144–149.
   Google Scholar
• DeMerlis CC, Schoneker DR. Review of the oral toxicity of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). Food Chem Toxicol. 2003;41(3):319–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong L, Chase DB, Noda I, et al. Discovery of β-form crystal structure in electrospun poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-(R)-3-hydroxyhexanoate] (PHBHx) nanofibers: from fiber mats to single fibers. Macromolecules. 2015;48(17):6197–6205.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng ML, Chen PY, Lan CH, et al. Structure, mechanical properties and degradation behaviors of the electrospun fibrous blends of PHBHHx/PDLLA. Polymer. 2011;52(6):1391–1401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosoda N, Tsujimoto T, Uyama H. Green composite of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) reinforced with porous cellulose. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2014;2(2):248–253.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Ye L. Structure and properties of polyvinyl alcohol/polyurethane blends. Compos B Eng. 2015;69:389–396.
   Google Scholar
• Gaaz TS, Sulong AB, Akhtar MN, et al. Properties and applications of polyvinyl alcohol, halloysite nanotubes and their nanocomposites. Molecules. 2015;20(12):22833–22847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dippold D, Tallawi M, Tansaz S, et al. Novel electrospun poly(glycerol sebacate)–zein fiber mats as candidate materials for cardiac tissue engineering. Eur Polym J. 2016;75:504–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Kai D, Ye H, et al. Electrospinning of poly(glycerol sebacate)-based nanofibers for nerve tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;70:1089–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motlagh D, Yang J, Lui KY, et al. Hemocompatibility evaluation of poly(glycerol-sebacate) in vitro for vascular tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(24):4315–4324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashneh-Tala S, Owen R, Bahmaee H, et al. Synthesis, characterization and 3D micro-structuring via 2-photon polymerization of poly(glycerol sebacate)-methacrylate – an elastomeric degradable polymer. Front Phys. 2018;6:17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen QZ, Ishii H, Thouas GA, et al. An elastomeric patch derived from poly(glycerol sebacate) for delivery of embryonic stem cells to the heart. Biomaterials. 2010;31(14):3885–3893.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frydrych M, Román S, MacNeil S, et al. Biomimetic poly(glycerol sebacate)/poly(l-lactic acid) blend scaffolds for adipose tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2015;18:40–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Cook WD, Moorhoff C, et al. Synthesis, characterization and properties of biocompatible poly(glycerol sebacate) pre-polymer and gel. Polym Int. 2013;62(4):534–547.
   Google Scholar
• Chen QZ, Bismarck A, Hansen U, et al. Characterisation of a soft elastomer poly(glycerol sebacate) designed to match the mechanical properties of myocardial tissue. Biomaterials. 2008;29(1):47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijst CLE, Bruggeman JP, Karp JM, et al. Synthesis and characterization of photocurable elastomers from poly(glycerol-co-sebacate). Biomacromolecules. 2007;8(10):3067–3073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frydrych M, Chen BQ. Large three-dimensional poly(glycerol sebacate)-based scaffolds – a freeze-drying preparation approach. J Mat Chem B. 2013;1(48):6650–6661.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeffries EM, Allen RA, Gao J, et al. Highly elastic and suturable electrospun poly(glycerol sebacate) fibrous scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2015;18:30–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi R, Best CA, Allen RA, et al. Long-term functional efficacy of a novel electrospun poly(glycerol sebacate)-based arterial graft in mice. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016;44(8):2402–2416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarski A, Bajer K, Kapuśniak J. Review of the most important methods of improving the processing properties of starch toward non-food applications. Polymers. 2021;13(5):832.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bursali EA, Coskun S, Kizil M, et al. Synthesis, characterization and in vitro antimicrobial activities of boron/starch/polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83(3):1377–1383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal K, Banthia A, Majumdar DK. Preparation of transparent starch based hydrogel membrane with potential application as wound dressing. Trends Biomat Artif Organs. 2006;20:59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kariduraganavar MY, Kittur AA, Kamble RR. Chapter 1 – polymer synthesis and processing. In: Laurencin CT, Kumbar S, Deng M, editors. Natural and synthetic biomedical polymers. Oxford: Elsevier; 2014. p. 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kurakula M, Rao G. Pharmaceutical assessment of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP): as excipient from conventional to controlled delivery systems with a spotlight on COVID-19 inhibition. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2020;60:102046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bühler V. Polyvinylpyrrolidone excipients for pharmaceuticals: povidone, crospovidone, and copovidone. Berlin: Springer; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Voronova M, Rubleva N, Kochkina N, et al. Preparation and characterization of polyvinylpyrrolidone/cellulose nanocrystals composites. Nanomaterials. 2018;8(12):1011.
   Google Scholar
• Kathe K, Kathpalia H. Film forming systems for topical and transdermal drug delivery. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2017;12(6):487–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal D, Mollick MMR, Bhowmick B, et al. Effect of poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) on the morphology and physical properties of poly(vinyl alcohol)/sodium montmorillonite nanocomposite films. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int. 2013;23(6):579–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maciejewska BM, Wychowaniec JK, Woźniak-Budych M, et al. UV cross-linked polyvinylpyrrolidone electrospun fibres as antibacterial surfaces. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2019;20(1):979–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teodorescu M, Bercea M. Poly(vinylpyrrolidone) – a versatile polymer for biomedical and beyond medical applications. Polym Plast Technol Eng. 2015;54(9):923–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi X, Fang H, Bao C, et al. The immunotoxicity of graphene oxides and the effect of PVP-coating. Biomaterials. 2013;34(21):5254–5261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayama M, Yamamoto K-I, Kohori F, et al. How polysulfone dialysis membranes containing polyvinylpyrrolidone achieve excellent biocompatibility? J Membr Sci. 2004;234(1):41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bolong N, Ismail AF, Salim MR. Spinning effect of polyethersulfone hollow fiber membrane prepared by water or polyvinylpyrrolidone in ternary formulation. 7th International Conference on Membrane Science and Technology (MST) – Sustainable Technology for Energy, Water, and Environment, May 13–15. Kuala Lumpur: John Wiley & Sons; 2009. p. 3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Kadajji VG, Betageri GV. Water soluble polymers for pharmaceutical applications. Polymers. 2011;3(4):1972–2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stammen JA, Williams S, Ku DN, et al. Mechanical properties of a novel PVA hydrogel in shear and unconfined compression. Biomaterials. 2001;22(8):799–806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher SA, Doty SB, Torzilli PA, et al. Nondegradable hydrogels for the treatment of focal cartilage defects. J Biomed Mater Res Part A. 2007;83A(1):145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Bichara DA, Bodugoz-Sentruk H, Ling D, et al. Osteochondral defect repair using a polyvinyl alcohol-polyacrylic acid (PVA-PAAc) hydrogel. Biomed Mater. 2014;9(4):045012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mow VC, Ratcliffe A, Robin Poole A. Cartilage and diarthrodial joints as paradigms for hierarchical materials and structures. Biomaterials. 1992;13(2):67–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Y, Xiong D. Microstructure and friction properties of PVA/PVP hydrogels for articular cartilage repair as function of polymerization degree and polymer concentration. Wear. 2013;305(1):280–285.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez JS, Alvarez VA. Mechanical properties of polyvinylalcohol/hydroxyapatite cryogel as potential artificial cartilage. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;34:47–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pan Y, Xiong D. Friction properties of nano-hydroxyapatite reinforced poly(vinyl alcohol) gel composites as an articular cartilage. Wear. 2009;266(7):699–703.
   Google Scholar
• Pan YS, Xiong DS, Ma RY. A study on the friction properties of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel as articular cartilage against titanium alloy. Wear. 2007;262(7–8):1021–1025.
   Google Scholar
• Li F, Su Y, Wang J, et al. Influence of dynamic load on friction behavior of human articular cartilage, stainless steel and polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel as artificial cartilage. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(1):147–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lilleby Helberg RM, Dai Z, Ansaloni L, et al. PVA/PVP blend polymer matrix for hosting carriers in facilitated transport membranes: synergistic enhancement of CO2 separation performance. Green Energy Environ. 2020;5(1):59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi A, Fussell G, Thomas J, et al. Functional compressive mechanics of a PVA/PVP nucleus pulposus replacement. Biomaterials. 2006;27(2):176–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Lowman A, Marcolongo M. Novel associated hydrogels for nucleus pulposus replacement. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;67A:1329–1337.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway JL, Lowman AM, Palmese GR. Aging behavior of PVA hydrogels for soft tissue applications after in vitro swelling using osmotic pressure solutions. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(2):5013–5021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holloway JL, Lowman AM, Palmese GR. Mechanical evaluation of poly(vinyl alcohol)-based fibrous composites as biomaterials for meniscal tissue replacement. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(12):4716–4724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan WK, Campbell G, Zhang ZF, et al. Optimizing the tensile properties of polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel for the construction of a bioprosthetic heart valve stent. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(6):854–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozinsky V, Damshkaln L, Shaskolskiy B, et al. Study of cryostructuring of polymer systems: 27. Physicochemical properties of poly(vinyl alcohol) cryogels and specific features of their macroporous morphology. Colloid J. 2007;69:747–764.
   Google Scholar
• Nasouri K, Shoushtari AM, Mojtahedi MRM. Effects of polymer/solvent systems on electrospun polyvinylpyrrolidone nanofiber morphology and diameter. Polymer Science Series A. 2015;57(6):747–755.
   Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Wang K, Yao J, et al. Effect of the addition of polyvinylpyrrolidone as a pore-former on microstructure and mechanical strength of porous alumina ceramics. Ceram Int. 2013;39(7):7551–7556.
   Google Scholar
• Dreesmann L, Ahlers M, Schlosshauer B. The pro-angiogenic characteristics of a cross-linked gelatin matrix. Biomaterials. 2007;28(36):5536–5543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen ZS, Cui X, Hou RX, et al. Tough biodegradable chitosan–gelatin hydrogels via in situ precipitation for potential cartilage tissue engineering. RSC Adv. 2015;5(69):55640–55647.
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth LA, Downes S. Physicochemical characterisation of degrading polycaprolactone scaffolds. Polym Degrad Stab. 2010;95(12):2269–2276.
   Google Scholar
• Sekosan G, Vasanthan N. Morphological changes of annealed poly-ϵ-caprolactone by enzymatic degradation with lipase. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys. 2010;48(2):202–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Dean K, Li L. Polymer blends and composites from renewable resources. Prog Polym Sci. 2006;31(6):576–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Cruz DM, Coutinho DF, Mano JF, et al. Physical interactions in macroporous scaffolds based on poly(ε-caprolactone)/chitosan semi-interpenetrating polymer networks. Polymer. 2009;50(9):2058–2064.
   Google Scholar
• Kim G, Park J, Park S. Surface-treated and multilayered poly(ε-caprolactone) nanofiber webs exhibiting enhanced hydrophilicity. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys. 2007;45(15):2038–2045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Cui FZ, Jiao YP, et al. Improvement of cytocompatibility of electrospinning PLLA microfibers by blending PVP. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009;20(6):1331–1338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felfel RM, Poocza L, Gimeno-Fabra M, et al. In vitro degradation and mechanical properties of PLA-PCL copolymer unit cell scaffolds generated by two-photon polymerization. Biomed Mater. 2016;11(1):015011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang K, Fu Q, Yoo J, et al. 3D bioprinting of urethra with PCL/PLCL blend and dual autologous cells in fibrin hydrogel: an in vitro evaluation of biomimetic mechanical property and cell growth environment. Acta Biomater. 2017;50:154–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng WL, Yeong WY, Naing MW. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-based bio-ink improves cell viability and homogeneity during drop-on-demand printing. Materials. 2017;10(2):12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaudhuri B, Mondal B, Ray SK, et al. A novel biocompatible conducting polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)-polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)-hydroxyapatite (HAP) composite scaffolds for probable biological application. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;143:71–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Li Z, Hong Y, et al. Influence of solvents on the formation of ultrathin uniform poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) nanofibers with electrospinning. J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys. 2004;42(20):3721–3726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim GM, Le KHT, Giannitelli SM, et al. Electrospinning of PCL/PVP blends for tissue engineering scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013;24(6):1425–1442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Q, Cosme JGL, Xu T, et al. Three dimensional electrospun PCL/PLA blend nanofibrous scaffolds with significantly improved stem cells osteogenic differentiation and cranial bone formation. Biomaterials. 2017;115:115–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar